Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Jacoby Brissett Impressions (Perma Merge)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Yep...he creates posts daily that discuss the QB position. Even the thread about wanting to draft a certain QB tie back to the idea of giving JB more time.

Okay So as I watch the Niners game I am noticing that Jimmy G is operating the game in a way thenReich and the Colts want JB to. I have the a huge take...   Jimmy G is no better than JB

Posted Images

Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

It can be because we have the right team around JB. We are a run 1st team now with a great O.Line. JB can win games as long as he has talent around him and we have the mind set that running the ball 1st is the most important thing. JB is a QB that rarely makes mistakes is why we can win playing the style we play. Can we win a SB with JB? That I am not sure of but we didn't with the great Andrew Luck either. I still think we are a good DT, a playmaker at WR to help JB, and another consistent young kicker away from being a great team. We are good right now though. 


Winning a SB is a tough tough thing, and luck plays a huge part. 
 

I’d instead like to get back to being the sort of team who are, barring major weirdness, going to be pretty much playoff locks year to year. Basically consistently win games over a large sample.

 

Could we get there from where we are now, without a major change, sure. But a lot will depend on Brissett, that’s just the nature of the game. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SteelCityColt said:


Winning a SB is a tough tough thing, and luck plays a huge part. 
 

I’d instead like to get back to being the sort of team who are, barring major weirdness, going to be pretty much playoff locks year to year. Basically consistently win games over a large sample.

 

Could we get there from where we are now, without a major change, sure. But a lot will depend on Brissett, that’s just the nature of the game. 

I trust Ballard to keep building this team up and I like Reich for the most part. Tonight's game would be a huge boost for JB and the team if we win regarding making the playoffs. If we lose tonight I still won't be too down on JB unless he just plays poorly. We are really still 3 or 4 players away from being a very good to great team. A good DT, WR that can make plays downfield, a good Kicker, and I would love another good Pass Rusher as well. Ballard will address these issues in the draft I am sure.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was watching a analyst on one of the shows and he mentioned how he thinks the league is starting to go back to a run first offense. Maybe I can go find the video.  It was a interesting take. He talked about how  dominate olines and pounding the ball are going to start becoming more of the norm.

 

I know some people find Jacoby boring. I think he is fun to watch. He is a lot like Watson and is Houdini avoiding the rush. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Never a dull moment in this thread. I just went through and read all the posts. Here is a question for everyone, is it fair to say that JB is defying all odds by being 6-2 in games he has started and finished based on his stats? If so, next time I go to Vegas I need him with me because 6-2 = 75% winnings :thmup: lmao 

 

JB isn't 6-2, the Colts are 6-2 in games in which JB starts. (Actually 6-3, but we're throwing out the Steelers game.)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

JB isn't 6-2, the Colts are 6-2 in games in which JB starts. (Actually 6-3, but we're throwing out the Steelers game.)

It is a team game you are correct. I should've said we are 6-3 in games he starts, 6-2 when he starts and finishes. That would be the best way to put it :thmup:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I was watching a analyst on one of the shows and he mentioned how he thinks the league is starting to go back to a run first offense. Maybe I can go find the video.  It was a interesting take. He talked about how  dominate olines and pounding the ball are going to start becoming more of the norm.

 

I know some people find Jacoby boring. I think he is fun to watch. He is a lot like Watson and is Houdini avoiding the rush. 

To me going by this year, JB reminds me of Alex Smith. A QB that was above average and good at times. That really isn't a bad thing, Smith actually got to an NFC Title Game and his team lost in OT. QB's like Jeff Hostetler, Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson all won SB's and Smith was better than all of those guys. Smith was actually better than Nick Foles as well IMO and Foles and his team beat the Pats in the SB.

 

All of the QB's I just named, JB is just as good if not better from what I have seen so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's like the study of odds. If you roll doubles 4 times in a row, the odds are pretty strong that you will not roll doubles in the next roll. However, the odds are spread over a massive amount of rolls. But, every time the dice is rolled, countless (approaching infinity) other odds are also in play. Such as....rolling dice 8 times in a row....which happens every now and then.

 

However, when the run is stuffed 10 timed in a row, using the same formation, against the same front......it's a pretty good bet that it's gonna get stuffed again. :cheers:

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

JB isn't 6-2, the Colts are 6-2 in games in which JB starts. (Actually 6-3, but we're throwing out the Steelers game.)

 

An important distinction IMO. Otherwise...why couldn't we say JB was 4-12 in 2017...giving him 10-12 record as Colts QB.

 

I recall...even in that "disastrous" 2015 season...the Colts were 5-3 when MH started. They were even 4-0 in the first 4 games he started.

 

And I would argue that MH was better over those first 4 games than JB has been over the past 4 games (he started and finished)...yet both teams went 4-0.

 

There is definitely more to it than W/L...I would have thought the Grigano era taught us this. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

An important distinction IMO. Otherwise...why couldn't we say JB was 4-12 in 2017...giving him 10-12 record as Colts QB.

 

I recall...even in that "disastrous" 2015 season...the Colts were 5-3 when MH started. They were even 4-0 in the first 4 games he started.

 

And I would argue that MH was better over those first 4 games than JB has been over the past 4 games (he started and finished)...yet both teams went 4-0.

 

There is definitely more to it than W/L...I would have thought the Grigano era taught us this. 

 

 

yes there are many factors to consider in a game but in the end the only stat that matters to many fans is the final score

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

An important distinction IMO. Otherwise...why couldn't we say JB was 4-12 in 2017...giving him 10-12 record as Colts QB.

 

I recall...even in that "disastrous" 2015 season...the Colts were 5-3 when MH started. They were even 4-0 in the first 4 games he started.

 

And I would argue that MH was better over those first 4 games than JB has been over the past 4 games (he started and finished)...yet both teams went 4-0.

 

There is definitely more to it than W/L...I would have thought the Grigano era taught us this. 

 

 

In the end, all that matters is wins and losses. Everyone in here can discuss every thing imaginable but in the end the W is all that counts. Are you going to be happier if JB throws for 300 yards and 3 TD's but we lose? Or if he throws for 185 yards and 2 TD's but we win? 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, stitches said:

I hope people will be consistent with their emphasis on results-oriented analysis if/when the results start regressing to the mean... 

 

I won't hold my breath. 

we have seriously benefited from the AFC falling apart and having a cupcake schedule. I fear the outcome when we play elite teams.

 

we have actually struggled more than I would like to beat these bad teams as well 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

In the end, all that matters is wins and losses. Everyone in here can discuss every thing imaginable but in the end the W is all that counts. Are you going to be happier if JB throws for 300 yards and 3 TD's but we lose? Or if he throws for 185 yards and 2 TD's but we win? 

very well said, who cares how we win as long as we do. if a qb does not throw many ints compared to tds, the metrics of it will figure a high r squared. lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

In the end, all that matters is wins and losses. Everyone in here can discuss every thing imaginable but in the end the W is all that counts. Are you going to be happier if JB throws for 300 yards and 3 TD's but we lose? Or if he throws for 185 yards and 2 TD's but we win? 

 

As a Colts fan...I am always happy when we win and not happy when we lose (except for lost seasons...as I am more pragmatic than most when it comes to the benefits of a lost season).

 

But what makes me happy above all else is winning football games in January. 

 

In fairness to JB...we haven't seen him as the QB of the Colts on that stage. But in fairness to me...there is data that shows the type of offenses that win in Janaury...and right now the Colts aren't quite there.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

In the end, all that matters is wins and losses. Everyone in here can discuss every thing imaginable but in the end the W is all that counts. Are you going to be happier if JB throws for 300 yards and 3 TD's but we lose? Or if he throws for 185 yards and 2 TD's but we win? 

So everyone gets an auto pass a long as we win. Our WR team must be great! No need to upgrade there either if their performance remains the same, right!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

To me going by this year, JB reminds me of Alex Smith. A QB that was above average and good at times. That really isn't a bad thing, Smith actually got to an NFC Title Game and his team lost in OT. QB's like Jeff Hostetler, Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson all won SB's and Smith was better than all of those guys. Smith was actually better than Nick Foles as well IMO and Foles and his team beat the Pats in the SB.

 

All of the QB's I just named, JB is just as good if not better from what I have seen so far.


Begs the question then, why did KC choose to move on from Smith?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

So everyone gets an auto pass a long as we win. Our WR team must be great! No need to upgrade there either if their performance remains the same, right!

No, I am just saying if we win that is the most important thing. Being critical of a player is perfectly fine. Also I have already said in an earlier post we are 3 or 4 players away from being very good to great. I think as of now we are a good team though. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SteelCityColt said:


Begs the question then, why did KC choose to move on from Smith?

Because Andy Reid thought Mahomes was better and he is. If there is a Mahomes in this draft than I would take him over JB. There isn't IMO. I would take Andrew Luck back over JB but Andrew is retired. I think it is fair to say JB is above average though and can win games was my point.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

No, I am just saying if we win that is the most important thing. Being critical of a player is perfectly fine. Also I have already said in an earlier post we are 3 or 4 players away from being very good to great. I think as of now we are a good team though. 

So then you can understand some that think QB may be one of those 3 or 4 players come end of the season. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, stitches said:

I hope people will be consistent with their emphasis on results-oriented analysis if/when the results start regressing to the mean... 

 

I won't hold my breath. 

 

I understand why people hold it in regard...but it's sort of the last bastion of this debate IMO.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Because Andy Reid thought Mahomes was better and he is. If there is a Mahomes in this draft than I would take him over JB. There isn't IMO. I would take Andrew Luck back over JB but Andrew is retired. I think it is fair to say JB is above average though and can win games was my point.


A fair position, and not exactly a million miles away from what I’ve said previously. What did you have us pitched as for a final record again? 9-7?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

I understand why people hold it in regard...but it's sort of the last bastion of this debate IMO.

 


It’s fairly obvious who are the people capable and willing to have a constructive conversation about things. Generally the people who stick around here for a long time too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

So then you can understand some that think QB may be one of those 3 or 4 players come end of the season. 

I am not one that thinks that but if someone thinks that than that is their opinion. Let me ask you some questions, who coming out of college do you think would be better than JB is? What round would you take a QB in and what QB's do you like coming out? To me there is no Andrew Luck coming out or a Mahomes.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I am not one that thinks that but if someone thinks that than that is their opinion. Let me ask you some questions, who coming out of college do you think would be better than JB is? What round would you take a QB in and what QB's do you like coming out? To me there is no Andrew Luck coming out or a Mahomes.


There’s isn’t anyone, IMO, who I’d be willing to give away significant capital to move up for. 
 

Someone drops and there’s value, then maybe. Even then I’d figure it’s a Brissett is starting and they’re sitting a year deal. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SteelCityColt said:


A fair position, and not exactly a million miles away from what I’ve said previously. What did you have us pitched as for a final record again? 9-7?

I actually had 8-8 when Andrew retired. So as of now we are doing better than I thought. Maybe that is why I am glass half full.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, SteelCityColt said:


Begs the question then, why did KC choose to move on from Smith?

 

Because...despite a 53-27 regular season record...and having a top offensive mind at HC...and building a stingy defense and a strong run offense...they were 1-4 in the playoffs from 2013-2017 with Alex Smith.

 

It's not like Ballard unearthed Mahomes...but I am sure he was still in KC when those QB transition discussions started. He is familiar with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I am not one that thinks that but if someone thinks that than that is their opinion. Let me ask you some questions, who coming out of college do you think would be better than JB is? What round would you take a QB in and what QB's do you like coming out? To me there is no Andrew Luck coming out or a Mahomes.

Especially with the upheaval the Tua injury might cause

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I actually had 8-8 when Andrew retired. So as of now we are doing better than I thought. Maybe that is why I am glass half full.


Back to exceeding expectations, but generally you then see a regression to the mean, which finishing 9-7 would represent from where we were. 
 

8-8, 9-7 is fine for a season. Multiple seasons, not so much. Parity hell.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, stitches said:

I hope people will be consistent with their emphasis on results-oriented analysis if/when the results start regressing to the mean... 

 

I won't hold my breath. 

If I think Jacoby was the reason for the losses I would say so. There are so many factors that could go into us finishing the season off bad. Was there injuries to key pieces like the oline. Did the defense fall apart. There are a lot of reasons a season could go south.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

Because...despite a 53-27 regular season record...and having a top offensive mind at HC...and building a stingy defense and a strong run offense...they were 1-4 in the playoffs from 2013-2017 with Alex Smith.

 

It's not like Ballard unearthed Mahomes...but I am sure he was still in KC when those QB transition discussions started. He is familiar with it.


One thing I will say, the loss to us was out the ordinary. Win that game with the way they had been playing and they might have had a shot. But.. that’s the game for you.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, SteelCityColt said:


Back to exceeding expectations, but generally you then see a regression to the mean, which finishing 9-7 would represent from where we were. 
 

8-8, 9-7 is fine for a season. Multiple seasons, not so much. Parity hell.

I agree nobody wants 8-8/9-7 every season but that is where Ballard comes in and puts more talent around JB, builds a better defense, etc. Most people in here thought we wouldn't even be any good this year when Luck retired. My step-dad predicted 5-11 and he has been watching football for 60 years. JB at least has us playing for (basically) a division Title tonight.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I am not one that thinks that but if someone thinks that than that is their opinion. Let me ask you some questions, who coming out of college do you think would be better than JB is? What round would you take a QB in and what QB's do you like coming out? To me there is no Andrew Luck coming out or a Mahomes.

I haven't made my mind up yet, and hope we don't need to draft. 

 

In terms of how I'd grade them....

I think Burrow is tops. I think Herbert, Love, and Tua will all be good and have high ceilings. All 4 have a higher ceiling than JB IMO. Doesn't mean they will be better. They are simply more advanced at their current stage than JB was when he entered the same stage. I think the team is overall is pretty well constructed and a place where a lot of QBs could flourish.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

I haven't made my mind up yet, and hope we don't need to draft. 

 

In terms of how I'd grade them....

I think Burrow is tops. I think Herbert, Jordan, Love, and Tua will all be good and have high ceilings. All 5 have a higher ceiling than JB IMO. Doesn't mean they will be better. They are simply more advanced at their current stage than JB was when he entered the same stage. I think the team is overall is pretty well constructed and a place where a lot of QBs could flourish.

Fair enough, I do like Burrow but he is going #1. The others may be good or bad, that is a crapshoot IMO. It is ashame what happened to Tua but IMO I think he is damaged goods now. I might be wrong but a hip injury is no joke.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I agree nobody wants 8-8/9-7 every season but that is where Ballard comes in and puts more talent around JB, builds a better defense, etc. Most people in here thought we wouldn't even be any good this year when Luck retired. My step-dad predicted 5-11 and he has been watching football for 60 years. JB at least has us playing for (basically) a division Title tonight.


I was around the 8-8 mark, post Luck, pre injuries and pre seeing the regression on O. Even then I can’t see it going more than a game each way. Maybe 10-6 if we get hot down the home straight. 
 

We may well win the division, but that I feel is more damming on the Texans. Luck retires and you still can’t win the division?! They’re a weird team.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Fair enough, I do like Burrow but he is going #1. The others may be good or bad, that is a crapshoot IMO. It is ashame what happened to Tua but IMO I think he is damaged goods now. I might be wrong but a hip injury is no joke.

I honestly think Love is the 2nd best overall, and a victim of being on a very bad team this year. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Nadine locked and unlocked this topic
  • Nadine unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In Ballard I trust. He is intuitive and a consensus builder. This is a great opportunity to use this decision to refine your offensive strategy. Remember, Reich loves the RPO and what he could do with a mobile QB.
    • Ballard didn't say it was definite.   He didn't rule it out.   He just said as of this minute.    I think he's hoping to find out in April and May.      He still might end up deciding Eason is OK as the back-up.   I was only trying to impress upon those in the "Throw Jacob Eason in and see what we have" crowd that Ballard has crushed that dream for 2021.    But I wouldn't rule out 2022....  at least not yet.  
    • TY - 2Y/22M - he can still play but he’s not Tyreek Hill taking the top of defenses anymore, and with his disappearing act at the beginning of the year I’m afraid to sign him any longer or with too much guaranteed. Partly for sentimental reasons I want him to stay, but I do think he’s still got some juice.    Mack - 1Y/1M - Likable player but due to his position and injury, no way can I justify giving him much more than vet minimum.    Houston - 1Y/8M - Fell off a lot this year compared to his first year. Still our best edge player, basically by default and I’d be hoping we can get a more 2019 performance out of him at arguably our weakest position on the team.    Autry - Walk. He will price himself out with an inflated sense of value because he’s gotten decent sack numbers, but he is the definition of JAG and I’d only keep him if he agreed to a minimum contract.    Rhodes - 1Y/6M - He was a stud this year. If we could guarantee that he won’t revert back to his last two years in Minnesota I would be willing to go longer and higher. With how much he fell off after getting paid the first time, I’m not giving him a long term deal.    Walker - 1Y/2M - He was playing a very small percentage of downs at the end of the year so I’m keeping him less based on ability and more based on leadership and football savvy.    Hooker - Walk. Both sides need to just move on. I’d keep him at minimum too but I think both sides want a fresh start. Also a little miscast in the current defense so no reason to force a square peg into a round hole.    Brissett - 1Y/5M - Too big of a fan of Brissett as a man to want to see him leave. I don’t want him starting but he’s a very solid backup and compared to the 20M we gave him last year, I can live with his salary being at 1/4 of that this year.    Pascal and MAC both tendered at 2.24M. I want to bring in Kenny Golladay or Allen Robinson and Pascal is JAG so he’s not falling into my future plans much. I’m a big fan of MAC and I wouldn’t mind seeing him play the Jack Doyle role. He’s a better blocker, has better hands, and is more explosive.    I may be lowballing some guys but I’d hate to fall into the trap of overvaluing our guys and keeping them just because you want to keep your own. Unfortunately, I think the five most important positions on the team also coincide with our five weakest positions on the team; QB, WR, CB, DE, and LT. Fortunately we’ve got a good cap situation and this is the perfect year to be needing a QB. 
    • If we let Walker Walk, (and I think it’s likely) it’s not because we want an upgrade.   It’s because we simply don’t play him enough.   I think East Street has the numbers in snaps, but I think Walker is roughly playing 25-30 percent of the snaps.   That’s it.    We can't pay him enough for that.   Some other team will PLAY him more so they will PAY him more.    When Walker is off the field, we are either playing a 4-2-5 or a 4-1-6.   Leonard plays basically 100 percent of the snaps and I think Oke is about 55-60 percent.     There is a method to our madness.  
    • I'm surprised some folks want to resign Walker. Imo we definitely need an upgrade.... I'd let him walk.
  • Members

    • MFT5

      MFT5 209

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt Overseas

      Colt Overseas 501

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 1,803

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,031

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AustexColt

      AustexColt 110

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mackrel829

      Mackrel829 9

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • smittywerb

      smittywerb 164

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...