Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
zibby43

Colts finish 5th in the league in rushing

Recommended Posts

Before this season, Reich stated that he wanted a top 5 rushing attack.

 

He accomplished his goal.  Kansas City is ranked 22nd, so they will not jump Indy.  Neither will Green Bay at 15th.  San Francisco is already ahead of the Colts at #3.

 

1. Baltimore

2. Tennessee

3. San Francisco

4. Dallas

5. IND (133.1 yards per game)

 

This off-season, Reich has proclaimed that he wants to improve the passing offense.  The Colts successfully achieving Reich's top 5 rushing offense target inspires confidence that the Colts will at least dramatically improve the passing game next year. 

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly.  Assuming they find a good QB and some decent receivers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something to build upon, for next year. Coach seems to be a man of his word in regards to expectations+meeting them in the regards of fielding a top rushing unit. Hopefully needs are addressed in the draft. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So much better than Pagano era. It was all too soon that we could never hit 100 yards rushing. We had Vick Ballard hit 100 yards rushing then a huge drought until Frank Gore hit it. I'm so glad that we have a competent GM that can draft players to put us in good position. Just need to keep stacking up elite talent.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, zibby43 said:


I’ve been using the entire season.

 

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/rushing-yards-per-game


So was the NFL.com page.  Weird they should have different numbers.  Whatever.  
 

Your point was still valid.  Reich made it a mission to be a top running team.  Now he said they need to improve the pass game.  

 

Anything would be an improvement. 
 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Colts were one dimensional all season and still made top 5 rushing. That's pretty I impressive. It's going to get interesting when we have an established passing QB whoever that may be. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, NannyMcafee said:

The Colts were one dimensional all season and still made top 5 rushing. That's pretty I impressive. It's going to get interesting when we have an established passing QB whoever that may be. 

Brissett  lol

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Stephen said:

Brissett  lol

 

I hope JB can establish himself as a passer. As of right now o wouldnt say hes established himself. Hes the current starter but so far I'm not impressed by his arm. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it ironic the Colts for over a decade were renowned for their superb passing, but awful running. Now, we're the opposite! I understand when you run the ball more that detracts from passing attempts, but why oh why did Luck have to retire once we got a run game going?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And all 4 backs are young, would be nice if Mack improved his pass catching skills, Wilkins ypc was really impressive, Williams shocked me how good he played once healthy and give a shot. Hines should have better yards per catch with all his speed and elusiveness, that number hopefully jumps. Really good situation and our O line obviously deserves a ton of credit.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need a beast of a running back that doesn't fall down when barely touched.  I think a 6-2 or 6-3 range and 230-240s lbs will complement the running attack with Mack and company...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Thunderbolt said:

We need a beast of a running back that doesn't fall down when barely touched.  I think a 6-2 or 6-3 range and 230-240s lbs will complement the running attack with Mack and company...

We are just fine with the RBs we have. 

There are much more positions that are needed. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/21/2020 at 1:39 AM, crazycolt1 said:

We are just fine with the RBs we have. 

There are much more positions that are needed. 

If Brissett  starts next year we need to draft another beast rb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Stephen said:

If Brissett  starts next year we need to draft another beast rb

No matter who the QB is RB is not a big need. 

Ballard said he is always trying to improve every position but I imagine RB is not very high on his priority list. 

Naturally all teams want a beast RB but with out O-line we don't need one to be successful. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

No matter who the QB is RB is not a big need. 

Ballard said he is always trying to improve every position but I imagine RB is not very high on his priority list. 

Naturally all teams want a beast RB but with out O-line we don't need one to be successful. 

We may if Anthony  C retires 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Stephen said:

We may if Anthony  C retires 

If AC retires he will be replaced. That still has nothing to do with needing a RB over positions of more pressing need. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

If AC retires he will be replaced. That still has nothing to do with needing a RB over positions of more pressing need. 

If you can't  get a better qb then you must improve  rb more to account for it. Imagine  a henry and mack combo. Would be better than mack and hines or Wilkins 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Stephen said:

If you can't  get a better qb then you must improve  rb more to account for it. Imagine  a henry and mack combo. Would be better than mack and hines or Wilkins 

Well I guess if we had a whole team of pro bowl players we might could get more wins. :sarcasm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

Well I guess if we had a whole team of pro bowl players we might could get more wins. :sarcasm:

49ers win in spite of garoppolo  so that could work lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Stephen said:

49ers win in spite of garoppolo  so that could work lol

IMO Garoppolo is better than he is given credit for. He does what is ask of him and that includes putting the ball down field when needed. 

3978 YDs-27 TDs   That put him at 12th in the league. 

Just saying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

IMO Garoppolo is better than he is given credit for. He does what is ask of him and that includes putting the ball down field when needed. 

3978 YDs-27 TDs   That put him at 12th in the league. 

Just saying. 

Yea , but if they had Mahomes  they might be undefeated 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean no two situations are 1:1 carbon copies. Love suffered loss of talent Mahomes didn't suffer. I also disagree about his receivers bailing him out in 2018. There was nothing to bail him out for in 2018. He was a much safer and much more in control player in 2018 because he had some relatively good weapons and he knew he didn't have to do everything by himself. He also had an offensive head coach who actually knew what he was doing, unlike in 2019. I've never seen a high end QB work with such poor supporting case that could rarely separate and was dropping passes left and right.    The Wake Forest game is weird, because he made a lot of mistakes there, but he also kept them in the game for longer than their talent suggested they can keep up with them. Also there are plenty of games where they actually fell behind big and he was pressing a ton trying to make things happen. Take the LSU game as a perfect example. He was making some exceptional throws in the beginning of the game and was moving their offense really well against a team with 3 first round DBs covering his horrible WRs who dropped 2 TD passes if I'm not mistaken. After which they fell behind and he started forcing it, which resulted in several picks and overall poor performance for the rest of the game.    The discrepancy between Love's first half vs Love's second half performances is kind of eye-popping and there is a reason for it. By PFF his rating was 85 in first halves and it was in the 50s in second halves of games(I'm citing this by memory, apologies for not being able to find the exact numbers)... From what I've seen he was forcing things a lot this last season. 
    • The only reason that I'm not sure it's a lock that Rivers becomes a Colt is that the idea is becoming conventional wisdom. Maybe there's a better move to be made, but if it's Rivers or JB, it's not a debate. Take the band aid option, as that's better than a team deteriorating infection.    And #13 should be used to find a QB if Ballard likes who's available irrespective. 
    • 7 mil per year should be the max for him   if you look at that link i posted, 8 million or more would be paying him top 5 RB money.  i dont think he has the leverage to push for top 5 money 
    • For the people in the back as well, LA has nothing left contractually with him. He is no longer apart of the organization, so there is no "releasing" him, he's already listed as a FA. Olsen is irrelevant because he was released while under contract. AGAIN, FA's can't be communicated with until the start of the new league year.    Come on guys.. this stuff has been talked about endlessly on here and is easy to look up as well.
    • Bone headed plays are not a huge red flag because, as you indicate, all QBs have them... the same bone headed plays through out two years as a starter is a red flag though.
  • Members

    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 1,448

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsGermany

      ColtsGermany 215

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BSteph1

      BSteph1 3

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 2,470

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • runthepost

      runthepost 930

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BleedBlu8792

      BleedBlu8792 1,568

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark_Indy

      Dark_Indy 262

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pelt

      Pelt 642

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 470

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WarGhost21

      WarGhost21 1,216

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...