Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Start a franchise with 3 players


danlhart87

Recommended Posts

Patrick Mahomes

Michael Thomas

Nick Bosa

 

24, 26, and 22 years old and will all be at the top of their positions, which happen to be the most important in today’s game, for the next 8 to 15 years... Those 3 with a supporting cast around them and solid drafting over the course of their careers would be hard to beat. Many championships. 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/12/2020 at 8:26 PM, ColtStrong2013 said:

Patrick Mahomes

Michael Thomas

Nick Bosa

 

24, 26, and 22 years old and will all be at the top of their positions, which happen to be the most important in today’s game, for the next 8 to 15 years... Those 3 with a supporting cast around them and solid drafting over the course of their careers would be hard to beat. Many championships. 
 

I almost took the same, but decided for Nelson instead of Thomas.   Neither is a bad choice.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Myles said:

I almost took the same, but decided for Nelson instead of Thomas.   Neither is a bad choice.  


If having a subpar o-line is the tradeoff, I’d take Nelson elevating a top 10 o-line in place of Thomas resulting in a subpar receiving core . I think Mahomes would elevate the offense behind a good offensive line. But if it’s an average or better o-line and Thomas and Mahomes have time to connect, there is no stopping that offense. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/12/2020 at 7:26 PM, ColtStrong2013 said:

Patrick Mahomes

Michael Thomas

Nick Bosa

 

24, 26, and 22 years old and will all be at the top of their positions, which happen to be the most important in today’s game, for the next 8 to 15 years... Those 3 with a supporting cast around them and solid drafting over the course of their careers would be hard to beat. Many championships. 
 

Mahomes would get killed behind no OL 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

Mahomes would get killed behind no OL 


which is why I said I would take Q elevating a sub par oline over Thomas. But if it were an average or better than average line without Nelson, I would take Thomas elevating a subpar receiving core. 

With all due respect to Mahomes, we really don’t know what kind of quarterback he is without Kelce, Hill and Watkins... Which is pretty great group of weapons. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 individual players?  Pick of the league?

 

QB Fran Tarkenton

FB Mike Alstott

LB Lawrence Taylor

 

I'll take Tarkenton over other more prominent QBs because Tarkenton specialized in compensating for weak OLs and could be a huge asset while building meat around the bones of the franchise.  Tarkenton was one of the few real QBs who unequivocally made the team around him better rather than leaning on his supporting cast. 

 

As you build your talent in the draft you then might transition to a young man who you intend to be "your guy" but in those first few years having Tarkenton over a conventional pocket passer could add 4-5 wins a year.

 

Alstott is self explanatory, if you're building a new offense Alstott is a perfect piece to build around.  Tough, physical, tough minded fullback that has the complete package.

 

And there is no question who you build your D around.  LT was just special.

 

Pick of current players is a bit more hazy, because the guys who were always the easy answers in years past are getting older and the new wave of talent is only just coming into its own now.

 

That said:

 

QB Aaron Rodgers

RB Derrick Henry

CB Stefon Gilmore

 

If you're building an offense from scratch with currently there is no correct answer that is not Aaron Rodgers.  Mahomes is getting there but if you have to choose the guy who's been there over the guy who's getting there, there is no comparison.

 

RB is a bit more up in the air but Henry is amazing.

 

Defense was more questionable because there's a lot of guys you could choose up front like the Bosas, the Watts, etc, but I tend to think elite secondary play sets up the rest of the defense for success in modern defensive schemes far more than used to be the case even 10 years ago.  Physical defense isn't obsolete but it's the coverage team that gives them a chance to do their thing in this era of quick release offense so I'll go for a consensus top corner or safety over a front 7 role at the moment.  And Gilmore is probably the best CB in football right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Hines isn't, nor ever has been, a true RB.  He's a 3rd down pass catcher or a specialty play guy that has to get the ball on a hand off occasionally to keep the D honest.  He has had to fill in as a backup RB over the years because of injuries or roster limitations.
    • I think it could be.  But we need more evidence.  However, I look back to last season when they likely had less overall talent.  This defense fared well vs. the Chiefs.  They fared well in both games vs. the Texans.  They held Tennessee down in the 1st game.  High-flying Atlanta had just 24.  I mean it's not like this defense didn't show some good things last year.  And now we have added Buckner and several others to that and didn't really lose much, maybe Sheard?    I think they could very well be legit.  Just how legit that is who knows, but I would not beat all surprised if they are top 10 by the end of the season.
    • I'm pretty sure they new early, and all along that Kelly would never play, unless it was an emergency. I'd bet they have given CK a "plan" to follow, and I'd also bet they were clear his chance at PT was little to none.   And aside from that, they just weren't going to do that to JB given he was under contract for the next year. Wouldn't have been a good look.   Now did I want to see CK late last year, absolutely. But I understand why I didn't. Well, either they really like CK, it's a favor from Reich to uncle Jim, or it's all about Covid. Or a combination of the 2 or all three. Without seeing them in preseason, we just don't know who's best. And yes, CK was obviously better in college, but that always doesn't translate to the NFL. Personally, I love the thought of CK sticking if he can keep his nose clean. I'm pretty sure at minimum he could be a good backup. He won that role in Denver after all, from a pretty picky Elway. Eason does have some great tools, and also could be very good if he can work some things out. We're simply not going to have any answers for a year or two.
    • Patience.  We might very well see Eason taking snaps toward the end of the season.  Right now JB is under a large contract and is the better backup option...to start a game.....in case Iron Man misses one.  So JB needs some reps now to be fresh enough able to come into a game or start.   I don't expect Eason to be activated on a game day until maybe mid-season.   Towards the end of the season, we'll begin to see more thought towards the future and Eason might get some work.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...