-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By ColtStrong2013 · Posted
a double covered Ty because Grigson also couldn’t give him proper weapons either… and yet we still complain about Ballard’s offensive weapons somehow. -
By ColtStrong2013 · Posted
I didn’t say his major injuries were. But to argue that he took abuse because he held the ball too long, and that somehow was not Grigson’s fault is absurd. He didn’t play that style in college, that was the system that Grigson put in for him and held onto until it was too late. The o-lines were bad, holding the ball too long or not. Ballard put a plan in immediately to remove that abuse, and it was too late. We know you love your brother R.G… you can say it. A good deal of happily moved on. -
By throwing BBZ · Posted
Game after game, season after season I complained here about all the players that flashed right in front of Lucky that were open and how he ignored them and was looking to throw so often to a doubled covered TY. Or how on the deeper routes he rarely trusted what deeper route was going to be ran, how he most aways had to wait till after the receiver made his break then he tried to use his big gun to get the ball downfield. LUCKY gave the D opportunity to close on our receivers. Then what a disaster he was throwing the ball short. He couldn't lead a receiver to save himself. High and to the wrong shoulder so many hundre r s of times. He took the beating that he earned. -
What are you talking about...Ballard vs Grigson? Have you been stuck on that for 7 years? Moose said that AR is injured, and that it was good possibility that Ballard wanted to MAKE SURE he was protected. Somebody attacked Moose's logic by saying that ARs injuries were not the result of the oline (as if that matters...no..it was just a forage for a nit pick to attack Moose), and I noted that Luck's major injuries were also not due to the oline, but Ballard sought to MAKE SURE Luck was protected (inferred by both shortening the O AND improving the oline). -
By smittywerb · Posted
He may be better, he may not be, but that’s not what I was saying. I was saying they essentially do the same thing and operate the same space.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now