Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

With the 13th pick in 2020 NFL Draft (merge)


Recommended Posts

The Colts take_______

 

We should be in good discussion for getting one of the best quarterbacks. If we are the 11th pick it wouldn't take a whole lot to move to 8. The good news there will be a solid quarterback available at that time. I guess we'll see how it works out because this season was a complete wreck from the Pittsburgh game on

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 352
  • Created
  • Last Reply
8 minutes ago, Fluke_33 said:

When it’s two teams they do a coin flip to see who picks first.  Not sure what happens with multiple.  Is it reverse strength of schedule?

In situations where teams finished the previous season with identical records, the determination of draft position is decided by strength of schedule — the aggregate winning percentage of a team’s opponents. The team that played the schedule with the lowest winning percentage will be awarded the higher pick.

If the teams have the same strength of schedule, division or conference tiebreakers are applied. If the divisional or conference tiebreakers are not applicable, or ties still exist between teams of different conferences, ties will be broken the following tie-breaking method:

1. Head-to-head, if applicable

2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games (minimum of four)

3. Strength of victory in all games

4. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed in all games

5. Best net points in all games

6. Best net touchdowns in all games

7. Coin toss

 

https://operations.nfl.com/the-players/the-nfl-draft/the-rules-of-the-draft/

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to NFL sat radio, we will pick number 13. 

Just now, New Zealands #1 Colts Fan said:

no as oakland takes there spot. we should be 13 it will be confirmed in a few minutes

Already has been according to the radio

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would be a mistake to go hell for leather for a QB in the first round.  None of the guys on the board in round 1 really impress me, and we have an even more pressing need at WR right now.  I'd rather go for a first round wideout and a second round QB, there's usually gonna be some decent talents that don't go in round 1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any game wreckers on D that might be there at #13?. We only + about the offense, but that D is definitely thirsty for a force at DT or DE.

 

I think they'd be able to potentially find a good QB prospect with that 33/34? pick.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Imgrandojji said:

I think it would be a mistake to go hell for leather for a QB in the first round.  None of the guys on the board in round 1 really impress me, and we have an even more pressing need at WR right now.  I'd rather go for a first round wideout and a second round QB, there's usually gonna be some decent talents that don't go in round 1.

 

 Ok then. That is settled. LMAO 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MTC said:

I doubt we end up picking 13 in April...

 

Colts will trade up for a QB.

As long as they don't get robbed and mortgage the future I'd be ok with it.

 

If Ballard does that and that QB busts, bye bye Ballard.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Imgrandojji said:

I think it would be a mistake to go hell for leather for a QB in the first round.  None of the guys on the board in round 1 really impress me, and we have an even more pressing need at WR right now.  I'd rather go for a first round wideout and a second round QB, there's usually gonna be some decent talents that don't go in round 1.

We need to be rid of Jacoby, otherwise the fan base is going to get smaller...maybe much smaller. Ballard and Reich won't like to spend the time breaking in a new QB (it is easier to go with the mediocre veteran)...but they are going to have to do it or explain to Irsay why not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Come back, Andrew, so we can draft whoever we want and compete for a title 8 months from now.

 

Doubtful, so trade up, if you have to.  If have no QB, you have nothing.  Can't go bargain shopping at the QB position.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Mr.Debonair said:

Ballard will trade back to acquire more pics and take a 2nd rounder who either sucks or is hurt more often than they play

Man, is that ever his mode of operation...the clown thinks that more picks is better than top picks. Quantity over quality is a stupid losing strategy...it just gets you a lot of average+ players and no stars. You have an average team forever.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, CheezyColt said:

I'll be operating under this assumption all offseason for sure.

 

Jim Irsay will pressure the Front Office to acquire a QB. Remember that we're in "win-now" mode. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CanuckColt said:

Man, is that ever his mode of operation...the * thinks that more picks is better than top picks. Quantity over quality is a stupid losing strategy...it just gets you a lot of average+ players and no stars. You have an average team forever.


Chill man, this place loves every move he makes

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MTC said:

 

Jim Irsay will pressure the Front Office to acquire a QB. Remember that we're in "win-now" mode. 

 

Irsay has also been spoiled the last two decades with Peyton and Andrew so anyone that doesnt play at a similar level is not gonna satisfy his expectations imo

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, #12. said:

Come back, Andrew, so we can draft whoever we want and compete for a title 8 months from now.

 

Doubtful, so trade up, if you have to.  If have no QB, you have nothing.  Can't go bargain shopping at the QB position.

 

 

 

As much of a concern as I have for the QB spot, I worry equally as much for the defensive crew, including do we have the right DC? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one not that impressed with Herbert?

 

I watched about 3 or 4 Oregon games this year (can't remember which ones though - one was the PAC championship game) and I just didn't find him that impressive.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, WarGhost21 said:

Looking for Herbert, Tua, or (hopefully) Derrick Brown at the 13th slot, or even moving up slightly

Tua has been hinting on his Twitter about returning to school next year and waiting a year to come out for the draft.

3 minutes ago, Pelt said:

Am I the only one not that impressed with Herbert?

 

I watched about 3 or 4 Oregon games this year (can't remember which ones though - one was the PAC championship game) and I just didn't find him that impressive.

I have a coworker who went to Oregon, he’s a diehard CFB fan and he has said all season long that Herbert is overly hyped. Which means nothing coming from a fan of course but just saying is all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yup. Has zero to do with race, and everything to do with his ability to read, progress, etc.. Good guy and all, just not very good. Wasn't really that good in college either. He's likely better off in another scheme to be honest where there is less focus on reads and progressions. Chud's O was probably better suited for him as it's more throw-to-spot, than read, progress, and make a bunch of decisions. But to bring race into the discussion is silly given most of the top QBs in the league (Mahomes, Wilson, Jackson, Prescott, Watson, etc.). Nobody cares about that.
    • https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/indianapolis-colts/zach-pascal-22405/market-value/   i can’t believe Pascal’s perceived contract value is being shown at 8.4 million avg and 4yrs. That is a lot of money for a guy who really hasn’t put together an entire season or even really half of a season with numbers that make you feel he has more to his ceiling. He at times has made some plays and looked like is he breaking out and then he levels back out. He is a usable 4/5th receiver imho but nowhere near 8 million $/yr. wow! 
    • He wasn't horrible. He had the lowest completion rate of DBs in his limited time. He did look lost at times, but that's to be expected for a rook changing positions. Keep in mind Tell was a FS at USC, and converted to CB last year. He's built like a tall corner, so filling in for Moore at NB probably wasn't ideal. Can he play NB, IDK. He was never physical in college. He's also not fast (4.6ish). He did score well in agility in the shuttle though.   I really don't know where he'll fit. Not fast enough IMO to play CB1 or CB2. Not sure if he's physical enough to play NB or SS. Probably fine to play split safety in a two high. If he could toughen up, could be good at NB, dime, or SS, but he was never that guy in college. Perhaps a rona year hitting the weights will help. 
    • Brissett was given every opportunity to prove himself to the coaches and GM and he failed.  He's a good back up QB and that is where he is at.  He had 2 seasons and was given a huge pay check.   He is an average starter at best.   Bringing race into this discussion is stupid.   
    • Are you sure it is me? I play if a few Yahoo fantast football leagues but not a Colts one.   
  • Members

    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,218

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 3,471

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 6,903

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 59

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mel Kiper's Hair

      Mel Kiper's Hair 2,024

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jdubu

      Jdubu 1,624

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shive

      Shive 2,543

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 3,908

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 10,540

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 438

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...