Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Smonroe

What Beating Jacksonville Means

Recommended Posts

If the Texans beat the Titans, and we beat the Jags - we’ll have a second place schedule.  

 

This means we’d play Buffalo and Oakland instead of the Jets and Denver.  
 

I’m not suggesting we should tank, I want to win every game.  
 

But, to me since the game is meaningless, it would be a perfect opportunity to play Kelly.  If he’s good, that’s a bonus.  If we lose, we get an easier schedule next season. Not to mention maybe one pick higher in the draft.  Seems like a no brainer, right?

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every season's different. At the start of this season, would you have called Buff/Oak a much tougher slate than NYJ/Denv?

 

The Broncos are going to be pretty good next year, the Jets thumped Luck and co. The Raiders played the Colts hard even under Luck and then thumped Brissett. Buffalo are good. The point is, tanking is a bad idea. You don't know what next season will bring. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Orioles22 said:

I'd like to see Kelly but not because I want to lose. I think we'd be as good or better.

 

Brissett is not a good QB. Kelly? Who knows...we've seen two Colts QBs this season who've looked like backups. Nothing says the third guy will be any better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Colt.45 said:

 

Brissett is not a good QB. Kelly? Who knows...we've seen two Colts QBs this season who've looked like backups. Nothing says the third guy will be any better.

But we've reached the point that we might as well see what the young guy has. It's a meaningless game for both sides, so it's pretty much a preseason game anyway

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Smonroe said:

If the Texans beat the Titans, and we beat the Jags - we’ll have a second place schedule.  

 

This means we’d play Buffalo and Oakland instead of the Jets and Denver.  
 

I’m not suggesting we should tank, I want to win every game.  
 

But, to me since the game is meaningless, it would be a perfect opportunity to play Kelly.  If he’s good, that’s a bonus.  If we lose, we get an easier schedule next season. Not to mention maybe one pick higher in the draft.  Seems like a no brainer, right?

 

First off Kelly is not playing.

 

and for what it's worth...

Tenn is a 5 point favorite on the road at Houston.

Indy is a 3 1/2 point favorite on the road at Jacksonville.

So if Vegas is right:  both Titans win and Colts win

Leaving us still with the 3rd place schedule. and middle of the round draft placement.

 

Furthermore,  if  KC wins their 1:00 game (at home vs the Chargers),

I believe the Texans are set with the 4 seed, and their own game then becomes meaningless, 

Houston would likely rest most of their starters in the 4:00 game vs the Titans.

 

So assuming KC wins, then it's likely Tenn wins.

However, if KC gets upset by the Chargers, then the Titans may have a much harder matchup.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Colts are planning on starting JB next season, in would be counter productive to pull him after the team just won a big game. It would send all sorts of mixed messages to JB, CK, and the rest of the team. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

If the Colts are planning on starting JB next season, in would be counter productive to pull him after the team just won a big game. It would send all sorts of mixed messages to JB, CK, and the rest of the team. 

 

 

I really would love to see Kelly play as I think Brissett is a bottom tier QB . He's a perfect "bridge" guy. Chances are he is the starter in 2020. For that reason , I think the same as you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TheMiz said:

Reich has said that JB will play out the season. Id imagine CK will again be inactive.

 

Which makes zero sense Brissett is garbage.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d like to see Kelly get a legit start but not because of the schedule ramifications next year. I don’t see much difference between playing the Broncos versus the Raiders or the Bills versus the Jets. Any of those teams could surprise next year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I readily admit I'd like to see what Kelly can do.  And honestly, I wouldn't be all that disappointed if JB comes down with a (ahem..) bad cold. 

 

But I still feel you always try to win.  And you never know who's going to be good or bad next year. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, WoolMagnet said:

Can someone throw this in the Play Kelly mega merge thread?


I should have left that last part out.  It was just my opinion.  I didn’t mean to start another ‘Start Kelly!’ Debate.   What I really wanted to point out was that this game really only means a possible difference in our schedule next year.  
 

The Raiders/Broncos choice is a wash.  But I think the Bills are a much better team than the Jets now and will continue that way next year.  
 

All that said, the game really means very little in the greater scheme of things.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Smonroe said:


I should have left that last part out.  It was just my opinion.  I didn’t mean to start another ‘Start Kelly!’ Debate.   What I really wanted to point out was that this game really only means a possible difference in our schedule next year.  
 

The Raiders/Broncos choice is a wash.  But I think the Bills are a much better team than the Jets now and will continue that way next year.  
 

All that said, the game really means very little in the greater scheme of things.  

Just messin with ya.

you are right. does affect draft position too.

 

I bet it does help the players’ spirit going into the offseason.

Its better than having the taste of getting beat all off-season.

Ending on a high, so to speak. 
 

In the end, doesnt mean much, tho i did see we could help the Steelers if we win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, TheMiz said:

But we've reached the point that we might as well see what the young guy has. It's a meaningless game for both sides, so it's pretty much a preseason game anyway

 

They're trying to build a certain culture with their team. Tanking, and 'seeing' what you have in others isn't part of it. You'll get to see Kelly next preseason.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

JB sent the fans off with a 38-6 win. I am happy now. Merry X-Mas everyone.

Me too, but twas Hines pulling the sleigh.  JB didn't deliver.  Merry xmas to you too!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Colt.45 said:

 The point is, tanking is a bad idea.  

 

What does tanking mean? Is it a season long process (bad) or is it just not giving maximum effort on week 17 (indifferent) when both teams are eliminated from the playoffs? Because this game while not 100% totally meaningless for the future, it is meaningless on Sunday and improving draft stock isn't a bad idea, it'd be a good thing to have improved draft stock given the QB situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Dingus McGirt said:

Benching him would hurt his trade value???

He isn't worth much anyway if I were a GM for any of the other 31 teams I would give up more than a 5th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Colt.45 said:

 

They're trying to build a certain culture with their team. Tanking, and 'seeing' what you have in others isn't part of it. You'll get to see Kelly next preseason.

Stupid at that point if I was coaching this team I would have pulled the trigger and benched Brisset 3 weeks ago.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some might think I am crazy but I think we could get a 3rd round pick for JB if Ballard wanted to trade him and draft another QB. There a few GM's and coaches that will look at his leadership and factor in he is still young, also those same teams may desperate for a QB. It is not like they would be giving us a 1st or a 2nd. 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Always play to win, that's why we keep score.   I believe we would have beaten the Saints in the Super Bowl if we would not have taken our feet off the gas.   Always play to win, if you play,  play to win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jameszeigler834 said:

He isn't worth much anyway if I were a GM for any of the other 31 teams I would give up more than a 5th.

I mean Wouldn't give up more than a 5th rounder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/23/2019 at 10:07 PM, Four2itus said:

If the Colts are planning on starting JB next season, in would be counter productive to pull him after the team just won a big game. It would send all sorts of mixed messages to JB, CK, and the rest of the team. 

Won a big game.   I don't think beating Carolina is winning a big game.   It was basically meaningless.  Brissett didn't play well either.   I think the message it could send is that Brissett has to improve his game in the offseason.   

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/24/2019 at 9:58 AM, Dingus McGirt said:

Benching him would hurt his trade value???

I agree ........MPStack has been telling people that JB is worth a 2nd or 3rd.........

 

Can you believe that????? !!!

 

Sheeze  

 

 

:)

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At 15-19

 

There should be a very good WR, DT, or OT available

 

If we choose to not move, we should just take BPA of these 3 groups

 

I think Love will show very well on individual drills that makes pro scouts drool

 

He may go in top 15 ahead of us

 

It doesnt make him a blue chip...... 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

I agree ........MPStack has been telling people that JB is worth a 2nd or 3rd.........

 

Can you believe that????? !!!

 

Sheeze  

 

 

:)


Those Jacoby threads going back about 1.5 years ago, would be funny to look at now! They’d probably sway in my favor! :banana:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, MPStack said:


Those Jacoby threads going back about 1.5 years ago, would be funny to look at now! They’d probably sway in my favor! :banana:

 

 

You may be right there.........

 

I have broken in to the Colts forum server and deleted my love of JB Threads......  :)

 

I think somebody HACKED my account.......  I didnt write those!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is your opinion @w87r not mine    Tyrod Taylor became the next Ty Detmer once Herbert was drafted         A place holder is a place holder no matter what              I know the Early new Browns era very well        I trust the combined 80 years around the game to make decisions           
    • I am very happy to have Pascal on the squad. He is the definition of great depth. As mentioned above though, of he is anything over #4 on WR depth chart. Things haven't gone as planned.
    • Tyrod wasn't brought in to start until Herbert gets ready, he was already there. He is a place holder for Herbert, but not all situations are the same. This comparison is way off in almost every aspect.    I fully understand the situation in NO.   The fact Hill can be listed/play as another position, has no effect on JW. It's actually the opposite. They will have 3 qbs with one able to be a gadget guy.   Taysom Hill has 13 career pass attempts. To add to that he is 3 yrs older than JW as well. Pretty sure if Brees goes down, they will be having JW as the QB. Now if both get injured in a game, they have a 3rd emergency QB in Hill.   Sorry PT, just think you're wrong on both accounts here.
    • Ty Detmer was brought in by the new Browns to start until Tim Couch was ready         The way NO uses TH if the team only dress 2 QBs it will be DB and TH
  • Members

    • Nate!

      Nate! 130

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 602

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 8,886

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ztboiler

      ztboiler 1,511

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 573

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 13

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • a06cc

      a06cc 743

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PrincetonTiger

      PrincetonTiger 10,353

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hark

      Hark 255

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • il vecchio

      il vecchio 167

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...