Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Moosejawcolt

Ballard

Recommended Posts

How come with the Colts current record and down ward spiral does Ballard seem immune to criticism?  Or a thorough evaluation of his drafts and moves since being the Colts's GM?

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

 

Because we'd be 13-0 likely if we had Luck. I'm not a Ballard worshiper, but this isn't on him. He's upgraded or made solid attempts to upgrade every unit after inheriting what was mostly a dumpster fire in terms of depth and talent.

 

Even the JB fan club knows this boils down to the change of QB.

 

Not saying we don't need upgrades in several areas, but who here thinks we're not at least at 11-2 had Luck not left and playing for a 1 seed right now, even with all the injuries.


No way we’re 13-0 with Luck. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

 

Because we'd be 13-0 likely if we had Luck. I'm not a Ballard worshiper, but this isn't on him. He's upgraded or made solid attempts to upgrade every unit after inheriting what was mostly a dumpster fire in terms of depth and talent.

 

Even the JB fan club knows this boils down to the change of QB.

 

Not saying we don't need upgrades in several areas, but who here thinks we're not at least at 11-2 had Luck not left and playing for a 1 seed right now, even with all the injuries.

Maybe not 11-2, but we would be leading the division with a healthy Andrew.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

How come with the Colts current record and down ward spiral does Ballard seem immune to criticism?  Or a thorough evaluation of his drafts and moves since being the Colts's GM?

He’s done more positive for the Colts than negative. You typically don’t build off the previous season’s success after losing the QB. 
 

He’s whiffed on a couple 2nd rounders (all GM’ do) and the JB extension just wasn’t necessary IMO. 
 

Other than that, the future looks good for the Colts.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

 

Because we'd be 13-0 likely if we had Luck. I'm not a Ballard worshiper, but this isn't on him. He's upgraded or made solid attempts to upgrade every unit after inheriting what was mostly a dumpster fire in terms of depth and talent.

 

Even the JB fan club knows this boils down to the change of QB.

 

Not saying we don't need upgrades in several areas, but who here thinks we're not at least at 11-2 had Luck not left and playing for a 1 seed right now, even with all the injuries.

We r in year 3 and going into year 4 of Ballard's draft and I still see a lot of  holes. Plus, u remember the KC game last year against an elite team with all their weapons? We got trashed and didn't belong.  

6 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

 

Because we'd be 13-0 likely if we had Luck. I'm not a Ballard worshiper, but this isn't on him. He's upgraded or made solid attempts to upgrade every unit after inheriting what was mostly a dumpster fire in terms of depth and talent.

 

Even the JB fan club knows this boils down to the change of QB.

 

Not saying we don't need upgrades in several areas, but who here thinks we're not at least at 11-2 had Luck not left and playing for a 1 seed right now, even with all the injuries.

Hmmmmmm.....intersting If I remember correctlyBsllard

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t think this is on ballard. Everything that could go wrong has gone wromg. It’s been a comedy of errors. 

 

We are close. We have been in every game this year with a chance to win in the 4th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

 

Because we'd be 13-0 likely if we had Luck. I'm not a Ballard worshiper, but this isn't on him. He's upgraded or made solid attempts to upgrade every unit after inheriting what was mostly a dumpster fire in terms of depth and talent.

 

Even the JB fan club knows this boils down to the change of QB.

 

Not saying we don't need upgrades in several areas, but who here thinks we're not at least at 11-2 had Luck not left and playing for a 1 seed right now, even with all the injuries.

I would say 11-2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think about it we are pretty deep. Considering pascal has turned into a 1 when he was like that 4th or 5th is pretty incredible. We do lack playmakers and that does hurt in the 4th quarter.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Ballard will ultimately be judged on what he does or doesn’t do this off-season.  Namely at the QB position.  Most give him a pass right now because there wasn’t much he could do two weeks before the season at that position beyond what he’s done.  This off-season he has to find “the guy” rather it’s Jacoby or someone else.  If he’s right he’s going to be praised.  If he’s wrong it will probably ultimately lead to him being fired.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy was building the team with the understanding that Luck was going to be his QB.

 

But Luck screwed the team over 2 weeks before the season opener, which has thrown the trajectory of this build off by a decent margin. 

 

He's had to (Along with the rest of us) sit back and see what he had with Brissett going forward. 

 

And knowing I'm just guessing here, I would say that Ballard going to see Love play recently tells me he's near the same ballpark in being as satisfied with Brissett's play as the rest of us are.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

I think Ballard will ultimately be judged on what he does or doesn’t do this off-season.  Namely at the QB position.

I doubt that.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll point to 5 things that anyone can argue has played a role in the struggles for the Colts this season.

 

1. Chris Ballard

2. Coaches

3. Current Players

4. Injuries

5. Andrew Luck retiring

 

The Pareto principle applies here. (for any event 80% of effect is from 20% of the cause)

 

Andrew Luck retiring represents 20% of the "cause" but it has impacted 80% of the season.

 

Yes, there are some thing that Ballard could have done better. Same for the coaches. Same for the current players. But Luck retiring changed the entire season for this team and I think most people understand that.

 

Personally, I consider Ballard one of the reasons to feel optimistic about the team going forward.

 

 

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I don’t think this is on ballard. Everything that could go wrong has gone wromg. It’s been a comedy of errors. 

 

We are close. We have been in every game this year with a chance to win in the 4th.

I would agree. Some years or some games just don’t bounce your way. This year between Luck retiring and the amount of injuries it is amazing we might finish 8-8. finally this just isn’t our year. We have left 33 points on the board with special teams and have lost 6 of our 7 games by a TD or less.  Just not our year. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard has way too many 4th string/borderline NFL players on the roster, like Mo Allie Cox. Too many prospects on Chris Ballard Scholarship. With all the resources available, Ballard should have brought in better players to fill out the roster. No reason Mo Allie Cox should have had his roster spot locked in. I don't want to only pick on Cox. He's one of several unproven players that had their roster spots locked up.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

How come with the Colts current record and down ward spiral does Ballard seem immune to criticism?  Or a thorough evaluation of his drafts and moves since being the Colts's GM?

Pretty simple really.   The franchise player quit. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

I doubt that.

I think so.  If he picks the wrong guy to be QB, rather it’s Jacoby or someone else the team is in all likely hood going to struggle and that will eventually get a GM fired.  Not next season mind you but ultimately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pacergeek said:

Ballard has way too many 4th string/borderline NFL players on the roster, like Mo Allie Cox. Too many prospects on Chris Ballard Scholarship. With all the resources available, Ballard should have brought in better players to fill out the roster. No reason Mo Allie Cox should have had his roster spot locked in. I don't want to only pick on Cox. He's one of several unproven players that had their roster spots locked up.

You can't evaluate Pacers players correctly,   . Stop trying to evaluate colts players

  • Like 4
  • Haha 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, deedub75 said:

No way we’re 13-0 with Luck. 

 

We're at least 11-2 and in it for a 1 seed. And honestly, what game would Luck have lost?

Honest question? We've played a very weak schedule vs a bunch of bad passing Ds. 

With our running game and gelled OL, Luck would have finally had a full year of a good supporting cast.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard is always preaching competition, yet the only FA WR he brought in was Devin Funchess. Devin was not going to push any of the young WR's to sweat making the roster. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jvan1973 said:

You can't evaluate Pacers players correctly,   . Stop trying to evaluate colts players

I'm not evaluating players, just stating facts. With all the money available, Ballard could have bought a better TE3 than Mo Allie Cox. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, MPStack said:

He’s done more positive for the Colts than negative. You typically don’t build off the previous season’s success after losing the QB. 
 

He’s whiffed on a couple 2nd rounders (all GM’ do) and the JB extension just wasn’t necessary IMO. 
 

Other than that, the future looks good for the Colts.

He did nothing wrong with giving Jacoby that contract. It in no way hurt this team. You can’t have the backup making more money. It also took the stress off of him worrying about his next contract.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pacergeek said:

Ballard is always preaching competition, yet the only FA WR he brought in was Devin Funchess. Devin was not going to push any of the young WR's to sweat making the roster. 

He got hurt and cain still got cut.  You are wrong again

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, CanuckColt said:

Maybe not 11-2, but we would be leading the division with a healthy Andrew.

Honestly what would be your losses?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pacergeek said:

I'm not evaluating players, just stating facts. With all the money available, Ballard could have bought a better TE3 than Mo Allie Cox. 

Like who?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I would say 11-2.

same question. what would your losses be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I give Chris Ballard a pass this year. When QB-1 was as good as Luck was. It not only helps your scoring average, It also impacts  your Defense as well. When QB-1 struggles as JB has this year. It will have a negative impact on your Defense. As we see today.

 I have a feeling that Chris has something up this off season. After today I’m looking forward to next year 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chloe6124 said:

He did nothing wrong with giving Jacoby that contract. It in no way hurt this team. You can’t have the backup making more money. It also took the stress off of him worrying about his next contract.


Just my opinion, please don’t get bent out of shape about it. 
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, deedub75 said:


No way we’re 13-0 with Luck. 

What games do we lose if Andrew didn't retire?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, BleedBlue4Shoe86 said:

I would agree. Some years or some games just don’t bounce your way. This year between Luck retiring and the amount of injuries it is amazing we might finish 8-8. finally this just isn’t our year. We have left 33 points on the board with special teams and have lost 6 of our 7 games by a TD or less.  Just not our year. 

Yep. Even with luck gone we have still had 4th quarter leads. Just tighten up a few things and we will be just fine no matter who is the QB next season. We aren’t that far off talent wise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

same question. what would your losses be?

I think at worse with a healthy JB we would be 7-6 because he would've beat Miami had he played. With Luck I say 11-2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jvan1973 said:

What games do we lose if Andrew didn't retire?

The fact we have been in every game with Jacoby and have had 4th quarter leads I can easily see us being undefeated with Luck. Just one more score a game is all we needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jvan1973 said:

What games do we lose if Andrew didn't retire?

It’s really too hard to tell.  The Colts have played so many one score games this year all it takes is one little thing to be different to change the outcome.  For example Luck was normally good for one “what were you doing” INT every two or three games.  Yes he’d make more big plays than Jacoby but it’s also possible maybe he makes a few more costly mistakes than Jacoby does.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This will be Ballard’s most important off season he has had in Indy. This could possibly define his career.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Pacergeek said:

Jared Cook. 

Cox isn't in cook's level.    They weren't paying ebron, doyle and cook.   Use your brain

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

What games do we lose if Andrew didn't retire?

Probably opening day because he usually did haha and every once in a while you lose one you shouldn't like at Pitt. 11-2 at worse though. We would have the division wrapped up if Luck was here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, MPStack said:

He’s done more positive for the Colts than negative. You typically don’t build off the previous season’s success after losing the QB. 
 

He’s whiffed on a couple 2nd rounders (all GM’ do) and the JB extension just wasn’t necessary IMO. 
 

Other than that, the future looks good for the Colts.

This is my beef with Ballard. He's created a narrative, amongst Colts fans, that he is an expert at the draft. Narrative that we can trust him to nail the draft every year. This isn't true. Draft picks are 50/50, and Ballard has not shown us he is capable of exceeding this percentage. For every Darius Leonard, there will be Quincy Wilson. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I think at worse with a healthy JB we would be 7-6 because he would've beat Miami had he played. With Luck I say 11-2.

who are your losses with Luck?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Cox isn't in cook's level.    They weren't paying ebron, doyle and cook.   Use your brain

Trolls don’t use brains they just want to spark a reaction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have LeBron 4th that is out of the players I have seen by my eye test and based on stats and championships as well. I have only been watching since 1977 so guys like Wilt and Russell do not factor in. My top 5 is: 1. Michael Jordan 2. Magic Johnson 3. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 4. LeBron is here IMO 5. Kobe Bryant 6. Larry Bird 7. Shaq O'Neal -Magic has to be #2 because not only was he more efficient than LeBron, his teams even more Championships 5-3. Magic was more clutch than LeBron, shot a better FG%, FT%, and is the all-time leader in Assist average with 11.2 per season. Magic also won Finals MVP as a rookie at 20 years old. He basically scored 20 points a night over his career too. Kareem won 6 Championships and 6 League MVP's, and is all-time leading scorer in NBA history, reason why I put Magic over him is because IMO Magic was the better player on most of the Lakers teams. LeBron deserves 4th because IMO he has been the best player of this generation like Kareem was in the 70's. Magic was in the 80's, and Jordan was in the 90's. Statistically LeBron may pass Kareem in scoring and LeBron has 4 League MVP's and 3 Championships. It is just different today though, players want to form super teams, LeBron didn't win a Championship until he joined Wade and Bosh in Miami. He even made a comment he would love to play with Jordan. He should've said he would want to beat Jordan. Any team LeBron is on will improve their win total by 12-15 games so he is great. When it comes to LeBron, Kobe, Bird, and Shaq it is a coin flip basically and all debatable. I could give a damn what ESPN says saying LeBron is #2, he isn't, Magic is and I could bring a ton of debate regarding that as posted above.
    • Watching his one starting year at OSU, I would have been convinced that he would be a generational type safety in the NFL. Then the CFP semi happened. More to the point, an at the time still very underrated offensive game planning Clemson and its savvy quarterback Deshaun Watson happened, and Malik's inexperience and still undeveloped game had a big, shining light cast on them. I was much more concerned after that showing. What OSU and mostly lesser competition had been able to very successfully "hide" of his inexperience during the season, Clemson and Watson picked apart to an alarmingly embarrassing degree. What may have been even more alarming were the huge numbers during that offseason leading up to the draft who seemed to ignore it, and treat it almost as if it didn't even happen. Having seen these strange human behaviors, even among football professionals, for almost 5 decades now, I probably shouldn't be surprised anymore, but it still amazes me how so many can talk themselves into believing whatever they wish were true, instead of accepting what really is.   And in this case, what really was true was that Malik wasn't ready for an existence of every week facing sophisticated offenses that made even that advanced Clemson attack look like a plain vanilla cone. He should have returned for one more year of seasoning and development at OSU. Yes, even despite the eye popping athletic ability that allows him to at times make plays everyone else only dreams of.   That said, he should still have been able to develop into a top safety with 3 years of work on an NFL team, too. Even though he wasn't ready in 2017, he certainly should have been by now. But he'll get at least one more year here to do so. We can all speculate on the chances of someone doing in one year what he hasn't in so many more before, but regardless of that, he does have that opportunity. Let's see what happens.
    • For what it's worth, I read the tweets and I don't get the vibe they were trashing her. She did take it that way though, which makes me feel bad for her. She said it came in the mail and they were stating it looked fake, as in that there might be a concern that she unknowingly purchased a fake. Though someone did insult her flooring lol. Regardless, cool on Pittman for his intention here!
    • Yeah, one article isn't going to convince me Hooker doesn't need to improve or we need to move on. PFF, the same people who made this, gave him a grade of 69.5 ... I'd say there's still room for improvement or an upgrade if needed. Don't get the wrong idea, I'd always wish for a player to improve before sending him away, just stating that this doesn't change the fact that he has issues.
    • I chose Pittman for the first one because it says "career". For now I think Taylor may end up being the better player, but he is a RB and he may not be able to have a better career than his WR teammate.    For the second I chose Julian Backmon. 10 TDs is a LOT to expect out of a rookie WR IMO even if his size makes him a red zone threat. 1000k yards as a rookie is not unheard of for rookie RBs, but he'll be splitting with Mack so I feel iffy on that one. Eason is probably the 3rd stringer so barring injuries, it's not likely he starts. So that leaves Blackmon taking the Hooker role. It wouldn't be immediate, but I wouldn't find it too far fetched. Blackmon already looks more polished to me than Hooker did coming out, he just may not have that "ball hawk" label Hooker had and hasn't perhaps lived up to.  But he could be a big help in the run game and as long as he's good in coverage too, he could take the job by year's end.    This was a good question though. I think all of those scenarios are unlikely so it was fun to speculate which was most likely.
  • Members

    • aaron11

      aaron11 2,704

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 12,371

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 3,162

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • midmoColtsfan

      midmoColtsfan 4

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 2,227

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts52761

      colts52761 109

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Melancholie

      Melancholie 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 5,101

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • egg

      egg 957

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNextGM

      TheNextGM 190

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...