Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
TimetobringDfence!

Fullback?

Recommended Posts

With us not having a sure thing at QB and condidering the talent of our O-line, could a fullback be an answer? I would love to us use TEs as a fullback or draft a Fullback with some hands. We have proven to be a physical power blocking offense this season. Why not go all in on being a full force run team would definately help any developing QB. Vikings and 49ers have it, we could too.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, TimetobringDfence! said:

With us not having a sure thing at QB and condidering the talent of our O-line, could a fullback be an answer? I would love to us use TEs as a fullback or draft a Fullback with some hands. We have proven to be a physical power blocking offense this season. Why not go all in on being a full force run team would definately help any developing QB. Vikings and 49ers have it, we could 

Using a FB and TE in the backfield would give us the ability to run and pass from on formation and be a headache for Defenses. Riech has a lot of success with TE heavy offenses and I believe he could utilize a FB/TE run pass offense very efficiently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's another limitation with JB.  He has little touch and doesn't throw flairs, and screens very well.   

 

Fullbacks are hard to account for in the passing game, but would be obselete with JB at QB.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Build the Colts offense around a fullback? I wonder if F. Reich has thought about this. Maybe run the Wishbone, to limit Brissett’s read down field to one in passing situations. 
 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MPStack said:

Build the Colts offense around a fullback? I wonder if F. Reich has thought about this. Maybe run the Wishbone, to limit Brissett’s read down field to one in passing situations. 
 

Teams would have to stack the box to respect the run, which should help our recievers get open a lot easier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, TimetobringDfence! said:

Teams would have to stack the box to respect the run, which should help our recievers get open a lot easier.

Teams already stack the box to respect the run.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, TimetobringDfence! said:

With us not having a sure thing at QB and condidering the talent of our O-line, could a fullback be an answer? I would love to us use TEs as a fullback or draft a Fullback with some hands. We have proven to be a physical power blocking offense this season. Why not go all in on being a full force run team would definately help any developing QB. Vikings and 49ers have it, we could too.

I certainly think it’s a legit question. Didn’t we recently sign a TE that was like 260+? If he is a blocker (I’d assume he is) could be a possibility with a small % of pass catch potential to just keep a defense at least honest enough to have to look at him if he goes out of the backfield now and then. Oh how I wished we still had Hentges. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Nickster said:

It's another limitation with JB.  He has little touch and doesn't throw flairs, and screens very well.   

 

Fullbacks are hard to account for in the passing game, but would be obselete with JB at QB.  

It seems all our pass catchers are limited with JB throwing the ball. :wall:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love an offense with a FB in it. The 49'ers run it right now, as do some other teams.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Is there a John Riggins or Earl Campbell coming out?

Draft A.J. Dillion problem solved. Three headed monster of Dillion, Mack and Hines in 2020. This will limit JB to maybe 5 passes a game. Colt Express!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also these power run teams with fullbacks hog the clock. It gives the team a physical identity and the defenses of those teams love it. Look at MIN and SF. We have a young D on the rise. Control the clock and allow the D more rest. And the D will to try to match and compete with the offense to prove which side of the ball is more physical. Win win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TimetobringDfence! said:

Lol we have running backs. Now if you said Mike Alstott I would be on page with you. 


Unfortunately, FB is not utilized by a lot of teams anymore. Rarely do you see two RB in the back field at same time. The NFL has mostly evolved away from it and is a pass first league now.
 

I miss the smash mouth football days, and there’s nothing more demoralizing to a defense that can’t stop the run. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MPStack said:


Unfortunately, FB is not utilized by a lot of teams anymore. Rarely do you see two RB in the back field at same time. The NFL has mostly evolved away from it and is a pass first league now.
 

I miss the smash mouth football days, and there’s nothing more demoralizing to a defense that can’t stop the run. 

Its seems to be resurging a little more, but it has died. I feel like we have the coach, oline, and defense to do it. Wouldnt hurt considering our reciever and qb situation.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Jdubu said:

It seems all our pass catchers are limited with JB throwing the ball. :wall:

We have to have some first, all of ours are either on IR or banged up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Geez, now we can limit Brissett's passing even further, take time off the clock and lose a bunch of low-scoring games instead of high-scoring ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, csmopar said:

We have to have some first, all of ours are either on IR or banged up

But they all haven’t been all season. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I often wondered that too.  I think its a 53 man roster thing, and GMs prefer to have multiple TEs who can do more in the passing game down field than to have a fullback, IMO.

 

There is no reason why teams can't use a FB and a lead blocker, but also as a pass catcher in a short range.

 

Our RB coach, Tom Rathman, was great at both.  Had some running ability, but blocking and catching was his forte.  He was a big part of the 49ers West Coast offense, which wasn't a running/power offense.

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, CanuckColt said:

Geez, now we can limit Brissett's passing even further, take time off the clock and lose a bunch of low-scoring games instead of high-scoring ones.

What do you mean high scoring lol we average maybe two tds a game as is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think Fromm is the type of Qb that BB would draft.  Maybe Peyton too. If Fromm passes the throwing tests (and I think he probably will), they'll take him in the first round at pick 23 and 24 respectively, IMO, if they desire a rookie QB.  I'd think BUFs pick 22 is the place to get him.   And I'm not sure that Love did a lot to resolve any decision making questions.  We know he can throw.  I know we all want the next Mahomes, but I can see BB or Peyton having Fromm ranked higher than Love in the end. Never know, Love might be available at pick 25, then we compete with the other teams who didn't get a QB in early round 1 to move up to take Love in late round 1.   I think Eason is the guy who is going to have too many unresolved questions, or definitive weaknesses that take time to develop, both throwing and mental.  I see him as being the only QB other than Gordon available at 34, and Gordon probably not below 44. 
    • I doubt anyone will need to beg. He's only 31. Even if he played another 4 years, he'd be 35. That's still very young. He commented that he's never felt healthier, so doubt injury or QoL is a big part of the thought process. If he's no longer passionate and doesn't need the money, great... I just think he will look at the situation, weigh things, and come back.
    • I have ALWAYS thought that accuracy, instinct, and pocket awareness were the best traits I look for in a QB.  Remember, although his arm wasn't exactly "weak", Peyton's arm strength probably wasn't in the upper echelon on the NFL.  But Peyton was SO much smarter, he could anticipate,  he could throw WR's open, and he was pretty accurate.  And once he settled in, he stopped turning the ball over so much.  I would take a QB like that over a guy who can just throw it through a wall but doesn't do those other things as well.   If we can find a guy like that whether that be in the draft or in FA, I'm all for it, no matter what his name is.
    • I get your logic and of course no one really knows what any prospect will actually do in the NFL   But.... on the surface   on paper Love has a much higher ceiling than JB Eason has a much higher ceiling than JB Gordon has a much higher ceiling than JB Even Fromm has a higher ceiling than JB   I believe Herbert, Burrows, and Tua, would outplay JB, play one, day one in NFL   Thats why I am more open to a trade that brings one of these 3 to Indy   Love will need to sit for at least a year as would the others outside of the top 3   Thats why if we use the better than JB argument than there are options available in this draft  
    • Having reached the point in my life where wanting more time is more of a goal than wanting more money, I can see why AC is thinking about this. His time/money line is drawn at a lot younger age than me, surely because of different circumstances.    Ballard's interview said that he would never ask or beg a player to come back.  That he needs to be all in.  But I would think that a one-year franchise tag would give AC time to soak in how much he loves the game or wants to move on.  I would trust his character to be the type that would give it his all for one year, even if he decides half way though he's done.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...