Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
TimetobringDfence!

Why was Williams benched?

Recommended Posts

Because he's not as good catching in the back field like wilkins or hines does plus he's not as shifty either he's good for a 3rd and short situation

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reich said today it was nothing that he did. He though Hines and Wilkins were getting better production.  Hines has actually been running the ball pretty well the last couple of games. Wilkins seemed like he was just quicker then Williams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Stephen said:

Because  they wanted to sabotage  my fantasy  team

 

Desperate times if you're starting Williams...

  • Haha 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, VaAllDay757 said:

Because he's not as good catching in the back field like wilkins or hines does plus he's not as shifty either he's good for a 3rd and short situation

Previous two games he was good at all of the above so that is wrong just 8 carries isn't enough for him took 13 against Jags to get 116 yards and took 26 carries 4 days later to get 104.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, jameszeigler834 said:

Previous two games he was good at all of the above so that is wrong just 8 carries isn't enough for him took 13 against Jags to get 116 yards and took 26 carries 4 days later to get 104.

The only reason why he had alot of yards those games because the o-line made huge holes for him to run thru he can't squeeze by a pile up like wilkins can and he's not shifty like mack is he's just a power runner that's it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to see Wilkins given a real starting work load to see what he does given the circumstances. I don't know if he'd be better than Mack, but I'll bet it'd be close.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

giphy.gif?cid=19f5b51a4c3f15bbae45248d2c

 

Anyone who has followed this team this season should know that we play running back roulette no matter who is hot. They’ll pull Mack out in the middle of getting hot and put someone else in. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

Reich said today it was nothing that he did. He though Hines and Wilkins were getting better production.  Hines has actually been running the ball pretty well the last couple of games. Wilkins seemed like he was just quicker then Williams.

I can’t believe a word coming from this team. Wilson was just held out for game planning and the type of team we were playing and Cain, and on and on. It’s all coach speak. I just tune anything they say out and just watch the games. It is certainly a turn off as a fan to be lied to about every aspect of the game in interviews. I’d rather them just say no comment or we got 53 guys who play the game etc... 

1 hour ago, Superman said:

 

Desperate times if you're starting Williams...

That’s what I was thinking. How many were already crowning him as a coveted FA starter somewhere with a big new contract. Many players see a couple really good games and then never see the field again. One hit wonders. Although I do like what Williams showed on the field those two games. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, John Waylon said:

giphy.gif?cid=19f5b51a4c3f15bbae45248d2c

 

Anyone who has followed this team this season should know that we play running back roulette no matter who is hot. They’ll pull Mack out in the middle of getting hot and put someone else in. 

Black magic 8 ball. Should I keep him in? Answer: all signs points to no. Mack, get out, 8 ball says you’re done.  Lol

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Jdubu said:

I can’t believe a word coming from this team. Wilson was just held out for game planning and the type of team we were playing and Cain, and on and on. It’s all coach speak. I just tune anything they say out and just watch the games. It is certainly a turn off as a fan to be lied to about every aspect of the game in interviews. I’d rather them just say no comment or we got 53 guys who play the game etc... 

That’s what I was thinking. How many were already crowning him as a coveted FA starter somewhere with a big new contract. Many players see a couple really good games and then never see the field again. One hit wonders. Although I do like what Williams showed on the field those two games. 

Yeah,  what do the coaches know.   They only watch them everyday in practice.   What do folks that do this for a living know.   

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Superman said:

 

Desperate times if you're starting Williams...

Yea well had mack, cook and conner, but mack and Conner got hurt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way this team runs the ball (very well) I don't care who they use.  Unless you are playing fantasy football that is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jdubu said:

Black magic 8 ball. Should I keep him in? Answer: all signs points to no. Mack, get out, 8 ball says you’re done.  Lol

LOL!! Not many will get this, I'll bet. Haven't seen one of those in many years! :) 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Superman said:

 

Desperate times if you're starting Williams...

Mack Howard and Bredia were hurt :(. What’s worse is I started Williams over Guice

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I heard he is on his 5th NFL team.  He runs hard, but has limitations.  Probably is a quality guy for a RB squad like we have though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Hammer said:

LOL!! Not many will get this, I'll bet. Haven't seen one of those in many years! :) 

I forget, the youth movement is real lmao

 

im now one of the old farts who had wooden toys as a kid lol 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://amp.indystar.com/amp/4346612002
I’ll put this here for discussion. This seems to be more of the same double speak coaching talk crap

we are getting. Either these guys have some weird plan they aren’t sharing or they are flying by the seat of their pants. If the article says they made an in game adjustment on pecking order of RB, and one assumes it’s based from in game production, then why too could this not apply to the QB situation and usage? Each week, my expectations for how solid this coaching staff is lowers. It’s not at Pagano level but he Pagano has more time to become disheartened. If Reich keeps trying to ramrod JB down the fans throats as “the guy” when he clearly isn’t a franchise type QB, he is going to reach Pagano level soon by being stubborn in this one area while adopting changes in other areas based on performance on the field (Williams/Cain) or in practice (Wilson/Lewis). If you are going to adapt in game changes with performance matchups, that should apply to a QB that’s not Manning or Luck caliber having 1 off game.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could go Brown at 13 , then Kinlaw at 34 (not sold on either QB)
    • Love a better QB funny
    • Ballard is a Polian clone and never going to spend the money on players we actually need.
    • Now this is a thread I will love to keep tabs on! I'm already opting out of the idea of taking a WR at 13 even if Lamb or Juedy is there. There looks like a TON of talent to be nabbed between our 34th pick until our 4th rounder. As of now I really like KJ Hill, Peoples-Jones, Pittman, and Gandy-Golden. All will probably be available by our 44th pick, some may last much longer.   And those are names were just my favorite. Aiyuk and Tyler Johnson look pretty good too. Lots of value this year at WR. 
    • I just clarify it's not just him, it's also where he's drafted. And as I said, what to do at pick 34 is a mystery to me so maybe someone like him is the right choice, afterall. I would concede that this early I don't have much to go off of. The bits I had seen of him I was concerned about some body catches and thought he didn't look explosive. His balance looked insane though iirc, definitely can slide out of a tackle. I also try to give players projected in the top 3 round a good look at some point especially if they are in a position of need, so I'm sure I'll watch some play by play stuff on him and may feel different. I think he's great, don't get me wrong, but I like someone like KJ Hill or Donovan Peoples-Jones just as much and they are going in the late second not late 1st/early second. Just my 2 cents.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...