Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Jonathan Williams


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Imgrandojji said:

Wilkins isn't bad, but we've been looking for him to emerge as a change of pace back to allow Reich to have the confidence not to put all the rushing burden on Mack, and that kind of just never quite happened.  Williams came in in 1 game and suddenly was that guy. 

 

it says something when Reich would rather give rushing carries to a depth RB and even to Chester Rogers than to Wilkins.  I dunno what but there's something going on there.

 

You realize Wilkins was hurt yesterday?

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Mr.Debonair said:

He hits the hold fast and breaks tackles. Rarely went down on first contact. I like the downhill style. Hopefully he can stay healthy 

His biggest criticism in the predraft process was his decisiveness and tendency to bounce runs outside when he didn't need to.  He seemed to have improved in that area substantially, though I don't have access to the All 22 to verify.  I always liked him as a potential 3 down guy as he's a natural receiver.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, krunk said:

As far as I know Wilkins was hurt, but I think they've been waiting on the chance to break J Will in though. 

Yep.   Wilkins was not active for the game yesterday.   

 

Personally I prefer Wilkins, but both have good numbers in a small sample size.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reich mentioned in his presser today that Williams is a very good route runner and pass catcher. Wonder if we might see him more as a pass catcher than what we normally do with Mack. He had a couple Sunday where he looked really good. He gives you a little bit of something we don’t have with Mack.

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, chad72 said:

I find Jonathan Williams' vision better than that of Jordan Wilkins.

 

For a 2nd string between-the-tackles back, I feel Jonathan Williams is the guy we need to ride. Great job by the coaches but I found his performance more exciting than the "meh" stuff we typically get with Jordan Wilkins. Granted it is just one game but I found his vision good in pre-season too before he got banged up. He showed me something today.

 

Thoughts???

I agree. I've been waiting for him to get healthy to see what he could do.

He looked just as good yesterday as he did in Preseason

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the play where JB either ran it in or hit Johnson, he had Williams open on the flare/swing route for the TD.  Don't think JB trusted him yet.  Be interesting to see if we go back to him in similar situations.  I know he took that screen and got busy.  1 cut and explode into the 2nd level.  Dude was quite impressive.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/18/2019 at 11:46 AM, Imgrandojji said:

Wilkins isn't bad, but we've been looking for him to emerge as a change of pace back to allow Reich to have the confidence not to put all the rushing burden on Mack, and that kind of just never quite happened.  Williams came in in 1 game and suddenly was that guy. 

 

it says something when Reich would rather give rushing carries to a depth RB and even to Chester Rogers than to Wilkins.  I dunno what but there's something going on there.

 

I don't know that Williams was ever really a change of pace back.  I don't think he had that many carries prior to Mack getting hurt.  He put up good numbers after Mack got hurt but Mack was putting up good numbers before that.  

 

Could Williams be good?  Yes of course.  The problem is that it's hard to separate his performance from that of the OL which pushed around the Jags for 4 quarters.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Loved his physical style.

I am trying to temper my excitement because he really hasn't done anything in the league besides yesterday.   I cant believe he can replace Mack, but i like what i see.

  I also would like to see Wilkens get some more carries. And Hines makes plays.

  None of these guys can do what Mack can, but i do like our depth.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s all up to the oline. If they come close to doing what they did against the jags him and Wilkins will run very well. With two safeties out I don’t know how they will even stack the box.  Oline just needs to take it to the Texans dline. I think they can with the injuries the Texans have.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/18/2019 at 11:46 AM, Imgrandojji said:

Wilkins isn't bad, but we've been looking for him to emerge as a change of pace back to allow Reich to have the confidence not to put all the rushing burden on Mack, and that kind of just never quite happened.  Williams came in in 1 game and suddenly was that guy. 

 

it says something when Reich would rather give rushing carries to a depth RB and even to Chester Rogers than to Wilkins.  I dunno what but there's something going on there.


sweet baby Jesus...

 

you do realize that Wilkins was inactive on Sunday right?  You asked what was going on there - that is it. And somehow tying Rogers’ reverse into a supposed unhappiness with Wilkins.  Clueless. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looked at his college high light reel. Wore #32 and the way he keeps his feet moving in a short, choppy way reminded me of Edge. Doesn't look to have great top end speed but looks sneaky fast from handoff to first 10-15 yards and runs with mean intentions. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/17/2019 at 7:29 PM, BProland85 said:

With the very talented RB class in the 2020 draft, I still would like Ballard to add one more guy to that backfield. Mack is a good RB, but he can't seem to stay fully healthy, and I still question whether he is our workhorse RB. 

 

Who knows what the Colts will do

 

But.... in my completely uneducated opinion.......  I think the Colts like what they have at RB

 

You have multiple role type players 

 

You have the everydown back - Mack

 

You have the jitterbug, speed back - Hines

 

You MAY have the power back that we have been needing - Williams

 - 

AND.......  You have a decent Mack, backup - Wilkins

 

IMHO, this covers the bases with quality talent, and gives excellent flexibility to the offense 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

Who knows what the Colts will do

 

But.... in my completely uneducated opinion.......  I think the Colts like what they have at RB

 

You have multiple role type players 

 

You have the everydown back - Mack

 

You have the jitterbug, speed back - Hines

 

You MAY have the power back that we have been needing - Williams

 - 

AND.......  You have a decent Mack, backup - Wilkins

 

IMHO, this covers the bases with quality talent, and gives excellent flexibility to the offense 

I think the Colts would be wasting a pick if they go RB next draft.   No way they will do it with an early pick.   Expecting better than Mack, Hines, Wilkins or Williams in the later rounds is iffy.   While I don't think we have a top 5 RB in the league, I do think we have 4 that could do well for most teams in their own way.  

I guess I don't see our RB crew as a weakness right now.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, chad72 said:

Jonathan Williams is definitely the flavor of this week but I do realize it’s a week to week league. If Wilkins gets carries and is productive vs Texans, it’s a full blown timeshare and @John Waylon will be here to tell us about it. :) 


Haha nope. Someone else claimed him. And I’m glad. I don’t have to worry about whatever they do with him and Wilkins tomorrow. haha

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Myles said:

I think the Colts would be wasting a pick if they go RB next draft.   No way they will do it with an early pick.   Expecting better than Mack, Hines, Wilkins or Williams in the later rounds is iffy.   While I don't think we have a top 5 RB in the league, I do think we have 4 that could do well for most teams in their own way.  

I guess I don't see our RB crew as a weakness right now.  

Agreed

 

I think TE may be a spot we go with one of our first 2 picks

 

I also think we have ZERO Tackle depth....  HAS to be addressed.... If AC gets knicked (he will)

we are toast

 

Another DL would also be appreciated 

 

TE / OT / DL .... Best Available

 

Then get a DB or two

 

If the OT is early, move RT in to RG.........

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If the OT class sucked i would be ok with this but it doesn't    Hope we get LT in draft
    • I'm not gonna make excuses for Wentz, but everyone leads in different ways. Peyton was demanding, while Andrew was more nonchalant and dad like. 
    • About 1 hour 21 min into this 2 former teammates of Carson talk about him (FYI, there are a few curse words throughout the podcast):  https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/malcolm-jenkins-on-activism-saints-eagles-trash-talking/id1485277290?i=1000510312176   They say he's not a locker room cancer.  He's a nice guy.  He didn't have to be a leader early in Philly - Jenkins says "his rookie year, we just asked him to be a rookie QB rather than be a leader..." essentially they had enough vet leaders.  Chris Long says he never  thought of Wentz as a jerk, but his rookie year and his MVP level year, he never thought about Carson being a leader, just thought "this QB is very good" and essentially that the team of veteran guys and looking back the only thing he could think is Wentz could reach out to guys across the whole team, rather than just producing well on field... says Nick Foles not a great QB, but Foles had a magnetism about him that made him appear like the leader of that SB team when Carson went down.  
    • By the way, it would be better if a poster — any poster — would simply say that (name a person) of ESPN says....   etc. etc. etc.    Because ESPN literally has dozens of people who comment on the NFL.   The Network as a whole does not make any such predictions.   People who work for the network make these predictions.   Big difference. 
    • Antonio Villanueva.  OT   2/25m.   Maybe 3/40m.  
  • Members

    • Four2itus

      Four2itus 4,895

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JoeThornburg

      JoeThornburg 27

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsBlueFL

      ColtsBlueFL 4,384

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Thunderbolt

      Thunderbolt 451

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 289

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 6,368

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Larry Horseman

      Larry Horseman 18

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,009

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 47

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WarGhost21

      WarGhost21 938

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...