Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Jonathan Williams


chad72

Recommended Posts

I find Jonathan Williams' vision better than that of Jordan Wilkins.

 

For a 2nd string between-the-tackles back, I feel Jonathan Williams is the guy we need to ride. Great job by the coaches but I found his performance more exciting than the "meh" stuff we typically get with Jordan Wilkins. Granted it is just one game but I found his vision good in pre-season too before he got banged up. He showed me something today.

 

Thoughts???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jordan Wilkins seems to be an outstanding back. So I won't try to point at any differences between him and Jonathan Williams.  

But I do agree, Williams seemed to have excellent vision, and runs more "north and south" than Mack and Hines do.

I also will say, I liked the power Williams showed, when he constantly kept his legs moving, and would carry the whole pile for extra yards.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

With the very talented RB class in the 2020 draft, I still would like Ballard to add one more guy to that backfield. Mack is a good RB, but he can't seem to stay fully healthy, and I still question whether he is our workhorse RB. 

 

With a stable of Mack, Williams, Wilkins and Hines in whatever order, we're actually really good for RB.  if Williams can settle in as that #1b back  we are actually in really good shape

Link to post
Share on other sites

He looked great but this was what the fourth time the Jags have given up over 200 yards on the ground this season and the line was highly motived today.  I am not taking anything from Williams because he got his chance and took advantage of it.  He might very well be the starter Thursday so I hope this wasn’t just a one hit wonder against a really bad run defense.  Still we should be thrilled with the whole running game performance today.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Imgrandojji said:

I hope I'm not the only one that finds having Jordan Wilkins and Jonathan Williams who both basically have the same job a little confusing.

Well right now, they may be all we have if Mack is out

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jordan Wilkins is averaging 6.1 yards per attempt.

 

Lamar Jackson is leading the league at 6.6 yards per attempt.

 

Wilkins is an absolute stud.  I don't understand why you are underwhelmed with his performance, but I agree that Williams looked good today. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, krunk said:

I been speaking on J Will since the first day we signed him and even before that. I wanted him when Pagano was here.

 

I was kind of hoping the Colts would draft him when he came out of Arkansas myself.

Now let's hope he stays healthy, looks like they are going to need to lean on him for a few games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Williams ran excellent today. The ends of a couple of his runs were a little weird though....like, keep running dude don't just fall down lol. 

 

I think Williams is light years better than Hines in between the tackles. I loved seeing him and Hines out there at the same time and using Hines as more of a WR in motion. They need to do more of that and get Hines in space where he excels. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Myles said:

He did great.

But:

It was against a Jags poor rush defense.  

It was second half with the defense tired.  

 

That said, he has earned some carries each game.  

 

This, he earned himself some future carries but let's not get too carried away.  The OL was plowing over the Jags all game.  Easy to look good when you are 5+ yards down the field before you get touched.  

 

But he will see some action anyways.  Mack's hand is broke, he's not going to be playing on Thursday.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, zibby43 said:

Jordan Wilkins is averaging 6.1 yards per attempt.

 

Lamar Jackson is leading the league at 6.6 yards per attempt.

 

Wilkins is an absolute stud.  I don't understand why you are underwhelmed with his performance, but I agree that Williams looked good today. 

I like what we always get out of Wilkins but calling him a stud is pretty far from correct at this point. I’m not sure why Wilkins never gets more carries than he has, he produces when in for the most part. It’s accurate that he has a pretty high avg for his carries and I’d like to see a few games with 10-15 touches before I go calling him a stud as opposed to he is a producer when given the chance. Elliott is a stud, Mack has been considered a stud and that Eckard out in chargers land has been a stud because they’ve all carried the team for more than a few carries a game. Let’s not use the term too loosely or it loses its meaning. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, LockeDown said:

Reich said that long run by Williams was designed for Hines and Williams had never run that play before. Wow.

Did they say why Williams got the carry of it was designed for Hines and Williams had never ran it before? Was it a game flow thing or misses player switch? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Restored said:

The problem with Wilkins is that he has had turnover problems. Not so much this year but it for sure was an issue last year.

If he hasn’t had anything this year, and we say Williams has “earned” carries, then the same would be true of Wilkins I would think. We have played enough games to say ok, here is the added carries, go do something with them now. Hopefully we have a healthy Wilkins, Williams and Hines Thursday and the oline pops holes Oppenheimer equally as big in the Texans defense. If so, all 3 should play well and our run game should produce tons of first downs and lesson the need to run patterns downfield so often. Save the tape views of our patterns for the playoffs :applause:

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Jdubu said:

Did they say why Williams got the carry of it was designed for Hines and Williams had never ran it before? Was it a game flow thing or misses player switch? 

He dialed the play up but for some reason he saw that Williams was on the field..I don’t know why the mixup...so he said Williams has never run the play before. Always been Hines in practice. So he thought it was funny that he breaks a long one on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, zibby43 said:

Jordan Wilkins is averaging 6.1 yards per attempt.

 

Lamar Jackson is leading the league at 6.6 yards per attempt.

 

Wilkins is an absolute stud.  I don't understand why you are underwhelmed with his performance, but I agree that Williams looked good today. 

I agree.  Wilkins ran for 5.6 YPC last year and 6.1 YPC this season.  Granted it is only 87 carries, but it at least shows great promise.

Williams looked great yesterday and I think if Wilkins is back, those 2 can power through behind our line.  

 

image.png.a37472b446cb258e775f8dd676a4ef7d.png

 

image.png.438fb907cfe7e68256d8d52c6cfdc067.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, zibby43 said:

Jordan Wilkins is averaging 6.1 yards per attempt.

 

Lamar Jackson is leading the league at 6.6 yards per attempt.

 

Wilkins is an absolute stud.  I don't understand why you are underwhelmed with his performance, but I agree that Williams looked good today. 

That guy is far from a stud take out the 55 yard run against the titans and he is below average.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jameszeigler834 said:

Im serious I never seen him break more than 1 or two tackles since he has been here Williams is the better back plain and simple.

Not really.   Running like he does without needing to break many tackles tells me he has superior vision to find the holes.  

 

4 minutes ago, jameszeigler834 said:

That guy is far from a stud take out the 55 yard run against the titans and he is below average.

You can't hold that against him.   He'd still be over 4 yards a carry without that run.   Williams day would be only 68 yards if you removed his 48 yard run.   But that is not fair to him either.  

Neither has much to go on in their careers.  

Williams - 45/211 4.7 YPC

Wilkins - 87/501 5.8 YPC

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, lollygagger8 said:

Williams ran excellent today. The ends of a couple of his runs were a little weird though....like, keep running dude don't just fall down lol. 

No argument here, just to clarify only.....he dropped at the end of those runs to stay in bounds and keep the clock running.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, zibby43 said:

Jordan Wilkins is averaging 6.1 yards per attempt.

 

Lamar Jackson is leading the league at 6.6 yards per attempt.

 

Wilkins is an absolute stud.  I don't understand why you are underwhelmed with his performance, but I agree that Williams looked good today. 

Wilkins isn't bad, but we've been looking for him to emerge as a change of pace back to allow Reich to have the confidence not to put all the rushing burden on Mack, and that kind of just never quite happened.  Williams came in in 1 game and suddenly was that guy. 

 

it says something when Reich would rather give rushing carries to a depth RB and even to Chester Rogers than to Wilkins.  I dunno what but there's something going on there.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Imgrandojji said:

Wilkins isn't bad, but we've been looking for him to emerge as a change of pace back to allow Reich to have the confidence not to put all the rushing burden on Mack, and that kind of just never quite happened.  Williams came in in 1 game and suddenly was that guy. 

 

it says something when Reich would rather give rushing carries to a depth RB and even to Chester Rogers than to Wilkins.  I dunno what but there's something going on there.

As far as I know Wilkins was hurt, but I think they've been waiting on the chance to break J Will in though. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doug....    I don't know how old you are,  but I know you're old enough to know the following is true.   Everything in life is understood looking backward.   That's why hindsight is seen as 20/20.   We understand our mistakes in life looking back and having context.   Very little is understood looking forward.   Decisions that seem obvious at the time,  often look bad in hindsight.  And that's true about all things in life,  not just football.   So, observing that Lewis is not worth the 2 and 5 we spent on him is not exactly some genius insight.   It's viewed with context of his 2.5 years as a Colt.   But in real time,  we thought enough of the kid not to risk losing him so we spent a 5 to move up 3 spots.  That's an investment of pennies on the draft dollar.    If Lewis was a raging success you wouldn't care.   But if you're going to make a mistake in the draft,  wouldn't you rather be Chris Ballard spending an extra 5 for a guy who is currently disappointing,  rather than, say,  Chicago, who spent two 3's and a 4 to move up one spot to take....  (wait for it)  Mitch Trubisky?!    Not only has that move not worked out,  it looks historically bad because they also bi-passed (wait for it)  Pat Mahomes and DeShaun Watson!    Now that trade looks dramatically worse.   That's the kind of trade that will haunt the Bears franchise for more than a decade.      Complaining about spending a 5 to move up to get a guy they rated highly is just fan boy nonsense.   Because what you're saying is the only trade worth making is a trade that works.   If it doesn't work -- for whatever reason -- is cause to take cheap pot shots years after the fact, and acting like you're offering up some pearls of wisdom.   You're not.   You're trying to make something out of almost nothing.   Like the popular song says.....    "Let it go!   Let is go!   Let it go!"  
    • Not an injured  rivers that can't  step into his throws. Pretty sure  Eason  is better  than that Rivers
    • This is arguably the most ignorant post I have ever read on this board.  "You're talking about talent levels in positions that don't matter."  I was talking about talent levels of players at just about every single position on the team and every position matters.   What positions 'matter' to you? Just the QB? Or the QB, P and K?  The most important position on the defense in the scheme Ballard is building is the 3-T.  He got us an all-pro in Buckner. He doesn't matter?   No sense in continuing this, it's a waste of time.  Out of the players you list, Rivers is a stop-gap (we all knew that and with Luck's somewhat abrupt retirement, Ballard/Reich had us in playoff contention with Jacoby until week 16 last year -- Polian had us as a 2-14 team without Peyton and Grigs had us as an 8-8 and then 4-12 team (inherited by Ballard) with or without Luck -- chances are we are not going to be in position to draft a #1 QB while Ballard is in charge since we'll always be in the playoff hunt and won't be 'tanking'). Nelson, Leonard, Smith were all drafted by Ballard.  He signed Autry, traded for (essentially drafted) Buckner.  He signed Rhodes and Houston.  He retained AC and Kelly and let go most of the rest of the garbage that Grigs handed off to him.  TY is no longer our best WR, Pittman is and he was brought in by Ballard.  Our best RB in JT and he was brought in by Ballard.  Our best DB is probably Blackmon (not Rhodes) and he was drafted by Ballard.  I'll stop there, there's an old adage about not letting people you argue with drag you down to their level.     You are right, I read over the word 'over', sorry @2006Coltsbestever
    • Interesting that this has come from Big Q. However, what about Q himself? He's played at times like a man who has some kind of injury.
    • That's only true if you don't trust the judgement of the coaching staff.    We haven't seen Eason play yet.   But the staff has seen him in practice and meeting rooms.     If you trust them,  then there's no need to wonder if Eason is better than Rivers.     But if you don't trust their judgement,  then go ahead and wonder....  
  • Members

    • IinD

      IinD 3,208

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • hoosierhawk

      hoosierhawk 831

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Valpo2004

      Valpo2004 4,107

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Zoltan

      Zoltan 405

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 1,441

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 2,713

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lancer1

      Lancer1 254

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,874

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 606

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shive

      Shive 2,674

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...