Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
ColtJax

Colts should have gone to Kelly in the 4th

Recommended Posts

Hoyer was horrible, that was obvious. By the 4th it was a sure bet that if we needed a play he wouldn't make it. At the end of the game when he kept tossing the ball to the back endzone there was open space for him to run and pick up 6-8 yards, he chose a jump ball. Kelly has a much higher up side and he's not afraid to tuck it and run. We should have gone to the bull pen, our starter didn't have it..

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So many geniuses on the forum. I wonder why F. Reich or Ballard didn’t think of this. One or both should be fired. 

  • Thanks 3
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, MPStack said:

So many geniuses on the forum. I wonder why F. Reich or Ballard didn’t think of this. One or both should be fired. 

They should just be shot at dawn...........  

 

 

SNARKINESS - OFF

 

We wont see Kelly this year, unless there is a major injury to JB.

 

If we lose the next 4 games......  and JB has bad games.......  we STILL wont see Kelly

 

You cant really put in Kelly without practice........  

 

Hoyer, looked like a guy that didnt take practice reps this week with the starters.......

 

Timing is important..... 

 

I would like to see Kelly get a chance.... ONLY if JB stumbles for multiple games or gets hurt

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be all for giving Chad Kelly the second string reps in practice, and then seeing what he can do. However, you saw how bad hoyer was when Brissett took all the reps even though they kept him out vs the dolphins. Yes. They let Brissettt have most of the teams first reps this past week, and then held him out vs the dolphins. 

 

Who throws it to the endzone 3 damn times in a row and THEN on 4th down you try to move the sticks? What a frustrating game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it's crazy how some folks think it's like grade school football where you can 'wing it' when it comes to real NFL football.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Who throws it to the endzone 3 damn times in a row and THEN on 4th down you try to move the sticks? What a frustrating game. "

 

Actually saw Joe Tiller do that more than a few times at Purdue late in games. Very frustrating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, not without the reps in practice. If there's any chance Brissett won't play, Kelly needs some reps this week in practice to get him ready. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hoyer was terrible but the the final drive was still within one score, in the red zone (where we've been very productive) with time on the clock. 

 

Dont love the playcalling, understand  and accept the explanations tho.  Obviously the outcome stunk.  But the team came within short Ebron route of having a shot at winning.

 

Overcame 3 ints and "the nail in the coffin" (vinny's new 70-30 nickname.  It can be positive or negative.  The fun is we can never know which nail or which coffin til after the kick, but it's always fitting .....(love u vinny,  HOF regardless).

 

It's a bad loss, but its Tuesday, time to bury it.  Seasons on the line in the very near future.  This dropping (pun intended) is behind us.

 

Swag (we need to workshop that one) will get his chance eventually just wasn't his week.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MPStack said:

100% Agreed

 

P.S. 

 

Reich and Ballard know more than we do. 

nonsense..... I watched a Colts podcast, I read the online newspaper, I watched a FULL 30 mins on YOUTUBE...... HOW WOULD THEY KNOW MORE THAN ME????

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, runthepost said:

He had no reps last week. It was not even an option 

What does that mean? If Hoyer had gotten hurt would they not have played Kelley at QB or would they forfeit the game because he did not get any Reps. If Reps are important then how does he not get reps since he may have to play in the game. Hoyer was awful but you leave Kelley on the bench because he did not get reps? That explanation makes zero sense. It makes about as much sense as the excuses for Hoyer not trying to get us a first down when we were on the 13 yard line. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, IinD said:

Yeah it's crazy how some folks think it's like grade school football where you can 'wing it' when it comes to real NFL football.

heh. all comon sense is ignored when you get to the real NFL level. Or maybe only Belechek thinks on this level.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Sumo63 said:

Hoyer was terrible but the the final drive was still within one score, in the red zone (where we've been very productive) with time on the clock. 

 

Dont love the playcalling, understand  and accept the explanations tho.  Obviously the outcome stunk.  But the team came within short Ebron route of having a shot at winning.

 

Overcame 3 ints and "the nail in the coffin" (vinny's new 70-30 nickname.  It can be positive or negative.  The fun is we can never know which nail or which coffin til after the kick, but it's always fitting .....(love u vinny,  HOF regardless).

 

It's a bad loss, but its Tuesday, time to bury it.  Seasons on the line in the very near future.  This dropping (pun intended) is behind us.

 

Swag (we need to workshop that one) will get his chance eventually just wasn't his week.

I guess Kelly gets a chance to play if Jacoby is injured and Hoyer gets concussed into unconsciousness....now where did I put that slingshot?

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, JMichael557 said:

What does that mean? If Hoyer had gotten hurt would they not have played Kelley at QB or would they forfeit the game because he did not get any Reps. If Reps are important then how does he not get reps since he may have to play in the game. Hoyer was awful but you leave Kelley on the bench because he did not get reps? That explanation makes zero sense. It makes about as much sense as the excuses for Hoyer not trying to get us a first down when we were on the 13 yard line. 

He was the emergency option.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Final drive within one score + Hoyer had 3 td passes the week before +Kelly no reps with the nbr 1's all adds up to it would have taken a major set of , well, you know, to put him in the game.

Wish they would have though...just to possibly get a glimpse of does Kelly have "it" - a specialness about him. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Myles said:

He was the emergency option.  

In all fairness, I can see why Kelly didn't get any reps. They were doing two things this past week-testing Brissett to see if he could play and prepare Hoyer. That must have left little window for Kelly to get reps.

But even with that, I wish they would have given Kelly a series or two. Barring that, I sure would like to know if Reich mentioned to Hoyer, during the timeouts, that the under routes were open once they got to the 16. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I admit, I would have liked to see him in some game action too.    However since we were in the game the whole time, I understand why he didn't see action.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, Reich & Ballard do indeed "know more than we do", but let's not downplay the post altogether. I was shocked we didn't go Kelly at HALF. It was CLEAR that Hoyer wouldn't get anything going. The only reason we still had a game in the fourth is because... well it's Miami. I will say, though: I didn't know how much (or how little) practice time Kelly got. Doesn't that happen sometimes though? I think it was worth the risk... I mean how much worse could the QB play have gotten? We literally only needed AVERAGE QB play. He looked good preseason.

 

This one leaves a sour taste in my mouth because I feel like we surrendered it by not playing Kelly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Thunderbolt said:

CK should have played the 2nd half, knowing what Hoyer did.

Cal Dr Who and he can give the team a ride "back" to half-time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure what you have seen during college or post college to determine that one Qb is a game manager and another other is not.  The physicality prism?     All the Qb can do is to see where to throw the ball, then throw it there accurately. The WRs have to go unscripted too, and find an open spot, or a spot that he can be lead to.      After 5 seconds from the snap of the ball, whether the Qb makes that decision and throws the ball from the pocket or by running to the right hash mark doesn't matter, other than being on the right hash mark provides half as many opportunities to see where to throw the ball and throw it there accurately.   If unscripted means that my $125 mil Qb is carrying the team by making 25 yard scrambles for TDs, and is treated as a runner, I don't want that.  Its pretty to watch and nice to have, but its not really what the Qb position is about, IMO.
    • I believe Reich has shown that he adjusts his offense to his QBs style, Therefore it's most important to get the best QB we can draft, instead of getting the best fit for a certain system   To me Fromm is like Gordon who has a lot to prove (if not more because he had a way more talented team). I keep hearing how smart he is but, Fitzpatrick is one of the smartest QBs to play the game and I wouldn't want him on our team, If we drafted him though I wouldn't trade back into the 1st for him because that would mean at least 3-4 QBs were taken and we could get him with one of our second rnd picks.          
    • The scrambling ability is not why I don’t want Fromm. I want a guy that can put a team on his shoulders when things aren’t going right.  A game manager is not going to give us a team that can compete with Mahomes the next decade. The ability to make plays unscripted though is something that is important in the NFL today with players getting faster. Having a QB that can go off script when a play breaks down is huge.
    • Jones is who I want...even if it's a franchise and trade.   As for DEs...I would look at Clowney. Would step right in and replace Sheard.
    • I think most want a QB who doesn't have to carry the team just to be competitive.    Reich had both the scrambler, Wentz, and the statue, Foles, and won with both.  Don't get fooled into adopting the scrambling trendiness as being something essential.   Its merely about how long a QB holds the ball to allow something to develop.  Some leave the pocket. Others stay there until the last second.  Running to one side of the field normally cuts your vision of the field in half, limiting the options.  We have the pocket to give any QB time to stand there and extend the play.  Most teams don't.   I'm intrigued by Eason.  I like his height.  Its tough to substitute that.  Obviously Herbert too.
  • Members

    • Vexed

      Vexed 73

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 1,726

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 8,335

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pacolts56

      pacolts56 3,689

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfanej

      coltsfanej 292

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coffeedrinker

      Coffeedrinker 7,305

      Senior Members
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 2,803

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Scott Pennock

      Scott Pennock 2,075

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • runthepost

      runthepost 919

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts00

      GoColts00 397

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...