Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
richard pallo

Willis starting over Gaethers?

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, SteelCityColt said:

 

I think there's a danger with any position of getting enamoured with the 40 time, I'd put 3 cone over it certainly. However, as always never go by just one metric, and never put metrics over film. 

 

For all that was written about him being a below average athlete, if you compare  him to some of the 'good' SS's in the league he matches up pretty well:

 

Willis 4.55s (40)/7.15s (3 Cone)

Collins 4.53s (40)/7.53s (3 Cone)

Chancellor 4.69s (40)/7.36s (3 Cone)

Jones  4.51s (40)/7.43s (3 Cone) 

Adams  4.56s (40)/6.96s (3 Cone) 

 

etc etc... 

At SS or Box, I agree on 40 not being a prime requisite. Chancellor was always a wild case, and clearly an exception to most norms. I think he went to college as a QB, played LB, and ended up going to S. Truly one of a kind story. 

 

On Willis, I think most of the below average comments and write ups are about non box situations. In short intermediate areas, he looks fluid and plays fast with great instinct. Outside of that (deep), he looks more mechanical to me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, DEFENSE said:

what willis lacks in speed his instincts for the ball more than make up for it

Both speed and instinct are plenty good for the box. He's got great leadership attributes as well.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Defjamz26 said:

He’s just as fast as Jamal Adams...

No he's not. Adams has run several times sub 4.4 times. He had a very bad combine. IIRC, he ran 4.3s in his pro day. Most expected low 4.4s at the combine at most.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, EastStreet said:

At SS or Box, I agree on 40 not being a prime requisite. Chancellor was always a wild case, and clearly an exception to most norms. I think he went to college as a QB, played LB, and ended up going to S. Truly one of a kind story. 

 

On Willis, I think most of the below average comments and write ups are about non box situations. In short intermediate areas, he looks fluid and plays fast with great instinct. Outside of that (deep), he looks more mechanical to me. 

 

Are you talking playing "speed" in deep situations, as in he's slower to react when the play isn't in front of him, or his technique/agility? 

 

Just seems like he's been written off as not being athletic enough, when his measurable are plenty good enough for a SS, and it's only really the 3 cone he falls short on when compared to a lot of FS which could be a indicator of not being as agile. 

 

I like him plenty, and think we might have got another late round safety steal. On a side note, I didn't realise how good Bethea's combine measurables were. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SteelCityColt said:

 

Are you talking playing "speed" in deep situations, as in he's slower to react when the play isn't in front of him, or his technique/agility? 

 

Just seems like he's been written off as not being athletic enough, when his measurable are plenty good enough for a SS, and it's only really the 3 cone he falls short on when compared to a lot of FS which could be a indicator of not being as agile. 

 

I like him plenty, and think we might have got another late round safety steal. On a side note, I didn't realise how good Bethea's combine measurables were. 

He looks plenty good enough to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, SteelCityColt said:

 

Are you talking playing "speed" in deep situations, as in he's slower to react when the play isn't in front of him, or his technique/agility? 

 

Just seems like he's been written off as not being athletic enough, when his measurable are plenty good enough for a SS, and it's only really the 3 cone he falls short on when compared to a lot of FS which could be a indicator of not being as agile. 

 

I like him plenty, and think we might have got another late round safety steal. On a side note, I didn't realise how good Bethea's combine measurables were. 

Yup, 4.39 lol (Bethea). I'm going to hold off on Bethea comparisons though...

 

On Willis, I think he's plenty athletic for box, and I agree (we might have gotten a steal). To me, he's great at things in front of him, and keeping up with TEs etc crossing in short duration. Where he looks to struggle at least to me is turning his hips on a vertical route. I'm also not sure he's had to defend a speed guy. He played sparingly against LAC and ATL, and KC was without their two top WRs (those being the best passing teams we've played). 

 

Overall, I'm very pleased, and he's totally surpassed my expectations so far. Trying to keep my expectations in check though until the end of the season. I see him being tested a lot more vs TB, NO, Houston, and Jax x 2. To add, I saw some graphic/tweet talking about # of targets, and he seemed to be on low end of Ss (in quantity).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/13/2019 at 8:54 PM, EastStreet said:

No he's not. Adams has run several times sub 4.4 times. He had a very bad combine. IIRC, he ran 4.3s in his pro day. Most expected low 4.4s at the combine at most.

Even so you’re only talking a couple tenths of a second difference. He’s not significantly slower than Adams. He’s definitely not as fast as Darnell Savage though. But compared to Adams, his measureables stack up similarly. He’s just not nearly as talented.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Defjamz26 said:

Even so you’re only talking a couple tenths of a second difference. He’s not significantly slower than Adams. He’s definitely not as fast as Darnell Savage though. But compared to Adams, his measureables stack up similarly. He’s just not nearly as talented.

4.3s capable vs 4.5s is very significant from a speed perspective. You can argue that "field" speed is important, and it is, but natural speed combined with field speed is very significant. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/15/2019 at 10:26 PM, EastStreet said:

4.3s capable vs 4.5s is very significant from a speed perspective. You can argue that "field" speed is important, and it is, but natural speed combined with field speed is very significant. 

 

Yes tenths of a second are important in a straight line sprint race, roughly would equate to a meter difference. Why I still argue the 3 cone is more important as it features the stop/cut/accelerate movements you're more likely to see on a football field. 

 

"Field speed", by which I guess you mean the mental ability to read and react to the football situation on the fly I think is far more important on defense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, SteelCityColt said:

 

Yes tenths of a second are important in a straight line sprint race, roughly would equate to a meter difference. Why I still argue the 3 cone is more important as it features the stop/cut/accelerate movements you're more likely to see on a football field. 

 

"Field speed", by which I guess you mean the mental ability to read and react to the football situation on the fly I think is far more important on defense. 

Field speed to me is agility + IQ (being in the right place). 

 

So includes 3 cone and just having a nose for the ball. Sorry, should have qualified it with definition. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Burrow was not thought of this highly early(when Ballard was rumored to like Herbert and Love). It was kind of an avalanche that was gaining more and more mass and power the more games got played. I don't think it was until November-December that people started talking about Burrow as a no. 1 pick. He just never had that body of work before this year and a lot of his most impressive games and against best opponents were at the end of the year.        I've heard Brady thrown around, but no idea if there is anything real behind those rumors. The rumors say that they are having hard time attracting any fans to their games and their owners think getting a legend like Brady to play for several years for them might jump start their new fanbase in LA. No idea whether to believe this or not. 
    • To me being a boom or bust is kind of a plus for a QB, because the worst you can be is mediocre once that rookie contract comes to an end. I would prefer for whoever we draft to be either great or horrible and for us to know relatively quickly so we can either invest in him or move on quickly. This is part of the appeal with Love for me. The things he needs to improve are heavily coaching based and I think we will have a good idea of where on the spectrum he will end up pretty quickly. For example - if you draft him and he's not ready to start by year 2, this is a red flag and you might start looking for another one. If 2 off-seasons and 1 in-season period are not enough for your coaching staff to get him ready you either have made a mistake with the draft pick or with your coaching staff and I do have good trust in the coaching staff so... 
    • For me the tiers are more important the the specific ranking... I rank players within a tier very similarly and even though I would have preferences within them, I don't feel strongly enough to argue one over the other.    Tier 1(sell the farm for him - i.e. multiple 1sts, multiple day 2 picks, etc) Burrow   Tier 2 (trade a significant asset for him - i.e. a future 1st round pick) Tua(if I have medical guarantees he'd be alright health-wise)   Tier 3 (trade a medium level asset for him(i.e. a second, a third...) or take him at #13) Love Herbert Tua(if our medical staff cannot give you any guarantees whatsoever either way -for example, there were some reports that it might be too early before the draft to tell whether he will be good or not)   Tier 4 (second round) Eason Fromm     Tier 5 (third-fourth round) Gordon(have to do more work on him, might change his ranking) Hurts   Tier 6 (round 5-7) Tua(if the medicals come bad and there is high risk of reinjury/retirement/not full recovery/etc.) Tyler Huntley Nate Stanley     I'm still watching some QBs so that's not my final ranking. 
    • Hey....    we’ve all had those whoops moments.    Comes with the territory.    I’ve had some whoppers!     
  • Members

    • austriancolt

      austriancolt 433

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 8,977

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,392

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • harrisoncolts88

      harrisoncolts88 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 519

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WoolMagnet

      WoolMagnet 4,350

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 6,920

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ScotColt

      ScotColt 45

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...