Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Warning: Angry Post


Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, MarquisJ said:

I’m sure a lot fans feel this way. It’s actually very simple.

 

Cut/Find immediate replacement for tonight:

Mark Glowinski

Adam V

Chester Rodgers

 

This makes no sense. 

 

Glowinski had the best game of any olineman yesterday.  Chester Rogers fumble was bad but he also had a couple of clutch catches.  And with AV, there is no one better to replace him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You aren't going to find valid replacements for any of those guys at this point in the year.   Doing this would be tantamount to giving up on the season when we're still 5-3.   But

Cain has needed to be replaced since week 4 at the latest.    I'm partially convinced that Ballard didn't invest in a WR out of some misplaced faith in his draft pick and if that's the case

I love all the over reaction after a loss.

11 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

This makes no sense. 

 

Glowinski had the best game of any olineman yesterday.  Chester Rogers fumble was bad but he also had a couple of clutch catches.  And with AV, there is no one better to replace him.

and rodgers caught a td, I like rodgers he is not elite but most time dependable

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

This makes no sense. 

 

Glowinski had the best game of any olineman yesterday.  Chester Rogers fumble was bad but he also had a couple of clutch catches.  And with AV, there is no one better to replace him.

We watched two completely different games yesterday in regards to glowinski.. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vinny probably needs to go although on the final kick I guess his holder was the problem there.  But he's just missed too many.  

 

Colts will probably try to see him to the end of the season but I doubt they re-sign him.  

 

Rodgers had one bad game.  Lets remember that at the start of the season Rodgers was ment to be the #3 or 4 receiver.  Getting rid of him doesn't fix the problem of no Funch and no Hilton.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MarquisJ said:

We watched two completely different games yesterday in regards to glowinski.. 

 

Yes, I watched the actual game not the game with a preconceived idea about Glowinski.

 

Per the tweet (and if you have to use a tweet from someone else to make your point then you don't really have a point), who?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DEFENSE said:

and rodgers caught a td, I like rodgers he is not elite but most time dependable

 

1 hour ago, Valpo2004 said:

Vinny probably needs to go although on the final kick I guess his holder was the problem there.  But he's just missed too many.  

 

Colts will probably try to see him to the end of the season but I doubt they re-sign him.  

 

Rodgers had one bad game.  Lets remember that at the start of the season Rodgers was ment to be the #3 or 4 receiver.  Getting rid of him doesn't fix the problem of no Funch and no Hilton.  

I'm just wondering, are you guys (and so many others on this forum) misspelling Rogers' name on purpose?

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, DEFENSE said:

not on purpose please forgive me, I  dont know how he spells his name, was more interested in his performance than his name spelling

You're not the only one, it seems every body on this forum misspells it.  I thought maybe there was an inside joke or something.

 

Personally, if I am going to bad mouth a player, I take the 5 seconds to go the the roster and make sure I spell his name correctly.

Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

 

I'm just wondering, are you guys (and so many others on this forum) misspelling Rogers' name on purpose?

 

No but I haven't made a point to check my spelling which is something I'm not naturally good at in the first place. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

You're not the only one, it seems every body on this forum misspells it.  I thought maybe there was an inside joke or something.

 

Personally, if I am going to bad mouth a player, I take the 5 seconds to go the the roster and make sure I spell his name correctly.

 

 After years of seeing Costanzo here.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

He is a body and he does kick although I don't know if Double Doink Parkey is more reliable.

 

Statistically his last year in Chicago he has a better accuracy on kicking from every distance except 30 to 39 than Vinny does this year.  He also has a higher accuracy on extra points.

 

http://www.nfl.com/player/codyparkey/2550380/careerstats

 

http://www.nfl.com/player/adamvinatieri/2503471/careerstats

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

You're not the only one, it seems every body on this forum misspells it.  I thought maybe there was an inside joke or something.

 

Personally, if I am going to bad mouth a player, I take the 5 seconds to go the the roster and make sure I spell his name correctly.

i was bragging on him, I like him

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First of all, I'd say bad fit for us. He's a 3-4 DE. In our system he'd be a tweener, or maybe even a 3T.  Great against the run, average vs the pass. Very solid 3 down guy overall in a 3-4.   IMO, even if he was a fit, we don't need run D help, and he'd be too expensive. Overall just not the benefit and value we need.    
    • Here's what we did on another board a few years ago. Worked out pretty good. 1 Round per evening 2 windows each night... picks 1-16, and then 17-32 (I think it was 7p-8p and 9-10, but could have been 8-9 and 10-11). That way, guys new pretty much when they needed to be there, and only needed to pay attention for roughly an hour per day. Really not even that long. Also gave the mods some time between windows to tidy up. 3 minute clock hence the "flash" term. If you miss a pick, you drop 5 spots (basically giving them an extra 15 minutes). If they missed it a second time, they get bumped to the end of the round and have up to an hour before the next days round starts. If they miss that, they get best player based on their primary needs.  We had 3 threads going at once, and 3 moderators. One thread for the pick announcements and general comments, one with a constantly updated order and big board, and one to manage trades. The big board management was great in terms of keeping it going and checking off who is gone. We also published team needs, but I can't remember if we tracked it except for using it when folks missed their window. Only trades allowed are pick for pick(s) so very little approval needed. No picks for existing players (We did the mock post FA fury, I think we started about 2 weeks prior to the draft).
    • I didn't say he could be as good as Leonard. I said pretty clearly that if Leonard was 95/100 That I think Oke's ceiling is about 86-90.    By in which I also added that any team would be alright that that level of play. I think you are misunderstanding. Because we both seem to agree that Oke will more than likely be a pretty darn good player. 
    • Again, I don’t doubt one bit he can turn out to be a good player. He has the traits. I watched him often when he was at Stanford... his name was not foreign to me come draft time. I was excited about Ballard loading up at linebacker which is a position we have plugged guys off the street before.    I just simply called out the inconsistency of saying he could be a good as Leonard (again, highly, HIGHLY unlikely) and then turn around saying that he could be “pretty good.”    do you know who didn’t need time to be great? Darius Leonard. THAT is the difference. Give Leonard time and see where he goes. My guess is the Hall of Fame. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...