Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
HOF19

2nd week in a row USA Today going big on picking Colts

Recommended Posts

May be the minority here , but I think TY being gone is a GOOD thing for Brissett. Doesn’t have that security blanket anymore, so in essence it “should” force him to go through all of his reads.... all wishful thinking of course. Sunday will answer a bunch of questions that seem to pop up every week. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, adubb84 said:

May be the minority here , but I think TY being gone is a GOOD thing for Brissett. Doesn’t have that security blanket anymore, so in essence it “should” force him to go through all of his reads.... all wishful thinking of course. Sunday will answer a bunch of questions that seem to pop up every week. 

So losing our best receiver is a good thing.  Ah huh.  Let's hope when Brissett goes through his reads our WRs are getting open.  If they are we should be ok.  If not it might come down to our defense and Adam kicking outdoors.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

So losing our best receiver is a good thing.  Ah huh.  Let's hope when Brissett goes through his reads our WRs are getting open.  If they are we should be ok.  If not it might come down to our defense and Adam kicking outdoors.  

yes losing him is a good thing we need to learn how to be able to survive without him at some point that means everything will need to come together orrr we blame the loss on having no hilton lmao 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, AZColt11 said:

We should run it like 35 times.  3 yards and a cloud of dust.  Old time football.

 

Against the Steelers front-7?  Are you serious?  More like 1 yard of dust and three-n-out.

 

I think we're going to see a similar gameplan to what Reich did against the Texans.

 

Spread 'em out, find mismatches against LBs in coverage, and dink-n-dunk our way down the field to control TOP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, will426 said:

yes losing him is a good thing we need to learn how to be able to survive without him at some point that means everything will need to come together orrr we blame the loss on having no hilton lmao 

I guess you could blame the loss on the other receivers not stepping up.  Lets hope they get open and catch the ball. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

I guess you could blame the loss on the other receivers not stepping up.  Lets hope they get open and catch the ball. 

true wasn’t it the raiders game where we had no hilton and everyone decided they didn’t know how to catch a ball haha  they better show up this time 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, AZColt11 said:

We should run it like 35 times.  3 yards and a cloud of dust.  Old time football.

Good idea if we had a passing game.  They will load the box and commit to stopping the run.  I don't think we will b able to run.  It will b up to Brissett and the receivers to win this one.  Teams r playing us the same way that's why our running game is looking average.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Fromm seems like a career backup   I think Eason is a better candidate for the tier 2 QBs 
    • Not sure what you have seen during college or post college to determine that one Qb is a game manager and another other is not.  The physicality prism?     All the Qb can do is to see where to throw the ball, then throw it there accurately. The WRs have to go unscripted too, and find an open spot, or a spot that he can be lead to.      After 5 seconds from the snap of the ball, whether the Qb makes that decision and throws the ball from the pocket or by running to the right hash mark doesn't matter, other than being on the right hash mark provides half as many opportunities to see where to throw the ball and throw it there accurately.   If unscripted means that my $125 mil Qb is carrying the team by making 25 yard scrambles for TDs, and is treated as a runner, I don't want that.  Its pretty to watch and nice to have, but its not really what the Qb position is about, IMO.
    • I believe Reich has shown that he adjusts his offense to his QBs style, Therefore it's most important to get the best QB we can draft, instead of getting the best fit for a certain system   To me Fromm is like Gordon who has a lot to prove (if not more because he had a way more talented team). I keep hearing how smart he is but, Fitzpatrick is one of the smartest QBs to play the game and I wouldn't want him on our team, If we drafted him though I wouldn't trade back into the 1st for him because that would mean at least 3-4 QBs were taken and we could get him with one of our second rnd picks.          
    • The scrambling ability is not why I don’t want Fromm. I want a guy that can put a team on his shoulders when things aren’t going right.  A game manager is not going to give us a team that can compete with Mahomes the next decade. The ability to make plays unscripted though is something that is important in the NFL today with players getting faster. Having a QB that can go off script when a play breaks down is huge.
  • Members

    • Gigc

      Gigc 163

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Khoops

      Khoops 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pacolts56

      pacolts56 3,689

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 2,803

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chloe6124

      Chloe6124 6,401

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TyTheGhost13

      TyTheGhost13 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 9,259

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bsteves

      bsteves 157

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mel Kiper's Hair

      Mel Kiper's Hair 1,003

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 25,036

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...