Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Up Next - Denver


Barry Sears

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Denver's offense is just bad. Flacco is a shell of himself. After playing teams like the Chiefs (Mahomes) and Texans (Watson) and even the Raiders (Carr), our defense has to be salivating at this game. I do not want to jinx it and say we will win fairly easily but that is a good possibility if we just play our normal game.

I think the Colts win, but winning easily isn't something this team has shown.   Nearly every game is close.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Kevin Bowen said on the radio this morning he thinks we see Brian hoyer in the 4th quarter. I hope he didn’t jinx us. Besides the KC game they haven’t allowed many points.

I don't think we'll see Hoyer Sunday, but definitely when we play the Dolphins we should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This game is going to be harder then we think. 4 of Denver’s 7 games have been decided by one score. Unless they totally fall apart with the trade rumors or Harris gets traded by Friday this is going to be a hard game and is not a given. They average giving up only 19  If we lose this game that Texans game means nothing. Also titans and jags will probably get back to 4-4 after their games. I think i read something the broncos have been pretty good at creating turnovers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

This game is going to be harder then we think. 4 of Denver’s 7 games have been decided by one score. Unless they totally fall apart with the trade rumors or Harris gets traded by Friday this is going to be a hard game and is not a given. They average giving up only 19  If we lose this game that Texans game means nothing. Also titans and jags will probably get back to 4-4 after their games. I think i read something the broncos have been pretty good at creating turnovers.

Earlier in this very same thread you suggested we could get close to the 9 sacks KC put on Denver. You also opined they could turnover the ball a lot. How bad will we need to be to make this a hard game, based on those previous comments?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, braveheartcolt said:

Earlier in this very same thread you suggested we could get close to the 9 sacks KC put on Denver. You also opined they could turnover the ball a lot. How bad will we need to be to make this a hard game, based on those previous comments?

We could get that many sacks and create turnovers. We win easily if we do. I also think though could go the other way and be a tight game if they get the run game going and don’t have to pass much.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

This game is going to be harder then we think. 4 of Denver’s 7 games have been decided by one score. Unless they totally fall apart with the trade rumors or Harris gets traded by Friday this is going to be a hard game and is not a given. They average giving up only 19  If we lose this game that Texans game means nothing. Also titans and jags will probably get back to 4-4 after their games. I think i read something the broncos have been pretty good at creating turnovers.


Harder than some people think. I've been saying most of our games will be close and this game is no different. We're not good enough to count any game as an easy win, except (hopefully) the Dolphins game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fisticuffs111 said:


Harder than some people think. I've been saying most of our games will be close and this game is no different. We're not good enough to count any game as an easy win, except (hopefully) the Dolphins game.

The dolphins  have been competitive  lately

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2019 at 10:16 PM, Chloe6124 said:

We could get that many sacks and create turnovers. We win easily if we do. I also think though could go the other way and be a tight game if they get the run game going and don’t have to pass much.    

So you think we could win easily or it could be a close game. My prediction is you will be proven right!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chloe6124 said:

Only player ruled out Sunday is Carl Lewis. Reich said Campbell will probably play. He also said all the safeties will rotate with them all healthy.

 

Sheesh. I was hoping for one of those Gold Medals. 

 

Sure you're not talking Carl Davis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2019 at 7:46 PM, MB-ColtsFan said:

I know I'm going to be slammed for saying it, but this is still a pretty young team.

 

TRAAAAAAPP GAAAAAME!!!

 

Young teams sometimes overlook bad opponents and this could be the case this coming Sunday.  Hope Reich & company keep the 1-0 mantra pinned to the bulletin board.

No I won’t slam you. Denver although the record won’t show is statistically the better team. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

So is he important? He isn’t a starter?

He might be the #2 FS, but he's in the game 60+% of the time. Very heavy in the rotation. Simmons, their #1 FS hasn't missed a defensive play this year. Parks is basically the 4th DB based on snap counts and depending on scheme/game plan.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2019 at 5:46 PM, Coffeedrinker said:

in all seriousness, this could be a tough game.  It's not like Denver has been blown out in any games except the KC game.  Their offense is not good (27 in AER) but their defense is tough (#4 AER).  They still have Von Miller and a FS that is playing as well any any FS in the NFL.

 

The Colts are going to have to bring their A game to come away with a win.

Exactly anyone who thinks this will be an easy win needs to go back and watch the Raiders game again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/24/2019 at 1:44 AM, Dark_Superman said:

If Pagano was still the coach this would absolutely be considered a trap game. Reich will have his guys ready. No doubt.

Just like he had them ready for the Raiders right?  I like Reich as much as the next guy but he’s not perfect, no coach is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Just like he had them ready for the Raiders right?  I like Reich as much as the next guy but he’s not perfect, no coach is.

Excellent point, and I think this game tells us a lot about this team (including the coach) learning and growing from past mistakes. For a young team being the underdog is an easy role to play. Being the targeted is not so easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2019 at 5:45 PM, richard pallo said:

It does seem to be deja vu.  But this years situation is different than last years.  This time last year we were 1-5.  Now we are 4-2 and could have been 5-1 if Vinatieri was his old self.  Different circumstances.   Ballard's past suggests he stands pat though.  Should be an interesting week coming up to see if he really does let the deadline walk on by. 

Should be unbeaten those two losses were bad but no matter what we cant afford to lose to the broncos that would be our most embarrassing loss of the year to date if that happens cause broncos are horrible.

36 minutes ago, pacolts56 said:

Joe Flacco stinks

 

Colts         27

Broncos    0

 

 

Yes he does but almost always plays well against us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baltimore will have a tough choice one day. To either put a statue of Flacco in front of their stadium or to just let him stand there in front of it. 

Obviously I think the key is to putting pressure on Flacco. Give him a pocket and he can be good. If we pressure him  all day we should win easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 956

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,239

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 938

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...