Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Brissett drug tested following yesterday's game?

Steamboat_Shaun

By Steamboat_Shaun
in Colts Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Steamboat_Shaun Walk On

Steamboat_Shaun

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 minutes ago, Imgrandojji said:

No doubt he'll pass.  JB7 doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who needs PEDs, his style is more cerebral than athletic

 

Oh I don't doubt that he'll pass, I just found the timing interesting is all. Has the game of his career then gets "randomly" tested... probably not a coincidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sumo63 Practice Squad

Sumo63

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, coltsfansince65 said:

I wonder if Aaron Rogers found one of those little notes on his locker yesterday..........

Aaron's locker gets stuffed with valentine's cards year round, I hear the NFL buys them in bulk.  In Aaron's case, per CBA, the shield considers the refs to be "more like mailmen than officials". 

 

In GB the crews even stuff the heads of their flags with those chalky little heart shaped candies.  They say it makes them fly in a smoother arc, but we know better..."Hope to see you in Feb" is second only to "Pick Me".

 

Side bar: coveted "Rodger's Urine" is only collected for DNA to be used in Collinsworth's legacy basement cloning operation(s).  Rumor had it he's already got a gallon of Mahomes down there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Coffeedrinker Practice Squad

Coffeedrinker

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, HungarianColtsFan said:

 

Winny nailed a FG from 50some yard few years ago, and he was "randomly " drug tested too...

Pooh got drug tested?  That's just not right.

14 minutes ago, HungarianColtsFan said:

 

"Move along people, there's nothing to see here."

The fact that many people have responded to this thread, there is something to discuss here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Valpo2004 Active Roster

Valpo2004

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, CR91 said:

Pat has tons of stories of getting "randomly" drug tested after hitting 60+ yard punts

 

Here is the thing about the drug testing.  Why does the NFL try to insist that it's random?  It's obviously not and why would that bother ANYONE?

 

The most dominate players out there should get the most testing.  

 

Feels like the NFL realizes this but for some reason thinks it's going to offend our sensibilities if they admit to that and continue to claim that it's all random.

 

It's not random and I don't think anyone thinks it should have to be.  I don't mind testing a guy after a career day.  I don't mind if the best players out there are being tested every 2 or 3 weeks while the team's 6th string wide receiver gets tested only once a year.  

 

Is there anyone here who thinks that is wrong?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ColtsBlueFL Team Captain

ColtsBlueFL

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, OffensivelyPC said:

Yeah, this is not real.  Seems like this would break all sorts of privacy laws and regulations.

 

Interesting, is notice of requirement to visit a medical rep considered PHI?  And was it disseminated by a 'covered entity'?

 

1 hour ago, csmopar said:

not if it originally was shared or posted by Jacoby himself...

 

To my understanding, People that get a hold of Protected Health Information (without illegal action of their own) and are not in the medical field and not in the direct care of the subject are not under HIPAA rules (covered entity). Those that allowed the leaks or discovery of such PHI may well be ... depending.

 

Also, Dr. John Lombardo independently runs the Substance abuse and PES testing.  (has been for 28 years).  The NFL/NFLPA collectively bargained the program, and he can be dismissed by either side at any time.

 

Each player faces one mandatory test per year under each policy. In addition, 10 players per team are chosen randomly by computer (cough: smart computer?) each week during the preseason, regular season and postseason to be tested under the policy on banned performance-enhancing substances. (only)

 

Rec drugs of abuse tested in the off season, or if one has previously rested positive.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OffensivelyPC Active Roster

OffensivelyPC

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

Interesting, is notice of requirement to visit a medical rep considered PHI?  And was it disseminated by a 'covered entity'?

It's not just HIPAA, there's several federal employment statutes that regard the drug test results as private confidential information.  There's an argument to be made under HIPAA, but even if HIPAA wouldn't cover employers and/or the test results, other regulations do.  For instance, an FAA regulated companies (i.e. airline carrier) is subject to FAA drug testing and the results are thus confidential.  There's similar regs in other employment related statutes - Drug-Free Workplace Act comes to mind.  

 

What I don't know is whether the notice to submit to drug testing is confidential.  But it stands to reason that if the results are, then the notice would be.  Wouldn't make much sense to enact a law that requires privacy in the results if employer disclosed that I was going to be tested, and then I disappeared (or was disciplined) a week later for "confidential purposes."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CR91 Ring of Honor

CR91

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

Here is the thing about the drug testing.  Why does the NFL try to insist that it's random?  It's obviously not and why would that bother ANYONE?

 

The most dominate players out there should get the most testing.  

 

Feels like the NFL realizes this but for some reason thinks it's going to offend our sensibilities if they admit to that and continue to claim that it's all random.

 

It's not random and I don't think anyone thinks it should have to be.  I don't mind testing a guy after a career day.  I don't mind if the best players out there are being tested every 2 or 3 weeks while the team's 6th string wide receiver gets tested only once a year.  

 

Is there anyone here who thinks that is wrong?  

 

Mahomes should have been tested all year last year haha

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ColtsBlueFL Team Captain

ColtsBlueFL

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, OffensivelyPC said:

What I don't know is whether the notice to submit to drug testing is confidential.**  But it stands to reason that if the results are, then the notice would be++.

 

That was my whole point**.  And I do not know++.  Also, If JB got the notice, and left it out in the public domain (for tours later) is anybody else liable?  That looks like it may be in the locker room, yes? Off limits until well after the players 'take care of business', yes? I'm pretty sure tours take place well after games and players use of the area.

 

Interesting plot though...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Valpo2004 Active Roster

Valpo2004

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

Mahomes should have been tested all year last year haha

 

I'm fine with that.  Although one thing I do have to note though.  I'm not entirely sure if it makes sense with QB's off career passing days.  Performance enhancing drugs to my understanding make you faster and stronger.  

 

I'm not sure what if any PED's would help you stand in the pocket delivering accurate strikes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Four2itus Ring of Honor

Four2itus

Posted
Posted
On 10/21/2019 at 1:32 PM, Coffeedrinker said:

In all fairness, random doesn't mean there are no circumstances to prompt it, it just means it does not happen at regular intervals.

 

and @Steamboat_Shaun, yes it's pretty common for the NFL to drug test players after a career game or even if they have a career quarter.

I get that. But they should have two testing programs. 

 

Random testing, and accusatory testing. Using the term "Random" to describe all testing is misrepresenting. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Superman
      Update: Jim Irsay speaks publicly (merged)

      By Superman · Posted

      I guess media could be saying stuff that I don't hear, I should acknowledge that. I just don't think anyone sourced or serious is saying it. It doesn't seem like those opinions are based on anything reputable.    I was personally concerned that the way things went with Reich and Saturday could undermine the coaching search. It doesn't seem like that happened. The Colts interviewed a ton of good candidates, and wound up getting one of the more sought after guys. They got a highly sought after GM in 2017. There was the McDaniels treachery, but I think he was just a slimeball.    The Colts are not a big free agent destination, I don't think that has anything to do with Irsay. I think free agents sign with the team that offers the most money, almost all the time. We've seen the Colts attract QBs like Rivers, Ryan, etc. Even Baker Mayfield listed the Colts as a desired landing spot in 2022. Maybe there's a player here or there who's turned off by Irsay, but I don't think anything like that has ever been reported. Like you said, the players only say good things. Anyone who goes on the record says good things. Former players call on him to introduce them to the HOF.    I just wanted to throw out there that despite the whispers and stuff, it doesn't seem like there's any substance to the idea that the Colts operation is negatively affected by Irsay.
    • Defjamz26
      2024 NFL Draft Thread (Final Discussions, Predictions, Rumors, etc…)

      By Defjamz26 · Posted

      I said it earlier but If you take Bowers, you re-work your TE room. Someone has to go. For me it would be Granson since he was drafted to be the mismatch TE, that’s what Bowers would be. Keep MAC for the blocking. I’d also put Ogletree or Mallory on the PS. Also wouldn’t mind drafting Tip Reiman late in round 5-6 to be the blocking TE with Bowers. He’s athletic enough to play STs too.   So again, if it’s Bowers, someone has to go. 5 TEs is too much anyways.
    • OhioColt
      2024 NFL Draft Thread (Final Discussions, Predictions, Rumors, etc…)

      By OhioColt · Posted

      Washington had a break-out year for sure and was his best decision of his collegiate career to transfer and obviously paid dividends.  Washington said it before but looks like Josh Downs 2.0 and project to be drafted very similar in Round 3.  Between wide receivers and defensive backs, we could use another strong Downs clone in the slot.  With Downs that is the only biggest knock about drafting TE Bowers as he commands a lot of passes in the slot and would take away an already important role the Downs already excels in doing. 
    • NFLfan
      2024 NFL Draft Thread (Final Discussions, Predictions, Rumors, etc…)

      By NFLfan · Posted

      I thought Odunze may drop to the Giants. My friend who is a Giants season-ticket holder said he believes the Giants are drafting WR in the first round. I think it may be Odunze if not one of the other two (Nabers and Harrison).
    • OhioColt
      2024 NFL Draft Thread (Final Discussions, Predictions, Rumors, etc…)

      By OhioColt · Posted

      Based on immediate needs and BPA totally agree.  Top CB Quinyon followed by TE Bowers.  I know our TE room is crowded but MAC really feel this is his last year with the Club.  Any given game we've seen a breakout game from one of the other tight ends we have.  Bowers would be an immediate upgrade a long-term fixture.  Since we haven't addressed the lack of DB depth this offseason, Quinyon is also a high priority need for our Club and should be versatile enough if we do change DC next season to match next defensive scheme.  

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...