Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
RockThatBlue

Poll: Is Reich the best Colts coach since Dungy?

Is Reich the best Colts coach since Dungy?  

134 members have voted

  1. 1. Is Reich the best since Dungy?

    • Yes
      133
    • No
      1


Recommended Posts

Yes, easily. Reich is smart, creative, and uses everyone to their strengths. He's also a true leader that the team respects and plays hard for.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a tough one, but I think Pagano was a little better. 

 

 

:sarcasm:

 

 

 

... Of course Reich is the best since Dungy. Why is this even a question? He's on the path to be better than Dungy.

  • Like 7
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a ton of competition, unless you count BA as a HC. 

 

Reich is a tremendous at scripting out the game plan. Really hope the Colts can get HFA.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering that the only competition are Arians, Caldwell and Pagano, was your intention to check how a 100% vs 0% vote looks like?

 

Well, this is how it looks like. :)

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Easily. Why? The Colts play like a well coach team with low penalty calls and yardage. Flexible game planning week by week. No bad actors in the locker room....no temptations to acquire any.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's way better then overrated Dungy.  Dungy had manning in his prime Harrison Wayne clark stokley  . A good o line edge addai   . Freeney mathis Bethea  bob Sanders.  And only has one ring give  reich those teams he would have 3 rings .     Reich is winning without a top ten QB and only Hilton and winning .

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was a former pastor so he definitely knows how to bring people together. This team is all in! 

 

HALLELUJAH ! 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question do you count Arians as a head coach?

 

In both cases I would say yes though.  But Arians would give him some run for his money.  

 

Reich, Arians, Caldwell, Pagano in that order. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, RockThatBlue said:

I say yes. You?

um considering there's been what, 3 others, yeah I'd say so. 

 

7 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

Question do you count Arians as a head coach?

 

In both cases I would say yes though.  But Arians would give him some run for his money.  

 

Reich, Arians, Caldwell, Pagano in that order. 

A lot of people like Arians but to me, I'd put him 3rd best, just above Pagano. Why? because his antiquated style of stand in there, take huge hits while trying to throw 40 yards down field is part of the reason Luck took a TON of abuse.  You saw it with Arians down in Arizona and now in Tampa.

Caldwell rode Manning's coat tails but the 14-2 season plus the Superbowl appearance puts him 2nd.

 

Pagano: Good as a coordinator but I think he was in over his head as a HC. definitely tail end charlie

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Loved him, but Tony D. was, to me, equivalent to the QB as a "game manager."  Reich is a COACH and strategist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, csmopar said:

um considering there's been what, 3 others, yeah I'd say so. 

 

A lot of people like Arians but to me, I'd put him 3rd best, just above Pagano. Why? because his antiquated style of stand in there, take huge hits while trying to throw 40 yards down field is part of the reason Luck took a TON of abuse.  You saw it with Arians down in Arizona and now in Tampa.

Caldwell rode Manning's coat tails but the 14-2 season plus the Superbowl appearance puts him 2nd.

 

Pagano: Good as a coordinator but I think he was in over his head as a HC. definitely tail end charlie

 

Arians has had a lot of success outside of Indy too.  But I do agree, I think his style is bad for your QB's health.

 

Also Caldwell had a good stint with the Lions.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, colt18 said:

I’d say he’s better than Dungy.

 

Might be, but they are different.  Dungy was a defense minded HC, and made HOF for the Tampa Bucs defense (Tampa 2), and Colts success. Reich is an offense minded HC.

 

5 hours ago, Dingus McGirt said:

Loved him, but Tony D. was, to me, equivalent to the QB as a "game manager."  Reich is a COACH and strategist.

 

Reich relies on analytics much more as well. If he sticks with it, he may eventually join Dungy in Akron.

 

BTW, Dungy was a rookie Steeler safety, but 3rd string emergency QB. One time, both Bradshaw and backup Kruczek got hurt. Dungy (a college QB) had to take over QB not knowing offense playbook (he was a safety, was always in D drills/meetings, not O ). He then gained the distinction of both intercepting, and throwing an interception in the same game. (October 1977)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dungy was one of my favorite coaches and favorite people (I would recommend his book on Leadership to everyone).  That being said, I think Reich could prove to be a better coach.  We need a few more years to see what type of sustained success he can have.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most likely, but hard to tell definitively.  This team is pretty solid.    

I would say he may end up being the best Indianapolis coach ever.  I think he is better than Dungy.  

 

image.thumb.png.5ed765f3ab5469c704990f77f86336f9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Need a few more years but he is well on his way. Best this Dungy had going for him was longevity, his well respected demeanor, and a lot of regular season wins, but for all the talent they had on the team, he won one SB. That’s an overrated coach and I was glad to have him. 

 

Reich on the other hand is in his second year and has shown no sign of regress, this after losing his franchise QB two weeks into the year. The man is a stud and I’m so glad Snake McDaniels bailed. Frank will beat you in  a thousand different ways, has lots of personnel groupings and seems to understand role players better than the other guys. 

 

Not to mention the gargantuan balls that he has to carry between his legs every day. Can’t be hard to move around so well carrying that much weight in your pants every day. 

 

Here’s to another 30 years of Reich/Ballard rocking the Horseshoe. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a small sample size with Reich as a HC (not even 1.5 full seasons under his belt).  

 

That said, he's clearly better than Caldwell/Pagano/Arians IMO.

 

Too early to say he's better than Dungy (he needs a ring before we make that argument), but I think he's on the right path.

 

The thing I like most about Reich so far, which reminds me a bit of Dungy, is that all of his players are bought into him/his system.  He leads with a calm demeanor (both he and Dungy and men of strong faith, so I bet that has something to do with their leadership styles).  I also like that he is willing to take calculated risks (something Dungy almost never did) and he uses very creative play calling and adjusts during the game (at least on offense) better than any Colts' coach I can recall in my days as a fan (since '94).  

 

We frequently start fast with Reich.  This was extremely rare in the Pagano era, and we were lucky to have had Andrew who could come back late during that time, but it seemed like his teams were so predictable offensively, especially to start games and it wasn't really until we had our backs to the wall that the offense opened up.

 

Reich changes his game-plans drastically between weeks, and he also changes better in game than an Colts coach I remember.  

 

Just look at this season:

Game 1 (vs LAC) -- Our 2nd drive we went 15 plays for 75 yards and a TD

Game 2 (vs TEN) -- Our 1st drive we went 7 plays for 78 yards and a TD

Game 3 (vs ATL) -- Our 1st drive we went 9 plays for a FG and our second drive we went 7 plays for 93 yards and a TD.

Game 4 (vs OAK) -- took us until our 3rd drive to score a TD (we got down early and couldn't come back.

Game 5 (vs KC) -- First drive 11 plays 70 yards and a TD, field goal on 2nd drive.

Game 6 (vs TEX) -- First drive -- 12 plays, 94 yards and a TD.

 

 

So in 4 of our 6 games with Reich we have scored on our opening offensive drive.  In 5 of 6 we have scored on at least one of our first 2 offensive drives.  In our worst game of the year (vs. OAK), it took us til our 3rd drive to score and we were already down 21-7 at that point.

 

I could be wrong -- but I don't recall it being the norm in the Pagano regime that we scored on the majority of our first possessions.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, csmopar said:

 

Caldwell rode Manning's coat tails but the 14-2 season plus the Superbowl appearance puts him 2nd.

 


I’d say the same for Dungy. 
 

One, SB with all the talent. What a waste! 
 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was an easy one. I'll take Frank for sure. The harder question is Ballard the best GM since Polian? 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, hoosierhawk said:

This was an easy one. I'll take Frank for sure. The harder question is Ballard the best GM since Polian? 

Nah Grigson is the best ever john c. mcginley laughing GIF, gotcha 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, MPStack said:


I’d say the same for Dungy. 
 

One, SB with all the talent. What a waste! 
 

 

Technically Dungy was great but I do not think he was on the level of a Vince Lombardi, Bill Belichick, Bill Walsh, Chuck Knoll, Tom Landry, or even a Jimmy Johnson type.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, MPStack said:


I’d say the same for Dungy. 
 

One, SB with all the talent. What a waste! 
 

 

Better than the zero Super Bowls the Colts won without Dungy but still having a lot of that talent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, hoosierhawk said:

This was an easy one. I'll take Frank for sure. The harder question is Ballard the best GM since Polian? 

What’s next?  Is TY the best WR since Wayne?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, John Hammonds said:

You beat me to it, @horseshoecrabs!

I was just typing out:

If you want a bigger variety of answer, have everybody rank all Colts head coaches since they moved to Indy.

Dungy

Reich

Marchibroda

Caldwell (Peyton Manning)

Arians

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All the rest

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This guy (writer) is the same guy that thought the Lions would win the NFC North last year, and that the NYGs would have one of the better O's last year...        This is hilarious.... Brady's receiving corp is #1 Edleman who leads the league in drops and is only target #1 because Brown and Gordon were let go. Dorsett is their #2 lol... They picked up Sannu, but he's averaging less than 30 YPG. Brown did better than both Dorsett and Sannu in just one game before he was cut. Their TEs are pretty much non-existent.   Also, JBs averages early on are a little misleading. 4 of those early games were vs teams with bottom 10 passing Ds, and we've probably played more teams with bad passing Ds this year than the majority of the league. Also, teams did not have film early on of JB in FR's O. Opponents learned quick to focus on the run and dare JB to throw.     Remove the Hoyer games as they're irrelevant. Sure you can blame AV for some of our woes, but lets be honest, we shouldn't have been in a situation where we had to have a FG to win, in a lot of these games against mediocre teams. Aside from just a few games vs very bad passing Ds, our passing O has been bad to mediocre all year.     Faster processor? Huh? His time to throw has not improved at all. And it's not like there haven't been a ton of film showing wide open WRs and TEs all year long...... Underrated touch? Are you kidding me. He has two speeds. Fast and faster.      We should probably look at the regression of every pass catcher (when healthy) this year with the exception of  Pascal.    Also, if A is the Pats, like I said above, they've been a revolving door at WR, had no TEs, plus serious OL woes..... yet are still a top 10 passing O.... while we are bottom 10.
    • When a QB has nearly 30 starts in his career, regardless of the circumstances, you know whether or not you have a franchise QB. If anyone has doubts about Jacoby at 27 years old and nearly 30 starts then he isn't the franchise QB.   There seems to be 2 thoughts regarding Brissett this season.   1. He is a franchise QB if the Colts upgrade the receivers and they stay healthy. 2. He is terrible and should be replaced as soon as possible.   The truth is somewhere between those two thoughts.   Jacoby would be better if he played with better receivers but that doesn't mean that Jacoby becomes a franchise QB. This doesn't mean the Colts don't need to upgrade that position group though.   Jacoby is not terrible. He is a QB a team can make the playoffs with and going on a run. But he is not an elite QB. So if the Colts come across someone in the draft who they view as being elite, or the potential to become elite, they will absolutely select him and let him sit a year or two behind Jacoby.    The Colts can believe in Jacoby as a starter but still look to upgrade that position if the right player comes along. 
    • When Hurts got pulled at half time 2 years ago in the national title game for true Freshman Tua that was all I needed to see. They interviewed Sabin after the game and asked why he put Tua in and he said “Because we needed to throw the ball and I thought he could do it better”. Pretty much a clear indication that Hurts isn’t exactly an amazing passer.   Then he goes to a coach who produced back to back Heisman QBs And has a turnaround and people want to act like it’s anything other than scheme. Hurts isn’t good; Lincoln Riley is.   I want no parts of Hurts. Give me Love all day
    • I just picked out this area of the quote in the post itself. Wasn’t picking on you, you’re just the quoted person it attached to I guess. 
    • I agree that I would challenge that as well.  Also, I didn't write it, the SI author did.
  • Members

    • aaron11

      aaron11 2,357

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Robin

      Robin 147

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsGermany

      ColtsGermany 193

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 100

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 181

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 558

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SteelCityColt

      SteelCityColt 8,214

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 2,607

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shastamasta

      shastamasta 2,089

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 8,230

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...