Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Shadow_Creek

Whoever Covered Fuller is legend

Recommended Posts

Against the Falcons he was targeted 16 times for 217 yards and 3 TDs and against Kansas City he was Targeted 9 times for 44 yards 0 TDs however against Us he was only targeted 1 time which is really odd considering how explosive he is on the field so major credit to whoever was covering him.

  • Haha 6
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He left early with an injury and didn’t return so I guess the injury bug is a legend?

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

Against the Falcons he was targeted 16 times for 217 yards and 3 TDs and against Kansas City he was Targeted 9 times for 44 yards 0 TDs however against Us he was only targeted 1 time which is really odd considering how explosive he is on the field so major credit to whoever was covering him.

He left the game with an injury 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, gregr507 said:

He was injured and left the game early lol

As always against Indy.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that Shakial Taylor I'm getting more and more comfortable with that kid.  Nice little player.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now Desir was toast today which was expected also he was in the right place at the right time for that pick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, runthepost said:

Now Desir was toast today which was expected also he was in the right place at the right time for that pick

 

He limped into that game. Don't even think he practiced once this week

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t even think Fuller made it past the first quarter lol.

 

Desir had a couple great plays he stopped Hopkins. He is going to get his yards. For being injured I thought he did pretty well.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, runthepost said:

Now Desir was toast today which was expected also he was in the right place at the right time for that pick

 

Desir played well, with or without the pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

Against the Falcons he was targeted 16 times for 217 yards and 3 TDs and against Kansas City he was Targeted 9 times for 44 yards 0 TDs however against Us he was only targeted 1 time which is really odd considering how explosive he is on the field so major credit to whoever was covering him.


 

FAC88C0E-FD1D-4970-B868-09F1D59266A0.jpeg

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, krunk said:

As always against Indy.

 

You called it.... Wasn't sure you knew what you were talking about.... Now I am.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Shadow_Creek said:

Against the Falcons he was targeted 16 times for 217 yards and 3 TDs and against Kansas City he was Targeted 9 times for 44 yards 0 TDs however against Us he was only targeted 1 time which is really odd considering how explosive he is on the field so major credit to whoever was covering him.

The training staff covered him very well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Barry Sears said:

We kept Clowney in check very well, too!!  :lol:

'Cept he managed to go through the whole game without 1 offsides penalty. 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, krunk said:

As always against Indy.

Is it just me or are we just injuring the heck out of everyone this year. Probably just me, but I keep feeling after watching us set the Mahomes downfall in motion I'm starting to think we might be some bus that teams may want to stay out of the way off. Just a thought.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, lollygagger8 said:

Excellent work on keeping Andre Johnson on the sidelines as well. 

 

For both teams!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is going to be out a few weeks with that hamstring. His hamstring is legend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/20/2019 at 10:37 PM, Shadow_Creek said:

Against the Falcons he was targeted 16 times for 217 yards and 3 TDs and against Kansas City he was Targeted 9 times for 44 yards 0 TDs however against Us he was only targeted 1 time which is really odd considering how explosive he is on the field so major credit to whoever was covering him.

I'm guessing you didn't watch the game live? lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/20/2019 at 10:37 PM, Shadow_Creek said:

Against the Falcons he was targeted 16 times for 217 yards and 3 TDs and against Kansas City he was Targeted 9 times for 44 yards 0 TDs however against Us he was only targeted 1 time which is really odd considering how explosive he is on the field so major credit to whoever was covering him.

Superman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, that's what I fear, for sure.  But even if that's the case.... What's the long term solution?  Who starts at QB in whatever city they have to play in in 2030?  Jk.... slightly.... That damage won't be undone soon, or easily.... Surrounding talent won't fix his issues, just raise the floor a game or two.
    • Oh, the players already know that, regardless of who starts jn The present, past, future, they are well aware JB isn't a true #1 leader at the qb going forward.  Stop gap? Sure... If there's an endgame.
    • This list does not fit the narrative you are trying to put forward.  Only 2 would even be close and even they had chances.    Browns and Redskins don't even count; they are dysfunctional franchises who had plenty of chances but couldn’t get out of their own way.   Dolphins, Titans, and Bears all could have had good QBs if not for trying for retreads, sticking with a player too long (Mariota, Tannehill), and/or missing when they had good players available to draft (Ryan, Mahomes, Watson). Also jury still out on Trubisky.   Vikings and Broncos have not had the best luck with QBs lately, but they have also lingered in the mediocre to good record zone a lot which doesn't help them getting a high draft pick for QB . They also got a few good seasons out of retreads which helped them in the short term, but not the long term. Although in the Broncos case I am sure they will take their SB with PM.   I will give you the Jets, they have had some bad luck. When they did have good picks there wasn’t much available; although jury still out on Darnold (also they could have taken Lamar Jackson). Buffalo also had some bad luck for a few years, but they also blew their chance to draft Mahomes (though Allen may still turn into something).   During the last few years all these teams have had periods where they had a player/or players  as good or better than JB and it didn't amount to much other than keeping them from a top draft pick. If you don't have an very good - elite QB you are just playing the lottery hoping for one of those all the stars perfectly aligned runs that rarely happen.
    • Thanks for this.   My favorite part is his tackle at 5:30.  
    • Not a big deal.     Brissett puts fans in an odd position.   He is almost the definition of average.  His QB rating is average.  His yards per game is below average but his INT % is above average.  So I can understand supporters and detractors.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...