Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Smonroe

Can the Colts Defense do it Again?

Recommended Posts

Great game last week, but there are facts we have to face:

 

Mahomes isn't near as good when he's not mobile - Watson won't have that problem.  The Colts will have to spy him on every play.

 

The Chiefs running game isn't much to speak of.  The Texans have a pounder in Hyde and a receiving back in Duke.

 

Neither of the Chiefs main threats at WR were on the field.  The Colts have done a great job on Hopkins and Fuller in the past, that needs to continue.

 

Before anyone says the Colts were also missing pieces on defense against the Chiefs, think about it like a chess match.  Were the pieces the Chiefs lost on offense worth more than what the Colts lost on defense?  Arguable, but probably even for the Colts at best.

 

On the other side of the ball, the Texans appear to be without Roby and Joseph.  I like our O line against their front seven.

 

Going to be a great game - maybe for the division.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything that has been done once can be done again.

 

It'll be down to Eberflus to break down the Texans' offense and to the players to execute the game plan.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The key to beating them is getting to Watson. These last couple of games, he's not been sacked and he's killing teams. Tunsil is starting to get acclimated, which sucks for everyone else because he's a monster LT. They need to stunt, blitz, disguise, whatever they have to do to get pressure on Watson. Easier said than done though too, he's obviously extremely mobile having like 45 rushing yards and 2 TDs against KC. The good news is that DeAndre Hopkins has been relatively quiet thus far and he normally posts huge games against Indy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have my doubts about the run D.  KC is really poor at it this year.

 

I'm hoping DLs terrible play in week 2 was because of his symptoms.  If so, we might be OK.

 

Can we rush the passer again after losing the main guy whose been getting the pressure the team has gotten?  That will determine the D's effectiveness IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the pass rush/pressure we got in the two games we got it correlates to poor LTs at KC and LAC.  If Tunsil is playing well, it might be difficult, even with Sheard back.

 

Our secondary play is difficult to judge.  Young guys seem to play well but that can go up or down in any given week.

 

This will be a good test game for Brissett.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joseph being out helps a bit.  I think we win the battle in the trenches.  Need a huge game from Autry & Grover, though.  Keep Watson contained and force pressure up the middle.  Very similar to KC game, in my opinion.

 

Hopefully we can keep the running game at least somewhat productive, but JB will have to get a few chunk plays in this one.  I'm looking forward to a really close game with us on top in the end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We should be able to run the ball at will again this Sunday, and that'll help our defense stay off the field. 

 

In regards to our defense, getting Leonard and Hooker possibly back will be huge. I expect our strong performance against KC to hopefully continue with the added playmakers we'll be getting back.

 

Not to mention we had success defensively against Watson and Hopkins in the playoff game from last year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

   One of the encouraging things I see about the Colts this year is the reduction in penalties. The old adage of; “more games are lost than won”. No friendly fire.

    Keep Watson in the pocket and press their receivers. Stopping the run is critical.

    They might load the box and dare us to pass. Missing Roby and Joseph hurts them and this will be a good test, not only for Brissett but for Reich, in scheming guys open.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CaptainColt12 said:

I think as long as Leonard plays well and we have Quincy and Rock play a lot of man we'll be pretty good. 

I wonder how Quincy graded out against KC. He was a man corner coming out of college so I wonder if he graded better playing his natural scheme

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, twfish said:

I wonder how Quincy graded out against KC. He was a man corner coming out of college so I wonder if he graded better playing his natural scheme

I think like a 40 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

We should be able to run the ball at will again this Sunday, and that'll help our defense stay off the field. 

 

In regards to our defense, getting Leonard and Hooker possibly back will be huge. I expect our strong performance against KC to hopefully continue with the added playmakers we'll be getting back.

 

Not to mention we had success defensively against Watson and Hopkins in the playoff game from last year. 

Houston is like 4th in run defense. That’s pretty good.

 

This should be a game where we can take advantage of the Texans secondary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Texans WR are a lot better then what we faced in KC. Should be a interesting Sunday. We have tall lanky corners who play their best in man coverage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tytus Howard will also be out.  May be able to get a sack from Sheard this Sunday?  Not sure who backs up Howard?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MB-ColtsFan said:

Tytus Howard will also be out.  May be able to get a sack from Sheard this Sunday?  Not sure who backs up Howard?

Isn’t that Houston’s side?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure we'll play some man but I don't know how much of that you play against a running QB like Watson.  When you play man the DB get their back turned away from the QB which allows a running QB like D. Watson to extend plays.   I think the winning formula will be more Zone coverage with some man mixed in at a lower percentage than KC.  That along with blitz pressures.  And lastly being very disciplined about pinning him in the pocket.   I'm not all that concerned about their receivers.  We've got decent matchups on all of them. 

 

Will Fuller almost never does anything against us or he ends up being hurt before the game is over.  Hopkins is Hopkins but honestly outside of that big game he had against us in Indy last year he usually doesn't do a whole lot of damage against the Colts historically. Desir and a combination of some safety help should be fine.   I think Kenny Moore will do more than okay against Coutee(another guy who usually ends up hurt).  Rock and Quincy can deal with Fuller and Stills.    I think we'll be fine as long as we do a good job on Watson.   I'm not too concerned with Hyde and Duke Johnson. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t think Hooker was coming back until after a few more weeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody know what percentage of Man vs Zone did we play in those last 2 games versus Houston last year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, atapcl said:

I didn’t think Hooker was coming back until after a few more weeks.

There is a chance he will play Sunday. He said he is preparing to play but if he isn’t ready he has confidence in the young guys. He said he won’t come back Sunday unless he is ready. Reich said he was cautiously optimistic he will play.

Kevin Bowen said Campbell was in the locker room yesterday. He thinks he is a week or two away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Isn’t that Houston’s side?


Houston's at RE going up against LT's and Sheard at LE going up against RT's, which is where Tytus was.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eberflus said today that how they play defense depends on who they play. He said it should a balance on keeping things simple with the young guys and being aggressive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Fisticuffs111 said:


Houston's usually going up against LT's and Sheard, RT's, which is where Tytus was.

Wonder if they could switch Houston on the other side once in awhile.  I know they have moved him around this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see why they shouldn't be able to play well against Houston. (Especially with Leonard coming back.) and the game being at Lucas Oil Stadium. Deshaun Watson, Hopkins and Fuller will give us a battle, but Coutee is the one guy I'm watching out for. Last year we took advantage of their weakness on offense and that was their offensive line. This game could go either way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, krunk said:

Anybody know what percentage of Man vs Zone did we play in those last 2 games versus Houston last year?

I don't know the percentages but one of the big things the Colts did against Houston in the last two games was they fooled Watson.  They would should man coverage but then drop into zones or they showed zone coverage and then went to man at the snap and I expect to see more of that this game, especially with 2 weeks to prepare.  Take away Watson's first two reads and he lacks the field awareness to be effective

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say roll with Willis and Odum again. 

I do want to see a Hooker/Willis duo at some point for sure as well. 

 

Leave Ya-Sin instead of Wilson, and put Desir on Hopkins again. 

 

Play more man (esp on 3rd down) and Blitz Moore! 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/15/2019 at 2:47 PM, krunk said:

I'm sure we'll play some man but I don't know how much of that you play against a running QB like Watson.  When you play man the DB get their back turned away from the QB which allows a running QB like D. Watson to extend plays.   I think the winning formula will be more Zone coverage with some man mixed in at a lower percentage than KC.  That along with blitz pressures.  And lastly being very disciplined about pinning him in the pocket.   I'm not all that concerned about their receivers.  We've got decent matchups on all of them. 

 

Will Fuller almost never does anything against us or he ends up being hurt before the game is over.  Hopkins is Hopkins but honestly outside of that big game he had against us in Indy last year he usually doesn't do a whole lot of damage against the Colts historically. Desir and a combination of some safety help should be fine.   I think Kenny Moore will do more than okay against Coutee(another guy who usually ends up hurt).  Rock and Quincy can deal with Fuller and Stills.    I think we'll be fine as long as we do a good job on Watson.   I'm not too concerned with Hyde and Duke Johnson. 

 

Both Fuller and Hopkins are banged up. Both were limited in practice yesterday. Stills is a bit banged up too, but was "full practice". Howard (starting RT) did not practice, which could be an impact (for our pass rush).

 

Houston's DBs are also banged up. While I think we'll try to run it a bunch, this might be a game where JB needs to do more with his arm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, EastStreet said:

 

Both Fuller and Hopkins are banged up. Both were limited in practice yesterday. Stills is a bit banged up too, but was "full practice". Howard (starting RT) did not practice, which could be an impact (for our pass rush).

 

Houston's DBs are also banged up. While I think we'll try to run it a bunch, this might be a game where JB needs to do more with his arm.

I think this might be a game for the offense like we saw against the falcons. They will do everything to stop TY and guys are going to be wide open.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Darius Leonard was key last year in stopping Deshaun Watson. Last year we had him spy Watson for most of the game. We need him to do that again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This guy (writer) is the same guy that thought the Lions would win the NFC North last year, and that the NYGs would have one of the better O's last year...        This is hilarious.... Brady's receiving corp is #1 Edleman who leads the league in drops and is only target #1 because Brown and Gordon were let go. Dorsett is their #2 lol... They picked up Sannu, but he's averaging less than 30 YPG. Brown did better than both Dorsett and Sannu in just one game before he was cut. Their TEs are pretty much non-existent.   Also, JBs averages early on are a little misleading. 4 of those early games were vs teams with bottom 10 passing Ds, and we've probably played more teams with bad passing Ds this year than the majority of the league. Also, teams did not have film early on of JB in FR's O. Opponents learned quick to focus on the run and dare JB to throw.     Remove the Hoyer games as they're irrelevant. Sure you can blame AV for some of our woes, but lets be honest, we shouldn't have been in a situation where we had to have a FG to win, in a lot of these games against mediocre teams. Aside from just a few games vs very bad passing Ds, our passing O has been bad to mediocre all year.     Faster processor? Huh? His time to throw has not improved at all. And it's not like there haven't been a ton of film showing wide open WRs and TEs all year long...... Underrated touch? Are you kidding me. He has two speeds. Fast and faster.      We should probably look at the regression of every pass catcher (when healthy) this year with the exception of  Pascal.    Also, if A is the Pats, like I said above, they've been a revolving door at WR, had no TEs, plus serious OL woes..... yet are still a top 10 passing O.... while we are bottom 10.
    • When a QB has nearly 30 starts in his career, regardless of the circumstances, you know whether or not you have a franchise QB. If anyone has doubts about Jacoby at 27 years old and nearly 30 starts then he isn't the franchise QB.   There seems to be 2 thoughts regarding Brissett this season.   1. He is a franchise QB if the Colts upgrade the receivers and they stay healthy. 2. He is terrible and should be replaced as soon as possible.   The truth is somewhere between those two thoughts.   Jacoby would be better if he played with better receivers but that doesn't mean that Jacoby becomes a franchise QB. This doesn't mean the Colts don't need to upgrade that position group though.   Jacoby is not terrible. He is a QB a team can make the playoffs with and going on a run. But he is not an elite QB. So if the Colts come across someone in the draft who they view as being elite, or the potential to become elite, they will absolutely select him and let him sit a year or two behind Jacoby.    The Colts can believe in Jacoby as a starter but still look to upgrade that position if the right player comes along. 
    • When Hurts got pulled at half time 2 years ago in the national title game for true Freshman Tua that was all I needed to see. They interviewed Sabin after the game and asked why he put Tua in and he said “Because we needed to throw the ball and I thought he could do it better”. Pretty much a clear indication that Hurts isn’t exactly an amazing passer.   Then he goes to a coach who produced back to back Heisman QBs And has a turnaround and people want to act like it’s anything other than scheme. Hurts isn’t good; Lincoln Riley is.   I want no parts of Hurts. Give me Love all day
    • I just picked out this area of the quote in the post itself. Wasn’t picking on you, you’re just the quoted person it attached to I guess. 
    • I agree that I would challenge that as well.  Also, I didn't write it, the SI author did.
  • Members

    • dodsworth

      dodsworth 1,069

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfan77

      coltsfan77 111

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MPStack

      MPStack 2,946

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • aaron11

      aaron11 2,357

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AlanNC

      AlanNC 125

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BleedBlue4Shoe86

      BleedBlue4Shoe86 122

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 181

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 121

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr.Debonair

      Mr.Debonair 2,245

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Robin

      Robin 147

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...