-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
From this morning: ESPN's Rob Demovsky said Packers backup QB Tim Boyle "would be more suited" than Jordan Love to start in 2021 if Aaron Rodgers is traded or retires this offseason. In other words, the Packers would be in bad spot if Rodgers isn't in green and yellow next season. Demovsky said "nothing [Love] has shown, at least publicly, would suggest" he's ready to replace Rodgers a year after the Packers inexplicably drafted Love in the first round. Packers beat writers have written extensively since last summer that Love is an erratic passer who appears over his head in Green Bay's offense. "Love has struggled with accuracy -- in the drill where quarterbacks throw to a stationary target (usually a net) and to players running routes on air (without a defender)," Demovsky said. He suggested the team's best course might be to trade Love, like the Patriots did with Jimmy Garoppolo when Tom Brady was unhappy about New England drafting his successor. That Love isn't locked in as Green Bay's starter post-Rodgers is an indictment of the entire organization. Just a validation to those seemingly hard to find Love assessments I was earlier referring to. You are welcome!!
-
Not sure let me see if I can find it. Has to be closed to the top. That is a yard more then Rivers.
-
By funktacious2 · Posted
I think Patrick Jones II is currently seen as a late 1st, early 2nd kind of guy, other than that I like it for what it is. Beware of the incoming haters on the Stafford trade, but I think that might be what it takes, I'm thinking at least a 20211st but yeah maybe more. I could personally get behind Stafford if Ballard and Reich are really sure on him. 1st round picks are nice but they are no slam dunk. Werner, T-rich, Dorsett are some names we may have heard of. But I do understand it's kind of more than just a pick, it's an investment into the future. We'd be trading with the hopes of him being "the guy", but if he isn't then let's hope we figure that out before his contract is up. Those two years may also tell us what we have in Eason. Two years would not be much to have for the cost of a first, so it's risky but could certainly be worth the cost too. Stafford would probably be getting the best supporting cast he has had in his whole career.
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now