-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted
Going into the season there were some that thought Pascal wouldn't make the roster. I had him as a #4, he is good enough to be a #3 IMO. -
By WoolMagnet · Posted
That could be written about him now. What i see, is that his negatives should be fixable. I think JB can be successful. I think now you have to gameplan and script well to help him. And i feel , in time, he can improve the down the field stuff. He protects the ball, so with a good D he could be “the guy.” But is he “the guy” for the Colts. I’m not gonna bash JB. I respect what he has done. I just hope Reich/Ballard ate realistic in what he can be and if that is enough. I dont have the expertise to know. Heck, its a guess for Reich and Ballard. I do, however, support drafting a QB (hopefully one with promise, not back-up ceiling quality) to compete and possibly be the future. JB was thrust into a terrible position 2 years ago and he never complained. In fact, all he did was gain the respect and faith of coaches and teamates. Then, this year, he is thrust unexpectedly into following a “generational talent” that replaced a “goat” and once again, he handled it with class. Now i agree i’d like to see more from him, but with the issues this tear its hard to tell whos to blame. I’m not sure he’s the answer, bit i also think many QBs would have struggled here. Look at how Brady is doing without receiver help. -
So why the love from Parcells, Reich and Ballard? Must be his personal character and leadership they like so much. They never talked about Luck that way...that I know of.
-
By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted
I look at Pascal as a #3 but that is my opinion. Average, not great/not bad. -
Until you can prove otherwise, JB is taking us nowhere.
-
-
Members