Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Leonard Williams


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Multiple teams interested in trading for him. I would not b surprised if the Colts were  one of those teams. A 6 overall pick and only 25.  I think it would take a 2nd rounder at least.  If they could get him with say and 2nd and another lower pick,  I would go for it.  

As much as I may chide people for lowball trade offers, I think a 2nd may be too much for his production level and what may be a 11 game rental

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

I am watching the Jets game and I must admit, I am not overly impressed with Williams.  Mayb playing in a one gap system would benefit him?  

And this should have been the game where he would have shown off some skills getting to the qb, as this was really the first game this year where the Jets were consistently playing with a lead. 

 

I think this is a lot closer to a 5th round pick territory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we win this week I could see Ballard being interested in Williams and maybe a few others.  A trade could also involve players like Odum, Gaethers or Wilson and a pick.  I think winning this week would make a trade more likely.  We could use DL and WR help for a run.  Not to mention we are in deep trouble if Costanzo goes down for any length of time.  JMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I HIGHLY doubt that it happens, 

 

I am usually against all the trade for this guy, trade for that guy bantor......

 

But to me..... right now, DT is a HUGE priority, for this team, right now.

 

I would offer a fourth round pick and and a conditional pick, plunk him in the rotation at DT (both spots)

 

Clowney is a much more valuable player, and was traded for a 3rd, and 2 non starters

 

He lines up at DE and DT, he is really good against the run, he also gets some pressure

 

He is basically a half year rental, as he is on the last year of his contract

 

We could work out a long term deal if he plays well

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d offer them a 3rd round pick and Haeg for Williams. They seem to like doing business with us. The trade in the 2018 draft and they also have 3 former Colts on their team (Anderson, Basham, and Hairston).

 

Or just wait till FA. Which is way more likely because you know Ballard likes dem picks lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/21/2019 at 8:23 PM, DownHillRunner said:

Jets will ask for no less than a 3rd round pick for him. Wait until he hits free agency. 

A 3rd round pick wouldn’t be bad considering we have two 2nd round picks. Plus I think the roster is nearing the state where there’s enough young high-ceiling players that you can afford to trade a 2nd or 3rd round pick.

 

Plus the Colts could use him now as opposed to later. Once we get into December, we’re going to need a run stopper like him because Hunt and Stewart ain’t cutting it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Defjamz26 said:

A 3rd round pick wouldn’t be bad considering we have two 2nd round picks. Plus I think the roster is nearing the state where there’s enough young high-ceiling players that you can afford to trade a 2nd or 3rd round pick.

 

Plus the Colts could use him now as opposed to later. Once we get into December, we’re going to need a run stopper like him because Hunt and Stewart ain’t cutting it.

I couldn't agree more.  He would be the perfect addition if we wanted to upgrade the defensive side of the ball.  He is young and he would also be a major contributor for many years to come.  Hopefully Ballard is interested and can he can strike another deal with the Jets.  We can afford to trade a 2nd or 3rd right now and get an immediate return in a position of need.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moosejawcolt said:


Slightly off topic, but did anyone recognize B/R got rid of the comments section they had. There are other options, but not the standard comment section. 
 

Over the years, I did catch when they were pushing an agenda, they’d close the comment section, but like I said, 100% gone now.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

This is okay.  We didn't draft him there.  He's a solid run stopper now and he does get pressure on the QB.  Just what we need and he is available.  It would be like deja vu with Booger McFarland.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2019 at 9:53 AM, Defjamz26 said:

A 3rd round pick wouldn’t be bad considering we have two 2nd round picks. Plus I think the roster is nearing the state where there’s enough young high-ceiling players that you can afford to trade a 2nd or 3rd round pick.

 

Plus the Colts could use him now as opposed to later. Once we get into December, we’re going to need a run stopper like him because Hunt and Stewart ain’t cutting it.

Stewart isn't doing horrible but Hunt isn't anywhere near the same player he was last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...