Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
RockThatBlue

Colts almost drafted Champ Bailey in 1999

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, RockThatBlue said:

Interesting.

 

Man, I love Edge (and Mike Peterson and Brad Scioli that we drafted with the Faulk picks), but wow, just thinking about Manning + Faulk on offense, AND Champ Bailey on defense...

 

giphy.gif

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, MTC said:

Hindsight is always 20/20.

 

True.  I just have a thing for cornerbacks, and CB was one of my favorites.

 

In Madden one year I traded Manning away and was able to trade for Champ Bailey and then for Charles Woodson.  Two best CBs in the game that year on the same team.  :rock:

 

My reasoning was that I can control the QB on offense, so he doesn't have to be that great, but I can't cover all the WRs when I'm on defense, so I want the best DBs to do that for me.  #MaddenLogic  haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t know how to react to this.  I mean it would have changed Colts history but I don’t know if that would have been bad.  Both Bailey and Edge are Hall of Fame players in my book.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well many years later Manning and Champ did end up teammates so funny how that worked out. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Edge would have stayed healthy, I think he would have shattered most records in a quick amount of time.

 

3200 yds running / 1200 yds receiving and 26 TD's his first 2 years. Those are crazy numbers.

 

Edge was definitely the better pick I think, he was on another level. He really was a physical beast who always came ready to play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like we knew this already, no? Maybe it wasn't confirmed by someone on the team, but I thought this story had been told before...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, SteelCityColt said:

I'd have rather had Champ Bailey... 

 

 

 

I'll run away from the mob now. 

 

Do keep in mind that Bailey went to the Redskins and then held them hostage to trade him once his rookie contract expired.  So trade him they did — to the Broncos for Clinton Portis.  The Broncos also got a 2nd rounder along with Bailey.

 

Who’s to say he wouldn’t have done us the same way?  Of course, the Skins were already under Snyder’s ownership by then, so maybe Bailey’s refusals were understandable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, luv_pony_express said:

 

Do keep in mind that Bailey went to the Redskins and then held them hostage to trade him once his rookie contract expired.  So trade him they did — to the Broncos for Clinton Portis.  The Broncos also got a 2nd rounder along with Bailey.

 

Who’s to say he wouldn’t have done us the same way?  Of course, the Skins were already under Snyder’s ownership by then, so maybe Bailey’s refusals were understandable.

 

I think it says more about the Redskins then it does about Champ Bailey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Edgerrin didn't tear his ACL in 2001 there's no telling how many rings the Colts might have ended up with. I would take Edgerrin over Bailey every day of the week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/13/2019 at 5:33 PM, Superman said:

I feel like we knew this already, no? Maybe it wasn't confirmed by someone on the team, but I thought this story had been told before...

Fangio mentioned it recently in an interview I'm not sure of the context for why he was talking about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here's where I think Kelly 'fans' are distressed. To your point we don't know Kelly...fair.  So what do we know.  We know he can run, dude's fast.  We know he has a strong arm, like that.  We know he'll throw downfield and into tight windows, good!  We know he will stand in the pocket, check. We know he has the stuff to go into Alabama with an Ole Miss team and beat em, that no small thing. We also know he has off-field issues maybe he's grown up, don't know but we hear good things from Frank.  So to someone like me, I like what I see and like what I hear...Rally confused.   Here's what we know about Hoyer, he has none of those physical attributes but he's good in the QB room.  Ok, well, I'm good in QB room but you wouldn't want me under center.  There's an obvious hesitation here on the part of Frank and/or Chris to make Kelly a part of the permanent roster, they will likely cut him again and hope he clears waivers over Hoyer, that to me is absolutely stunning.  Either, Kelly is an off the field nightmare we shouldn't be investing in OR he should be at worst QB2. Hoyer is simply not good, we can get his level of performance literally anywhere, he's the prototypical failed backup and those are readily available on the cheap. I wouldn't understand keeping him over a contract when he weakens the team relative to someone like Kelly on game day.  So to a previous posters comment, why is Kelly here?  If he is such an integrity issue it's not our job to make a man out of him while he occupies a spot.  If he's is good enough physically, which he is, and he's on this roster, which he is, he should stay up and get some first team reps, as all back ups should and see how matures.  It starting to feel like some ego at play here.  All in all, our leadership was ill-prepared to deal with Brissett going down and choked this week in prep.  It's my hope we dump Hoyer who is useless and keep Kelly at QB2, I don't think that will happen.  My 2+ cents.
    • Willis ran in the low 4.5s in both his pro day and combine. No offense, but the articles on Colts.com are always very kind to the guys we draft. Like I said, love Willis, I just think he's more of a box guy. And low 4.5s is fast enough. He's field fast in the short space, which is great. 
    • Ok, read the following, and let me know specifically what you disagree with...   On Parcells.... https://nypost.com/2019/09/08/why-jacoby-brissett-has-a-big-backer-in-bill-parcells/   I love BP. Old school dude. Keep in mind he was a "defensive" coach. Do you remember the Bruner/Simms fiasco when he was in NY (not sure how old you are). Even BP admits he made the wrong QB decisions. At NE, he drafted Drew B with the first pick his first year, and then he bolted for NYJ after a few years. He didn't last long there either. When he was at Dallas, they were all over the place with QB.   I give him props for the two SBs in NYG, but he's also had some bad years and a lot of first round and WC losses. I don't think of him as a QB genius at all. It's pretty clear BP is more sold on JB's character than talent. And that's fine too. But his endorsement doesn't weigh heavily from a talent perspective given the entire context.    As far as Belichick is concerned, he's a genius on many things. And he's also a D guy. Aside from Brady, what is his track record for QBs? His HC gig with the Browns was a real mixed bag. At NE, since Brady, he's drafted 10 QBs. The majority of them never amounted to anything. Aside from Cassell (who had more downs than ups) and Jimmy G, the rest were bombs.    And JB was third on their depth chart, and IIRC they were shopping JB after the deflate gate and injury time was done. Not saying BB isn't a genius, or a great at evaluating .........  but the other 8 QBs did nothing, and what does that say about him? Love to hear the explanation.      
    • Yea that’s what his combine profile states but when the scouts took him through position drills and had him run his 40 at pro day their numbers tell a different story. And anyone can tell you a 40 yard dash is all about technique. Track speed doesn’t necessarily translate to “On the Field Speed” but I found the article and verbatim this is what the scouts said on Willis. If you’re curious to read the entire article it’s on Colts.com and titled “Through the Scouts Eye”   “So, you see him not only playing in the box, but I mean, he's played free safety. He plays nickel. He's played on the slot and he did a pretty good job with that. I think he's faster than a lot of people and a lot of people give him credit for it and he tested pretty well that way. I think he ran in the 4.4s, and he's a very well-rounded player. I was always taught a long time ago slow safety usually get your beat, dumb safeties always get your beat. He's the polar opposite of both. So, we're really excited about him.”
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...