Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Broncos week 8 flexed back to 1:00 pm


ColtsBlueFL

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, CaptainColt12 said:

Are 4 o'clock games considered to be more of a prime time game than 1. Well doesn't matter cause I like 1 games much more than any other time, I don't have to wait as long. 

 

Their games that are more publized, but not good enough for sunday night

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both games are on CBS, so clearly they believe Oakland vs Houston will be the more exciting match up. Makes sense Texans put up 50 last week and the raiders are on a winning streak beating the colts and bears. I’m planning to be at this game and was looking forward to the 4pm timing. Oh well 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

 

With Texans and Colts at 3 - 2 currently, and that the Raider's had defeated the Colts. So...

No was just thinking do we want the raiders or texans to win that one. Raiders currently  have wildcard tie breaker over US unless they finish  with worse record. If the texans lose it may  make it easier  to win division 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm down either way, as long as gametime is after church.  I actually prefer it early because our family does a joint video chat with my brother who's in the Army every Sunday evening.  Skype is a wonderful invention. 

 

that always takes precedence over football for obvious reasons but an early afternoon game is great because there's no conflict.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Stephen said:

No was just thinking do we want the raiders or texans to win that one. Raiders currently  have wildcard tie breaker over US unless they finish  with worse record. If the texans lose it may  make it easier  to win division 

 

First goal, win division and get home field playoff game. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2019 at 2:35 PM, ColtsGermany said:

That's great for me! So i don't have to stay awake till 1 a. m. :thmup:

I don’t know how you do it.  I was on vacation last week and listening to the game at 220am.   Kept falling asleep and waking up to it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Fluke_33 said:

I don’t know how you do it.  I was on vacation last week and listening to the game at 220am.   Kept falling asleep and waking up to it.  

That happened to me too. Where have you been? 

When the game is at 4.25 p.m. it's ok. But not more. Games at 1 p.m. Are the best for me. 

I watched the game vs the pats last season complete in the middle of the night and was sooo tired the next day. But I have to admit I don't do it very often when we play that late. Only for special games :P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ColtsGermany said:

That happened to me too. Where have you been? 

When the game is at 4.25 p.m. it's ok. But not more. Games at 1 p.m. Are the best for me. 

I watched the game vs the pats last season complete in the middle of the night and was sooo tired the next day. But I have to admit I don't do it very often when we play that late. Only for special games :P

 

I was in Paris, which I was told Indy is designed after- circle city and all. 
i planned on sleeping through it and watching replays the next day but got too excited.  Unfortunately my SundayTicket and gamepass both said they won’t work outside the us so I had to listen to the radio broadcast.   That was annoying.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Latu, but don't you think there's a significant number of teams that are scared off by his medical? And then a couple more who will downgrade him because of his age?
    • yeah pretty much what I figured.  If they are going to start mixing up coverages and running more man coverage, then sure grab a CB in the first.  If they're going to continue being a mostly zone team regardless, then no, no round 1 CB.
    • The mission is to build something that has us competing with the best of the best. This is a season for AR to get tuned up.  Who do you think will be the right guys on our roster now to take us to an AFC Championship game?  It's not Smith, Fries, and we likely can't get there with more than 2-3 of our current back seven.  I would offer Buckner to the Bears as part of a trade for 9. Eberflus wants to have a great D so maybe he bites.  Then hopefully trade back 2-3 spots for a good pick.  I'd love to come out of the draft with Latham and the Dline guy.
    • I think he's a little overrated as a corner prospect. Doesn't mean I don't like him, I do. But I was hearing about how incredibly athletic he is, people were talking about him like he was a lockdown defender, then I watch him for a couple games and I don't see that. So at first I was pretty down on him. Then I went back and watched him with my expectations much lower, and I see what he has to offer.   He's definitely athletic, but not the standout, premier athlete people were making him out to be at first. Watching his high school basketball videos helped me contextualize his athleticism, there's plenty of burst there. He has some struggles flipping his hips and staying connected late in the down. He's feisty and physical, plays the run with enthusiasm, tackles well, and he has explosiveness. He's better in shorter areas when he doesn't have to try to keep up with a receiver with elite speed. I know he ran 4.43, but it wasn't a pro day, it was a private workout. I discount timed speeds at pro days, and definitely at private workouts. To me, he's closer to 4.5 than 4.4, and that's what I expected when watching him play.   To me, he's a safety/nickel prospect, not a boundary corner. And if he were looked at as a boundary corner, I think his arm length would probably disqualify him for the Colts, at least in the first round. And I think the Colts already view corner as a Day 2 position. He's said all the right things about playing multiple positions. And while I don't know how the new rules will affect kickoffs, I think it makes sense to have good options at returner, so that helps his stock as well. But I think the second round is the right range for him. If we drafted him, I think we still need a boost on the outside.
    • Personally….  I’m hoping and praying you’re wrong.   I don’t even think Murphy is a Ballard type of player. He’s not tall or long or rangy or athletic.   He’s a 6’1” 300 pound ball of muscle.   I’m not saying he’s not a good player, he is.   But CB has never drafted or signed a player with that body type or athletic background.      Is it possible the Colts draft Murphy?   Yes.  I’m just hoping it doesn’t happen.   I’d be scratching my head forever.   Just my two cents.  
  • Members

    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,169

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,312

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,816

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • wig

      wig 221

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,738

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jason_

      Jason_ 2,271

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ChuggaBeer

      ChuggaBeer 1,756

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hooch

      Hooch 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 8,955

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • boo2202

      boo2202 672

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...