Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

KC vs Houston Your Take


King Colt

Recommended Posts

I disagree with you, I see no way the Chiefs lose 2 in a row at Arrowhead. Chiefs may win this one by 10 or so. What we did to the Chiefs rarely happens to them. I will say 30-20 Chiefs. Watson is good but he isn't better than Mahomes and the Texans do not have our run game or O.Line to dominate that way.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I disagree with you, I see no way the Chiefs lose 2 in a row at Arrowhead. Chiefs may win this one by 10 or so. What we did to the Chiefs rarely happens to them. I will say 30-20 Chiefs. Watson is good but he isn't better than Mahomes and the Texans do not have our run game or O.Line to dominate that way.

I agree. The Texans will do opposite and try to be in a shootout with KC. No one beats KC in a shootout 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, IndySouthsider said:

I agree. The Texans will do opposite and try to be in a shootout with KC. No one beats KC in a shootout 

NO ONE? (Point to last year and both losses to NE).

 

i see their D giving Mahomes fits especially if his ankle has him hobbled still. I also see Watson Lighting up KC secondary a lot better than the Colts did because Watson is a better QB. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chrisaaron1023 said:

Let go Mahomes! Is Tyreek Back this week?!

Yes, and Watkins. which completely changes the way KC attacks a secondary.  It sounds like they may also get a starter or two back on OL and DL. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, csmopar said:

Yes, and Watkins. which completely changes the way KC attacks a secondary.  It sounds like they may also get a starter or two back on OL and DL. 

I heard Watkins was still out and Hill is a game time decision. (I’m keeping a close eye since Hill on my Fantasy team and I want him back in lol)

Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, JimJaime said:

I heard Watkins was still out and Hill is a game time decision. (I’m keeping a close eye since Hill on my Fantasy team and I want him back in lol)

both are on my team, yahoo app has hill as P (probable) and Watkins (Q)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what happens when your not balanced and your QB is not the same with that injury. Hopefully they can pull this out. If not it isn’t the end of the world since we do play them next week and they have a bye when we play miami.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would 100% give a second round for Darnold, hell we have fleeced the Jets enough and possibly trading Brissett along with it. I still think he has every single tool to be a great QB in this league, his issue is #1 whose around him talent wise and #2 who is coaching him. It gets him out of a bad situation and keeps us set up to be contenders moving forward. He gets the time to learn our offense and team and then next year we roll with Darnold and Eason. I honestly see it as an absolute win for every party involved besides Brissett but even then he would only be there for a year.   I think its a move we need to make because otherwise we are in QB purgatory for the next several years. We have too good of a defense and to much talent to sit idly by without having an above average QB. 
    • We aren't some bad team, he would sign here, and the price was a 3rd and conditional 5th that could be a 4th. Just offer a 3rd and 4th next year and you get him. Ballard knew this 100%. I don't give him the benefit of the doubt to draft pass-rushers. In fact, quite the opposite. He has proven he can't draft them with Lewis, Banogu, and Turay.
    • I think a rules change is needed lol...  IMO, you shouldn't have to pay any unrealized contract $ to retain rights, and you shouldn't lose the rights to any player retiring mid contract. The money should have returned, and if he ever decides to come back, the Colts should have first option to reinstate the contract. 
    • If about $20 plus mil. a year comes off the QB position with JB (even if we bring back Rivers), we should be able to make it work. If we felt it was a fit, we would make it work. It is just that Ballard still feels this roster needs more talent added on the offensive side and other areas that only draft picks can provide unless you overpay in free agency. That is my educated guess.
    • Looks like the Raven's are going to get him. He has talent, but the guy has been a cancer every place he's been. Lets not forget he's also suing both the Raiders and Patriots for signing bonus money.
  • Members

    • krunk

      krunk 12,729

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 6,920

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 2,389

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 731

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,670

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 10,554

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LJpalmbeacher2

      LJpalmbeacher2 1,784

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 438

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 515

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 582

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...