Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Week 4 impressions: Brissett


SouthernIndianaNDFan

Recommended Posts

Just now, GoColts8818 said:

These are the kinds of games that make me give pause about feeling comfortable with him.  

Why?  I mean I  don't get this mentality at all.  Brissett did enough to win, he made some mistakes including a whopper in the form of the pick 6, but in a game when the running wasn't working for us he put the team on his back and nearly brought us back into the game.

 

I mean we should have gone into this game knowing he wasn't Peyton.  Peyton should be expected to fuel this kind of comeback.  With Brissett you've GOT to have more than him.  We really didn't today.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Drops didn’t help but this wasn’t his best game either.  Once again the chunk plays were missing and the Raiders were sitting on the run and had the two deep passes the Colts tried well covered.  Not Reich’s best day calling the plays but the drops were the biggest issue.

 

  We got outplayed and out coached today. 
  Surprised i guess that Cain is such a no show. Campbell isn't there yet either that is for sure.
 And yes Brissett was off target and his throws were late getting there.
 Very good job by Oakland against our o-line, and against our passing game.
  Glad to see Speed out there. We need him in lots of situations.
  Walker meh

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The word coming into this year was:

a. Brissett has a lot of balls batted down. The Raiders sure did that.

b. Brissett locks onto a receiver. Check. He still does.

c. Brissett throws mostly fastballs. Outside of some goal line flips, check. But the Colts receivers go above and beyond in aiding Brissett's mediocrity with their numerous drops. It reached ridiculousness in the Oakland game.

d. Brissett will have untimely turnovers. In the Oakland game...check.

 

For all the leadership Brissett and Reich are supposed to have, it must have been behind closed doors in the locker room because you sure didn't see any fire/"we need to do better" emotion on the sideline in the Oakland game. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Imgrandojji said:

Campbell and Cain have looked lost all year.  I'm almost ready to stop waiting on them and start calling for Ballard to shore up the WR team.  

 

Right now our #2 receiver is Zack Pascal.  That's how bad Cain and Campbell have been.

sadly you are right. pascal and rodgers have been better than cain and campbell.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bravo4460 said:

NFL receivers should catch those footballs.

 

Brissett is accurate and hitting their hands. That’s what matters.

 

Maybe.  But it really doesn’t help our cause if they’ve got too much heat on them.

 

That said, most of the drops today were clearly on the receivers.  I’ve been critical of Jacoby’s velocity from short/medium distance.  But he wasn’t too bad on that today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

I think he had a really bad game.  Went to Campbell twice on deep routes, but he was completely covered.  He was once double covered and once quadruple covered.  He threw a lot of passes into coverage.  He also telegraphed that pick 6 at the end by a mile.  And is it just me, or does he look like he's throwing the ball at 100 mph each time?  Receivers didn't help him out very much with all those drops though

 

This x100. He has way too much on all of his passes, he has to slow those down. I get that the receivers dropped some balls they probably should've caught, but you can't rifle every pass like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CanuckColtsFan said:

Why did it take so long for someone to say this

Because people are used to a QB centered philosophy.

 

Really was't on Brissett guys.  He wasn't great, but he did pick it up in the second half and made a valiant effort to get us back in the game.  When nothing else is working though, there's only so much you can ask of a young non-premium QB.

 

Brissett did more than I expected today.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ColtsAC said:

The word coming into this year was:

a. Brissett has a lot of balls batted down. The Raiders sure did that.

b. Brissett locks onto a receiver. Check. He still does.

c. Brissett throws mostly fastballs. Outside of some goal line flips, check. But the Colts receivers go above and beyond in aiding Brissett's mediocrity with their numerous drops. It reached ridiculousness in the Oakland game.

d. Brissett will have untimely turnovers. In the Oakland game...check.

 

For all the leadership Brissett and Reich are supposed to have, it must have been behind closed doors in the locker room because you sure didn't see any fire/"we need to do better" emotion on the sideline in the Oakland game. 

it was a bad game all around, but they can do better than this. Heck if throwing 3tds and 1 int is a bad game for Brissett despite all the drops I'd say we are in good hands. With that being said if hilton is out in kc chiefs 62 colts 17

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, luv_pony_express said:

 

Maybe.  But it really doesn’t help our cause if they’ve got too much heat on them.

 

That said, most of the drops today were clearly on the receivers.  I’ve been critical of Jacoby’s velocity from short/medium distance.  But he wasn’t too bad on that today.

Idk man, it just seems to me that the majority look like they're thrown too hard. It's obviously not every pass, but he has to refine that to take a step forward. Guys like Cain and Campbell haven't played at this level, they need help and I'm not sure he's gonna be able to provide that for them. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ColtsAC said:

The word coming into this year was:

a. Brissett has a lot of balls batted down. The Raiders sure did that.

b. Brissett locks onto a receiver. Check. He still does.

c. Brissett throws mostly fastballs. Outside of some goal line flips, check. But the Colts receivers go above and beyond in aiding Brissett's mediocrity with their numerous drops. It reached ridiculousness in the Oakland game.

d. Brissett will have untimely turnovers. In the Oakland game...check.

 

For all the leadership Brissett and Reich are supposed to have, it must have been behind closed doors in the locker room because you sure didn't see any fire/"we need to do better" emotion on the sideline in the Oakland game. 

I contest D.  Brissett has a grand total of 10 turnovers in his entire career.  If you have less turnovers than  career games played, "turnover prone" is not a valid criticism of your game.

 

That, and until this game timely 4th quarter execution was Brissett's calling card.  I think you're a victim of recency bias

 

I also contest C.  We've got a stable of young, unproven wideouts.  If you're looking to blame JB for the drops, you kind of have to neutralize them as a factor first.  We've got some serial droppers in this WR group.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Imgrandojji said:

I contest D.  Brissett has a grand total of 10 turnovers in his entire career.  If you have less turnovers than  career games played, "turnover prone" is not a valid criticism of your game.

 

I also contest C.  We've got a stable of young, unproven wideouts.  If you're looking to blame JB for the drops, you kind of have to neutralize them as a factor first.  We've got some serial droppers in this WR group.

yea if the wrs don't catch or fumble the ball when they do that is not on the qb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick thoughts:

 

I praised Brissett after last weeks performance, but then I re-watched the game realized that play calling was responsible for most of the wide open receivers and he only had to make an "easy" pass to them.  It was also obvious that all those wide open passes were to the first read receiver.  I want to watch Brissett go through his reads and FIND open receivers, and I have yet to see that.  Now, maybe our wide receivers are not open, but I am concerned about the following from his game play so far:

 

- Stares down receivers (both picks) -- this is worse than letting your receivers make a play, and the other team's DB does.

- Checks down 90% of the time (or more).

- When he runs he pulls down the ball with little to no intention of making a big play downfield (EXCPET for that TD at the end of the game, I want to see more of that).

- lacks touch and anticipation

 

I think the bombs today were also scripted (first read) so that teams would have to respect the deep ball, and that is why he threw in to double and triple coverage.

 

Earlier this year I was worried that Brissett would be little more than a game manager and that we might end up in QB purgatory (like Tennessee), and this game did little to dispel this thought. 

 

 

On a side note, the cover 2 defense is even worse when you don't have a high powered offense.  I miss the "Starwars" era now that we have the same defense with a medicore offense.  I guess this is the "Cardiac Colts" era.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brissett had a bad game, but let's not throw him into the rearview mirror.  The guy is in his first season as a full-time starter.  He's going to have some growing pains and adjustments.  Not only that, but it was just 1 week ago that he played absolutely lights out.  No one is perfect and every QB is bound to have bad games here and there.  Even Brady had a bad game this week.  Furthermore, this loss was on the whole team and coaching staff.  Defense couldn't stop anything, play calls were questionable, lots of drops by the pass catchers, lots of injuries to deal with.  Let's not go overboard here

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bhougland said:

Quick thoughts:

 

I praised Brissett after last weeks performance, but then I re-watched the game realized that play calling was responsible for most of the wide open receivers and he only had to make an "easy" pass to them.  It was also obvious that all those wide open passes were to the first read receiver. 


The Falcons game could be one of the best Brissett has all season (it was a really good game to be fair). Part of it was the Falcons run a super soft zone defense. Just look at what they gave up to the Titans today.

I don't mean for that sound negative at all...just that it was a perfect game for him to flourish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stephen said:

it was a bad game all around, but they can do better than this. Heck if throwing 3tds and 1 int is a bad game for Brissett despite all the drops I'd say we are in good hands. With that being said if hilton is out in kc chiefs 62 colts 17

Heck even with Hilton it might be that ugly with this defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

I just wish they would start Kelly :wall:

You want to bench a guy who:

a) is completing over 70% of his passes

b) has only 1 INT on the year

c) has a passer rating of over 110 this season

d) has 20 starts under his belt

e) has been the starter since training camp

 

In exchange for a guy who has played in 1 career game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

Does he have to throw it as hard as he can every time? Good lord man, take something off some of those passes. The guys have their man beaten and he still rifles it in there. No wonder they drop everything. 

Merging this with the other Brissett thread since this topic was brought up in the other thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 21isSuperman changed the title to Week 4 impressions: Brissett
2 minutes ago, CantBeStopped said:

Those rockets absolutely affect how the receiver catches the ball. Truth is brissett is just an ok QB. Hes not gonna lose you very many games but hes not gonna win you very many either

So your going to ignore the first three games. Just stop. Luck didn’t okay great every game either. We didn’t have our two top WR. I actually think he played well considering what he had to work with.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Stop you sound ridiculous.  What did you expect with two rookie WR having to carry the game and all the drops. JB still had 3 TD.

 

Oh ffs. 

 

You saying someone sounds ridiculous it the pot calling the kettle a cooking instrument. You regularly embody the concept. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

So your going to ignore the first three games. Just stop. Luck didn’t okay great every game either. We didn’t have our two top WR. I actually think he played well considering what he had to work with.

What exactly did I ignore? I said hes an ok qb. Which is what he showed the first 3 weeks. It's hard to make a ton of mistakes throwing 5 yard passes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CantBeStopped said:

What exactly did I ignore? I said hes an ok qb. Which is what he showed the first 3 weeks. It's hard to make a ton of mistakes throwing 5 yard passes. 

Brissett had more yards, completions, touchdowns and YPA than the guy that "beat" him.

 

You've heard of team wins, this was a team defeat.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CantBeStopped said:

What exactly did I ignore? I said hes an ok qb. Which is what he showed the first 3 weeks. It's hard to make a ton of mistakes throwing 5 yard passes. 

What did you expect with two rookie WR who looked totally lost. Your always going to be in trouble with two rookies.

 

We were also way to predictable con offense. Where did Reichs great play calling go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bravo4460 said:

NFL receivers should catch those footballs.

 

Brissett is accurate and hitting their hands. That’s what matters.

This! 

 

Go watch this years Hard Knocks and the discussion with a former receiver and AB. I would have to go back and see who exactly it was, but to paraphrase he was talking of the zip on Carr's passes and how as a receiver, you want a guy that can get you the ball as fast as possible. 

 

If you are a professional receiver/tight end or runningback in this league, there is no excuse to drop a pass that hits your hands. ZERO. You get paid more than lifetime's worth earnings in a single year to do one thing...

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, HungarianColtsFan said:

                               CP/ATT            YDS     TD        INT

Jacoby Brissett     24/46               265      3             1

4-5 less drops and we'd be talking about what a great game he had

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He just said MHJ trade up is fantasy land. Some like Steve Smith and Zierlein are ranking Nabers ahead of MHJ so both of those you can pretty much scratch off the trade up list unless they are some how available around pick 10-13. Very unlikely!
    • 2006 has that winning 11 games is enough mentality like so many here. Having a SB level right side of our o-line should be priority one. We are far from it.  We need a shutdown corner that can go man on the many great 4.3 running WR's. This simply allows the deep safety to defend everything else. Instead of Ballard sticking him in the middle of the field knowing that one of his slow corners will get beat deep.  We need a LB for development and depth that can cover better.  And yes a 3rd receiver that gets open quick that can also threaten deep.  With faster, better players on D, Gus could blitz 5 more times a game to get the pressure we need.  I have No Doubt Steichen has taken Ownership, Ballard and his staff to school regarding what we have and what we need.   Pray that 4-5 of our current very young players can become really solid by seasons end. Plus 3-4 really nice draft picks and 2025 and beyond we can be reckoned with.  We need to be amongst the very Best at running the dang ball and pass blocking.   I think if I could move back 5 spots and take Mims at RT and move Smith over that would be great.  Then use the necessary draft capital to get LB Cooper and CB from Rutgers Melton. I would expect Ballard to take Leggett over a CB. That would be a good move to.  I would feel really good about our prospects.
    • I couldn't agree more with the bolded statement.  Once a player is on the team, the only thing his draft position does for him (aside from the money) is maybe give him a little more time to develop.  Mainly because teams are reluctant to admit that their research didn't pan out and they want to see their guy succeed.   As far as defense, I feel the number one responsibility of the GM and the coach is to help the franchise QB be the franchise QB, if you get what I mean.  And until that's proven, if it means sacrificing a need on defense in order to enhance the QB's arsenal, so be it.  But that's just me...    
    • Yeah I didn’t get the impression he felt a huge need to draft a CB.    He was asked about mentioning YAC guys and he said every team wants them. The Colts have had meetings with the two top YAC guys in the draft - Brock Bowers and Malachi Corley. I absolutely think we’re taking Bowers if he falls to us and I even think we may jump up a couple of picks to land him.    If Bowers gets taken ahead of us I feel pretty certain we’re trading back hoping to land another 3rd rounder.    I didn’t catch if they were talking about draft targets or players already on the roster when they talked about on dimensional guys? My initial thought was Pierce.    I think it’s a given we’re taking at least one Olineman this draft, but that’s not really anything new. 
    • My guesses based on this presser:   - Ballard will NOT draft a CB in the 1st... maybe at all? Everything he's saying seems to suggest he likes the group we have and he wants to see them play and have a chance to develop. I'm almost certain if Mitchell for example is there at 15... we pass on him... either for trade back or for an offensive weapon... or DE? - Ballard WILL trade back. If not in the 1st... then later in the draft... but most probably in the 1st. IMO he pretty much advertised to his potential customers by telling them how many 1st round grades he has. Teams 19-21 are welcome to call and will receive warm greetings from Ballard. Rams, Steelers, Dolphins?  - He seemed to be talking about a specific someone one dimensional offensive weapon when he was talking about them just having had a meeting about a certain player... about whether them and the coaching staff see the way he can be used the same way... and if they agree on this, IMO this is a potential target for the Colts. The names that come to mind - Brian Thomas Jr and Xavier Worthy... A lot of the other WRs are more well rounded...  - The Colts LOVE the OL class both at the top and in depth. I have seen some OL experts suggest there might be 10 starting centers in this draft... and the OTs class in the 1st is like nothing I've ever seen. Can we draft an OL in the 1st? Doubt it... but absolutely expect a few shots on day 2 and 3.   
  • Members

    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,730

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MB-ColtsFan

      MB-ColtsFan 2,654

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,762

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,199

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Iron Colt

      Iron Colt 128

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,775

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,442

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 309

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,286

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 331

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...