.jpg.03c76055d967f51b813e290416ac9bfa.thumb.jpg.b1d64d49e1863163f4eefe42ad172348.jpg)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By Yoshinator · Posted
Yep. it was the worst move of the offseason IMO. Even worse than not trading for Sneed when we had interest. If we don't get pressure more often, those sack numbers will not be sustainable either. -
By masterlock · Posted
A big reason the Colts were 28th in points allowed, IMO, was Gus Bradley's non-contesting zone scheme. Time and time again, we saw opponents complete critical 3rd and 4th downs, with the nearest Colts defender 10 yards away. It's disappointing to me that they brought him back. IMO, what the Colts' D needs is aggression, not soft, non-contesting zone that keeps opposing offenses on the field. -
-
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
I think everyone is in awe over the wrs and qbs, but I think you are going to see the LT's DE's and corners picked earlier than most people think. Maybe there is a chance that a guy like Bowers will fall to 15 and everyone here will be happy. Sure, we will score 30 points a point but end up giving up 31 as we have no playmakers at the positions that are necessary to make a defense good. -
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
If you are really interested in making this team more complete and willing to trade up, I would do it to get a DE that can rush the qb. Ballard has been unable to get " the guy" and I am not opposed to moving up to get a guy like Turner. I would never use draft capital to move up to say #5 and get Harrison and/or Nabers. Honestly, if i were to move up to get a receiver, it would be Nabers who is explosive and has that dog in him.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now