-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By CurBeatElite · Posted
If we traded up to get Herbert, we wouldn't have Buckner and we likely wouldn't have Pittman, Taylor, or Paye. You failed to mention what we would have had to give up and discuss other holes in our roster. I don't think Ballard would readily admit he whiffed on Herbert, as we would have had to traded with or surpassed the Chargers and that would have taken a ton to give up, if it was even possible. In 5 years, I believe the only players left on our team are Kelly, TY and Doyle. Ballard has totally overturned the roster. I don't think it's fair to say he is bad at evaluating WR, DE or QB. He got a good young WR in Pittman, we should be all right with Paye and Dayo and perhaps Turay and Lewis if they stay healthy. Campbell has been good when healthy. And he hasn't really gone for a young QB who we'd expect to be a franchise qb. -
By AustinnKaine · Posted
We didn't get fleeced, but at this current moment I don't think we made the best decision long term. -
By Boondoggle · Posted
I think if he allows Ballard to do his job he's going to continue to win. And re: Reich he has grown on me. Team needs a strong draft and FA period and steady the course. -
To get Stafford, we would've had to do better than what the Rams gave up: two #1s, a 3rd & a player, likely a starting caliber quarterback, in this case it was Jared Goff, a #1 overall draft pick. -
By Boondoggle · Posted
TBD is the answer. But you need to have a QB in this league. The Colts went after a guy who they knew had basically lost his team in Philly, but they know him personally, believe in him, and that matters. So what you do is continue to build around him. Let's get a nice passing game weapon added to the mix. Fill some holes and coach him hard and if he's the guy they think he is he will do the work and find the success.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts