Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Imgrandojji

Do we wreck teams?

Recommended Posts

Week 2, Chargers come out incredibly flat, lose to the Lions

Week 3, Titans come out even flatter, get Minchewerd.

 

Each team we've played so far has looked battered and broken against soft competition in the following game.  This despite the fact that the Chargers were supposed to be competitive and the Titans looked like they were off to a solid week 1 before we came in there like a horseshoe hurricane.

 

Does that say something about us or them or both?

 

The grinding, smashmouth style we play is targeted at wearing teams down and create openings for our offense.  To take the starch out of their linemen, exhaust their quarterback and make him play while looking over his shoulder for Autry in particular and the pass rush in general.    Is there a lingering effect? 

 

Do we sabotage a team's confidence, wear them out and weaken their resolve, make them run scared and sabotage them in the weeks after they play us?

 

Do we wreck teams?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either that or the two teams we beat aren’t as good as some people think.

 

Of course, the Titans did thump the Browns. Maybe it’s just a parity thing.

 

As far as the AFC goes, I think it’s the Pats, Chiefs....and then everybody else.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Too early to tell. Plus the chargers really let that game against the lions slip away. Two missed kicks (oof) and a red zone picked doomed em. 

 

But it I do love this nasty style of play our team plays with on both sides of the field. Now if we can get some downfield passing on offence and some more turnovers on defense, this team will be elite.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 2 games into a season where very few starters played league wide.    

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, luv_pony_express said:

Either that or the two teams we beat aren’t as good as some people think.

 

Of course, the Titans did thump the Browns. Maybe it’s just a parity thing.

 

As far as the AFC goes, I think it’s the Pats, Chiefs....and then everybody else.

Oh I don't think we're going to unseat the reigning champs or their main conference rival this year.

 

It's just satisfying to fantasize that the Chargers and Titans coming out very soft in the following games mean we're leaving a path of destruction in our wake.  That it means we're tough, mentally strong, physical, and capable of tearing apart mentally soft teams so badly that they struggle to recover.

 

Especially because that's the kind of team Reich has repeatedly told us he WANTS the Colts to be.  So there's intent there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

It's 2 games into a season where very few starters played league wide.    

I know I'm jumping the gun quite a bit at this point, but I kinda wanted to explore the topic from the early returns and maybe go back to this thread later and see if the trend holds up.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Imgrandojji said:

Week 2, Chargers come out incredibly flat, lose to the Lions

Week 3, Titans come out even flatter, get Minchewerd.

 

Each team we've played so far has looked battered and broken against soft competition in the following game.  This despite the fact that the Chargers were supposed to be competitive and the Titans looked like they were off to a solid week 1 before we came in there like a horseshoe hurricane.

 

Does that say something about us or them or both?

 

The grinding, smashmouth style we play is targeted at wearing teams down and create openings for our offense.  To take the starch out of their linemen, exhaust their quarterback and make him play while looking over his shoulder for Autry in particular and the pass rush in general.    Is there a lingering effect? 

 

Do we sabotage a team's confidence, wear them out and weaken their resolve, make them run scared and sabotage them in the weeks after they play us?

 

Do we wreck teams?

 

I don’t think the Colts are used as a benchmark against opposing teams yet. If, the Colts are still a effective run heavy offense with say a 6-2 record, and the pass rush is still averaging 4 sacks a game, I could see what you’re saying. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, HOZER said:

Maybe we expose teams weakness?

 

The Titans pass protection, most definitely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, MPStack said:

 

I don’t think the Colts are used as a benchmark against opposing teams yet.

Is that really required?  Right now I'm mostly just collecting this as evidence that Frank Reich's Colts are tough to play against.  Which is good news for me because that was Reich's main goal this year and so far it's working.

 

If Brissett rounds into form and gets us into playoff competition, all the better, but for right now, I'll settle for being tough to kill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally when it comes to Mariota I don't think he does well against speed defenses and neither does their OL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, krunk said:

Personally when it comes to Mariota I don't think he does well against speed defenses and neither does their OL.

He is really just not an accurate passer is his biggest problem

 

But the OL is a DISASTER

 

9 Sacks????

 

Sheeze

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

He is really just not an accurate passer is his biggest problem

 

But the OL is a DISASTER

 

9 Sacks????

 

Sheeze

Especially when you clog those passing lanes with Zone Defense and force him to throw in small windows. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

He is really just not an accurate passer is his biggest problem

 

But the OL is a DISASTER

 

9 Sacks????

 

Sheeze

17 sacks through 3 lol

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

17 sacks through 3 lol

I dont think the kid is going to make it

 

They need to improve the OL and get another QB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

I dont think the kid is going to make it

 

They need to improve the OL and get another QB

The kid is already headed the same way Andrew Luck went.  He's done well to last as long as he did but with that % of his snaps end up with him on his butt, the Titans have bigger problems than Mariota.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

I dont think the kid is going to make it

 

They need to improve the OL and get another QB

 

I'm not a Mariota fan, but I'd like to see how he could perform with a good OL. He's really never had one. Now that they have AJB, he actually has a decent 1-2 punch at WR. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The offensive playcalling has also been disastrous for the Titans. Not that they can do much with that OL which is definitely awful, but man, calling runs on 2nd and 15+ twice on pretty much consecutive drives. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HOZER said:

Maybe we expose teams weakness?

That's a distinct possibility.   hadn't thought of that, but if so, it does speak to both the brilliance of Reich and our players' ability to execute a game plan.

 

So far, these Colts look physically and mentally tough.  I'll take that as a foundation to build on for the future, whether or not Brissett is the guy who ultimately takes the starting QB job longterm

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Imgrandojji said:

Week 2, Chargers come out incredibly flat, lose to the Lions

Week 3, Titans come out even flatter, get Minchewerd.

 

Each team we've played so far has looked battered and broken against soft competition in the following game.  This despite the fact that the Chargers were supposed to be competitive and the Titans looked like they were off to a solid week 1 before we came in there like a horseshoe hurricane.

 

Does that say something about us or them or both?

 

The grinding, smashmouth style we play is targeted at wearing teams down and create openings for our offense.  To take the starch out of their linemen, exhaust their quarterback and make him play while looking over his shoulder for Autry in particular and the pass rush in general.    Is there a lingering effect? 

 

Do we sabotage a team's confidence, wear them out and weaken their resolve, make them run scared and sabotage them in the weeks after they play us?

 

Do we wreck teams?

 

  There was once a great article regarding how teams that played Seattle back in 2013, how they had a terrible record in games that followed playing the Seahawks.

 

 Early in our last QB's career (2013) we played SF when they were supposed to be very good, on the road. And we won like 27-7.
 Another confirmation of our last QB's awesomeness.
  They had played Seattle the previous week. And had been pounded.
 They came out of that game having lost one of the best NT's, Ian Smith, Michael Crabtree, and Vernon Davis. And Justin Smith played with a shoulder harness(one arm basically. They had other issues that i don't recall. Their currently jobless QB couldn't complete a 8yd out with our db's playing 10 yards off.
 And the Colts Blue thought Linkenback was the next coming after that game. chuckle.
  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we're not quite the Legion of Boom, but playing a highly physical team will put a lot of wear and tear on a team that is soft or finesse driven.

 

This is actually one of the biggest reasons the Giants beat the Patriots in 07 and 11.  As talent goes it was a mismatch in the favor of the patriots but the Giants D was VERY VERY physical and it broke them each time.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Imgrandojji said:

Week 2, Chargers come out incredibly flat, lose to the Lions

Week 3, Titans come out even flatter, get Minchewerd.

 

Each team we've played so far has looked battered and broken against soft competition in the following game.  This despite the fact that the Chargers were supposed to be competitive and the Titans looked like they were off to a solid week 1 before we came in there like a horseshoe hurricane.

 

Does that say something about us or them or both?

 

The grinding, smashmouth style we play is targeted at wearing teams down and create openings for our offense.  To take the starch out of their linemen, exhaust their quarterback and make him play while looking over his shoulder for Autry in particular and the pass rush in general.    Is there a lingering effect? 

 

Do we sabotage a team's confidence, wear them out and weaken their resolve, make them run scared and sabotage them in the weeks after they play us?

 

Do we wreck teams?

Honestly, it’s two weeks. We still have no idea how good/bad the Colts, Chargers, Titans, Lions, or Jags are. We may have seriously demoralized the Titans, but if you watch the Lions-Chargers game you’ll see that the Lions should not have won that game; the Chargers gave it to them with dumb mistakes, like how they almost gave us our game.

I don’t think we wreck teams, but we still rule in Nashville for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe...sure.

 

Or it could be that JAC (on defense) and DET are actually better teams.

 

It’s way too early to know. Need another 4-5 games to know more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Since Vinny's knee is basically shot for the 2019 season this is a great chance for Chris Ballard to get a good look at McLaughling as possibly the Colts starting kicker beyond 2019. Either way, the Colts will move on from Vinatieri no matter what he decides to go beyond 2019. Place him on IR and see what you have from McLaughing. Worst case scenario you sign or draft another Kicker to be your guy.
    • I don’t care if this team had Tyreek Hill and Deandre Hopkins, Brissett would still stand in the pocket for five seconds and then dump it off to Doyle in the flat. The guy is not the answer, and a bunch of cherry picked stats about his ‘efficiency’ is not going to change that. 
    • He was signed off the street by the Niners. But he was a "non-vested" player, which means he doesn't have enough years of service to reach unrestricted free agency. So whatever team he's on would have his exclusive rights for 2020 and 2021, whether he was claimed on waivers or signed as a free agent. Then he can be a restricted free agent in 2022.   His contract technically expires at the end of the 2019 league year, but the Colts can tender him and effectively extend his rookie contract, one year at a time, until 2023. (And at that point, they could franchise tag him, assuming that provision still exists in the new CBA.)   As a UDFA, the CBA allows him to be signed to a veteran extension after two years of service; for drafted players, it's three years. Until then, his contract is based on the rookie wage scale, which was determined by the CBA.   A recent case study for this is Kenny Moore. He signed with the Patriots as a UDFA in 2017, then was waived at cut down, and the Colts claimed him. After 2018, he had two years of service, so he was eligible to sign a veteran extension, which is what he did in the 2019 offseason. If he had not agreed to an extension, the Colts could have tendered him as an ERFA for 2019, and then as an RFA for 2020.
    • RG3 would be available also
    • IF Ballard and Reich still think JB is the answer at this point, then we need to start thinking about who is running what at Colt world HQs.
  • Members

    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 6

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 100

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • esmort

      esmort 1,576

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Robert Johnson

      Robert Johnson 346

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jimmy g

      jimmy g 426

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Perfect_Clark

      Perfect_Clark 3,702

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 440

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • zibby43

      zibby43 1,096

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B-B

      B-B 378

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Peytonator

      The Peytonator 2,582

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...