Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Imgrandojji

Do we wreck teams?

Recommended Posts

Week 2, Chargers come out incredibly flat, lose to the Lions

Week 3, Titans come out even flatter, get Minchewerd.

 

Each team we've played so far has looked battered and broken against soft competition in the following game.  This despite the fact that the Chargers were supposed to be competitive and the Titans looked like they were off to a solid week 1 before we came in there like a horseshoe hurricane.

 

Does that say something about us or them or both?

 

The grinding, smashmouth style we play is targeted at wearing teams down and create openings for our offense.  To take the starch out of their linemen, exhaust their quarterback and make him play while looking over his shoulder for Autry in particular and the pass rush in general.    Is there a lingering effect? 

 

Do we sabotage a team's confidence, wear them out and weaken their resolve, make them run scared and sabotage them in the weeks after they play us?

 

Do we wreck teams?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either that or the two teams we beat aren’t as good as some people think.

 

Of course, the Titans did thump the Browns. Maybe it’s just a parity thing.

 

As far as the AFC goes, I think it’s the Pats, Chiefs....and then everybody else.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Too early to tell. Plus the chargers really let that game against the lions slip away. Two missed kicks (oof) and a red zone picked doomed em. 

 

But it I do love this nasty style of play our team plays with on both sides of the field. Now if we can get some downfield passing on offence and some more turnovers on defense, this team will be elite.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 2 games into a season where very few starters played league wide.    

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, luv_pony_express said:

Either that or the two teams we beat aren’t as good as some people think.

 

Of course, the Titans did thump the Browns. Maybe it’s just a parity thing.

 

As far as the AFC goes, I think it’s the Pats, Chiefs....and then everybody else.

Oh I don't think we're going to unseat the reigning champs or their main conference rival this year.

 

It's just satisfying to fantasize that the Chargers and Titans coming out very soft in the following games mean we're leaving a path of destruction in our wake.  That it means we're tough, mentally strong, physical, and capable of tearing apart mentally soft teams so badly that they struggle to recover.

 

Especially because that's the kind of team Reich has repeatedly told us he WANTS the Colts to be.  So there's intent there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

It's 2 games into a season where very few starters played league wide.    

I know I'm jumping the gun quite a bit at this point, but I kinda wanted to explore the topic from the early returns and maybe go back to this thread later and see if the trend holds up.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Imgrandojji said:

Week 2, Chargers come out incredibly flat, lose to the Lions

Week 3, Titans come out even flatter, get Minchewerd.

 

Each team we've played so far has looked battered and broken against soft competition in the following game.  This despite the fact that the Chargers were supposed to be competitive and the Titans looked like they were off to a solid week 1 before we came in there like a horseshoe hurricane.

 

Does that say something about us or them or both?

 

The grinding, smashmouth style we play is targeted at wearing teams down and create openings for our offense.  To take the starch out of their linemen, exhaust their quarterback and make him play while looking over his shoulder for Autry in particular and the pass rush in general.    Is there a lingering effect? 

 

Do we sabotage a team's confidence, wear them out and weaken their resolve, make them run scared and sabotage them in the weeks after they play us?

 

Do we wreck teams?

 

I don’t think the Colts are used as a benchmark against opposing teams yet. If, the Colts are still a effective run heavy offense with say a 6-2 record, and the pass rush is still averaging 4 sacks a game, I could see what you’re saying. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, HOZER said:

Maybe we expose teams weakness?

 

The Titans pass protection, most definitely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, MPStack said:

 

I don’t think the Colts are used as a benchmark against opposing teams yet.

Is that really required?  Right now I'm mostly just collecting this as evidence that Frank Reich's Colts are tough to play against.  Which is good news for me because that was Reich's main goal this year and so far it's working.

 

If Brissett rounds into form and gets us into playoff competition, all the better, but for right now, I'll settle for being tough to kill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally when it comes to Mariota I don't think he does well against speed defenses and neither does their OL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, krunk said:

Personally when it comes to Mariota I don't think he does well against speed defenses and neither does their OL.

He is really just not an accurate passer is his biggest problem

 

But the OL is a DISASTER

 

9 Sacks????

 

Sheeze

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

He is really just not an accurate passer is his biggest problem

 

But the OL is a DISASTER

 

9 Sacks????

 

Sheeze

Especially when you clog those passing lanes with Zone Defense and force him to throw in small windows. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

He is really just not an accurate passer is his biggest problem

 

But the OL is a DISASTER

 

9 Sacks????

 

Sheeze

17 sacks through 3 lol

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

17 sacks through 3 lol

I dont think the kid is going to make it

 

They need to improve the OL and get another QB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

I dont think the kid is going to make it

 

They need to improve the OL and get another QB

The kid is already headed the same way Andrew Luck went.  He's done well to last as long as he did but with that % of his snaps end up with him on his butt, the Titans have bigger problems than Mariota.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

I dont think the kid is going to make it

 

They need to improve the OL and get another QB

 

I'm not a Mariota fan, but I'd like to see how he could perform with a good OL. He's really never had one. Now that they have AJB, he actually has a decent 1-2 punch at WR. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The offensive playcalling has also been disastrous for the Titans. Not that they can do much with that OL which is definitely awful, but man, calling runs on 2nd and 15+ twice on pretty much consecutive drives. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HOZER said:

Maybe we expose teams weakness?

That's a distinct possibility.   hadn't thought of that, but if so, it does speak to both the brilliance of Reich and our players' ability to execute a game plan.

 

So far, these Colts look physically and mentally tough.  I'll take that as a foundation to build on for the future, whether or not Brissett is the guy who ultimately takes the starting QB job longterm

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Imgrandojji said:

Week 2, Chargers come out incredibly flat, lose to the Lions

Week 3, Titans come out even flatter, get Minchewerd.

 

Each team we've played so far has looked battered and broken against soft competition in the following game.  This despite the fact that the Chargers were supposed to be competitive and the Titans looked like they were off to a solid week 1 before we came in there like a horseshoe hurricane.

 

Does that say something about us or them or both?

 

The grinding, smashmouth style we play is targeted at wearing teams down and create openings for our offense.  To take the starch out of their linemen, exhaust their quarterback and make him play while looking over his shoulder for Autry in particular and the pass rush in general.    Is there a lingering effect? 

 

Do we sabotage a team's confidence, wear them out and weaken their resolve, make them run scared and sabotage them in the weeks after they play us?

 

Do we wreck teams?

 

  There was once a great article regarding how teams that played Seattle back in 2013, how they had a terrible record in games that followed playing the Seahawks.

 

 Early in our last QB's career (2013) we played SF when they were supposed to be very good, on the road. And we won like 27-7.
 Another confirmation of our last QB's awesomeness.
  They had played Seattle the previous week. And had been pounded.
 They came out of that game having lost one of the best NT's, Ian Smith, Michael Crabtree, and Vernon Davis. And Justin Smith played with a shoulder harness(one arm basically. They had other issues that i don't recall. Their currently jobless QB couldn't complete a 8yd out with our db's playing 10 yards off.
 And the Colts Blue thought Linkenback was the next coming after that game. chuckle.
  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we're not quite the Legion of Boom, but playing a highly physical team will put a lot of wear and tear on a team that is soft or finesse driven.

 

This is actually one of the biggest reasons the Giants beat the Patriots in 07 and 11.  As talent goes it was a mismatch in the favor of the patriots but the Giants D was VERY VERY physical and it broke them each time.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Imgrandojji said:

Week 2, Chargers come out incredibly flat, lose to the Lions

Week 3, Titans come out even flatter, get Minchewerd.

 

Each team we've played so far has looked battered and broken against soft competition in the following game.  This despite the fact that the Chargers were supposed to be competitive and the Titans looked like they were off to a solid week 1 before we came in there like a horseshoe hurricane.

 

Does that say something about us or them or both?

 

The grinding, smashmouth style we play is targeted at wearing teams down and create openings for our offense.  To take the starch out of their linemen, exhaust their quarterback and make him play while looking over his shoulder for Autry in particular and the pass rush in general.    Is there a lingering effect? 

 

Do we sabotage a team's confidence, wear them out and weaken their resolve, make them run scared and sabotage them in the weeks after they play us?

 

Do we wreck teams?

Honestly, it’s two weeks. We still have no idea how good/bad the Colts, Chargers, Titans, Lions, or Jags are. We may have seriously demoralized the Titans, but if you watch the Lions-Chargers game you’ll see that the Lions should not have won that game; the Chargers gave it to them with dumb mistakes, like how they almost gave us our game.

I don’t think we wreck teams, but we still rule in Nashville for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe...sure.

 

Or it could be that JAC (on defense) and DET are actually better teams.

 

It’s way too early to know. Need another 4-5 games to know more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Had Funchess been practing? I thought he had to practice for two weeks before being able to come back?
    • Oh you were right on that one.  I still won, but I missed out on having highest score of the week by .32 points.  Our league pays out for highest weekly scores. 
    • I think there's a danger with any position of getting enamoured with the 40 time, I'd put 3 cone over it certainly. However, as always never go by just one metric, and never put metrics over film.    For all that was written about him being a below average athlete, if you compare  him to some of the 'good' SS's in the league he matches up pretty well:   Willis 4.55s (40)/7.15s (3 Cone) Collins 4.53s (40)/7.53s (3 Cone) Chancellor 4.69s (40)/7.36s (3 Cone) Jones  4.51s (40)/7.43s (3 Cone)  Adams  4.56s (40)/6.96s (3 Cone)    etc etc... 
    • CeeDee Lamb would be the dream pick imo. Reminds me a lot of Hopkins/Thomas, good size, great route runner and hands. Means he could take on a high volume of targets in the short/intermediate range, something I think Frank Reich badly needs (that's why he was high on signing Funchess). Put him on the boundary opposite Hilton and Campbell in the slot and we have serious options. Not as high on Ruggs when we already have Hilton.   I like Mack as a lead back, but not 25 carries a game. I would prefer a legit RB2 to take some of that load off him, preferably a RB to compliments his game, so a heavier, more physical, north/south RB. This draft has options in the mid round.
    • Here's where I think Kelly 'fans' are distressed. To your point we don't know Kelly...fair.  So what do we know.  We know he can run, dude's fast.  We know he has a strong arm, like that.  We know he'll throw downfield and into tight windows, good!  We know he will stand in the pocket, check. We know he has the stuff to go into Alabama with an Ole Miss team and beat em, that no small thing. We also know he has off-field issues maybe he's grown up, don't know but we hear good things from Frank.  So to someone like me, I like what I see and like what I hear...Rally confused.   Here's what we know about Hoyer, he has none of those physical attributes but he's good in the QB room.  Ok, well, I'm good in QB room but you wouldn't want me under center.  There's an obvious hesitation here on the part of Frank and/or Chris to make Kelly a part of the permanent roster, they will likely cut him again and hope he clears waivers over Hoyer, that to me is absolutely stunning.  Either, Kelly is an off the field nightmare we shouldn't be investing in OR he should be at worst QB2. Hoyer is simply not good, we can get his level of performance literally anywhere, he's the prototypical failed backup and those are readily available on the cheap. I wouldn't understand keeping him over a contract when he weakens the team relative to someone like Kelly on game day.  So to a previous posters comment, why is Kelly here?  If he is such an integrity issue it's not our job to make a man out of him while he occupies a spot.  If he's is good enough physically, which he is, and he's on this roster, which he is, he should stay up and get some first team reps, as all back ups should and see how matures.  It starting to feel like some ego at play here.  All in all, our leadership was ill-prepared to deal with Brissett going down and choked this week in prep.  It's my hope we dump Hoyer who is useless and keep Kelly at QB2, I don't think that will happen.  My 2+ cents.
  • Members

    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 2

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CantBeStopped

      CantBeStopped 444

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CS Coltsfan

      CS Coltsfan 27

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,757

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Franklin County

      Franklin County 468

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt.45

      Colt.45 76

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 5,456

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 77

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheMiz

      TheMiz 121

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jimmy g

      jimmy g 420

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...