-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By smittywerb · Posted
I don’t think we’re going tight end. Ballard has spoken about what we have at tight end and he likes it. usually when Ballard speaks on a position group and says something along the lines of “give them a chance”, he doesn’t draft that position high. He said it about our OL when they were bad. And he’s saying it now about our corners and tight ends. if y’all have been listening, it’s only one group he hasn’t spoke on regarding the “I like our guys” statement…the wide receivers. -
-
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
I hope u r right. For once take a stab at a play maker. -
By Yoshinator · Posted
Yep. This is true. It's tough to hit on TEs. Seems like a crapshoot. Most GMs don't want to try to be the smartest guy in the room by taking the first one in the draft. Personally, I'd like to see what we have in our TEs for a year. If we can get Bowers though, it's hard to pass up. A lot of it is position strengths and weaknesses in the draft for me. We can get someone like a Theo Johnson in the 3rd, I just don't know if he'll be ready right away, and we have 4 guys that are good and I don't want to draft a TE in the mid-rounds that has to fight for a roster spot. If it meant we cut Cox, then ok. Bowers would cause us to do that IMO. -
By NewColtsFan · Posted
Something doesn’t add up. I just looked up comments Beane made about how many players have first round grades. Quoting from the Buffalo News paper his quote was this: “Not as many as last year, but not 28” which is where Buffalo picks this year. So his quote isn’t close to saying they have zero players with first round grades. It’s almost the opposite.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts