Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Chloe6124

Injury report

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

Wonder how many 4th downs the falcons go for with no punter.

They have a punter on their PS.  I'm guessing they will bring him up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

They have a punter on their PS.  I'm guessing they will bring him up

I meant their normal starting punter. I think they signed another punter already or brought some one up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/20/2019 at 4:03 PM, 2006Coltsbestever said:

They say 10 huh lmao . Ok good luck with that haha 

 

what makes y’all think we’re this juggernaut offense we scored 19 points last week. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MFT5 said:

 

what makes y’all think we’re this juggernaut offense we scored 19 points last week. 

I don't think you've got to be a juggernaut to score 10 points.

 

10 is extremely confident for a team that hasn't held anyone below 24.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, MFT5 said:

 

what makes y’all think we’re this juggernaut offense we scored 19 points last week. 

To be fair we score over thirty without the Vinny misses week one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, MFT5 said:

 

what makes y’all think we’re this juggernaut offense we scored 19 points last week. 

Any mediocre offense can score 10 points just on a break or 2 alonelmao . We should have that by halftime. I guess Atlanta fans think they have the 2000 Ravens defense or something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

To be fair we score over thirty without the Vinny misses week one.

Facts

Also the turn over factor for the Tenn game. Ball was on the ground a few times instead of trying to scoop it and make a play secure it first. Hooker dropped an INT along with Bobby.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

T.Y. Hilton, Marlon Mack likely to play Sunday

 

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/09/22/t-y-hilton-marlon-mack-likely-to-play-sunday/

 

...Adam Schefter of ESPN.com reports that wide receiver T.Y. Hilton and running back Marlon Mack are both likely to play in Week Three. Pregame warmups will be the final obstacle to clear before they are given the green light...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t like they are saying it’s a game time decision. We are screwed if Mack and TY don’t go.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm wondering if Mack will at the very least be limited. I like Wilkins a lot but the Falcons are much better at defending the inside run and Mack is probably are best bet at turning the corner on the outside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The injury list looks like it will balloon after the ATL game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Myles said:

The injury list looks like it will balloon after the ATL game.

The only good thing is at least it's not a travel week. They can lounge around the facility getting treatment and sleep in their own beds at home.

 

I'm looking for a silver lining.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, IinD said:

The only good thing is at least it's not a travel week. They can lounge around the facility getting treatment and sleep in their own beds at home.

 

I'm looking for a silver lining.

Maybe that is just an aluminium lining.     I'll take it though.  

This weeks Raiders game will be another important game for us.   Since we have the Chiefs the next week, we'll be 2-3 if we lose to the Raiders this week.    I think we will win, but the Raiders aren't as bad as people think.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Myles said:

Maybe that is just an aluminium lining.     I'll take it though.  

This weeks Raiders game will be another important game for us.   Since we have the Chiefs the next week, we'll be 2-3 if we lose to the Raiders this week.    I think we will win, but the Raiders aren't as bad as people think.    

Yeah they've definitely gotta scrape out a win this week because on paper we should get killed again KC.

 

Beating KC would be one of those signature wins we'd remember for years if we could pull it off. That's another topic for another day.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, IinD said:

Yeah they've definitely gotta scrape out a win this week because on paper we should get killed again KC.

 

Beating KC would be one of those signature wins we'd remember for years if we could pull it off. That's another topic for another day.

It sure would.   I'd give us less than a 20% chance at beating the Chiefs though.   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Supe it's not an angle whatsoever, it's purely the truth.   I am, of course not talking about you, or what you do on this board in terms of evaluating players. I always enjoy hearing your take on players.   I am obviously talking about the people spewing bile on here after the loss to the Raiders, and every other loss for that matter. And a lot of that includes tripe about Jacoby Brissett that just goes way over the top.   We can disagree on Brissett, it's not really a big deal. And I apologize for quoting you in the other thread and giving you the impression I am including you in this. I'm really not. I quoted you because I would rather debate the topic with someone like yourself than get sucked into a flame war with some troll, which has happened to me a time or two. That's all. Me and you can have a somewhat interesting discussion. I always enjoy it.     
    • Nice thread...    There have been some arguments for a while now about the relative value of pass-coverage vs pass-rush. Teams offensively are turning to faster and faster game plans and this affects the pass-rush a ton. You can practically scheme the pass-rush away if you have good enough QB and receivers that get open quickly. The latest advanced analytics seem to favor positions like CB and WR value-wise over long-held champions like EDGE rushers or OTs. I will also take into account your characterization of the rest of the roster(average players as opposed to straight up trash). At some positions the improvement between pro-bowler and average/JAG is higher than at other positions. Those are just part of the considerations that will inform my choise here:   Offense:   1. QB: not controversial take here - most important position of all... he handles the ball and makes a decision that might affect the game pretty much 100% of the snaps. I want the best passer and decisionmaker to run my offense.    2. WR: yep, give me a beast of an X-receiver. Pass-catchers are incredibly important.   3. LT: Yeah, I know, this goes against some of the things I said above, but time and time again we see what a great LT does to an offensive line. Leremy Tunsil is not even that great and he almost single-handedly turned around the HOU OLine. Same with AC last year - we missed him mightily when he was injured to start the year and then turned the line into a great unit. And again - he's not even at the level we are talking here. He still has not had a pro-bowl or all-pro recognition(maybe he gets one this year, he deserves it). But yeah... give me Bakhtiari, give me Armstead, give me Tyron Smith level player... I think this raises the level of the whole O-Line, especially if it's filled with average players at the other positions(rather than horrible ones)   ------------------------------------ Those will be my selections offensively. I think a QB masks a lot of deficiencies and I think he elevates average players and squeezes everything out of most of them. Just look at what Luck used to do with players like Jack Doyle, Donte Moncrief, Eric Ebron, Inman, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen...    Defense:   4. CB: yep, I want a shut down corner. Like I said earlier, newest research shows pass-coverage and especially on the boundary is paramount. and it affects pass-rush more than pass-rush affects CB play.    5. CB: yep, give me one more... I'm shutting down both sides of the field and hoping this gives additional time to my pass-rush to get there. They will play on island and I will scheme out everything else(i.e. slot receivers and TEs)... if I have to I will double away from them.    6. WILL: I want a sideline to sideline monster to clean up the run game and take on crossing routes in the short-intermediate middle in coverage.     7. EDGE: I still want a player capable of beating his man one-on-one on the line and creating pressure/affecting the pass when my pro-bowl CBs lock down their match ups.    So what do you think? Does it make sense?     
    • 23: R1P23 DL JAVON KINLAW SOUTH CAROLINA   35: R2P3 QB JORDAN LOVE UTAH STATE   55: R2P23 OT CALVIN THROCKMORTON OREGON   87: R3P23 LB TROY DYE OREGON   129: R4P23 S J.R. REED GEORGIA   166: R5P22 G NICK HARRIS WASHINGTON   201: R6P23 CB ESSANG BASSEY WAKE FOREST   203: R6P25 WR MICHAEL PITTMAN JR. USC   236: R7P23 CB KINDLE VILDOR GEORGIA SOUTHERN
    • DE NT DT DE   LB   CB CB   Nobody is scoring on me. 
    • Don't be ridiculous   Darius Leonard was an All-Pro his rookie year. Okereke will have a hard time matching that.
  • Members

    • iLoveMyBoys

      iLoveMyBoys 40

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoatBeard

      GoatBeard 604

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 1,398

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colt18

      colt18 275

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...