Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Chloe6124

Refs screwed up again

Recommended Posts

Even with the bogus calls, the Colts are the least penalized team so far with 11 penalties for 75 yards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts got some call too.  One of their drives was extended by a bad PI call too.  It evens out more times than not.

 

With that said the refs have to get these things right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After what the NFL has allowed refs to do to New Orleans- inc this weekend- anything is possible.  I am constantly amazed by the competence.  I blame the owners: the NFL is a $15B/yr business, but the owners are so cheap that even now most refs are doing a part time job and not performing a serious profession with proper training.  

 

Insecure people tend to make more mistakes. Personally, I think the continued incorrect usage of replay (trying to correct calls to be most perfect ie Ebrons catch) has made refs go from bad to worse.

 

IMHO replay should only overturn calls when there is clear undisputed evidence (like the PO in the championship game) and refs should be properly trained and paid.  

 

<rant off>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Fat Clemenza said:

After what the NFL has allowed refs to do to New Orleans- inc this weekend- anything is possible.  I am constantly amazed by the competence.  I blame the owners: the NFL is a $15B/yr business, but the owners are so cheap that even now most refs are doing a part time job and not performing a serious profession with proper training.  

 

Insecure people tend to make more mistakes. Personally, I think the continued incorrect usage of replay (trying to correct calls to be most perfect ie Ebrons catch) has made refs go from bad to worse.

 

IMHO replay should only overturn calls when there is clear undisputed evidence (like the PO in the championship game) and refs should be properly trained and paid.  

 

<rant off>

You don't think 200k a year is being properly paid?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's as if we tune in every Sunday and watch the refs dictate the

outcome of games instead of the coaches and players.

It is starting to make me nauseated watching the corruption that

is going on in sports anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

You don't think 200k a year is being properly paid?

Ok wow good point I guess I should have simply said "properly trained" should have looked that up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jvan1973 said:

You don't think 200k a year is being properly paid?

 WOW!!!! Where do I sign up? Do you know what the qualifications are? A pulse? Good “vision?” I’m at 20/20 so I have that going for me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, HOZER said:

 WOW!!!! Where do I sign up? Do you know what the qualifications are? A pulse? Good “vision?” I’m at 20/20 so I have that going for me!

It would seem good vision would be a problem so you are probably over qualified.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, HOZER said:

 WOW!!!! Where do I sign up? Do you know what the qualifications are? A pulse? Good “vision?” I’m at 20/20 so I have that going for me!

The refs have 20/20 vision too....

 

 

578C0231-9B53-4944-87C3-6855B70390AC.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, pacolts56 said:

The refs have 20/20 vision too....

 

 

578C0231-9B53-4944-87C3-6855B70390AC.png

 

I quit drinking alcohol when I was 31 but prior to that, esp. the college days, I went through a lot of that! It wasn't just that it was cheap, I actually kind of liked it! :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, gspdx said:

It would seem good vision would be a problem so you are probably over qualified.

 

Damn, you’re right, lol!!! I could get some thick frame glasses to purposefully throw it off a bit! 

 

BBqvylYCMAAaG7j.jpg

 

 

2 hours ago, pacolts56 said:

The refs have 20/20 vision too....

 

 

578C0231-9B53-4944-87C3-6855B70390AC.png

 

Oh no you didn't, lol! Had some run ins with the Mad Dog back in the day, along with Night Train, Thunderbird,  and Old English, those were the days, hahaha! I didn’t really seek out the MD, it just always seemed to find me, lol!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

What about the bogus PI called on Wilson also.

Probably making up for the extremely generous spot they have JB on the run to get the first down   He was clearly a yard short and they got the 1st down.  

 

It goes both ways.  And as someone posted earlier the Colts are the least penalized team in the league.  

 

Soooooo.....    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, HOZER said:

 WOW!!!! Where do I sign up? Do you know what the qualifications are? A pulse? Good “vision?” I’m at 20/20 so I have that going for me!

I'm old (at least I get senior discounts). My vision was just tested at 20/15 without glasses. I'm a professional referee in a different sport making far less than $200K. I can tell you it takes hard work refining your understanding of the rules and a lot of practice to be good at refereeing. That said, NFL refs need to up their game. It's getting out of hand, and almost embarrassing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, HOZER said:

 

Damn, you’re right, lol!!! I could get some thick frame glasses to purposefully throw it off a bit! 

 

BBqvylYCMAAaG7j.jpg

 

 

 

Oh no you didn't, lol! Had some run ins with the Mad Dog back in the day, along with Night Train, Thunderbird,  and Old English, those were the days, hahaha! I didn’t really seek out the MD, it just always seemed to find me, lol!

Don’t forget my drink of choice as a youth........Brass Monkey! Had some long mornings following those nights for sure. :) Sorry to mods for not being Colts related*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Surprised to see that not many mentions Kuechly or Wagner as the best 'linebackers ever' conversation. 
    • This whole Chad Kelly phenomenon on this site is fascinating 
    • Anthony Walker. Now or never.
    • Don’t feed the trolls.   We have an ELITE Dt. We have an ELITE Lb.   If the ends can generate a little pressure our D could be lights out. Add in the fact our o-line should be great and produce a strong run game - keep the D fresh.   Bold Prediction - Colts finish with a top 5 D.
    • I'm sorry,  I've said this before,  but I see you added more material here and you've completed misunderstood this.   First,  there are no writers for the on-air talent.   None.   The talent writes what they want to say.   I even contacted a friend who works at ESPN for the last 30 years.   He says all on-air talent writes what they say -- period.   And thre is no company position on various issues.   So, for example, on al the debate shows you talked about,  the hosts say what they want.   No writer writes what to say for them.      Here's what your article is talking about.   The company is clearly on the liberal side.   They've hired in the past a bunch of Conservatives who wanted to say whatever they wanted to say.  Mostly about politics in the real world.   The name Curt Schilling might be familiar.   He had been warned repeatedly about talking about real world politics that have nothing to do with sports.   He kept doing it and basically dared the company to do something.   He thought they wouldn't.   They did and eventually he was let go.      ESPN is trying to stay away as best as they can from real world politics.   If oyu want to point to Conservative political views,  fine, you'll get no argument from me.   SPOILER ALERT:  That's going to take a huge hit on Wednesday, 5/27,  in the aftermath of the dead black man in Minneapolis and the black man in New York who a white woman called the politce on and lied about what he was doing (caught lying on tape), as well as the jogger in Georgia who was shot and killed months ago and the video has now surfaced.  Outraged professional athletes are now loudly speaking out.    That means ESPN is going to talk about the real world even thought most of their viewers may not like it.   But you have to cover what the athletes are doing and saying.   Many people here (most?) think ESPN doesn't like Jim Irsay and the Colts.   Do certain anchors, hosts, reporters have issues with us?    Maybe,  possibly.    But there is no corporate position on Irsay or the Colts.  All on-air talent is free to say whatever they want to say.   No one tells on-air talent what to say when it comes to day-to-day sports.   To be clear,  ESPN doesn't want anyone trashing the sports they cover or hurting the professinal relationships.   If you're going to attack the commissiner of a sport,  then you had better have more than just an opionion.   You better have some substance to back it up.    Former NBA Commish David Stern was legendary for calling up the head of ESPN and SCREAMING about things he heard said about the NBA on ESPN that he didn't like.     You wrote that there's plenty of things on the internet to support your view.   Please feel free to take another crack at it,  because the first article doesn't support your position.    It's taking about something different,  how ESPN doesn't want the real world of politics infringing on the day to day coverage of sports.   Some things can't be stopped.   More women in pro sports.   Gays in sports.   How athletes react to real world injustice.    But if Curt Schilling wants to spew hate about Muslims, which he did,  or talk about transgender bathroom laws,  that's going to lead to the unemployment line, which it did. What do those issues have to do with sports?   Last thought:   I try as often as I can to explain the world of the media to people here.   30 years in the business so I should be able to to.   Frankly,  I take no pleasure in strongly opposing your views here.   In fact, no one is more surprised than me.   Because, quite honestly,  I think you've had an incredibly long stretch of really top notch posts for many months here.    I think you've seriously rasied your game and I find myself in agreement with many of your views.    And if I haven't given you a ton of likes then shame on me.   I try to reward good posting.  I find your posts smart and well reasoned.   I enjoy reading your views.    And then we hit this thread.   And I did a double-take when I saw who posted about the media.  So please take this as the compliment that it is intended.   I'm a fan of yours.   Just not here on this particular subject.   If you have other comments, or questions,  I'm happy to continue this discussion....   my apologies for the length of ths post.   Just so much to respond to.   NCF
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...