Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Nickname for Our Sack Pack!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

How about "Too Soon?"

I now expect zero sacks, the next three weeks. 

This thread makes me crave some White Castle.........  

Posted Images

Yes I am the * that started this thread! I was excited to see the D line perform the way they did in the first 2 games. It has now turned into a ridiculous nightmare. I am certain the entire organization at the top is as dazed and confused as we all are. Here’s my dilemma - we re-signed great character guys

Kenny Moore

Margus Hunt

Pierre Desir

Signed Justin Houston 

And Drafted Speed players on the defensive side of the ball. 

I would say 1/4 way through the season the top 4 have not delivered. Hunt is actually embarrassing.

too early for the draft picks to grade yet, but Willis stands out as the top pick so far. 

This has been the best disappearing act I have ever seen. Big o-lines, fast QB release, Wr running free all over the field, I like all of our players, I just don’t like there performance. Team Reich and Ballard and Eberflus, get this fixed please!!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/17/2019 at 3:38 PM, MPStack said:

I now expect zero sacks, the next three weeks. :facepalm:

 

Then it would have to be-

 

"Nap Sack"

 

On 9/17/2019 at 4:06 PM, TrueBlue4ever said:

Secondary could be “The No Fly Zone”

 

Between the LB's and safety's, the

 

"Demilitarized Zone" or DMZ

 

because no defense takes place there...

 

 

 

 

 

 

:sarcasm:

 

 

 

 

 

maybe...

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Communication:

DLine: Coach, You told us to  “demonstrate” and then “suck”. 

Eberflus: No, I said “penetrate” and then “sack”. 

Ballard: Look, you are doing a great job, Matt.

Eberflus: No, I said “raise”, not “praise”.

Jacoby: Coach, here is that bottled water you wanted.

Reich: No, I said I want a “leader”, not a “liter”. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/5/2019 at 5:07 PM, coltsva said:

I am hijacking this thread and turning it into a Patrick Mahomes nickname thread. Maybe it will slow him down like it did our Dline.

 

I'll start: Mahomes sweet Mahomes.

You're welcome everyone.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, coltsva said:

You're welcome everyone.

Yes I appreciate it! Not sure if it was my thread or MP Stack saying we wouldn’t have any sacks in our next 3 games.  

 

Anyways, a lot less stunting last night and a much more speed, bull rush. They all used there hands much better too. Let’s get the Maniac back healthy and see if the pressure can continue. Nice to see Moore get home last night off the edge. Go Blue!!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure, but it's an easy early indicator. In pure record, we rank 9th. Like I said, some use record + SoS, some predicted DVOA. Regardless, we're bottom 16. Haven't seen a rank that puts up in the top half yet. As long as we have 4 games against Jax and Houston, it'll be hard. Our early stretch is rough, our late stretch is easy. Middle is up and down.   Vegas really doesn't do that though. They'll do record prediction more on a combo of eye test experts, analytics, plus what their experts think will be betting trends. Vegas does get very analytical, but they are not concerned with being accurate lol. Only the dolla dolla bills yo,    
    • Strength of schedule based on last year records is not great. Too much turnover and changes year to year. Vegas lines or some sort of advanced analytics projections are probably better for SoS.   Here's one based on Vegas over unders: https://theathletic.com/news/nfl-strength-of-schedule-steelers-raiders-seahawks-lions-bengals/wa372YuigYZB   This one thinks we with the 5th easiest schedule.
    • Taking a break from NBA (Pacers stink BTW lol), and deep diving the Colts Schedule (will likely post something tomorrow)...  With all the talk on OL, extensions, etc, decided to quickly take a look at our OL and projections, and compare to other teams.   TLDR General Notes Colts Highest NFL OL spend already at 53.3M (prior to extensions), and 28% of salary cap (assumes Fisher's 9.4 is in 2021) Projections Nelson - 18M (+12M) - highest paid LG Smith - 16M (+14M) - top 3 paid RT If both are extended this year, Indy would be spending 79M on OL, and 27ish M more than the next NFL team. If the salary cap goes up to 200M next year (from 188M this year), Colts could be spending nearly 40% of the cap on OL if they simply resign Glow for the same, and that doesn't count a raise for Fisher if they choose to resign. If Fisher recovers, he's likely to get 15M or more next year, pushing the yearly up (+5 or more) even more. Glow, while a bargain IMO, and the best weak link in the NFL, is still making top 10 money. He's in a contract year. See SB teams spend and performance rank farther below.  NFL Position High, Position 10th LT: Top 23M/Y, 10th 14.75M/Y Fisher: 17th (9.4M) LG: Top 16M/Y, 10th 6.0M Nelson: 10th (6.0M) OC: Top 12.5/Y, 10th 9.0M/Y Kelly: 2nd (12.4M) RG: Top 18M/Y, 10th 5M/Y Glow: 9th (5.4M) RT: Top 18M/Y, 10th 8M/Y Smith: 44th (1.8M) Other T: Tevi (2.5M), Davenport (1.1M), Holden (0.8M), Od'Donnell (0.7M) Other G: Reed (1.3M), Fries (0.9M), Elderkamp (0.9M) Other C: Hunt (1.0M), Pinter (0.9M) Current Top 5 OL spending 2021 / 2020 spending rank / 2020 OL Rank 1. Colts 53.3M / 8th / #7 2. Jags 52.7M / 16th / #22 3. Browns 52.6M / 6th / #1 4. WFT 51.6M / 4th / #6 5. Titans 46.0M / 19th / #15 6. Jets 45.1M / 17th / #29 7. Eagles 43.9M / 29th / #19 8. Cardinals 41.6M / 13th / #12 9. Bills 40.2M / 3rd / #10 10. 49ers 38.7M / 28th / #9 Note:  2020 AVG OL Spend: 26M 2021 AVG OL Spend: 35.1M SB Teams / OL Spend / OL Rank 2020 TB / 2nd / #5 KC / 24th / #11 2019 KC / 14th / #16 SF / 17th / #14 2018 NE / 26th / #4 LAR / 8th / #6 Average Spend Rank (last 3 SBs): 16th Average OL Rank (last 3 SBs): #9
    • Adam Shefter is reporting that it's a one-year deal at $9.4 million. There may be some cap management voodoo going on with it though, so the details could still be a bit murky. If he comes back close to his Pro Bowl form, it's a bargain, and if not, there isn't any long-term cap damage. I think he is certainly worth the gamble.
    • Yup, tough opening stretch, but easy closing stretch.  I'm Ok with that.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...