Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Chad Kelly decision today?

Lucky Wolf

By Lucky Wolf,
in Colts Football

 Share Followers 4

Recommended Posts

Myles

Myles 4,066

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

 

Belichick is considered the best coach/GM combo ever..... He drafted and kept a 4th round guy over Hoyer.

 

 

That same Belichick signed Hoyer in 2009 and then brought him back in 2017.   So that means he liked him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 837
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

jvan1973

I was told there was a 0% chance he would clear waivers.   

Coffeedrinker

offensive post snipped...   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks man, I'm here working hard in my medioc

jvan1973

They were like he is the best QB since Joe Montana   Now they're like.   

Posted Images

jvan1973

jvan1973 5,351

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

 

Belichick is considered the best coach/GM combo ever..... He drafted and kept a 4th round guy over Hoyer.

 

 

the 4th round guy was much cheaper.   They have the most seasoned qb in the league.   Tom doesn't need a veteran mentor.   Jacoby probably does.   Keeping Hoyer makes far more sense than keeping a guy that has knelt down once in a game

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
luv_pony_express

luv_pony_express 623

Posted
Posted
Just now, Myles said:

I agree.   The team has looked good so far this year.   You don't start an unproven rookie in our situation.   If you are the Giants and your team looks like crap and you are 0-2, then it makes sense.  If we are 6-4 and Brissett goes down for a game or 2, Hoyer gives us the much better chance at winning a game than Kelly at this point.   The ceiling is much higher with Kelly, but so is the floor.  

 

Yep.  We’re a team with a fighting chance.  Yes, we were almost certainly hurt by Luck’s retirement.  But it doesn’t change the fact that we’ve got a lot of good pieces in place....including at QB.

 

We’re not the kind of team who would consider taking more risks in the present to hopefully hit paydirt for the future.

 

Kelly is the riskier choice at backup.  Hoyer is the safer.  And safer is better right now.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
Colts_Fan12

Colts_Fan12 1,825

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, BleedBlu8792 said:

 

Chandler Jones? Richard Seymour? Both were some of the top defensive players in their time they were traded. 

and? they obviously weren't need for him to be successful. and why would he trade JB if he was destined to be this great franchise QB when Tom was at the age he was at. if JB is as great as hes touted here there would have been a 0% chance BB trades him.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
jvan1973

jvan1973 5,351

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

and? they obviously weren't need for him to be successful. and why would he trade JB if he was destined to be this great franchise QB when Tom was at the age he was at. if JB is as great as hes touted here there would have been a 0% chance BB trades him.

We're they going to franchise him next year?   Plus the had Garrapolo.  Guess what,   they traded him too

Link to post
Share on other sites
EastStreet

EastStreet 9,236

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Myles said:

His career is 48 TD's and 30 INT's with an 84 QB rating.    That is awesome to have as your backup QB.  

I would agree he isn't great, but he doesn't "suck".  

48:30 is a BAD ratio

 

83.4 is his average, and that would have been good enough for like 29th or 30th in the last full year of QB passer ratings.

 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
BLUEx40

BLUEx40 24

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

and? they obviously weren't need for him to be successful. and why would he trade JB if he was destined to be this great franchise QB when Tom was at the age he was at. if JB is as great as hes touted here there would have been a 0% chance BB trades him.

Well they did have jimmy and at that point i dont think belichick thought he was going to be forced to trade him

Link to post
Share on other sites
jvan1973

jvan1973 5,351

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

48:30 is a BAD ratio

 

83.4 is his average, and that would have been good enough for like 29th or 30th in the last full year of QB passer ratings.

 

Who cares?  He isn't here to win games.   He is here as a veteran to help Jacoby.   What part of that are you struggling with?  Chad Kelly in no way can help Jacoby  prepare.   Hoyer can

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
EastStreet

EastStreet 9,236

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Do you know why they released him. They didn’t want to release there young qb because they were afraid to lose him on waivers. They wanted to resign him. 

they would not have spent a 4th round pick if they liked hoyer in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BleedBlu8792

BleedBlu8792 638

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

and? they obviously weren't need for him to be successful. and why would he trade JB if he was destined to be this great franchise QB when Tom was at the age he was at. if JB is as great as hes touted here there would have been a 0% chance BB trades him.

 

Because Belicheck also had Jimmy G at that time? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Colts_Fan12

Colts_Fan12 1,825

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

Belichick traded a mid round QB for a 1st round WR. And JB was 3rd on their depth chart at the time....

 

Not the same situation. at all...

I'm just saying everyone acts like we are ripping NE off when so far JB hasn't done crap and Hoyer's never will 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Colts_Fan12

Colts_Fan12 1,825

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, BleedBlu8792 said:

 

What does that have to do with anything that's being discussed? I bet you * in the wind alot..

I didn't even bring Jimmy G up the other poster did you all act like he traded JB cause he had Jimmy he also traded him when reality is they prolly neither are gonna amount to % so that's why he shipped then away 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
LockeDown

LockeDown 1,323

Posted
Posted

Face it. We aren’t a high flying offense this season. Our identity is going to be a tough offense who can impose our will in the run and make passes when they are there. No turnovers. QB sneaks that get 1st downs and touchdowns.  A defense that always keeps us in the game. We really need special teams because we won’t blow anyone out. We need Vinny to be good again.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Myles

Myles 4,066

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

48:30 is a BAD ratio

 

83.4 is his average, and that would have been good enough for like 29th or 30th in the last full year of QB passer ratings.

 

No it isn't.   That is a great ratio for a backup QB.  Heck, you want to keep Kelly who had a 2/2 ration in preseason against 3rd stringers.   

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
shasta519

shasta519 2,829

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

There is nothing more to the story. You guys just have inflated heads when it came to him. With it being wed there is less of a chance a team takes him. He will end up on the practice squad.

 

That won’t stop another team was scooping him up. Any team that would want him will want him on the active roster anyways.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Colts_Fan12

Colts_Fan12 1,825

Posted
Posted
Just now, LockeDown said:

Face it. We aren’t a high flying offense this season. Our identity is going to be a tough offense who can impose our will in the run and make passes when they are there. No turnovers. QB sneaks that get 1st downs and touchdowns.  A defense that always keeps us in the game. We really need special teams because we won’t blow anyone out. We need Vinny to be good again.

our identity will be hope they opposing QB cant throw a football that well 

Link to post
Share on other sites
jvan1973

jvan1973 5,351

Posted
Posted
Just now, Fluke_33 said:

If Kelly signs with the jets and takes them to the Super Bowl while setting every single season nfl record and they sign him to 100 mil a year will we get a compensatory 3rd round pick?

No,   we cut him.   He wasn't a free agent.   But I will eat both of my steel toad work boots if  that happens.   I'll live stream it

  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
EastStreet

EastStreet 9,236

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

the 4th round guy was much cheaper.   They have the most seasoned qb in the league.   Tom doesn't need a veteran mentor.   Jacoby probably does.   Keeping Hoyer makes far more sense than keeping a guy that has knelt down once in a game

Hoyer can give him tips on how to have a bad TD/INT ratio.... 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Fluke_33

Fluke_33 2,614

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, jvan1973 said:

No,   we cut him.   He wasn't a free agent.   But I will eat both of my steel toad work boots if  that happens.   I'll live stream it

Sorry.  I should have added.  Please don’t answer this!  Hahaha

Link to post
Share on other sites
Myles

Myles 4,066

Posted
Posted
Just now, shastamasta said:

 

TD/INT only matters when it fits the narrative.

I wonder if there is a backup QB in the league with a better ratio.   Bridgwater (considered one of the best) has a 29 TD to 23 INT ratio.

Link to post
Share on other sites
shasta519

shasta519 2,829

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, LockeDown said:

Face it. We aren’t a high flying offense this season. Our identity is going to be a tough offense who can impose our will in the run and make passes when they are there. No turnovers. QB sneaks that get 1st downs and touchdowns.  A defense that always keeps us in the game. We really need special teams because we won’t blow anyone out. We need Vinny to be good again.

 

Woof...I like having a defense that can increase the margin for error...but playing a bunch of coin flip games...not sure my heart can take it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Followers 4
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • crazycolt1
      Pittman's off-season

      By crazycolt1 · Posted

      The Colts will keep Eason because he is on a rookie contract.  Ballard traded for Brissett to be a back up so it stands to reason he values the back up QB position more than some fans do. 
    • Superman
      Not to Blow Up all the Salary Cap Talk.... BUT!

      By Superman · Posted

      I think Brandt might be using the Colts rollover from a previous season. Either way, he's not accurate in this case.
    • Shive
      Darius Leonard

      By Shive · Posted

      OLB money is a bit convoluted, because that typically includes 3-4 OLBs, who are edge rushers and typically are paid more than off-line LBs. In previous interviews when asked about his position, he's referred to himself as an ILB, which I think is a little more appropriate. Although Bobby Wagner is sitting at $18M AAV, so I'd say your point is still accurate.
    • crazycolt1
      Pittman's off-season

      By crazycolt1 · Posted

      Is this a joke? Where do you come up with this nonsense?  Eason will need just as much work as Wentz if not more. Wentz has been a starter and if Eason is going to be the back up he will need just as much work. We have already seen what happens when the Colts don't have a competent back up QB.   No one can predict injuries and if a team is not prepared for it the they are the ones who lose.   
    • Superman
      Darius Leonard

      By Superman · Posted

      My only nitpick is that the Colts don't like big signing bonuses. That makes it hard to do a big money deal with a low Year 1 cap hit.

  • Members

    • Nadine

      Nadine 6,430

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shive

      Shive 1,980

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TonyBungee

      TonyBungee 165

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AustinnKaine

      AustinnKaine 291

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 6,390

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 212

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 9,208

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crazycolt1

      crazycolt1 7,396

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 33

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...