Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
LucasOilStadium

Colts @ Titans Game Day Thread

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr.Debonair said:

I know it’s early but Brissett is giving me Chad Pennington vibes

 

Don't scare me like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mr.Debonair said:

I know it’s early but Brissett is giving me Chad Pennington vibes

Chad has better record?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s over now. Time for titans to run it down our throats. I can imagine that ball is sweaty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

It’s over now. Time for titans to run it down our throats. I can imagine that ball is sweaty.

There's a joke in there somewhere...lol

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So we fumble and Tennessee manages to immediately jump on the ball. They fumble and all 11 of our guys can’t just fall on a ball. Quite annoying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

It’s over now. Time for titans to run it down our throats. I can imagine that ball is sweaty.

 

It's far from over.. come on, 4 point game with over a Qtr to play?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, IndySouthsider said:

Brissett has far more arm strength than Pennington ever had

Big Deal; 5 wins so far, supposed to be happy with that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

It’s over now. Time for titans to run it down our throats. I can imagine that ball is sweaty.

 

Chloe, has anyone ever told you this is annoying to say in a close game? Far from over... stop being annoying. 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, IndySouthsider said:

Must be nice to have a good FG kicker

We used to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ColtStrong2013 said:

 

Chloe, has anyone ever told you this is annoying to say in a close game? Far from over... stop being annoying. 

 

Yes... yes they have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should have been a 3 point game i.e. FG if not for Adam.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, will426 said:

run defending atrocious this year

Better this game than against SD, though.  And we're defending against the short/flat pass better.

...not a whole lot better, but better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, JColts72 said:

Big Deal; 5 wins so far, supposed to be happy with that?

2017 doesn’t mean a damn thing. A complete non issue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was a forward pass, (JB's arm was going forward) on top of it the announcers said at that point when JB tucked it it would be the tuck rule haha . They said it like it should be a fumble though lmao . That wasn't a fumble. The refs are making this unwatchable. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JB is a great backup but he is not a franchise QB. The play where he does not wait for Hilton to come open shows his limitations.  As a result the offense is limited. 

 

Special teams killing us. We cannot play without a kicker.

 

Colts for two weeks in a row are not getting beat simply beating themselves. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

It’s over now. Time for titans to run it down our throats. I can imagine that ball is sweaty.

You realize they swap balls every play and it’s wiped down after it comes off the field right

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

That was a forward pass, (JB's arm was going forward) on top of it the announcers said at that point when JB tucked it it would be the tuck rule haha . They said it like it should be a fumble though lmao . That wasn't a fumble. The refs are making this unwatchable. 

Reffing is really WWF bad nowadays. It's terrible.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

That was a forward pass, (JB's arm was going forward) on top of it the announcers said at that point when JB tucked it it would be the tuck rule haha . They said it like it should be a fumble though lmao . That wasn't a fumble. The refs are making this unwatchable. 

The refs are gift wrapping this game to the garbage titans.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those plays are why I just can't shake negative vibes...The Brissett fumble, that near INT...we just can't seem to stop shooting ourselves in the foot.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

That was a forward pass, (JB's arm was going forward) on top of it the announcers said at that point when JB tucked it it would be the tuck rule haha . They said it like it should be a fumble though lmao . That wasn't a fumble. The refs are making this unwatchable. 

JUst stop it....It was a fumble.   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

You realize they swap balls every play and it’s wiped down after it comes off the field right

 

Each team has it's own set of balls too, hence the fun in New England..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I get your point but I am sure Ballard agree's. JB even by my eye ball test doesn't suck. We are just used to Peyton and Luck. Ballard may draft a QB and to be honest I would be happy if he did but not in round 1. He may get a gem in round 2 or 3 or so.
    • I don't think either of us can say exactly how Ballard does, or does not, look at things. We know some basics though. We know both he and FR are stats guys, and Ballard has grown the analytics team since coming to Indy. We know one of Ballards core responsibilities is build a team that not only wins, but also one that fills seats and generates revenue. We also know he loves leadership and the "right guys".   I think we both agree that Ballard is a very smart guy. He knows everything about JB. He knows his flaws from college, he knows every stat that has been laid out by all of us here, plus probably a bunch more. He knows exactly what last year's team and players did, and the difference in their performance to date this year.   I agree that the FO didn't get to evaluate JB under perfect/ideal situations, but frankly that never happens. He's not going to give pure grace for injuries, and disregard that JB still has a big problem with missing wide open guys regardless of who they are. He sees it all, and a lot more. And I'm sure he knows sometimes you have to make a call without ideal input/evaluation.    I do think that Ballard will do what ever he does, and we'll likely never know all the past, current, and future variables he may weigh. I just know where I'd put my money.
    • I truly believe the front office and Reich do want him to succeed. They would love a guy with is character and leadership to pilot this franchise for the next 10+ years. Sadly, I think he has reached his ceiling and  I think the Colts org privately know it as well.
    • Yeah I had him at #4, I liked TY, Funchess, and Campbell better going into the season. I just put Pascal 4th because I love his work ethic and his hands are decent. I liked him better than Cain or Rogers hence the #4.
    • But my point is...even if he could build around an average QB...why should he? For starters, no GM is good enough to build a consistent Super Bowl team without a legit QB. Dorsey was pretty damn good in KC...and those teams were talented...yet they won 1 playoff game in 4-5 years.   If Ballard is truly a top 5 GM...then that's even more reason to shoot for a legit franchise QB...not settle on an average QB. A top 5 GM, a franchise QB and top tier coaching is the stuff of dynasties...or multiple rings in a 5-6 year span. Why you intentionally put yourself at a disadvantage in one area...when you have clear advantages in other areas? Just seems like you are robbing Peter to pay Paul.   I mean...is he going to just stop being a good GM or just stop adding talent to the roster because they used resources on a QB? I have always thought this "great roster vs. great QB" debate was a false choice (sort of like FA vs. the draft). Why not have both? Sure there are opportunity costs and financial logistics involved in finding and keeping a top tier QB...but a savvy GM as good as Ballard is purported to be...should be able to overcome that...especially early on in that QB's contract...and especially when he's sitting on $100M in cap space.   We all got a taste of what an improving Ballard team with a top tier QB could look like last year...that's the direction I want to see this team take. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...