Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

This first game felt different in a good way from previous years with Luck


Happy2BeHere

Recommended Posts

I personally felt like this was the first time in many years where before the game started I knew that our Colts were going to actually play more as a team. I've felt so often in the past that our Colts were always having to to win with Luck taking the majority of the game(s) on his shoulders to win these things because we weren't getting enough help all around. Sadly the missed kicks ultimately is what doomed us but I still felt outside of that it was one of the most complete team effort I've seen in awhile and it was what I was expecting to be as an entire team effort instead of the typical mindset I always had of "Luck will save us".

 

I will say though so many times I was always worried about Luck putting us in a hole with his turnover problem (yea it wasn't always on him but it sure felt like he was turnover prone). I loved Luck he was awesome and a big help to the team.

 

That said I think we have a really well rounded team and one that should obviously naturally get better with more practice and game time. I think the Colts are in a great position without Luck and will be just fine. Ballard has done a great job overhauling this team so kudos to him.

 

Am I the only one who has these similar feelings ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

The offense played great playoff football. The defense needs to tighten up. I still don’t like our safeties outside of hooker. We need to draft one high and hopefully they would be a stud.

Safety really isn’t our problem. We’re not getting beat over the top, we’re getting beat on screens and the short, middle field. In other words, our zone is too big. We need better coverage in the middle and that to me is more of a scheme thing than a personnel issue. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Safety really isn’t our problem. We’re not getting beat over the top, we’re getting beat on screens and the short, middle field. In other words, our zone is too big. We need better coverage in the middle and that to me is more of a scheme thing than a personnel issue. 

 

We didn't get beat deep because the Chargers were gashing us all day over the middle.

 

I think Hooker played pretty well, and he serves as a deep threat deterrent, but his tackling was just average yesterday, and Geathers got burned down by the goal line (got caught looking in the backfield). 

 

Geathers' tackling was not good yesterday.  Willis got beat on ST for the punt block.

 

Finally, we actually played a lot more man-to-man yesterday, and I think the entire secondary looked a little lost. 

 

I agree that the S position isn't a fatal flaw, completely lacking any play-making ability, but it was 1 of my 2 biggest concerns about this team heading into the season and after watching yesterday, we need a major talent upgrade at the position outside of Hooker, and we could upgrade the talent behind him, too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a lack of repetitions, I don’t think the Colts came out overly flat against the Chargers. It will take time for both the offense and defense to get into a better rhythm. Last year is a good example. However, the Colts had an easier schedule last season. The Titans game is huge this week. If they lose, I don’t see the Colts making the playoffs. It’s still going to be a fun season to watch regardless. Patience!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This change from being the most zone heavy team to use much more man coverage won't happen by snapping fingers. It'll take some time to get used to it. Not to mention the rookies, who needs snaps anyway to get used to the NFL. All in all, against such a pass happy, and efficiently pass happy team as the Chargers are, I think the pass defense was OK. I was more dissappointed regarding the run defense. They found holes where there should have been no holes all day.

 

On the offensive side, the OL played well, our running game found it's rythm, that was nice to see in the second half. What I didn't like is that by now, many NFL teams successfully implemented this quick RB/WR checkdown plays, they use it efficiently. Not sure if it's lack of efficient blocking from the WR-s / TE-es or lack of vision from Hines (sometimes Mack, whoever gets the ball), or we just can't sell them so defenses can react to it in time. Whatever the reason is, we struggle to execute these plays well enough. Too many times the result is zero or negative yards, and even if we can gain some, it's only 4-5 instead of 6-10-12. These plays could help Brissett tremendously, if we could get them fixed & execute them better.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Peterk2011 said:

This change from being the most zone heavy team to use much more man coverage won't happen by snapping fingers. It'll take some time to get used to it. Not to mention the rookies, who needs snaps anyway to get used to the NFL. All in all, against such a pass happy, and efficiently pass happy team as the Chargers are, I think the pass defense was OK. I was more dissappointed regarding the run defense. They found holes where there should have been no holes all day.

 

On the offensive side, the OL played well, our running game found it's rythm, that was nice to see in the second half. What I didn't like is that by now, many NFL teams successfully implemented this quick RB/WR checkdown plays, they use it efficiently. Not sure if it's lack of efficient blocking from the WR-s / TE-es or lack of vision from Hines (sometimes Mack, whoever gets the ball), or we just can't sell them so defenses can react to it in time. Whatever the reason is, we struggle to execute these plays well enough. Too many times the result is zero or negative yards, and even if we can gain some, it's only 4-5 instead of 6-10-12. These plays could help Brissett tremendously, if we could get them fixed & execute them better.

Agreed and when they are ran against us, our D seems to give up huge chunks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Peterk2011 said:

This change from being the most zone heavy team to use much more man coverage won't happen by snapping fingers. It'll take some time to get used to it. Not to mention the rookies, who needs snaps anyway to get used to the NFL. All in all, against such a pass happy, and efficiently pass happy team as the Chargers are, I think the pass defense was OK. I was more dissappointed regarding the run defense. They found holes where there should have been no holes all day.

 

On the offensive side, the OL played well, our running game found it's rythm, that was nice to see in the second half. What I didn't like is that by now, many NFL teams successfully implemented this quick RB/WR checkdown plays, they use it efficiently. Not sure if it's lack of efficient blocking from the WR-s / TE-es or lack of vision from Hines (sometimes Mack, whoever gets the ball), or we just can't sell them so defenses can react to it in time. Whatever the reason is, we struggle to execute these plays well enough. Too many times the result is zero or negative yards, and even if we can gain some, it's only 4-5 instead of 6-10-12. These plays could help Brissett tremendously, if we could get them fixed & execute them better.

Reich mentioned yesterday that the TE will be getting more involved.  I think we wanted to keep things as simple as possible to get Brissett back in starting mode. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Peterk2011 said:

This change from being the most zone heavy team to use much more man coverage won't happen by snapping fingers. It'll take some time to get used to it. Not to mention the rookies, who needs snaps anyway to get used to the NFL. All in all, against such a pass happy, and efficiently pass happy team as the Chargers are, I think the pass defense was OK. I was more dissappointed regarding the run defense. They found holes where there should have been no holes all day.

 

On the offensive side, the OL played well, our running game found it's rythm, that was nice to see in the second half. What I didn't like is that by now, many NFL teams successfully implemented this quick RB/WR checkdown plays, they use it efficiently. Not sure if it's lack of efficient blocking from the WR-s / TE-es or lack of vision from Hines (sometimes Mack, whoever gets the ball), or we just can't sell them so defenses can react to it in time. Whatever the reason is, we struggle to execute these plays well enough. Too many times the result is zero or negative yards, and even if we can gain some, it's only 4-5 instead of 6-10-12. These plays could help Brissett tremendously, if we could get them fixed & execute them better.

 

the problem with that is mack has not been a good receiver.  dropped passes and tipped interceptions have been a problem, and its obvious what we are trying to do when hines is in the game

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, csmopar said:

Safety really isn’t our problem. We’re not getting beat over the top, we’re getting beat on screens and the short, middle field. In other words, our zone is too big. We need better coverage in the middle and that to me is more of a scheme thing than a personnel issue. 

We've said this for years. Each linebacker has to account for somebody the best teams don't kneel while running backs and receivers to cross the middle without being harassed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He couldn’t make any money with a bush league QB.  I think this is basically it and I don’t blame him a bit.
    • One last thing to add, before I leave you folks alone, another point for consideration.   It takes guts to put yourself out there, face a life long stuttering problem head on by speaking in front of large audiences when so much effort is involved to just speak.     Takes guts, and considering the school he chose, in the city it’s in, he took up that challenge before he was even out of HS.   Good luck folks, hope our guy is who you were looking for, on and off the field. ✌️ 
    • Kevin Bowen talked in a podcast last year how Luck in 2018 even went to coaches to complain about his work ethic. All of this happened after he said he had a big talk with coaches about wanting the ball. Reich forcing the ball to him in the Miami game trying to appease him. There is no speculation. He quit after a fall out with the coaches. That ankle could of waited until after the season.
    • It wasn't mysterious. He had issues with his ankles and was getting shots for weeks prior. The FO just figured he'd play through it, but it was known he'd need a procedure or procedures after the season. That's not speculation because Ballard talked about it.    And again, he didn't develop stone cold hands anywhere near the Pitt game. He didn't drop the ball in the Pitt game, nor 3 previous. Those are easily available stats.   I'm not spinning anything. I don't care for him as a player or person. I do not however have a problem for him taking care of his body for the next year, as his body is his primary asset and means of making money.   Fans seem to think players owe it to teams to play through injury. Some players do, some players don't. My expectations, and your expectations on the topic don't matter either. But the reality of it is, if you're a player, and under contract for the next few years, you're probably more inclined to play through injury. If you're not under contract, and especially if you don't think you're going to be resigned, you're probably inclined not to. Again, it's a business. 
    • A few thoughts:   The speed guy can't just have speed, otherwise you have Philip Dorsett.  TY could do many things, and that's what made him a threat.  He didn't go first round because of small school and probably size.  To get a TY talented guy who is bigger is going to take something higher than the low second round he was drafted, IMO.  Its possible to find one lower, but from a planning standpoint, I think you have to plan to devote a first round pick to get the same impact and mileage we got from TY.   The question is, can we get by without a TY?  That's a legitimate question.  So far, when TY has been absent, the Colts struggle, but maybe that's what the Pittman and Campbell investments are supposed to alleviate.    While the other guys were talented, we signed them only because they were not good enough to be in the long term plans of the teams they left.  I don't think Ballard wants to use that FA method for key positions on a perpetual basis, and that's what the Pittman pick is supposed to stop.  Campbell was always more of a slot or a TY clone, not an X.    IMO, Ballard has seen the need for having proper talent at the skilled positions by drafting a slot and an X with second round picks.  Thankfully, a Colts GM finally pulled those triggers, now we just need Campbell to live up to his investment.
  • Members

    • Bluesmith

      Bluesmith 113

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blueblood23

      Blueblood23 405

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 2,673

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 10,051

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shive

      Shive 2,441

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nickster

      Nickster 442

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 3,074

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 12213

      12213 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 928

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jmac_48

      jmac_48 689

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...