Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Happy2BeHere

This first game felt different in a good way from previous years with Luck

Recommended Posts

I personally felt like this was the first time in many years where before the game started I knew that our Colts were going to actually play more as a team. I've felt so often in the past that our Colts were always having to to win with Luck taking the majority of the game(s) on his shoulders to win these things because we weren't getting enough help all around. Sadly the missed kicks ultimately is what doomed us but I still felt outside of that it was one of the most complete team effort I've seen in awhile and it was what I was expecting to be as an entire team effort instead of the typical mindset I always had of "Luck will save us".

 

I will say though so many times I was always worried about Luck putting us in a hole with his turnover problem (yea it wasn't always on him but it sure felt like he was turnover prone). I loved Luck he was awesome and a big help to the team.

 

That said I think we have a really well rounded team and one that should obviously naturally get better with more practice and game time. I think the Colts are in a great position without Luck and will be just fine. Ballard has done a great job overhauling this team so kudos to him.

 

Am I the only one who has these similar feelings ?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The offense played great playoff football. The defense needs to tighten up. I still don’t like our safeties outside of hooker. We need to draft one high and hopefully they would be a stud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

The offense played great playoff football. The defense needs to tighten up. I still don’t like our safeties outside of hooker. We need to draft one high and hopefully they would be a stud.

Safety really isn’t our problem. We’re not getting beat over the top, we’re getting beat on screens and the short, middle field. In other words, our zone is too big. We need better coverage in the middle and that to me is more of a scheme thing than a personnel issue. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Safety really isn’t our problem. We’re not getting beat over the top, we’re getting beat on screens and the short, middle field. In other words, our zone is too big. We need better coverage in the middle and that to me is more of a scheme thing than a personnel issue. 

 

We didn't get beat deep because the Chargers were gashing us all day over the middle.

 

I think Hooker played pretty well, and he serves as a deep threat deterrent, but his tackling was just average yesterday, and Geathers got burned down by the goal line (got caught looking in the backfield). 

 

Geathers' tackling was not good yesterday.  Willis got beat on ST for the punt block.

 

Finally, we actually played a lot more man-to-man yesterday, and I think the entire secondary looked a little lost. 

 

I agree that the S position isn't a fatal flaw, completely lacking any play-making ability, but it was 1 of my 2 biggest concerns about this team heading into the season and after watching yesterday, we need a major talent upgrade at the position outside of Hooker, and we could upgrade the talent behind him, too.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a lack of repetitions, I don’t think the Colts came out overly flat against the Chargers. It will take time for both the offense and defense to get into a better rhythm. Last year is a good example. However, the Colts had an easier schedule last season. The Titans game is huge this week. If they lose, I don’t see the Colts making the playoffs. It’s still going to be a fun season to watch regardless. Patience!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This change from being the most zone heavy team to use much more man coverage won't happen by snapping fingers. It'll take some time to get used to it. Not to mention the rookies, who needs snaps anyway to get used to the NFL. All in all, against such a pass happy, and efficiently pass happy team as the Chargers are, I think the pass defense was OK. I was more dissappointed regarding the run defense. They found holes where there should have been no holes all day.

 

On the offensive side, the OL played well, our running game found it's rythm, that was nice to see in the second half. What I didn't like is that by now, many NFL teams successfully implemented this quick RB/WR checkdown plays, they use it efficiently. Not sure if it's lack of efficient blocking from the WR-s / TE-es or lack of vision from Hines (sometimes Mack, whoever gets the ball), or we just can't sell them so defenses can react to it in time. Whatever the reason is, we struggle to execute these plays well enough. Too many times the result is zero or negative yards, and even if we can gain some, it's only 4-5 instead of 6-10-12. These plays could help Brissett tremendously, if we could get them fixed & execute them better.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Peterk2011 said:

This change from being the most zone heavy team to use much more man coverage won't happen by snapping fingers. It'll take some time to get used to it. Not to mention the rookies, who needs snaps anyway to get used to the NFL. All in all, against such a pass happy, and efficiently pass happy team as the Chargers are, I think the pass defense was OK. I was more dissappointed regarding the run defense. They found holes where there should have been no holes all day.

 

On the offensive side, the OL played well, our running game found it's rythm, that was nice to see in the second half. What I didn't like is that by now, many NFL teams successfully implemented this quick RB/WR checkdown plays, they use it efficiently. Not sure if it's lack of efficient blocking from the WR-s / TE-es or lack of vision from Hines (sometimes Mack, whoever gets the ball), or we just can't sell them so defenses can react to it in time. Whatever the reason is, we struggle to execute these plays well enough. Too many times the result is zero or negative yards, and even if we can gain some, it's only 4-5 instead of 6-10-12. These plays could help Brissett tremendously, if we could get them fixed & execute them better.

Agreed and when they are ran against us, our D seems to give up huge chunks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Peterk2011 said:

This change from being the most zone heavy team to use much more man coverage won't happen by snapping fingers. It'll take some time to get used to it. Not to mention the rookies, who needs snaps anyway to get used to the NFL. All in all, against such a pass happy, and efficiently pass happy team as the Chargers are, I think the pass defense was OK. I was more dissappointed regarding the run defense. They found holes where there should have been no holes all day.

 

On the offensive side, the OL played well, our running game found it's rythm, that was nice to see in the second half. What I didn't like is that by now, many NFL teams successfully implemented this quick RB/WR checkdown plays, they use it efficiently. Not sure if it's lack of efficient blocking from the WR-s / TE-es or lack of vision from Hines (sometimes Mack, whoever gets the ball), or we just can't sell them so defenses can react to it in time. Whatever the reason is, we struggle to execute these plays well enough. Too many times the result is zero or negative yards, and even if we can gain some, it's only 4-5 instead of 6-10-12. These plays could help Brissett tremendously, if we could get them fixed & execute them better.

Reich mentioned yesterday that the TE will be getting more involved.  I think we wanted to keep things as simple as possible to get Brissett back in starting mode. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Peterk2011 said:

This change from being the most zone heavy team to use much more man coverage won't happen by snapping fingers. It'll take some time to get used to it. Not to mention the rookies, who needs snaps anyway to get used to the NFL. All in all, against such a pass happy, and efficiently pass happy team as the Chargers are, I think the pass defense was OK. I was more dissappointed regarding the run defense. They found holes where there should have been no holes all day.

 

On the offensive side, the OL played well, our running game found it's rythm, that was nice to see in the second half. What I didn't like is that by now, many NFL teams successfully implemented this quick RB/WR checkdown plays, they use it efficiently. Not sure if it's lack of efficient blocking from the WR-s / TE-es or lack of vision from Hines (sometimes Mack, whoever gets the ball), or we just can't sell them so defenses can react to it in time. Whatever the reason is, we struggle to execute these plays well enough. Too many times the result is zero or negative yards, and even if we can gain some, it's only 4-5 instead of 6-10-12. These plays could help Brissett tremendously, if we could get them fixed & execute them better.

 

the problem with that is mack has not been a good receiver.  dropped passes and tipped interceptions have been a problem, and its obvious what we are trying to do when hines is in the game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, csmopar said:

Safety really isn’t our problem. We’re not getting beat over the top, we’re getting beat on screens and the short, middle field. In other words, our zone is too big. We need better coverage in the middle and that to me is more of a scheme thing than a personnel issue. 

We've said this for years. Each linebacker has to account for somebody the best teams don't kneel while running backs and receivers to cross the middle without being harassed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I expect  Brissett  to be much better eventually.  Luck was brought  along just as slow the beginning  of last year and every one was like where are the deep balls? Eventually  Cain, Campbell,  or Roger's will get more involved  with offense.   
    • To me, we would know his progression, not ceiling. I’ll bet the playbook is still not fully installed yet, nor fully grasped by all of the player.  Some are further along than others as well.  I believe we can thank the CBA (with its very much reduced coach/player/team activities in the off season) at least in part for the less than stellar offensive creativity and brilliance in execution.   JB is a Works In Progress. I don’t feel that 4 weeks will determine his final destination. Unless, he really isn’t going to be more than average.  I’m watching the full year.  That should be a good indicator for what the team should plan to do next off season/training camp,
    • For a second, based on the link title, I thought that someone pulled an Aaron Hernandez.
    • Yep.   And nothing you’re going to type will move me from that position.   I appreciate what he did when was here. But that appreciation is only for what he did prior to his little show this year. 
    • Facts Also the turn over factor for the Tenn game. Ball was on the ground a few times instead of trying to scoop it and make a play secure it first. Hooker dropped an INT along with Bobby.
  • Members

    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 22,629

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IrishColt

      IrishColt 52

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Rebel

      Rebel 58

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltspamela

      coltspamela 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Stephen

      Stephen 1,619

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blindside

      Blindside 22

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 2

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • COLTS7

      COLTS7 283

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Beizy317

      Beizy317 19

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 35

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...