Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Hoose

Do the Colts put Chad Kelly on the 53 man roster after his suspension is over?

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

 

Chad no longer Swag. He is now, Wild Thing.

If they play that song when Kelly takes the field I will lose my s*** :D

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Jared Jammer said:

Personally, I'd rather gamble on greatness than settle for mediocrity.

 

Good god yes. This is a QB league and we’re depending on a guy who was mediocre in college to be great in the NFL. I just don’t see how that happens. 

 

If he possessed the intuition, skill set, and athleticism to be great in the NFL he’d have been an exceptional college QB. As I’ve hopefully shown in this thread, even your average NFL starters were, without exception, outstanding college QB’s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Lennon1940 said:

 

Yeah, has a little something to do with the fact that in Kelly’s best season he had 1500 more yards and 15 more TD’s than JB’s best season. 

trust me I know I like kelly more too but got to see what JB does first 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Lennon1940 said:

 

Yeah, has a little something to do with the fact that in Kelly’s best season he had 1500 more yards and 15 more TD’s than JB’s best season. 

trust me I know I like kelly more too anyone that goes to Bama and beats the crap out of the tide has my vote but got to see what JB does first 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

It wasn't because he couldn't follow rules.    There are countless stories about guys with amazing talent that flamed out because they couldn't stay out of trouble.   By all accounts Jacoby is a hard worker and was voted a team captain.   That tells me what I need

 

Hahaha

 

Character doesn’t win football games. Beating the hell out of your opponents and enforcing your will on them is what wins games. Usually successful NFL QB’s are character guys AND exceptional talents. 

 

Show me an elite NFL QB who was merely average in college (aside from

the one obvious exception). I’ll wait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Lennon1940 said:

 

Hahaha

 

Character doesn’t win football games. Beating the hell out of your opponents and enforcing your will on them is what wins games. Usually successful NFL QB’s are character guys AND exceptional talents. 

 

Show me an elite NFL QB who was merely average in college (aside from

the one obvious exception). I’ll wait.

 

Kurt Warner and Warren Moon 

 

 

Show me an elite qb in the NFL that was cut by his first college team,   then later arrested

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

 

Kurt Warner and Warren Moon 

 

 

Show me an elite qb in the NFL that was cut by his first college team,   then later arrested

I would throw Johnny Unitas into that mix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

 

Kurt Warner and Warren Moon 

 

 

Show me an elite qb in the NFL that was cut by his first college team,   then later arrested

 

baker-mayfield.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Lennon1940 said:

 

baker-mayfield.jpg

Lmao.  He is far from elite.   My goodness my ribs hurt from laughing

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Lennon1940 said:

Character doesn’t win football games.

A blanket statement that skirts reality. I could just as easily say that lack of character can lose football games. 

 

Doesn't make it true, but it's a nice sound bite. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jvan1973 said:

Lmao.  He is far from elite.   My goodness my ribs hurt from laughing

 

What about this guy 

 

1200px-Cam_newton_2016.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lennon1940 said:

 

What about this guy 

 

1200px-Cam_newton_2016.jpg

I wouldn't call him elite.   But that's one.   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

Mayfield is listed in most top 10 QB rankings for 2019.... just saying.

Yeah.  That means zero.    Show me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Mayfield is listed in most top 10 QB rankings for 2019.... just saying.

I year doesn’t make someone elite

  It is a good start for him but he is not there yet 

    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bottom line is that if JB is going to turn out to be a good NFL QB he’s going to be the exception not the rule given his college background. It’s extraordinarily rare for a QB to be better in the NFL than they were in college. 

 

I hope I’m wrong. It’d be one hell of a story for our franchise if he turned out to be great. 

 

But I suspect that we just married ourselves to a guy who won’t ever be bad enough to be benched but won’t ever be good enough for us to win anything big. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PrincetonTiger said:

I year doesn’t make someone elite

  It is a good start for him but he is not there yet 

    

 

This talk about “elite” is just semantics. I literally listed every starting QB under 30 in the league, elite, good, average, or bad, and almost all of them were freakshows in college EXCEPT our guy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Lennon1940 said:

 

This talk about “elite” is just semantics. I literally listed every starting QB under 30 in the league, elite, good, average, or bad, and almost all of them were freakshows in college EXCEPT our guy. 

Just like in real life college success means very little in the NFL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jared Jammer said:

I view Brissett's best-case scenario as somewhere around Ryan Fitzpatrick: a replacement-level starting QB who'll get shuffled around the league for the better part of a decade.

 

Kelly's much more boom or bust. Two years from now he could be a Pro Bowler, or he could be in prison.

 

Personally, I'd rather gamble on greatness than settle for mediocrity.

 

If JB guns it like Fitz does...it will at least be fun to watch.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Just like in real life college success means very little in the NFL

But at least college is why all the NFL players are so scholarly.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Just like in real life college success means very little in the NFL

 

Well I guess we just have to hope that our guy is a once in 20 years exception to the rule that NFL starters were excellent college QB’s. I don’t like being in that position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lennon1940 said:

 

This talk about “elite” is just semantics. I literally listed every starting QB under 30 in the league, elite, good, average, or bad, and almost all of them were freakshows in college EXCEPT our guy. 

 

I appreciate the great points you are making. But by now most of what JB has done in the past has become largely irrelevant to many Colts fans. And that's not meant to be a criticism...just an observation from reading posts here and on other forums.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PrincetonTiger said:

I year doesn’t make someone elite

  It is a good start for him but he is not there yet 

 

It's a pretty good sign whenever a QB is drafted in the top 10 (Baker was #1), and then takes a team that went 0-16 a year before to only losing 8 games while putting up 3700+ yards on a bad team..... He then is listed by most experts in the top 10 to start the next year.

 

He may not be elite by "career" expectations, but most view him as elite right now. Like others have said... semantics. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is definitely making the team...the Colts like Kelly, I can tell that Frank really likes Kelly! I still believe one of the main reasons they got Hoyer was to avoid a QB controversy! They knew that if/when Brissett struggles, many fans would start screaming for Kelly....by making Hoyer the number two they eliminate the QB controversy because nobody is going to be screaming for Hoyer!

 

But, I also believe that if Jacoby doesn't get the job done we will see Kelly and not Hoyer...coaching staff just wants to make that decision without pressure from the fans! JMHO

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

I appreciate the great points you are making. But by now most of what JB has done in that past has become largely irrelevant to many Colts fans. And that's not a criticism...just an observation from reading posts here and on other forums.

 

JB has a tremendous opportunity to write his own story now. He has a very very solid team around him on both O and D. It's all up to him.

 

If he knocks it out of the park, nobody will ever talk about his mediocre college days again, nor talk about Chad Kelly's higher ceiling. If he and the team struggle, it'll continue to be discussed. 

 

He's in the driver seat. Cheering loud for him Sunday!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

 

It's a pretty good sign whenever a QB is drafted in the top 10 (Baker was #1), and then takes a team that went 0-16 a year before to only losing 8 games while putting up 3700+ yards on a bad team..... He then is listed by most experts in the top 10 to start the next year.

 

He may not be elite by "career" expectations, but most view him as elite right now. Like others have said... semantics. 

 

Baker had a great rookie year....arguably better than Luck. I think if Luck was top 10 after his rookie year (which he was)...Baker should be as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

I appreciate the great points you are making. But by now most of what JB has done in the past has become largely irrelevant to many Colts fans. And that's not meant to be a criticism...just an observation from reading posts here and on other forums.

 

Oh I totally agree. Me complaining on a message board about all of this doesn’t make me like JB as a dude less or want to root for him any less. His destiny is tied to the destiny of the team. He’s the QB of our team and the team being successful is the ONLY thing that really matters to me. 

 

I think about what a great story it’d be to be awesome this year in spite of all that has occurred with Luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

Baker had a great rookie year than Luck....arguably better than Luck. I think if Luck was top 10 after his rookie year (which he was)...Baker should be as well.

Yup. I dislike BM for many reasons, but you have to give him props for what he's done. Out of all the QBs out there, he's in the top 5 of those that I'd want long term as a QB.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

 

JB has a tremendous opportunity to write his own story now. He has a very very solid team around him on both O and D. It's all up to him.

 

If he knocks it out of the park, nobody will ever talk about his mediocre college days again, nor talk about Chad Kelly's higher ceiling. If he and the team struggle, it'll continue to be discussed. 

 

He's in the driver seat. Cheering loud for him Sunday!

 

Oh...same here. He's definitely got what he needs to be successful now. I will be rooting for him too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Lennon1940 said:

 

Oh I totally agree. Me complaining on a message board about all of this doesn’t make me like JB as a dude less or want to root for him any less. His destiny is tied to the destiny of the team. He’s the QB of our team and the team being successful is the ONLY thing that really matters to me. 

 

I think about what a great story it’d be to be awesome this year in spite of all that has occurred with Luck.

 

That's where I am at. But if I am being honest, I am skeptical...based on both the data and eye test. I have been wrong before...many times...so it wouldn't be anything new.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

That's where I am at. But if I am being honest, I am skeptical...based on both the data and eye test. I have been wrong before...many times...so it wouldn't be anything new.

you're not alone in thinking that lol I feel the same 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

you're not alone in thinking that lol I feel the same 

 

definitely not alone lol.

the confidence poll was a lot more honest than the vocal sunshine pumpers.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EastStreet said:

 

definitely not alone lol.

the confidence poll was a lot more honest than the vocal sunshine pumpers.

lol and just cause we haven't crowned JB the next Luck we are obviously against him haha

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

lol and just cause we haven't crowned JB the next Luck we are obviously against him haha

 

Everybody has to prove it. I'll be more than happy to crown him if he does. We all will.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Yup. I dislike BM for many reasons, but you have to give him props for what he's done. Out of all the QBs out there, he's in the top 5 of those that I'd want long term as a QB.

 

He's a stud. I started paying more attention to him during the 2nd half of his senior season...along with the other QBs that year (cause we didn't know about Luck at that time)...and Baker was so damn accurate. Should have been the the #1 guy all along...CLE did not get that one wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, shastamasta said:

 

He's a stud. I started paying more attention to him during the 2nd half of his senior season...along with the other QBs that year (cause we didn't know about Luck at that time)...and Baker was so damn accurate. Should have been the the #1 guy all along...CLE did not get that one wrong.

 

yup. he was an 8 game swing by himself....

browns are sitting well right now. but... they are the browns :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Lennon1940 said:

 

This talk about “elite” is just semantics. I literally listed every starting QB under 30 in the league, elite, good, average, or bad, and almost all of them were freakshows in college EXCEPT our guy. 

Trent Richardson  was a freakshow in college  and sucked in the nfl. You don't  need to be an elite college  qb to become a great nfl one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Stephen said:

You don't  need to be an elite college  qb to become a great nfl one.

 

Unless you’re Tom Brady, actually you do. 

 

I think I’ve shown pretty irrefutable evidence in this thread that literally every single starting QB in this league with the exception of Tom Brady and Jacoby Brissett were elite college QB’s.

 

There’s only one dude on our roster who was an elite QB in college and it ain’t JB or Hoyer.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lennon1940 said:

 

Unless you’re Tom Brady, actually you do. 

 

I think I’ve shown pretty irrefutable evidence in this thread that literally every single starting QB in this league with the exception of Tom Brady and Jacoby Brissett were elite college QB’s.

Well Brissett  is the next Brady/ kurt warner. He is the real deal. Pocket presence strong arm and great coaching staff and all doubters will be quieted soon enough.  NCAA state produced Philip rivers and Russell Wilson. Now Brissett  is ready to shine with better weapons and a full offseason. He'd have to be worse than curtis painter to fail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Had Funchess been practing? I thought he had to practice for two weeks before being able to come back?
    • Oh you were right on that one.  I still won, but I missed out on having highest score of the week by .32 points.  Our league pays out for highest weekly scores. 
    • I think there's a danger with any position of getting enamoured with the 40 time, I'd put 3 cone over it certainly. However, as always never go by just one metric, and never put metrics over film.    For all that was written about him being a below average athlete, if you compare  him to some of the 'good' SS's in the league he matches up pretty well:   Willis 4.55s (40)/7.15s (3 Cone) Collins 4.53s (40)/7.53s (3 Cone) Chancellor 4.69s (40)/7.36s (3 Cone) Jones  4.51s (40)/7.43s (3 Cone)  Adams  4.56s (40)/6.96s (3 Cone)    etc etc... 
    • CeeDee Lamb would be the dream pick imo. Reminds me a lot of Hopkins/Thomas, good size, great route runner and hands. Means he could take on a high volume of targets in the short/intermediate range, something I think Frank Reich badly needs (that's why he was high on signing Funchess). Put him on the boundary opposite Hilton and Campbell in the slot and we have serious options. Not as high on Ruggs when we already have Hilton.   I like Mack as a lead back, but not 25 carries a game. I would prefer a legit RB2 to take some of that load off him, preferably a RB to compliments his game, so a heavier, more physical, north/south RB. This draft has options in the mid round.
    • Here's where I think Kelly 'fans' are distressed. To your point we don't know Kelly...fair.  So what do we know.  We know he can run, dude's fast.  We know he has a strong arm, like that.  We know he'll throw downfield and into tight windows, good!  We know he will stand in the pocket, check. We know he has the stuff to go into Alabama with an Ole Miss team and beat em, that no small thing. We also know he has off-field issues maybe he's grown up, don't know but we hear good things from Frank.  So to someone like me, I like what I see and like what I hear...Rally confused.   Here's what we know about Hoyer, he has none of those physical attributes but he's good in the QB room.  Ok, well, I'm good in QB room but you wouldn't want me under center.  There's an obvious hesitation here on the part of Frank and/or Chris to make Kelly a part of the permanent roster, they will likely cut him again and hope he clears waivers over Hoyer, that to me is absolutely stunning.  Either, Kelly is an off the field nightmare we shouldn't be investing in OR he should be at worst QB2. Hoyer is simply not good, we can get his level of performance literally anywhere, he's the prototypical failed backup and those are readily available on the cheap. I wouldn't understand keeping him over a contract when he weakens the team relative to someone like Kelly on game day.  So to a previous posters comment, why is Kelly here?  If he is such an integrity issue it's not our job to make a man out of him while he occupies a spot.  If he's is good enough physically, which he is, and he's on this roster, which he is, he should stay up and get some first team reps, as all back ups should and see how matures.  It starting to feel like some ego at play here.  All in all, our leadership was ill-prepared to deal with Brissett going down and choked this week in prep.  It's my hope we dump Hoyer who is useless and keep Kelly at QB2, I don't think that will happen.  My 2+ cents.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...