Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Patrick Miller

Gary Brackett says....

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, Patrick Miller said:

..... There's a trade in the works. He said this yesterday on Twitter.

 

I very seriously doubt he knows anything.  

 

Plus it just makes no sense.  What QB is out there worth giving up a pick to get? What have we seen from Ballard to suggest that he'd give up a pick, especially when he can just sign a vet like Hoyer?

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Patrick Miller said:

..... There's a trade in the works. He said this yesterday on Twitter.

Yeah..... it was posted yesterday on here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

We NEED an OT for depth

 

HUGE HOLE

3d-4th for Jordan Mailata? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, stitches said:

3d-4th for Jordan Mailata? 

He is hurt, but why not

 

This is a DIRE need for this team... probably the biggest hole on the roster

 

Backup OT

 

One or both OTs will get hurt for a game or two (or more :( )

 

Clark will get someone KILLED

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

He is hurt, but why not

 

This is a DIRE need for this team... probably the biggest hole on the roster

 

Backup OT

 

One or both OTs will get hurt for a game or two (or more :( )

 

Clark will get someone KILLED

 

Oh, I didn't know he's hurt. What's wrong with him? Is it serious? I just knew he's been playing well for the Eagles. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, stitches said:

Oh, I didn't know he's hurt. What's wrong with him? Is it serious? I just knew he's been playing well for the Eagles. 

I hadnt heard of him until you posted.... seems better than Clark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MikeCurtis said:

I hadnt heard of him until you posted.... seems better than Clark

He's the rugby player that the Eagles got from Australia a couple of years ago and it seems like he's been developing really well. Ross Tucker has been hyping him a ton and he seems to think he can be a starter for some team. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, seems like he's wrong. I don't know what kind of connections he could have to the FO. The only trade I could see possible is Josh Rosen, and there are issues with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, IndyScribe said:

Yep, seems like he's wrong. I don't know what kind of connections he could have to the FO. The only trade I could see possible is Josh Rosen, and there are issues with that.

I dont think Josh Rosen is proven to be better than JB

 

I dont think that is the path

 

If you look at this team, the one BLARING need is depth at OT

 

We have NADA after AC, and really Smith

 

I believe Clark is a placeholder, until this trade happens

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Now that Hoyer is signed Chris can work on finishing this trade today. 

What trade would that be? Colts have a backup. I can't see a trade unless they're working on a young QB with potential.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, IndyScribe said:

What trade would that be? Colts have a backup. I can't see a trade unless they're working on a young QB with potential.

I have no idea.  Brackett said there was a trade in the works.  I didn't read where he said it was for a QB.  It could be for any position.  We'll see. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

I have no idea.  Brackett said there was a trade in the works.  I didn't read where he said it was for a QB.  It could be for any position.  We'll see. 

He was responding to Holder. Holder said Colts needed a QB and Brackett said the Colts would trade for one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turns out they didn't have to.

 

We now have our starter, a rock solid mentor type QB2, and a  long term project with some upside.  We're actually set at QB.  You may not like what we have, but it's what we're going to war with because there's no easy way to upgrade from here without playing out the season first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Imgrandojji said:

Turns out they didn't have to.

 

We now have our starter, a rock solid mentor type QB2, and a  long term project with some upside.  We're actually set at QB.  You may not like what we have, but it's what we're going to war with because there's no easy way to upgrade from here without playing out the season first.

I agree. Whatever QB they trade for isn't going to start over Brissett this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe he did decide to retire at the end of last season, but consider this:  Would Ballard have been able to attract FAs with Brissett as his QB?  Maybe Ballard asked Luck to hold off on retirement so he could sign some good FAs first (Funchess, Houston, etc) under the guise that they would get to play with Luck.  Maybe Ballard, Reich, and Luck realized it might be best for the team if Luck waited until August to retire, even though he might have decided to do so last January.     And for what it's worth, Luck was going to give the money back, but Irsay insisted he keep it (just in case he decides to come back so the Colts still retain his rights).   You're free to assume the worst, but we don't know, and we probably never will.
    • I have similar thoughts on Love, but not sure what happened this year is something he's "learned". I think it was just a little unavoidable given all changes to the program, and a product of him being asked to do too much. Not sure if the bad would carry over to a better situation and better coaching.   I agree on Fromm. I'm still up in the air on Eason. Did he say anything about Herbert?
    • Just curious, do you feel the same way about Barry Sanders?   He retired abruptly in July right before training camp, not at the end of the previous season.  So the Lions went through the offseason (draft, free agency) thinking he would play, the fans thought he was going to play, but he abruptly retires and on top of that flies to London.   Granted, this was before Twitter, so his retirement wasn't leaked to Adam Schefter and wasn't nearly as sloppy as Lucks retirement.  But do you feel like Sanders "quit" on the Lions?
    • Ballard does seem to focus on a position group in the draft. WRs this time? QBs? Lol
    • I watch a YouTube account called strong opinion sports. He is an ex college QB who watches lots of tape and has good breakdowns. He says that Love has Patrick Mahomes talent and needs to sit behind a veteran QB to learn good habits. Carrying a bad team caused him to learn bad habits and hurt his development. He does not like Eason at all. He thinks Fromm is a good leader but is not super talented. He was surrounded by great players and still struggled somewhat. And of course he loves Burrow.  Who doesn’t ?
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...