Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts 53 Man Cut Transactions Thread

LucasOilStadium

By LucasOilStadium,
in Colts Football

 Share Followers 3

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 765
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

csmopar

Ummmmm   the final score was Colts 13 Bengals 6.... wouldn’t that mean the Colts won and thus are not winless in the preseason(not that it matters) Or am I seeing things?

lollygagger8

Wentzszn

Posted Images

  • Popular Post
csmopar

csmopar 7,514

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
6 hours ago, LucasOilStadium said:

Hi, Colts fans.   Hopefully a winless preseason doesn't reflect a poor regular season by record.  Colts will release and cut players to meet the final 53 man as early as Thursday Night, to meet the NFL mandatory 4:00 PM Saturday Afternoon deadline on August 31.

 

https://www.colts.com/team/transactions/

Ummmmm

 

the final score was Colts 13 Bengals 6.... wouldn’t that mean the Colts won and thus are not winless in the preseason(not that it matters) Or am I seeing things?

  • Like 9
  • Haha 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
Archer

Archer 674

Posted
Posted

Can’t help but think that Walker might make the roster the first two weeks.  He doesn’t deserve it, and it would be disastrous if he played.  But would Wheeden or Osweiler be better a week into the system?  At least Walker could run the same system...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
MPStack

MPStack 3,508

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Shepman said:

I have a feeling based on Phillips performance and team reset that Sheard will be cut.

 

Doubtful IMO. Sheard sets the edge better than anyone on the roster. He’s been consistent and has a reasonable contract.

 

However, I’m a fan of Phillips too. :thmup:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
egg

egg 635

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, csmopar said:

Ummmmm

 

the final score was Colts 13 Bengals 6.... wouldn’t that mean the Colts won and thus are not winless in the preseason(not that it matters) Or am I seeing things?

 

I guess beating the Bengals in a pre-season game is the same as losing?

  • Haha 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
Smonroe

Smonroe 2,327

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, MPStack said:

 

Should be on a CFL roster sooner rather than later. Don’t know how he’s stuck around so long.

 

 It’s better to have a guy from your PS running your scout team in practice than your second string QB.  Especially when he has to imitate mobile QBs.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
jameszeigler834

jameszeigler834 967

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Archer said:

Can’t help but think that Walker might make the roster the first two weeks.  He doesn’t deserve it, and it would be disastrous if he played.  But would Wheeden or Osweiler be better a week into the system?  At least Walker could run the same system...

That guy is a bum some guys can learn the offense on a fly so i'm sorry but if i'm in Ballard's shoe's i'm not keeping walker he is terrible 82 yards in a half is awful.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jdubu

Jdubu 1,268

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Archer said:

Can’t help but think that Walker might make the roster the first two weeks.  He doesn’t deserve it, and it would be disastrous if he played.  But would Wheeden or Osweiler be better a week into the system?  At least Walker could run the same system...

He could run the same system as long as he doesn’t have any routes in the middle of the field. See if Peyton would come back for 2 games lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jdubu

Jdubu 1,268

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MPStack said:

 

Doubtful IMO. Sheard sets the edge better than anyone on the roster. He’s been consistent and has a reasonable contract.

 

However, I’m a fan of Phillips too. :thmup:

Can’t see Sheard cut but it’s possible he gets IR and comes back second half fully healed for the run. But you’re right, he set the edge well with just enough penetration skill to be very effective at his job. 

 

I have enjoyed Phillips as well but does he have enough to get around starting string OT’s? He looks so little on tv. He had a little Mathis type pass rush moves though didn’t he? That rush and knife straight back into the QB for strip sack. Loved it. Rooting for him to make it, just don’t see who they cut to fit him on the team. 

 

 

21 minutes ago, Myles said:

I hope Skai Moore makes the team.  

I like this guy as well but like Phillips, who can you cut to make the room? I see PS or he may make someone’s 53. I’m rooting for him too, he has talent to be in this league and maybe if things fall just right for him, he could blossom into a starter somewhere with more playing time. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
MPStack

MPStack 3,508

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, CanuckColt said:

Does Walker have any eligible PS time remaining?

 

 

Not sure, but is anyone really worried about losing the guy??  

 

If, he plays things are bad and there are better options.

Link to post
Share on other sites
chad72

chad72 7,480

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, csmopar said:

actually... no. the 2006 COLTS won the superbowl in 2007.. in Miami

 

The 2 years we went to the SB, we were 1-3 in pre-season and the SB was in Miami both those years, and this time the SB is in Miami too.

 

Having said that, here are a few preseason stats to chew on, no team in the last 10 years has won the SB while having a losing record in pre-season, scroll below to read the preseason stat regarding the Jaguars, comical : :) 

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/this-one-preseason-stat-might-have-just-eliminated-11-teams-from-winning-the-super-bowl/

 

So, what this means is that we make it to the SB and lose for all these stats to mean something??? :dunno:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
PrincetonTiger

PrincetonTiger 8,520

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, csmopar said:

So who gets cut first?

Also, I don't think we'll see the cuts come out until closer to 4pm tomorrow

Technically Mathias Farley and Nate Hairston

    It will be hard to tell since more than likely it will be released en masse

 

 

     3 Jag cuts have already been leaked

     

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
csmopar

csmopar 7,514

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Technically Mathias Farley and Nate Hairston

    It will be hard to tell since more than likely it will be released en masse

 

 

     3 Jag cuts have already been leaked

     

yeah ballard historically has waited until the last minute as well

Link to post
Share on other sites
stitches

stitches 8,429

Posted
Posted

Yeah, some names are starting to trickle out for waived Colts players. 

 

Jordan Veasey

Antonio Garcia

Caraun Reid

Nate Theaker

Isaiah Langley

 

is what I've seen so far. 

 

edit(adding more waived players):

Kai Nacua

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Followers 3
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 2006Coltsbestever
      Poll: Edge or LT at pick 21?

      By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted

      I voted OT as in (LT). I would take an Edge at #54. We need to make life as easy as possible for Wentz and need a LT badly.
    • Jared Cisneros
      a big if

      By Jared Cisneros · Posted

      Then we keep our 1st round pick next year, start Eason, prepare for the worst and hope for the best. Hopefully it doesn't happen though (it'll usually happen to 1 or 2 teams a year, just have to avoid random, bad luck).
    • Jared Cisneros
      Poll: Edge or LT at pick 21?

      By Jared Cisneros · Posted

      The question did say (if no trade) by it on who we would pick at 21. By that standard, I'd go OT. There's just no guarantee on who Ballard would like would be there at 54. We can like 6-8 options at OT around that point as fans, but Ballard realistically probably likes 3-4. He then has to hope they make it to 54 and we can grab one. EDGE is mostly the same all throughout day 2 of the draft, and if we miss out on Paye, there's not a huge fall until probably late round 3.    We can also re-sign Houston still. Kerrigan and Ingram are available after the draft without losing a pick, while the options at LT are guys like Villineuva, Schwartz, and Fisher. I heard Schwartz and Fisher may both go back to the Chiefs, and Villineuva will be a 1 year guy that's expensive.   All this makes me lean towards OT with 21 with no trade. You got the guy you wanted at 22 in Cosmi with the Chiefs. We could get him at 21 with the Colts, or maybe Teven Jenkins, and that would be a win over any EDGE besides Paye IMO. Now if Paye is there at 21, and I like a bunch of OTs in the 2nd, maybe go for it. That's the only exception to the rule though.
    • EastStreet
      a big if

      By EastStreet · Posted

      Yup. I'd have zero problem with it.  If you have zero chance of a SB with another FA QB, which we wouldn't, might as well sink or swim with Eason.  At worst, we'd have a good draft pick, and know Eason isn't the answer.
    • NewColtsFan
      Colts 2021 Draft Watchlists and Team Fits/ Senior Bowl Week (Merge)

      By NewColtsFan · Posted

      Well...     got a guy who didn’t know how to rush the QB, he recorded 17 sacks in two seasons at TCU.    8.5 in back to back seasons.    TCU plays a very unconventional defense, so BB’s skill set was very raw.   But he was not without real talent.     Do I wish we’d have drafted AJ Brown instead and taken BB at pick 59 instead of Campbell — sure.   But hopefully next off-season we will all feel better about our Day 2 picks from 2019. 

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...