Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts 53 Man Cut Transactions Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 765
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Ummmmm   the final score was Colts 13 Bengals 6.... wouldn’t that mean the Colts won and thus are not winless in the preseason(not that it matters) Or am I seeing things?

Posted Images

Can’t help but think that Walker might make the roster the first two weeks.  He doesn’t deserve it, and it would be disastrous if he played.  But would Wheeden or Osweiler be better a week into the system?  At least Walker could run the same system...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shepman said:

I have a feeling based on Phillips performance and team reset that Sheard will be cut.

 

Doubtful IMO. Sheard sets the edge better than anyone on the roster. He’s been consistent and has a reasonable contract.

 

However, I’m a fan of Phillips too. :thmup:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, csmopar said:

Ummmmm

 

the final score was Colts 13 Bengals 6.... wouldn’t that mean the Colts won and thus are not winless in the preseason(not that it matters) Or am I seeing things?

 

I guess beating the Bengals in a pre-season game is the same as losing?

  • Haha 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, MPStack said:

 

Should be on a CFL roster sooner rather than later. Don’t know how he’s stuck around so long.

 

 It’s better to have a guy from your PS running your scout team in practice than your second string QB.  Especially when he has to imitate mobile QBs.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Archer said:

Can’t help but think that Walker might make the roster the first two weeks.  He doesn’t deserve it, and it would be disastrous if he played.  But would Wheeden or Osweiler be better a week into the system?  At least Walker could run the same system...

That guy is a bum some guys can learn the offense on a fly so i'm sorry but if i'm in Ballard's shoe's i'm not keeping walker he is terrible 82 yards in a half is awful.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Archer said:

Can’t help but think that Walker might make the roster the first two weeks.  He doesn’t deserve it, and it would be disastrous if he played.  But would Wheeden or Osweiler be better a week into the system?  At least Walker could run the same system...

He could run the same system as long as he doesn’t have any routes in the middle of the field. See if Peyton would come back for 2 games lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MPStack said:

 

Doubtful IMO. Sheard sets the edge better than anyone on the roster. He’s been consistent and has a reasonable contract.

 

However, I’m a fan of Phillips too. :thmup:

Can’t see Sheard cut but it’s possible he gets IR and comes back second half fully healed for the run. But you’re right, he set the edge well with just enough penetration skill to be very effective at his job. 

 

I have enjoyed Phillips as well but does he have enough to get around starting string OT’s? He looks so little on tv. He had a little Mathis type pass rush moves though didn’t he? That rush and knife straight back into the QB for strip sack. Loved it. Rooting for him to make it, just don’t see who they cut to fit him on the team. 

 

 

21 minutes ago, Myles said:

I hope Skai Moore makes the team.  

I like this guy as well but like Phillips, who can you cut to make the room? I see PS or he may make someone’s 53. I’m rooting for him too, he has talent to be in this league and maybe if things fall just right for him, he could blossom into a starter somewhere with more playing time. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, CanuckColt said:

Does Walker have any eligible PS time remaining?

 

 

Not sure, but is anyone really worried about losing the guy??  

 

If, he plays things are bad and there are better options.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, csmopar said:

actually... no. the 2006 COLTS won the superbowl in 2007.. in Miami

 

The 2 years we went to the SB, we were 1-3 in pre-season and the SB was in Miami both those years, and this time the SB is in Miami too.

 

Having said that, here are a few preseason stats to chew on, no team in the last 10 years has won the SB while having a losing record in pre-season, scroll below to read the preseason stat regarding the Jaguars, comical : :) 

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/this-one-preseason-stat-might-have-just-eliminated-11-teams-from-winning-the-super-bowl/

 

So, what this means is that we make it to the SB and lose for all these stats to mean something??? :dunno:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, csmopar said:

So who gets cut first?

Also, I don't think we'll see the cuts come out until closer to 4pm tomorrow

Technically Mathias Farley and Nate Hairston

    It will be hard to tell since more than likely it will be released en masse

 

 

     3 Jag cuts have already been leaked

     

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Technically Mathias Farley and Nate Hairston

    It will be hard to tell since more than likely it will be released en masse

 

 

     3 Jag cuts have already been leaked

     

yeah ballard historically has waited until the last minute as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, some names are starting to trickle out for waived Colts players. 

 

Jordan Veasey

Antonio Garcia

Caraun Reid

Nate Theaker

Isaiah Langley

 

is what I've seen so far. 

 

edit(adding more waived players):

Kai Nacua

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got some decent value at the 5 and dime store.   Great bargains Rhodes Moore   Good bargains TJ Carrie Wilson
    • They are talking about next year's picks, which one (either 1st or 2nd) is conditionally going to Philly. Doubt they can contractually use either in a trade for this year (unless it's with Philly). Perhaps there's contract language that says we can deal our 2nd, but if we do, Philly would automatically get our 1st.
    • What is his role?     So does everybody on the team who doesn't want to be traded because of whatever Easterby did not seeing things as well as Watson and 5 players who were let go by the team?  Why are the 5 seeing it correctly and the 150 not?      
    • Instead of trying to split the atom on how stats are measured, let's keep it simple and just apply basic logic.    Should we not expect a 31 year old to lose speed? Should we not expect a tiny guy who's losing his speed, to struggle getting the same separation he relied on all these years? Even if you disagree with the majority of fans (who think he's slowed), wouldn't the trained eyes of the coaches know better? And if TY still had it (and Rivers was at fault), wouldn't TY get a better/longer deal than 1 year / 8M? Should we believe TY's stats are simply wrong, while most of the other pass catchers are grading better at separation while getting the same balls, by the same QB? Are stats out to get TY, or is Philip just bad throwing to TY and good to everyone else? And nobody saying Rivers is great. But simply other pass catchers are grading better with Rivers, than TY. TY relied on his speed all these years (along with route running). He's losing that speed, and now has to rely on route running (for tough yards) and mismatches (seam and bad DBs) for the majority of his highlights. There's no mystery here. It's just getting harder for him. I really hope he can squeeze one more 1000 yard season out for the Colts.   
    • You are having a different conversation than I am.   I'm talking about the narrow issue of Watson possibly being traded, and citing the reasons he supposedly stated for wanting to be traded.  I show you articles because you insinuate that I am wrong about those reasons.    What the culture is or is not in the HOU organization is not relevant, because no articles have cited culture as being the reason.    Its also not relevant to Watson, because it seems to me that if these adverse conditions were long standing since the time AJ and Foster were in the locker room, then those conditions must not have have been a big deal to Watson in September when he chose to extended his playing time with such a bad organization run by such awful political owners.  That must not be the reason he wants a trade.               
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...