Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Coltsfan0112

Dungy on Luck

Recommended Posts

 

At the 6:00 minute mark he explains things on Luck. Dungy makes it seems like the Colts are going to have to rely on Brissett for a bit. He does mention that the healing could come at anytime but the way he talks makes it seem like Luck won't be ready for week 1.  Take it with a grain of salt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to be that guy of saying he won't play. Maybe he's started to heal idk. Just the way Dungy talks it makes it seem like he won't be ready in time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe maybe not. But again, why let Luck do pre game warm up drills publicly if he’s still rehabbing& won’t play?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn’t Dungy also saying just the other day that he was all but sure that Luck would play?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t really get anything out of that. I doubt he had conversations with Luck that deep.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

Wasn’t Dungy also saying just the other day that he was all but sure that Luck would play?

No he said he would be back at sometime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

 

Article is about how he's prepared mentally and how he's done walk throughs. Nothing new. Who's to say he will or will not play. I sure do hope he does play. It just sounds odd how Dungy said they're going to have follow Brissett for a bit. My gut says he does play week 1 so let's pray. Just find it really odd how he basically thinks Brissett will have to carry the team for a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm starting to drift towards wondering if he'll be ready for week 2...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Week 1 can't get here fast enough. Some people will believe anything now days. If Luck doesn't play in game #1, I will be shocked.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone wants to hang on every word. I could even dissect Reich in his press conference today making it look like he will play. He said If Luck doesn’t practice next week they will have to revisit who starts week one. That sure sounds like they expect Luck to start. Also with luck doing those drills in public that would make him look really bad if he didn’t play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. I do believe he plays. I said i take it with a grain of salt. I do believe Dungy is speaking his opinion and what he's been told which I find it odd. I do believe if Dungy thought luck would play week 1 he would of said he will mostly likely be out there but not 100% or something along those lines. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If luck doesn’t go after those drills people will be calling him soft even more then they do now. To them looking at that video it looks like a guy who should be out there practicing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Always listen to Dungy. He’s very wise and more often right than wrong.  However his point is that nobody knows what’s going on with Lucks injury and they said they won’t play him if there’s any doubt so the team should be prepared to win with Brissett until Luck can go.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the "get 1% better per day" mantra At this point, Andrew has to make up like 320%

Right?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll take a WILD guess and say that if Luck doesn't start week 1, Brissett will.   

 

Crazy, I know. 

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, WoolMagnet said:

With the "get 1% better per day" mantra At this point, Andrew has to make up like 320%

Right?

It would take about 41 days to make a 50% improvement at that rate. 320% would take a very long time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, lollygagger8 said:

I'll take a WILD guess and say that if Luck doesn't start week 1, Brissett will.   

 

Crazy, I know. 

 

 

 

 

Bold

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

If luck doesn’t go after those drills people will be calling him soft even more then they do now. To them looking at that video it looks like a guy who should be out there practicing.

 

JMV said this verbatim on his show the other day, & it's pretty hard to disagree.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

JMV said this verbatim on his show the other day, & it's pretty hard to disagree.

 

Unless you're one of the Colts front office, medical staff or trainer.  These guys have a lot more information than JMV does so frankly, who cares what JMV (or whoever the "them" are that Chloe mentioned) said?

 

image.png.7fd05ef1b6e0bb1c947de7ab6569df06.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

Unless you're one of the Colts front office, medical staff or trainer.  These guys have a lot more information than JMV does so frankly, who cares what JMV (or whoever the "them" are that Chloe mentioned) said?

 

image.png.7fd05ef1b6e0bb1c947de7ab6569df06.png

I think point is Luck is smart. He knows what it would look like if he didn’t play week one after doing that. That’s why I think he plays. No way he would of done that in public because be knows the criticism he would get if he doesn’t play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

Unless you're one of the Colts front office, medical staff or trainer.  These guys have a lot more information than JMV does so frankly, who cares what JMV (or whoever the "them" are that Chloe mentioned) said?

 

image.png.7fd05ef1b6e0bb1c947de7ab6569df06.png

 

I'd love to think that they do, but the Colts medical staff, front office, & trainers didn't even know what Luck's injury was until last week, so I honestly don't know how much more info they have than JMV at this point. Seems like it might be a wash.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JMV wasn’t saying he had info. All he said was that the video looked like a guy who should be practicing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think point is Luck is smart. He knows what it would look like if he didn’t play week one after doing that. That’s why I think he plays. No way he would of done that in public because be knows the criticism he would get if he doesn’t play.

 

If Luck is truly smart, and I believe he is, then he won't care "what it would look like" and he'll be more concerned about whether or not playing would or could further exacerbate his injury. 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, CoachLite said:

It would take about 41 days to make a 50% improvement at that rate. 320% would take a very long time.

Well ?...........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, csmopar said:

Maybe maybe not. But again, why let Luck do pre game warm up drills publicly if he’s still rehabbing& won’t play?

 

My question is that if he can do those drills, and it's a calf/ankle problem. . . What can't he do that would prevent him from playing in a game?  

 

I mean the only other things I can think of is get hit and run.  

 

I am hoping that this is an injury that wouldn't keep him out of a meaningful game.  But it's hard to say, they don't give us much to go on.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

I'd love to think that they do, but the Colts medical staff, front office, & trainers didn't even know what Luck's injury was until last week, so I honestly don't know how much more info they have than JMV at this point. Seems like it might be a wash.

 

Do you really honestly believe that?  I don't for a second.  It seems far more likely that the injury has evolved since it was first diagnosed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I truly think it is a stress fracture that happened on that second day he practiced. He was really bad that day and that is day the ankle pain was mentioned. It makes sense that if he had a calf strain and the ankle was always troublesome that could happen. Just my opinion but they are just giving it u til the last second to heal and start practicing. They know how much time he needs so that is when we will see him practice. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

Do you really honestly believe that?  I don't for a second.  It seems far more likely that the injury has evolved since it was first diagnosed.

 

I'm just going by what Ballard said, and for what it's worth, both can be true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

My question is that if he can do those drills, and it's a calf/ankle problem. . . What can't he do that would prevent him from playing in a game?  

 

I mean the only other things I can think of is get hit and run.  

 

I am hoping that this is an injury that wouldn't keep him out of a meaningful game.  But it's hard to say, they don't give us much to go on.  

 

As encouraging as that footage was, I have to remind myself that he's in a t-shirt & shorts, & there's no one forcing him to move 1 way or the other, it's a totally controlled drill with no x-factors to take into consideration. I definitely feel better about his side to side movement, but does that drill make me confident that he can feel Bosa coming off the edge, step up in the pocket at the last second, & throw a dime to the sideline for a first down? That I'm not so sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/22/2019 at 6:50 AM, braveheartcolt said:

IR. PUP. Starts Wk 1. 

 

That's covered it. 

Oops. Missed 'retirement'.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Supe it's not an angle whatsoever, it's purely the truth.   I am, of course not talking about you, or what you do on this board in terms of evaluating players. I always enjoy hearing your take on players.   I am obviously talking about the people spewing bile on here after the loss to the Raiders, and every other loss for that matter. And a lot of that includes tripe about Jacoby Brissett that just goes way over the top.   We can disagree on Brissett, it's not really a big deal. And I apologize for quoting you in the other thread and giving you the impression I am including you in this. I'm really not. I quoted you because I would rather debate the topic with someone like yourself than get sucked into a flame war with some troll, which has happened to me a time or two. That's all. Me and you can have a somewhat interesting discussion. I always enjoy it.     
    • Nice thread...    There have been some arguments for a while now about the relative value of pass-coverage vs pass-rush. Teams offensively are turning to faster and faster game plans and this affects the pass-rush a ton. You can practically scheme the pass-rush away if you have good enough QB and receivers that get open quickly. The latest advanced analytics seem to favor positions like CB and WR value-wise over long-held champions like EDGE rushers or OTs. I will also take into account your characterization of the rest of the roster(average players as opposed to straight up trash). At some positions the improvement between pro-bowler and average/JAG is higher than at other positions. Those are just part of the considerations that will inform my choise here:   Offense:   1. QB: not controversial take here - most important position of all... he handles the ball and makes a decision that might affect the game pretty much 100% of the snaps. I want the best passer and decisionmaker to run my offense.    2. WR: yep, give me a beast of an X-receiver. Pass-catchers are incredibly important.   3. LT: Yeah, I know, this goes against some of the things I said above, but time and time again we see what a great LT does to an offensive line. Leremy Tunsil is not even that great and he almost single-handedly turned around the HOU OLine. Same with AC last year - we missed him mightily when he was injured to start the year and then turned the line into a great unit. And again - he's not even at the level we are talking here. He still has not had a pro-bowl or all-pro recognition(maybe he gets one this year, he deserves it). But yeah... give me Bakhtiari, give me Armstead, give me Tyron Smith level player... I think this raises the level of the whole O-Line, especially if it's filled with average players at the other positions(rather than horrible ones)   ------------------------------------ Those will be my selections offensively. I think a QB masks a lot of deficiencies and I think he elevates average players and squeezes everything out of most of them. Just look at what Luck used to do with players like Jack Doyle, Donte Moncrief, Eric Ebron, Inman, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen...    Defense:   4. CB: yep, I want a shut down corner. Like I said earlier, newest research shows pass-coverage and especially on the boundary is paramount. and it affects pass-rush more than pass-rush affects CB play.    5. CB: yep, give me one more... I'm shutting down both sides of the field and hoping this gives additional time to my pass-rush to get there. They will play on island and I will scheme out everything else(i.e. slot receivers and TEs)... if I have to I will double away from them.    6. WILL: I want a sideline to sideline monster to clean up the run game and take on crossing routes in the short-intermediate middle in coverage.     7. EDGE: I still want a player capable of beating his man one-on-one on the line and creating pressure/affecting the pass when my pro-bowl CBs lock down their match ups.    So what do you think? Does it make sense?     
    • 23: R1P23 DL JAVON KINLAW SOUTH CAROLINA   35: R2P3 QB JORDAN LOVE UTAH STATE   55: R2P23 OT CALVIN THROCKMORTON OREGON   87: R3P23 LB TROY DYE OREGON   129: R4P23 S J.R. REED GEORGIA   166: R5P22 G NICK HARRIS WASHINGTON   201: R6P23 CB ESSANG BASSEY WAKE FOREST   203: R6P25 WR MICHAEL PITTMAN JR. USC   236: R7P23 CB KINDLE VILDOR GEORGIA SOUTHERN
    • DE NT DT DE   LB   CB CB   Nobody is scoring on me. 
    • Don't be ridiculous   Darius Leonard was an All-Pro his rookie year. Okereke will have a hard time matching that.
  • Members

    • iLoveMyBoys

      iLoveMyBoys 40

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoatBeard

      GoatBeard 604

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 1,398

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colt18

      colt18 275

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...