Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Chloe6124

Reich presser 8/21

Recommended Posts

The bears have said they aren’t playing starters so this makes sense.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fine with that. Getting out of the PS healthy should be priority #1. I had a feeling Reich wouldn't be playing the starters a lot in the 3rd game.

 

I could see that becoming the norm around the league soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good! Let the 2nd, 3rd and 4th string battle it out and see what cream rises to the top as quality depth and/or future starters!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the bears not playing their starters Saturday this makes sense.

 

We are going to see a lot of Kelly. I doubt Brissett gets much time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Goodell did talk about the possibility of shortening preseason recently. The discussion gets brought up most every summer but maybe if enough teams start holding out their starters more it could help lead to that possibility.

Although I think that discussion was also connected with expanding the playoffs, which would just be silly.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see how this effects teams starting the season.

 

 

I think Reich basically moving the bar back on making a decision on week 1 QB proves Luck is playing.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sucks for the people that shelled out money for that game...thinking they would be able to see some starters (on both sides) for maybe half the game. 

 

The NFL just needs to get rid of half of these games. They aren't even watchable...unless it's your own team.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I would say since the Bears aren't going to play any starters then there's no reason for us to have starters out there either. We need to have health guys going forward. Look at last season without Castonzo and some other guys, it was rough until they returned healthy. We fell in a huge hole off the start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, shastamasta said:

Sucks for the people that shelled out money for that game...thinking they would be able to see some starters (on both sides) for maybe half the game. 

 

The NFL just needs to get rid of half of these games. They aren't even watchable...unless it's your own team.

 

Yeah but everyone should know that you're going to see none, if not, very limited gameplay by the starters. If you're shelling out tons of money to haul the family to see a preseason game and hope to see all of your favorites play, then you should rethink things. Preseason games are usually a lot cheaper anyway.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, pgt_rob said:

 

Yeah but everyone should know that you're going to see none, if not, very limited gameplay by the starters. If you're shelling out tons of money to haul the family to see a preseason game and hope to see all of your favorites play, then you should rethink things. Preseason games are usually a lot cheaper anyway.

 

The 3rd preseason game is typically the warm-up for the regular seasonn...where the starters will play around half of the game. I am sure the schedulers were hoping for that as well.

 

I doubt people shelled out big bucks...but the tickets aren't that cheap. Season ticket holders have to buy them...and right now the cheapest on the secondary market are $25. And even tickets at $20-30 + concessions for a family can get up there. Might be worth it if you got to see a handful of players...or your kids do...because going to a regular season game is really expensive. But paying even that to see Hogan catch passes from Walker...not so much.

 

I just think it's something they will need to fix moving forward.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

Sucks for the people that shelled out money for that game...thinking they would be able to see some starters (on both sides) for maybe half the game. 

 

The NFL just needs to get rid of half of these games. They aren't even watchable...unless it's your own team.

I was contemplating going to this game until i saw the prices for them. No way am i paying more than 20-30 bucks a ticket just to watch back ups play

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am ok with this. I thought he played Mack to long in the browns game. Then Hines almost getting killed on that punt seemed kind of silly. As long as no one gets hurt in practice we are actually really healthy to start the season. I would assume Campbell even if he gets back to practice won’t play in the last two games either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 It is time for the 18 game regular season.

I think I saw on ESPN they wanted 18 regular season games, expanded playoffs (8 teams per instead of 6), and shortening the preseason by one or two games.

 

sign me up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If coaches are going to just play vanilla schemes in the pre season there really is no need to play the starters. The only thing it does is gives you a look at roster bubble guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Listening to Mike Francesa (WFAN NY radio ) last 2-3 days he has been reporting (and he does not like this ) that his "sources" are telling him that many head coaches in NFL are not playing HEALTHY starters . And he has been spending a fair amount of time (lately) on this specific subject. To him he is wondering if this will be a new trend across the league .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Irish YJ said:

I think I saw on ESPN they wanted 18 regular season games, expanded playoffs (8 teams per instead of 6), and shortening the preseason by one or two games.

 

sign me up

I may be old fashioned but I think the NFL should keep everything the way it is except only play 2 pre-season games should be played. Only 6 teams making the playoffs is perfect IMO, it makes the regular season super important. Usually all 6 teams that do make it from each conference are good to great as well. An 18 game regular season is too long, more chance of injury. If the NFL goes to 18 games than records won't mean anything either because today's players would have the advantage compiling bigger stats. Like 55 TD's in one season would be easier to obtain for QB's and QB's may come close to throwing for 6000 Yards. To me those seasons won't mean as much if that happens. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I may be old fashioned but I think the NFL should keep everything the way it is except only play 2 pre-season games should be played. Only 6 teams making the playoffs is perfect IMO, it makes the regular season super important. Usually all 6 teams that do make it from each conference are good to great as well. An 18 game regular season is too long, more chance of injury. If the NFL goes to 18 games than records won't mean anything either because today's players would have the advantage compiling bigger stats. Like 55 TD's in one season would be easier to obtain for QB's and QB's may come close to throwing for 6000 Yards. To me those seasons won't mean as much if that happens. 

Exactly. No doubt you would also have to increase the size of the active roster past 53. That or teams would treat it like the NBA and have planned rest certain games. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm taking it that if I don't see JB play too much in this one, then it's a good sign Luck is starting week 1.

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 It is time for the 18 game regular season.

 

Not without an expansion of the 53 man limit, which I already despise.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, krunk said:

I'm taking it that if I don't see JB play too much in this one, then it's a good sign Luck is starting week 1.

I would think it’s the opposite. They wouldn’t take a chance of him getting injured if they were worried about luck.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, adubb84 said:

Exactly. No doubt you would also have to increase the size of the active roster past 53. That or teams would treat it like the NBA and have planned rest certain games. 

Yeah last season's regular season was real exciting because it was basically a playoff game from mid season and on. If 8 teams were allowed to make it in, we would've made it with no problem. I loved that we had to beat Houston, Dallas, Giants, and Tennessee just to get in. That was some drama.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is Reichs press conference. Does anyone else think he kind of just confirmed Luck will play. He said him not practicing this week does not impact who starts week 1 , but if that goes in to next week they will have to reconsider. That sounds to me like he is playing.

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I would think it’s the opposite. They wouldn’t take a chance of him getting injured if they were worried about luck.

I don't see them trotting Brissett out there for game 1 with no real reps with the starting group.  I think they would play him against the bears for a few series. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, krunk said:

I don't see them trotting Brissett out there for game 1 with no real reps with the starting group.  I think they would play him against the bears for a few series. 

If he got injured though then your looking at walker If there was not a chance of luck playing.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, throwing BBZ said:

 It is time for the 18 game regular season.

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

If he got injured though then your looking at walker If there was not a chance of luck playing.  

Yikes!

Any way we can appeal Kelly's suspension or get it postponed?

We don't lose much when he replaces Brissett.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also if none of the other starters are playing it’s kind of useless to put Brissett out there with a back up oline and backup WR. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take the 37 players (90 - 53 = 37) who aren't going to make the team, put them out there for the whole game, and let them showcase their talents in case other teams want to pick them up. Yes, we might lose 120 - 0, but it's only a preseason game anyway - no big deal. It might be kind of entertaining to see a lineman playing quarterback, a wide receiver playing center … who knows?

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

I'm fine with that. Getting out of the PS healthy should be priority #1. I had a feeling Reich wouldn't be playing the starters a lot in the 3rd game.

 

I could see that becoming the norm around the league soon.

I like this move don't risk the health of your starters in a meaningless game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

 It is time for the 18 game regular season.

 

It's time for the 19 week, 16 game regular season.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I may be old fashioned but I think the NFL should keep everything the way it is except only play 2 pre-season games should be played. Only 6 teams making the playoffs is perfect IMO, it makes the regular season super important. 

 

I understand the sentiment, but I can't see that happening.  The owners are not going to give up the kind of revenue they get with 2 pre-season games.  If they cut the pre-season down to 2 games, which would be fine by me, they are going to want to make up that revenue somewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Supe it's not an angle whatsoever, it's purely the truth.   I am, of course not talking about you, or what you do on this board in terms of evaluating players. I always enjoy hearing your take on players.   I am obviously talking about the people spewing bile on here after the loss to the Raiders, and every other loss for that matter. And a lot of that includes tripe about Jacoby Brissett that just goes way over the top.   We can disagree on Brissett, it's not really a big deal. And I apologize for quoting you in the other thread and giving you the impression I am including you in this. I'm really not. I quoted you because I would rather debate the topic with someone like yourself than get sucked into a flame war with some troll, which has happened to me a time or two. That's all. Me and you can have a somewhat interesting discussion. I always enjoy it.     
    • Nice thread...    There have been some arguments for a while now about the relative value of pass-coverage vs pass-rush. Teams offensively are turning to faster and faster game plans and this affects the pass-rush a ton. You can practically scheme the pass-rush away if you have good enough QB and receivers that get open quickly. The latest advanced analytics seem to favor positions like CB and WR value-wise over long-held champions like EDGE rushers or OTs. I will also take into account your characterization of the rest of the roster(average players as opposed to straight up trash). At some positions the improvement between pro-bowler and average/JAG is higher than at other positions. Those are just part of the considerations that will inform my choise here:   Offense:   1. QB: not controversial take here - most important position of all... he handles the ball and makes a decision that might affect the game pretty much 100% of the snaps. I want the best passer and decisionmaker to run my offense.    2. WR: yep, give me a beast of an X-receiver. Pass-catchers are incredibly important.   3. LT: Yeah, I know, this goes against some of the things I said above, but time and time again we see what a great LT does to an offensive line. Leremy Tunsil is not even that great and he almost single-handedly turned around the HOU OLine. Same with AC last year - we missed him mightily when he was injured to start the year and then turned the line into a great unit. And again - he's not even at the level we are talking here. He still has not had a pro-bowl or all-pro recognition(maybe he gets one this year, he deserves it). But yeah... give me Bakhtiari, give me Armstead, give me Tyron Smith level player... I think this raises the level of the whole O-Line, especially if it's filled with average players at the other positions(rather than horrible ones)   ------------------------------------ Those will be my selections offensively. I think a QB masks a lot of deficiencies and I think he elevates average players and squeezes everything out of most of them. Just look at what Luck used to do with players like Jack Doyle, Donte Moncrief, Eric Ebron, Inman, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen...    Defense:   4. CB: yep, I want a shut down corner. Like I said earlier, newest research shows pass-coverage and especially on the boundary is paramount. and it affects pass-rush more than pass-rush affects CB play.    5. CB: yep, give me one more... I'm shutting down both sides of the field and hoping this gives additional time to my pass-rush to get there. They will play on island and I will scheme out everything else(i.e. slot receivers and TEs)... if I have to I will double away from them.    6. WILL: I want a sideline to sideline monster to clean up the run game and take on crossing routes in the short-intermediate middle in coverage.     7. EDGE: I still want a player capable of beating his man one-on-one on the line and creating pressure/affecting the pass when my pro-bowl CBs lock down their match ups.    So what do you think? Does it make sense?     
    • 23: R1P23 DL JAVON KINLAW SOUTH CAROLINA   35: R2P3 QB JORDAN LOVE UTAH STATE   55: R2P23 OT CALVIN THROCKMORTON OREGON   87: R3P23 LB TROY DYE OREGON   129: R4P23 S J.R. REED GEORGIA   166: R5P22 G NICK HARRIS WASHINGTON   201: R6P23 CB ESSANG BASSEY WAKE FOREST   203: R6P25 WR MICHAEL PITTMAN JR. USC   236: R7P23 CB KINDLE VILDOR GEORGIA SOUTHERN
    • DE NT DT DE   LB   CB CB   Nobody is scoring on me. 
    • Don't be ridiculous   Darius Leonard was an All-Pro his rookie year. Okereke will have a hard time matching that.
  • Members

    • iLoveMyBoys

      iLoveMyBoys 40

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoatBeard

      GoatBeard 604

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 1,398

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colt18

      colt18 275

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...