Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Chloe6124

Reich presser 8/21

Recommended Posts

The bears have said they aren’t playing starters so this makes sense.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fine with that. Getting out of the PS healthy should be priority #1. I had a feeling Reich wouldn't be playing the starters a lot in the 3rd game.

 

I could see that becoming the norm around the league soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good! Let the 2nd, 3rd and 4th string battle it out and see what cream rises to the top as quality depth and/or future starters!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the bears not playing their starters Saturday this makes sense.

 

We are going to see a lot of Kelly. I doubt Brissett gets much time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Goodell did talk about the possibility of shortening preseason recently. The discussion gets brought up most every summer but maybe if enough teams start holding out their starters more it could help lead to that possibility.

Although I think that discussion was also connected with expanding the playoffs, which would just be silly.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see how this effects teams starting the season.

 

 

I think Reich basically moving the bar back on making a decision on week 1 QB proves Luck is playing.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sucks for the people that shelled out money for that game...thinking they would be able to see some starters (on both sides) for maybe half the game. 

 

The NFL just needs to get rid of half of these games. They aren't even watchable...unless it's your own team.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I would say since the Bears aren't going to play any starters then there's no reason for us to have starters out there either. We need to have health guys going forward. Look at last season without Castonzo and some other guys, it was rough until they returned healthy. We fell in a huge hole off the start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, shastamasta said:

Sucks for the people that shelled out money for that game...thinking they would be able to see some starters (on both sides) for maybe half the game. 

 

The NFL just needs to get rid of half of these games. They aren't even watchable...unless it's your own team.

 

Yeah but everyone should know that you're going to see none, if not, very limited gameplay by the starters. If you're shelling out tons of money to haul the family to see a preseason game and hope to see all of your favorites play, then you should rethink things. Preseason games are usually a lot cheaper anyway.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, pgt_rob said:

 

Yeah but everyone should know that you're going to see none, if not, very limited gameplay by the starters. If you're shelling out tons of money to haul the family to see a preseason game and hope to see all of your favorites play, then you should rethink things. Preseason games are usually a lot cheaper anyway.

 

The 3rd preseason game is typically the warm-up for the regular seasonn...where the starters will play around half of the game. I am sure the schedulers were hoping for that as well.

 

I doubt people shelled out big bucks...but the tickets aren't that cheap. Season ticket holders have to buy them...and right now the cheapest on the secondary market are $25. And even tickets at $20-30 + concessions for a family can get up there. Might be worth it if you got to see a handful of players...or your kids do...because going to a regular season game is really expensive. But paying even that to see Hogan catch passes from Walker...not so much.

 

I just think it's something they will need to fix moving forward.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

Sucks for the people that shelled out money for that game...thinking they would be able to see some starters (on both sides) for maybe half the game. 

 

The NFL just needs to get rid of half of these games. They aren't even watchable...unless it's your own team.

I was contemplating going to this game until i saw the prices for them. No way am i paying more than 20-30 bucks a ticket just to watch back ups play

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am ok with this. I thought he played Mack to long in the browns game. Then Hines almost getting killed on that punt seemed kind of silly. As long as no one gets hurt in practice we are actually really healthy to start the season. I would assume Campbell even if he gets back to practice won’t play in the last two games either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 It is time for the 18 game regular season.

I think I saw on ESPN they wanted 18 regular season games, expanded playoffs (8 teams per instead of 6), and shortening the preseason by one or two games.

 

sign me up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If coaches are going to just play vanilla schemes in the pre season there really is no need to play the starters. The only thing it does is gives you a look at roster bubble guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Listening to Mike Francesa (WFAN NY radio ) last 2-3 days he has been reporting (and he does not like this ) that his "sources" are telling him that many head coaches in NFL are not playing HEALTHY starters . And he has been spending a fair amount of time (lately) on this specific subject. To him he is wondering if this will be a new trend across the league .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Irish YJ said:

I think I saw on ESPN they wanted 18 regular season games, expanded playoffs (8 teams per instead of 6), and shortening the preseason by one or two games.

 

sign me up

I may be old fashioned but I think the NFL should keep everything the way it is except only play 2 pre-season games should be played. Only 6 teams making the playoffs is perfect IMO, it makes the regular season super important. Usually all 6 teams that do make it from each conference are good to great as well. An 18 game regular season is too long, more chance of injury. If the NFL goes to 18 games than records won't mean anything either because today's players would have the advantage compiling bigger stats. Like 55 TD's in one season would be easier to obtain for QB's and QB's may come close to throwing for 6000 Yards. To me those seasons won't mean as much if that happens. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I may be old fashioned but I think the NFL should keep everything the way it is except only play 2 pre-season games should be played. Only 6 teams making the playoffs is perfect IMO, it makes the regular season super important. Usually all 6 teams that do make it from each conference are good to great as well. An 18 game regular season is too long, more chance of injury. If the NFL goes to 18 games than records won't mean anything either because today's players would have the advantage compiling bigger stats. Like 55 TD's in one season would be easier to obtain for QB's and QB's may come close to throwing for 6000 Yards. To me those seasons won't mean as much if that happens. 

Exactly. No doubt you would also have to increase the size of the active roster past 53. That or teams would treat it like the NBA and have planned rest certain games. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm taking it that if I don't see JB play too much in this one, then it's a good sign Luck is starting week 1.

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 It is time for the 18 game regular season.

 

Not without an expansion of the 53 man limit, which I already despise.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, krunk said:

I'm taking it that if I don't see JB play too much in this one, then it's a good sign Luck is starting week 1.

I would think it’s the opposite. They wouldn’t take a chance of him getting injured if they were worried about luck.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, adubb84 said:

Exactly. No doubt you would also have to increase the size of the active roster past 53. That or teams would treat it like the NBA and have planned rest certain games. 

Yeah last season's regular season was real exciting because it was basically a playoff game from mid season and on. If 8 teams were allowed to make it in, we would've made it with no problem. I loved that we had to beat Houston, Dallas, Giants, and Tennessee just to get in. That was some drama.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is Reichs press conference. Does anyone else think he kind of just confirmed Luck will play. He said him not practicing this week does not impact who starts week 1 , but if that goes in to next week they will have to reconsider. That sounds to me like he is playing.

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I would think it’s the opposite. They wouldn’t take a chance of him getting injured if they were worried about luck.

I don't see them trotting Brissett out there for game 1 with no real reps with the starting group.  I think they would play him against the bears for a few series. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, krunk said:

I don't see them trotting Brissett out there for game 1 with no real reps with the starting group.  I think they would play him against the bears for a few series. 

If he got injured though then your looking at walker If there was not a chance of luck playing.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, throwing BBZ said:

 It is time for the 18 game regular season.

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

If he got injured though then your looking at walker If there was not a chance of luck playing.  

Yikes!

Any way we can appeal Kelly's suspension or get it postponed?

We don't lose much when he replaces Brissett.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also if none of the other starters are playing it’s kind of useless to put Brissett out there with a back up oline and backup WR. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take the 37 players (90 - 53 = 37) who aren't going to make the team, put them out there for the whole game, and let them showcase their talents in case other teams want to pick them up. Yes, we might lose 120 - 0, but it's only a preseason game anyway - no big deal. It might be kind of entertaining to see a lineman playing quarterback, a wide receiver playing center … who knows?

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

I'm fine with that. Getting out of the PS healthy should be priority #1. I had a feeling Reich wouldn't be playing the starters a lot in the 3rd game.

 

I could see that becoming the norm around the league soon.

I like this move don't risk the health of your starters in a meaningless game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

 It is time for the 18 game regular season.

 

It's time for the 19 week, 16 game regular season.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I may be old fashioned but I think the NFL should keep everything the way it is except only play 2 pre-season games should be played. Only 6 teams making the playoffs is perfect IMO, it makes the regular season super important. 

 

I understand the sentiment, but I can't see that happening.  The owners are not going to give up the kind of revenue they get with 2 pre-season games.  If they cut the pre-season down to 2 games, which would be fine by me, they are going to want to make up that revenue somewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree with your logic.  But it is the same logic some people are using for the converse.  We have young receivers and no Funchess, so no one is open.
    • Not trying to start an argument. I'm only pointing out that you are essentially drawing a conclusion based on assumptions.   1) ........receivers are fast 2) ........QB makes few attempts 3).........the box is stacked   So, Brissett must be missing open receivers downfield.   I'm sure he misses some. But how many compared to other QBs?  ....  We don't really know.         
    • SO your contention is that teams leave Ebron open because of his drops?
    • No more than someone being convicted and imprisoned when it's obvious the police force engaged in improper procedure.   I guess the issue here is that I can see the world outside my own head better than a lot of people.  And I know a little more about physics than the average bear, simply from boredom clicks that turned into self directed study sessions.    The idea that the balls were below PSI because the air was cold and cold air is denser and reduces air pressure, makes a lot more sense to me than some nefarious conspiracy, especially because the Colts' balls were also just barely under PSI, and we all know Andrew Luck doesn't cheat.   The way I had it explained to me is the Patriots keep their balls at the low end of the allowed PSI limit at room temperature.  Throw in a super cold January evening that was way below room temperature and the nefarious becomes the inevitable.  That's why the Colts' balls were also low, because air cold enough to shrink a Patriots ball will shrink a Colts ball too.    The reason that the Colts' balls had higher PSI is that they started higher -- Colts don't push the lower edge of the PSI limit.  Also the Colts balls were tested later, after things had a chance to warm up and normalize   If it was Manning or Luck being accused none of us would have been satisfied with the standard of "proof" on display.    there might just barely be enough actual evidence to get the equipment people themselves on something, if you completely ignore the way temperature affects air pressure, but the evidence tying any of that directly back to Brady is practically nonexistent.   They would have had a better reason to suspend either of Robert Kraft or Bill Belichick than Tom Brady.  Both of them have more authority over the equipment personnel than the starting QB does and at least you could get them on the commander clause. '   All they have on Brady is that he destroyed his phone after they said they didn't want it and before they changed their minds and decided they did
    • I was going to respond to each point but it's not really worth it so I will just say, the fact that he was suspended and fined was not proof enough for you?
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...