Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
cjrichard

Defensive play calls in the redzone?

Recommended Posts

I dont understand the play calls on defense when the Browns where in the redzone. Why were we playing cover 2 zone?  Made it soooo easy to dump passes underneath and get huge chuncks of yards. Imo not great situational play calling

 

Joseph

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Preseason is not where you give up any of your playbook

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, cjrichard said:

I dont understand the play calls on defense when the Browns where in the redzone. Why were we playing cover 2 zone?  Made it soooo easy to dump passes underneath and get huge chuncks of yards. Imo not great situational play calling

 

Joseph

 

Is this really an honest question?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the holes will be closed down as the team gets some pass rush, the defense learns to play some of the new schemes, and they get the rust out

 

We will be ok

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d love to see them play better and make all the plays we want but I also want them to be experimenting with stuff to fix what needs fixed from preseason film sessions. This is where you learn against other teams. They may not be doing exotic stuff either but we get to see our guys in patterns on film breakdown. I’m not worried what the record of preseason is or how they managed certain situations. I’m more concerned In how guys block, tackle and run routes. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The calls were wildly incompetent/horrible. And Eberflus was one of the better coordinators in the whole league last year. This should tell you enough. They just didn't want to show ANYTHING new or anything interesting from the things they've been working on. 

 

I wouldn't take anything away from those pre-season games schematics-wise. Just look at individual performances for the roles and schemes the players are given, don't look at schemes and playcalls themselves.  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, jskinnz said:

 

Is this really an honest question?

Yes it is. What do you learn by playing coverages you typically wont run during the season in certian situations?  I get playing rookies with the 1s to see what they do in a REAL GAME SITUATION. 

 

Joseph

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This just goes to show that a "one-size-fits-all" defensive strategy, like Cover 2, doesn't work in every situation. But if this is the base strategy from which all other situational strategies - hybrid or Cover 1 - emerge from, watching how players play that simple strategy is important.

 

Obviously, preseason games are not REAL GAME SITUATIONS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly the entire team, including the coaches have regressed. It's time for changes. I hear Pagano is doing big things in Chicago 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, IndyD4U said:

Clearly the entire team, including the coaches have regressed. It's time for changes. I hear Pagano is doing big things in Chicago 

You made me blow Diet Coke through my nose, laughing while I read this.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, cjrichard said:

I dont understand the play calls on defense when the Browns where in the redzone. Why were we playing cover 2 zone?  Made it soooo easy to dump passes underneath and get huge chuncks of yards. Imo not great situational play calling

 

Joseph

Vanilla Defense. Think about that for a minute Vanilla Vanilla Vanilla hope that helps :applause: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, cjrichard said:

Yes it is. What do you learn by playing coverages you typically wont run during the season in certian situations?  I get playing rookies with the 1s to see what they do in a REAL GAME SITUATION. 

 

Joseph

 

We don't know, seeing as we aren't the ones putting guys in spots to evaluate this preseason. Perhaps there is a good reason?? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, CoachLite said:

You made me blow Diet Coke through my nose, laughing while I read this.

 

I know that diet crap has to burn like a mother... Aspartame forcefully spewing through your nostrils? Ouch...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree with your logic.  But it is the same logic some people are using for the converse.  We have young receivers and no Funchess, so no one is open.
    • Not trying to start an argument. I'm only pointing out that you are essentially drawing a conclusion based on assumptions.   1) ........receivers are fast 2) ........QB makes few attempts 3).........the box is stacked   So, Brissett must be missing open receivers downfield.   I'm sure he misses some. But how many compared to other QBs?  ....  We don't really know.         
    • SO your contention is that teams leave Ebron open because of his drops?
    • No more than someone being convicted and imprisoned when it's obvious the police force engaged in improper procedure.   I guess the issue here is that I can see the world outside my own head better than a lot of people.  And I know a little more about physics than the average bear, simply from boredom clicks that turned into self directed study sessions.    The idea that the balls were below PSI because the air was cold and cold air is denser and reduces air pressure, makes a lot more sense to me than some nefarious conspiracy, especially because the Colts' balls were also just barely under PSI, and we all know Andrew Luck doesn't cheat.   The way I had it explained to me is the Patriots keep their balls at the low end of the allowed PSI limit at room temperature.  Throw in a super cold January evening that was way below room temperature and the nefarious becomes the inevitable.  That's why the Colts' balls were also low, because air cold enough to shrink a Patriots ball will shrink a Colts ball too.    The reason that the Colts' balls had higher PSI is that they started higher -- Colts don't push the lower edge of the PSI limit.  Also the Colts balls were tested later, after things had a chance to warm up and normalize   If it was Manning or Luck being accused none of us would have been satisfied with the standard of "proof" on display.    there might just barely be enough actual evidence to get the equipment people themselves on something, if you completely ignore the way temperature affects air pressure, but the evidence tying any of that directly back to Brady is practically nonexistent.   They would have had a better reason to suspend either of Robert Kraft or Bill Belichick than Tom Brady.  Both of them have more authority over the equipment personnel than the starting QB does and at least you could get them on the commander clause. '   All they have on Brady is that he destroyed his phone after they said they didn't want it and before they changed their minds and decided they did
    • I was going to respond to each point but it's not really worth it so I will just say, the fact that he was suspended and fined was not proof enough for you?
  • Members

    • krunk

      krunk 11,708

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • egg

      egg 791

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • runthepost

      runthepost 721

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • anunnakidna

      anunnakidna 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Btown_Colt

      Btown_Colt 431

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 139

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Qwiz

      Qwiz 3,722

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 2,016

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • davidshoff

      davidshoff 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 2,104

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...