Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
ColtStrong2013

Trading Brissett after week 4.

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, shastamasta said:

 

CAR just drafted a QB in the 3rd round.

 

And the Broncos drafted Tim Tebow in the 1st. What's your point? It means jack who and where they drafted somebody if they like what they see. Josh Rosen was a 1st round draft pick and they turned around and got rid of him for another 1st round qb a year later. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they wanted to trade Brissett,  it would have happened already

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, WoolMagnet said:

This and the fact no one is willing to admit we tend to value him more than the rest of the league.   IF we did receive calls on Brissett, i'm pretty sure they were late-round.

  Also, there have been more drafted QBs having success early in the last few years than i can remember.

  If i'm looking for a QB, i may be more apt to draft a couple in early or mid-rounds and develop them.  Heck, take a QB every 2 or 3 years.  A better value than costly vets who dont seem to pan out any better than developed players.  Target QBs that fit you, and draft like you do for other positions.  It seems like a team will do aft a QB (high-ish), and then assume it will work and sort of ignore the position.  Most other positions, the team is ALWAYS looking to make improve.  At QB, most teams have a major drop to the #2.

i think we may have done well if we traded him last year, especially before the draft.  he wont get much mid season this year with a few weeks left on his contract

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All this talk about trading Jacoby Brissett puzzles me. He seems like a smart, team-oriented guy that reminds me a little of Teddy Bridgewater who I think is a very good quarterback. If there is a starting position that appeals to Brissett, let him go for it next year. Being a starter brings a lot of pressure he may not want. If he wants to stay here and back up Andrew Luck, that would be fine, too. The verdict is still out on Chad Kelly. Seems to me we are in a good place when it comes to QBs - even with the questions (real or not) about Andrew Luck's ankle.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would he do that? Kelly can still be QB2 after this season. I don't know why people want to trade Brissett so badly. If he leaves, he leaves. You still get a comp pick out of him. Realistically, the Colts aren't going to get higher than a 3rd rounder for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think we'll be trading Brissett unless we get an offer we can't refuse.  

 

Ballard and Reich are very focused on the locker room and the culture of the locker room and Brissett is too valuable in the locker room.  

 

His replacement that everyone is focused on Chad Kelly is someone who we're hoping reforms his life but it hasn't been long enough that you can rely on him to not get in trouble.  

 

I think the idea generally is to practice squad Kelly and see if he can behave himself for a year and when Brissett goes in FA we will hopefully get a comp pick from him and maybe Kelly can earn the backup job.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

I don't think we'll be trading Brissett unless we get an offer we can't refuse.  

 

Ballard and Reich are very focused on the locker room and the culture of the locker room and Brissett is too valuable in the locker room.  

 

His replacement that everyone is focused on Chad Kelly is someone who we're hoping reforms his life but it hasn't been long enough that you can rely on him to not get in trouble.  

 

I think the idea generally is to practice squad Kelly and see if he can behave himself for a year and when Brissett goes in FA we will hopefully get a comp pick from him and maybe Kelly can earn the backup job.

 

 

 

If a ham sandwich is "an offer we can't refuse" , he has a chance to be traded. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would trade him only if...

 

1) Luck is a full go week one no pain anywhere.

2) If Kelly continues to play well. 

3) After week 4.

4) we get a good enough offer for him or maybe package him with one of our seconds next year for a STUD D-lineman. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, FirsTime said:

I would trade him only if...

 

1) Luck is a full go week one no pain anywhere.

2) If Kelly continues to play well. 

3) After week 4.

4) we get a good enough offer for him or maybe package him with one of our seconds next year for a STUD D-lineman. 

It's all about the bolded part.  I don't think Ballard will shop JB at all this year, but if a desperate team calls, he'll listen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Conspiracy theory.  Let Luck sit for a game or two.  Brissett plays his butt off in those games and the skies the limit in terms of trade value hahaha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all in (at this point) on Kelly, but he needs a full year on the PS plus an off season of good behavior before we can truly "rely" on him. I'd rather ride out the remainder of JBs contract unless 1) Luck turns out to be !00%, 2) it's mid season or later, 3) Kelly is being a model citizen, and 4) we get at least a 3rd rounder for him. If for some reason we become ineligible for the playoffs, I'd trade him without much thought so long as we net something comparable to what a compensatory pick might be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have come around to the idea that this year Ballard should carry three QB's on the active roster.  Why?  Because QB is the most important position on any team and we currently have three NFL QB's on our roster.  Luck, Brissett and Kelly.   It doesn't make sense to expose Kelly on the practice squad when we know Brissett is going to be gone after this year.  Kelly can play and I have to believe the other teams know it too.  Teams carry 53 players but can only can dress 46 or 47 or whatever the number is.  Assuming we have Brissett all year Kelly would be one of the inactives along with a few other end of the roster players.  I think it would be smart to give that 53rd spot to Kelly and use the practice squad to tweak the remaining players on the roster as needed.  We gave him a chance and he has shown he can play.  It would be a shame to lose him to a practice squad claim given our current circumstances with Brissett.  JMO

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question for you guys.  With the love Reich has shown Kelly by bringing him in, is there a chance that he would choose to stay on our practice squad for a season rather than going to a bad team???  I mean there’s a good chance JB is gone next year & the backup job to Luck is all his.  I can definitely see a scenario where we put him on the practice squad & say a team like the Bengals comes calling & he chooses to stay with us & Reich.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/18/2019 at 2:21 PM, krunk said:

I still say no. You don't totally know what you've got in Kelly. Brissett been here 3 years now. There's no rush. Kelly isn't ready to lead this team if Luck goes down. He looks good but it's mostly against back ups. I think you look at moving JB next year.

Don't know if anyone has pointed this out, but his contract expires this year, so we have to trade him or let him go.

 

I think if we do trade, he will go to the Patriots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cam got hurt last night.  Their GM is "hoping" it's not too bad.  What if it is?  They have no reliable backup.  I wonder if Ballard would get a call.  That's why we are lucky to have three NFL caliber QB's.  Their misfortune could turn out to be a good situation for the Colts.  We should know Cam's status today.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Mr. Irrelevant said:

Well, we can end this thread now.

I’m still down to trade him if we can get some good draft capitol that can be used on a future QB otherwise we are looking at paying him 20-25 million after this season to be our starter. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Every breakdown I read or listen to lately all show our players don’t seem to know where they are supposed to be and are not executing well.  I hope it’s just because We are a young team.
    • Pocket Passing QBs are defined as QBs who sit in the pocket under pressure and make throws from the pocket. Most of the league these days is based upon QBs getting outside of the pocket to make plays, which means they are not primarily pocket passers. I’m not saying Love will be unable to get outside of the pocket, but I don’t see it much on tape as he has great protection and doesn’t need to. Personally, I don’t care for either of them, and would rather wait for the better class in 2021 while building more this year, but of the two, it would at least be more interesting to go for something the Colts haven’t really ever had. Spice it up a bit, ya know
    • ...a big fat check the man is freaking awesome! Give this dude an extension already    come on we need some humor around here not much else to look forward to the rest of the season for the Colts that is.   Time to laugh with me 
    • Huh? The top 15 QB's statistically are all primarily pocket passing QB's. Mahomes, Watson, Wilson, Rodgers, Prescott, Wentz, while being mobile in the pocket, are not running QB's. Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson are really the only 2 QB's used in actual running situations continuously.    Sorry, but there are no Lamar Jackson's in this draft and Hurts isn't the answer either. A) I don't want to see an offense rebuilt into something that isn't sustainable. Eventually LJ will have to sit his * in the pocket. B) Every time I see Hurts' name pop up I wonder if people have actually watched him. There is a reason he couldn't cut it at Bama, and got beat out by an actual passing QB. I don't think there are going to be many teams who are going to rebuild their offense for a guy who can't read a defense, nor progress beyond his first/second read before he's wanting to just take off running. Hurts wouldn't even be on my board just due to him not being a good passing QB.
  • Members

    • Coltsman1788

      Coltsman1788 3,394

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 1,242

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • T-Cubed

      T-Cubed 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GusFring

      GusFring 191

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 12,047

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • runthepost

      runthepost 816

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BloodyChamp

      BloodyChamp 912

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsleafs

      coltsleafs 144

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HOZER

      HOZER 4,108

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Happy2BeHere

      Happy2BeHere 706

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...