Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
LucasOilStadium

Colts Vs. Browns Preseason Game Day Thread

Recommended Posts

Just now, JlynRN said:

Kelly looked good on that drive. Has he surpassed Walker?

Only if luck is healthy. He is suspended two games. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our TE group.

 

Ebron

Doyle

My boy Mo

Travis

Hentges

 

All of them can play in this league.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chloe6124 said:

Only if luck is healthy. He is suspended two games. 

For what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Kelly leads us to a comeback win in this game, he needs to instantly be upgraded to our #3 QB

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, HOF19 said:

Gotta believe Jim Kelly watching this game .

Absolutely he is, and most likely smiling

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, csmopar said:

For what?

Because he broke into someone’s house while with the Broncos . He is in s short leash here.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Mike Tahoe said:

If Kelly leads us to a comeback win in this game, he needs to instantly be upgraded to our #3 QB

Only #3?  He should be #2.

If we don't keep him somebody will pick him up for sure.

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we need to get this over before anyone else goes down.

1 minute ago, CanuckColt said:

Only #3?  He should be #2.

 

Your crazy lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boy Ballard need to be scouring the waiver wire heavily after final cuts for backup OL...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CanuckColt said:

Only #3?  He should be #2.

 

Jacoby won't get passed that easily, Kelly would have to ball out for a few more games to do that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CanuckColt said:

Only #3?  He should be #2.

 

As much as it is fun to watch Kelly against third stringers, I'll take Brisett as #2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bluefire4 said:

Boy Ballard need to be scouring the waiver wire heavily after final cuts for backup OL...

I agree. OLine depth is probably our biggest need at this point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok  So we do have a shot at a 200 yard penalty game .

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, compuls1v3 said:

As much as it is fun to watch Kelly against third stringers, I'll take Brisett as #2.

Brissett is not going to get us very many Ws.

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, CanuckColt said:

Brissett is not going to get us very many Ws.

 

Well the good thing is Luck looks like he is going to play lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, CanuckColt said:

Brissett is not going to get us very many Ws.

 

You think Kelly will??

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Garcia and Andrews were our two best backup linemen but they are getting killed today too. Do we have anybody on this team outside of the starting fine linemen that even deserve to be on the roster? Haeg maybe?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has this franchise ever had a game (pre-season or otherwise ) where it had 200 yards penalties in one game ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

The refs are flag happy. 

 

Trying yo pad their stats, lol.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Mike Tahoe said:

Penalty number 36 for 412 yards so far for the Colts

I’m not watching the game, is that true or an exaggeration 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bluefire4 said:

I thought Garcia and Andrews were our two best backup linemen but they are getting killed today too. Do we have anybody on this team outside of the starting fine linemen that even deserve to be on the roster? Haeg maybe?

You have to remember your not typically going to play a bunch of backups at the same time. Most likely you you can be ok with just having to have one in there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, csmopar said:

I’m not watching the game, is that true or an exaggeration 

Slight exaggeration 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, CanuckColt said:

Yikes! Foreman looks like Tarzan, runs like Jane.

 

 

He won't be here long. :thmup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Maniac said:

 

He won't be here long. :thmup:

Maybe they put him on the practice squad. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chloe6124 said:

Maybe they put him on the practice squad. 

He was a 3rd rounder if I remember right

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mike Tahoe said:

He was a 3rd rounder if I remember right

Why does that matter.

That was much better then last week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

Why does that matter.

That was much better then last week.

Earlier round draft picks typically get a longer leash. Not saying he will make the team but that should be obvious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not really. We can go into Oakland  and beat them.
    • Nope.  I do admire the Patriots as a rival fan, I've been loud in my calls for the team to become more Patriots-like, and it looks to me like Reich is moving in that direction too, which is something I like to see.  Because the commitment to discipline, execution, and putting the team over individual accomplishments is the way you win big games.   I hate to see everything they do right dismissed with the "cheater" label when it's generally not the case that they win by cheating.  Especially over something petty like deflated footballs.   The whole Deflategate saga has always struck me as a tempest in a teacup and the more I've dug around the issue, the less impressed I've been with the way Goodell and the rest of the NFL brass handled it.  The response just seemed and still seems, ridiculously excessive.  Other episodes of doctored footballs are answered with a warning or a fine, not a 4 game suspension of a guy who is possibly indirectly involved in the whole thing.   I've never been satisfied that the "Brady Cheated" narrative has a leg to stand on, it strikes me as the sort of thing rival homers cling to as a way to discredit his legitimate accomplishments and put their own GOAT candidates forward, especially Rodgers and Peyton.  To make their guys seem better by comparison.  Which is why the Manning HGH rumors deserve to be brought up -- our guy has a mark on his record too.  probably a worse one than deflated footballs if we're all being honest.    If you can discredit a guy based on rumors that may or may not be true, Manning is in a certain amount of trouble.   If we assume everything is true, PEDs vs doctored footballs is not an argument we want to be making.  We don't have a leg to stand on either.  If we assume everything is overblown, we can't use the "Brady Cheated" mantra.  If we accept one as true but not the other despite a similar level of evidence in both cases, then we aren't being fair or reasonable.   Either way the "Brady Cheated" mantra is something that probablt needs to die.  And it doesn't do the Colts any favors to cling to it unreasonably.   It's just how I feel about the whole thing.
    • its official http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001066803/article/mri-confirms-patrick-mahomes-suffered-dislocated-kneecap
    • I heard his test was scheduled for Noon?  That's central time, right?  Unless he went in earlier, that test would be ongoing as it is 1:22 EST as I write (12:22 CST).  This exam/imaging can take anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour from setup to getting off the table.  Then it has to read (properly) for results.   However, it would be great to here no other significant damage.  I'm not \convinced yet, though.  We'll know later.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...