Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Will Andrew Luck play in the first regular season game?


Will Andrew Luck play in the first regular season game?  

163 members have voted

  1. 1. Will Andrew Luck play in the first regular season game?



Recommended Posts

Brissett is not terrible, but he is not that good. Top 20 in this league please. One thing that will get tested if Luck doesn’t play this year is that wonderful locker room culture. Here is looking forward to 2021 if Luck doesn’t play. Let the end of the year song play

HAD A BAD DAY.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 247
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

No..... With CB "questioning" his readiness for week 1; that is Ballard speak for week 3 or 4 at best.  Ballard is a genius at building a team.  But he is very poor as the face of the Colts.  This is

19 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

My vote made it 27/27.

 

I feel like if there was a third option that was just the  :dunno:  emoji, it would have gotten the overriding majority of votes...  :funny:

 

It seems like there's just not enough evidence to make an educated guess either way, so this poll is basically "Who are the optimists and who are the pessimists?"  :thinking:

It's the same as a poll asking who will win the Colts/Chargers game.  It's just an educated guess.   

I base my "no" vote, not off pessimism, but off of the length of time this injury has hung around.   Since March or April, right?    3 weeks may not heal it.   Of course, he would have to have some live action before the first game and that could lead to aggravating it again.  

But, it is just a guess.     

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Old Colt said:

I agree with a lot of what you say, but 11-5 without Luck isn't happening, unless they shut out most of the teams they play.....  Brissett is terrible and so is Walker.  Kelly may be serviceable.  We better have a top 5 running game if Luck is out, otherwise 8 - 8 may be the best we could do.

We get it you really don’t like Jacoby. But the dude was 3rd rounder. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that it is more frustrating to think how long they knew about this and how he could have undergone surgery in the offseason to fix this. Instead, they wait til preseason starts to say, "HEY! HE MIGHT NEED SURGERY!" When by now, he could have been fully recovered.

 

I was expecting alot from Luck this season and I want him to be healthy so he can whoop Tom Bradys butt before he retires so we can get revenge. Now that window is getting smaller and all we will remember is how Luck was 0-7 against the Patriots.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, bap1331 said:

I think that it is more frustrating to think how long they knew about this and how he could have undergone surgery in the offseason to fix this. Instead, they wait til preseason starts to say, "HEY! HE MIGHT NEED SURGERY!" When by now, he could have been fully recovered.

 

I was expecting alot from Luck this season and I want him to be healthy so he can whoop Tom Bradys butt before he retires so we can get revenge. Now that window is getting smaller and all we will remember is how Luck was 0-7 against the Patriots.

To be fair they have not said anything about surgery. It’s been the exact opposite.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knows really? 

Best case: Luck heals and is fine for the year.

Worse case: This lingers and the Colts fall behind in standings.

 I wouldn’t be surprised if Kelly worked his way into the backup role, although Ballard said they liked Brissett.

Even if they lose Luck for a game or two, if he returns week 3 completely healed, (and they are 1-1 or even 0-2, they’ll be fine.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JR Indy said:

Chris has created competition at position except QB. With this looking more and more like a long lost season (JB is not that good). I think it is a very good time to spend a high draft pick on a QB in this next draft. That will do two things. Give the Colts stability at the QB position whether Luck is there or not. Take the pressure off of Luck. The body can only take so many hits. And unfortunately Chris (no fault to him) may have been a little too late in building a team around him. The team is here. But Luck may be damage beyond repair (once this is repaired, something else is wrong or broken every year it’s something different). 

JB is a 3rd QB at best. PW is not any better. With those two and no Andrew. The Colts  will be picking in the top 5 in the next draft easy

Half of the teams in the NFL don't have a quality quarterback and you think the Colts should have two?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Brissett played with the swiss cheese OL so don't write him off. Also, he has every motivation to play well so when he goes on the free agent market he can demand more money.  I saw this morning the Colts are given only a 36% chance of beating the Chargers with Luck. I don't get that at all playing LA or in Indy. 

    How do two "specialists" misdiagnose an ankle injury for a calf problem. It was said today the third specialist called the ankle as the problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Myles said:

I hope so but do not think he will.

 

You know, people keep saying something like “there’s no reason to believe he will miss games.”

 

I’d say the reality is the opposite:  there’s no reason to believe he won’t miss games.  You have to consider what happens if the status quo persists.

 

He’s not physically able to play football right now.  And there is no reliable prognosis.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, fahlman said:

Half of the teams in the NFL don't have a quality quarterback and you think the Colts should have two?

 

Let’s not fall into the trap of overvaluing Brissett.  There’s no question but that we’ve made suggestions that we’d deal him — even Irsay’s own public comments have made that clear.

 

So too did he basically let it slip that the prevailing market value for Jacoby was lower than what the Colts (or at least Irsay) thought it should be.

 

There might be a few teams where Jacoby would be competitive for a starting spot.  But no more than a few.  He’s roughly a top 6-7 #2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether or not Andrew plays in any particular game I plan on rooting like all H*** (as much as humanly possible ) to win that particular game whether Andrew plays or not …...My dad PREACHED to me for decades ……"You root for the team as a whole and NEVER any one particular player "

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had family members (Giants fans ) who ( 5 years ago ) swore on the largest stack of bibles ever that ELI might not be replaceable......Now they love Daniel Jones .....Everyone is replaceable .

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted yes. I still stick by what I have said all along, he will play opening day. If not I will admit I was wrong. Until he misses a regular season game I am still not overly worried about this. The whole thing is just annoying at this point reading about his injury and how some of the fans in here bad mouth our team.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, richard pallo said:

Luck is reportedly throwing and doing walk throughs with the offense.  Last year he was hardly hit with our new OL.  That's a plus.  Reich's offense has him getting rid of the ball earlier.  That's also a plus.  With three weeks to go and with more rest and rehab and if our OL is healthy and ready to start then I can see him starting game one.  He has already said the pain he is feeling would not prevent him from starting the season.  A lot of healing can take place in three weeks. 

 

He needs to be on the practice field in 2 weeks, otherwise he's not playing. The Colts brass won't use precaution & keep him out of practice where he's not even allowed to be hit, only to throw him to the wolves week 1 with no full speed practice reps under his belt. Reich said he wants him to have a week of full team drills etc before he plays. So if he's not out there by September 1, or before, you can count on him missing the regular season opener.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, brownsfan4life said:

its unfortunate about luck. if they didnt commit to him playing week one  i doubt he plays.  probably misses 2-3 games. its not a season killing thing the colts just have to weather the storm early.

If he misses 2-3 games, it would be against the Chargers, at the Titans and against the Falcons.  With a back up QB, we could go 0-3.  1-2 would probably be best case scenario.   With a tough schedule this year, combined with lots of teams expected to be improved, a playoff spot may be out of reach.   

6 teams make the playoffs:

Patriots

Chiefs

Chargers

Ravens

Steelers

Colts

Texans

Browns

Other teams

 

Starting 1-2 would not cut it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Myles said:

If he misses 2-3 games, it would be against the Chargers, at the Titans and against the Falcons.  With a back up QB, we could go 0-3.  1-2 would probably be best case scenario.   With a tough schedule this year, combined with lots of teams expected to be improved, a playoff spot may be out of reach.   

6 teams make the playoffs:

Patriots

Chiefs

Chargers

Ravens

Steelers

Colts

Texans

Browns

Other teams

 

Starting 1-2 would not cut it.

 

Yeah the notion that Luck can be out 3-4 games & the Colts wouldn't miss a beat is silly. We're a contender with him, & fortunate to get 8 wins without him.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, IndySouthsider said:

We get it you really don’t like Jacoby. But the dude was 3rd rounder. 

And Brady was a 7th Rounder....  Round makes little difference after the 1st.  If they make the team, they should be be able to offer something by their 2nd or 3rd year.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, fahlman said:

Half of the teams in the NFL don't have a quality quarterback and you think the Colts should have two?

For this team. That is one good healthy QB from going on a Super bowl run yes, exactly.

Brissett is a pretty cool guy. But he is not that good on game day and practice. 2017 I get that he was going to struggle. But in practice this year. No pass rush. He is struggling bad. Andrew before his current calf strain. Was craving that same defense up. There needs to be a major upgrade in the backup QB position 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, JR Indy said:

For this team. That is one good healthy QB from going on a Super bowl run yes, exactly.

Brissett is a pretty cool guy. But he is not that good on game day and practice. 2017 I get that he was going to struggle. But in practice this year. No pass rush. He is struggling bad. Andrew before his current calf strain. Was craving that same defense up. There needs to be a major upgrade in the backup QB position 

>>For this team. That is one good healthy QB from going on a Super bowl run

 

Why does everyone seriously think we are set for a Super Bowl run?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Devildog said:

I'm hoping he plays.  The last time the Colts opened their season here in So Cal was against the Rams in 2017 were my wife and I bought tickets to watch Luck and the Colts play against the Rams.  This was before the surgery and during the pre-season they kept saying Luck will start.  Well, they started Tolzien and we lost to the Rams 9-46.  To make long story short, I hope they don't lead us to believe he will start and come first game of the season he's not.  Looking forward to going to the game.  The Chargers are a good team and I will tough to match up against them if Luck doesn't play.

Don't remind me of that game. I flew from new Zealand to Los Angeles spending $1000 on game tickets.............................

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, VaAllDay757 said:

51% no? Lol I see why this forum is a train wreck

 

I voted no.  Hope I’m wrong.  Nobody knows.  Time will tell.

 

Thing is, for him to play something has to change between now and then.  If nothing changes, he’s not playing.

 

And the clock is ticking.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JR Indy said:

For this team. That is one good healthy QB from going on a Super bowl run yes, exactly.

Brissett is a pretty cool guy. But he is not that good on game day and practice. 2017 I get that he was going to struggle. But in practice this year. No pass rush. He is struggling bad. Andrew before his current calf strain. Was craving that same defense up. There needs to be a major upgrade in the backup QB position 

 

We have one of the best backup QBs in the league, IMO.

 

And, that said, even if Luck is 100% healthy, I don’t think we’re a Super Bowl caliber team quite yet.  Certainly headed in the right direction, though.

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, luv_pony_express said:

 

I voted no.  Hope I’m wrong.  Nobody knows.  Time will tell.

 

Thing is, for him to play something has to change between now and then.  If nothing changes, he’s not playing.

 

And the clock is ticking.

Change for the better is always great but he said it himself if he had to play a game in the regular season he would play

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, PanthersRolls2017 said:

>>For this team. That is one good healthy QB from going on a Super bowl run

 

Why does everyone seriously think we are set for a Super Bowl run?

We won a playoff game last year and have improved our roster.   A Superbowl run is understandable.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, luv_pony_express said:

 

We have one of the best backup QBs in the league, IMO.

 

And, that said, even if Luck is 100% healthy, I don’t think we’re a Super Bowl caliber team quite yet.  Certainly headed in the right direction, though.

One of the best backup QBs in the league? Hardly. At least not from what I saw in that first preseason game. Brissett and Walker both frankly sucked and Kelly looked pretty good playing against a bunch of guys who will probably be working in a car wash or selling life insurance come September. No, what we have are three guys who could probably take a few snaps and hand the ball off or take a knee, or possibly pick up a quarter or so in a blowout game. But if any of those three guys have to take a significant number of snaps we're going 5-11 at best. 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, VaAllDay757 said:

51% no? Lol I see why this forum is a train wreck

I'm not sure why you would say this.   It's a guess either way.   

If you were to bet $100 on whether Luck would play in the first regular season game or not, what would you choose?

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Myles said:

I'm not sure why you would say this.   It's a guess either way.   

If you were to bet $100 on whether Luck would play in the first regular season game or not, what would you choose?

I would say he's playing.....he's not practicing with the team right now but he's active it's not like back in 2017 when he couldn't even throw the ball like he wanted to

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, PanthersRolls2017 said:

>>For this team. That is one good healthy QB from going on a Super bowl run

 

Why does everyone seriously think we are set for a Super Bowl run?

My apology’s, that is my opinion, based off the way this team ended last year, and I’m not talking about KC. The upgrades at talent at every position except Backup QB. And a healthy Andrew Luck. I thought this team was ready to roll. But this injury has really changed my mind 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, VaAllDay757 said:

I would say he's playing.....he's not practicing with the team right now but he's active it's not like back in 2017 when he couldn't even throw the ball like he wanted to

That's fair.   I'd bet my money on him not playing the first game.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They are likely kicking the can down the road, and the negative consequence is higher cap numbers for those players in future seasons, and greater cap penalties to move on from those players in future seasons. The thing is there's no much else they can do. they're set to be nearly $70m over the cap in 2021, and other than these restructures, they would not be able to get under the cap by the start of the new league year. They would have to cut or trade all of their highly paid players.
    • I feel the hype about Carl Lawson is from a combination of people who haven't really watched him play, and who overrate "pressures" by assuming that all pressures are equally disruptive.    Lawson is a tough, physical, high effort guy, he tackles well, plays the run reasonably well, he has decent size, and he would fit nicely as a DE for us. He's not a dynamic pass rusher, and I don't think he ever would be a dynamic pass rusher.   He has some quickness and speed, good speed to power, but he's not the kind of explosive pass rusher that blows up the other team's blocking schemes. He has below average bend and closing speed, and he takes a lot of steps, which explains his tragically poor three cone. He also has below average length, and gets neutralized by good blockers. This is all obvious on his tape, it was obvious on his college tape, and it's why he went in the 4th round.   TomDiggs mentioned Lawson's knockdowns/hits and hurries. PFF recorded six edge rushers with at least QB 15 hits; despite the fact that Lawson had 24 hits, he only had five sacks, which is the least sacks among those six players. In fact, there were ten edges with fewer than 15 QB hits, but with at least ten sacks. PFF has 24 edges with at least 30 pressures; Lawson had 34 hurries, but was tied for fifth fewest sacks among those 24 players. In fact, there were five edges with fewer hurries than Lawson, but at least ten sacks.   My point is that QB hits and pressures only show a player that manages to get near the QB at some point during the play. Without context, they don't necessarily show a player that makes a definite impact on the play. That's why I value PFF's pass rush productivity (PRP) stat, because sacks are weighted more heavily than hits and pressures. And that makes sense because a sack ends the play. A QB can be pressured, even hit, and still make a positive play. Recognizing a sack as nearly always a negative play for the offense, PRP shows the difference between a guy who gets near the QB, and a pass rusher who makes plays for the defense. Sometimes the overlap is not as great as you might think.   Lawson's PRP was 8.5, tied for #18, well separated from guys like Bosa (10.6) and Watt (9.7). In general, a player with a bunch of total pressures, but low sack numbers, like Lawson, is a guy who gets a bunch of pass rush snaps but doesn't have the length, bend and closing speed to get home often enough. This is why guys like Trey Hendrickson and Leonard Floyd can have a third fewer total pressures, but twice as many sacks as Lawson (Hendrickson also had 80 fewer pass rush snaps). And Lawson gets a ton of pass rush snaps because he plays for a bad team with no other good edge rushers, so as long as he's healthy he'll have a lot of pressures, but he'll probably never be a big sack guy.   He's Trey Flowers. Better 40, same agility, not as long, mid level edge rusher who is well rounded and a good guy to have on your team, but not a dominant pass rusher. I can't see offering him $14m/year to not sack the QB. Any projection that has him as a big time sack guy is unrealistic, IMO.
    • It's nice to see Pittman, Smith and Okereke get some love.
    • Did I misread your post?   Did you not say you were in favor of moving Nelson to LT?   That if we’re going to pay him top dollar, it would be better to do it with him as our LT instead of at LG?    That wasn’t you?    I’m sorry, I thought that’s what I responded to.... 
    • With me, road whites are off-limits.  As to the blue tops, as much as i do dig the color rush blues, I’m an old-school-uni guy, and would lean to white pants.   I’m in Penn State country, and there are some similarities i guess.   I do think improvements can be made in the striping.  Minimal enough cahange to keep purists happy, but could “update the uni.  Perhaps 3 stripes down the leg and middle of helmet.  Middle one thicker than sides.  Not crazy wide.... tasteful like the stripes on a shelby. The middle stripe could be horseshoes similar to the way seattle uses imagry.  Maybe a large horseshoe on each shoulder that circles down around the number.  Minimal...... but updated..... without losing the “brand.”   Remember that outdated font that was recently retired?  A small “refresh” might be nice.   I’d like to see a “ghosted” image of like padding texture or like metalplate image (barely noticeable) at shoulder pads, knee and thigh pads.  Like a 3d effect.   I remember oregon once had ghosted wings on the shoulders that were cool, bit not “too much.”
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...