Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Offense ranking for the season


runthepost

Recommended Posts

Should be a good season for us Colts fans as we should have an elite offense next year. 

 

1. Chiefs. They lost Hunt this year but they still have Kelce and Hill. Also have a Tyreek Hill clone minus the drama. Mahomes may not throw 50 TDS but I expect between 35 to 45 TDs 

 

2. Falcons. Same offense minus Coleman but upgraded their offensive line. Matt Ryan last year had a year on par with his MVP year. Also Julio and Calvin will be a dynamic duo.

 

3. Rams. Yes they put up an ugly dud in the Super Bowl but next year they should still be a high scoring high yardage team again. Coop was a key receiver before his season ended last year. Team success depends on the growth of Goff and the health of Gurley.

 

4.  Colts. Another year under our current staff and a healthy Doye hopefully this year. Improve from the younger receivers will be key this year. Luck will be Luck and Mack will have a great year.

 

5.  Browns. Surprise team here. Mayfield will become a top 10 QB this season and OBJ will have a season on par or better than his rookie year. Browns also have Kareem Hunt who will have over 1700 in all purpose yards again. 

 

Remaining top 10

 

6. Saints

7. Patriots :tvsmash:

8. Packers

9. Eagles

10. Panthers

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, ManningGM said:

Bruh compared to the other teams you totally undersold our offense. 

 

 

All the other teams have guys in the top tier in terms of their position. We still have a good offensive system that makes good use of players skill set. Only thing is compared to those team in the top 5 we don’t have a top 3 to 5 guy at the skill positions unless we are considering Ebron as a top tier tight end.

Julio Jones 

Mike Thomas 

OBJ

Tyreek Hill

Gurley 

Kamara

Kelce

Not sure where Hunt ranks on running backs.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

In points per game i have doubts we will finish in the top 10.
We have a tough schedule and are one loss of an o-lineman away from it being a big problem. 

 

Most every team is one loss of a starting OL away from being a big problem.   Lots of teams are dangerously thin there....      it's that way pretty much most every year....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, DerekDiggler said:

you have the Saints 6th????????   They may well be the best offense in the league this yr

 

Timing is everything.

 

Yesterday,  ESPN ran a top story showing that the inevitable decline for Brees may have alreaady started.     That he was light out for the first 11 weeks of the 18 season.    But the last 6 weeks of the regular season, and the two playoff games,  Brees was............  Less than great.    He was human.    Not bad.    Not terrible.    But not very Brees like at all.    Remember,  MAY have already started.   

 

It's all explained in this article....

 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/27343569/barnwell-inevitable-drew-brees-decline-already-begun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

In points per game i have doubts we will finish in the top 10.
We have a tough schedule and are one loss of an o-lineman away from it being a big problem. 

 

When Luck was healthy, the Colts always finished in the top 10 (twice in the top 5) in points per game, except in Luck's rookie year. Despite atrocious olines, ever changing OC's, and their sometimes outdated offensive systems. Do you really think that with the help of Reich and his up to date, QB friendly system, Luck won't be able to lead this offense in to the top10 if one OL gets hurt? C'mon, you can't seriously believe that. :)

 

If Luck can stay healthy, the Colts will easily be a top10 scoring offense. Probably a top5 or top3. The schedule does not matter. Last year's schedule was a lot easier, but not the defenses. They played plenty of very good defensive teams last year.

 

So point averages will be up there, the "only" question is consistency and big games. Will they be more consistent than last year - so games like the Jaguars game won't happen? And will they be able to deliver against top contenders in the playoffs, so a meltdown like vs the Chiefs won't happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Downs broke out in year one. He has incredible quickness off the line, and is fast enough to take most any match up deep. He also sees holes in the  zones instantly, he is a great slot. We do have all the necessary receiving weapon to exploit a D. Of course a 3rd WR that plays fast would be a great add. 3rd rd makes sense.  
    • I don't think the defense is the same old. For starters, our defense is no longer undersized, and doesn't struggle against the run.   If the Colts draft a man coverage corner in the first round, it will signal a major departure from the previous way of doing things, and it probably means Gus Bradley is gone after this season. I'm not against any of that happening. I just don't expect it, based on the established pattern.   As for what Ballard said in his presser, he also acknowledged that the expected top three boundary corners were unavailable for most of the season. Brents was our highly drafted rookie, and only played 9 games; Flowers played four games; Rodgers was released. That left us with rookies and journeyman playing corner most of the season. With Brents in Year 2 and hopefully healthy, Flowers back and healthy, another year in for Jaylon Jones, that gives Bradley a lot more to work with in the secondary. And I think that's more what Ballard was implying with his comments. Otherwise, he probably would have signed a veteran corner already.
    • Are you going to tell me that I haven’t heaped tons of thanks on you?   How many times have I said thank you and that you are way too kind with your praise?  The answer is many.   I’m sorry you seem not to remember those moments.     Sorry about the headache.  The feeling was mutual.  
    • That has always been my issue going back to the Polian years. They preferred undersized players to fit this scheme. That was great when they had a lead and played indoors. The problem  is that teams started running the ball to keep Peyton on the bench. Plus, u get in bad weather and on grass, their speed is negated and they are just a bunch of undersized players getting blown off the ball. I am in favor of building a team that can play in any environment and that can run various schemes. I see flexibility with the offence, however the D is the same old. That's why I think this is an important draft defensively. Will the Colts stray from their previous tendancies of drafting players that fit the Seattle scheme or will they deviate and say draft a man corner? Last year we were all on the edge of our seats when a trade was made at 3. Will we get our qb at 4? We were all on pins and needles till they made that pick. This draft has that same excitement for me. At 15 will Ballard and company do something different? This team needs a play maker on D and I contend that is their biggest need. I don't believe they get that player moving back.  Sure u may get him at 15 but if u really want a playmaker, this just might be the year to say move up and get a guy like Mirchell and Latu who may fall because of the medical. I am not in favor of getting a wr or te. Richardson, if he is the guy, should deliver explosive plays with our current roster.  Jot a fan of Gus and this scheme, but I really don't think he has a lot to work with and Ballard kind of eluded to that in his post season pressers.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...