Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Training Camp Day 14


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

There is a difference in worrying and understanding there is defiantly a possibility this teams offense starts out bad. The ones saying it will be fine are  really not being honest either.  It really could go either way.

 

Chloe let me ask you something you see a team that doesn't game plan for a opponent take them on and not look good on the oline due to two missing key offenses players being out and yet were gonna look bad this year when the season starts is that what your implying? do you not realize that theirs a major difference between playing a team without game planning vs game planning for the opponent? have we played a game vs a team that we've game planned for yet? no we have not so instead of worrying why not wait and see what happens preseason game 3 :goodluck:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

Chloe let me ask you something you see a team that doesn't game plan for a opponent take them on and not look good on the oline due to two missing key offenses players being out and yet were gonna look bad this year when the season starts is that what your implying? do you not realize that theirs a major difference between playing a team without game planning vs game planning for the opponent? have we played a game vs a team that we've game planned for yet? no we have not so instead of worrying why not wait and see what happens preseason game 3 :goodluck:

That wasn’t my reason, lol. When the offense hasn’t had luck actually running live drills there is a great possibility it  won’t be in rhythm, had nothing to do with the pre season game.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

That wasn’t my reason, lol. When the offense hasn’t had luck actually running live drills there is a great possibility it  won’t be in rhythm, had nothing to do with the pre season game.

i see well with the type of injury Luck has i would let him take as much time off as he needs because all it takes is a set back that can keep him out all season long just like Durant will do this coming year. id rather have Luck back week 4 of the regular season then not have Luck at all calf injuries are nothing to play around with or willing to risk rushing someone back into action whose not ready

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

i see well with the type of injury Luck has i would let him take as much time off as he needs because all it takes is a set back that can keep him out all season long just like Durant will do this coming year. id rather have Luck back week 4 of the regular season then not have Luck at all calf injuries are nothing to play around with or willing to risk rushing someone back into action whose not ready

I am not questioning whether or not to give Luck time. That is the right decision.  It is still a big possibility that the offense won’t be ready,  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was I on peyote or did I not see Luck jumping around, doing drills, and moving around quickly and throwing passes to start camp, all without problem? If he's that damn injured, wouldn't he not be able to make those kind of movements/cuts? I'm 99% sure it's just precautionary, and the pain crept back in from the original injury in April, and they don't want it to turn into something worse. It's fact that he's still throwing to guys on the side, and I'd assume he's still doing absolutely everything he would've been doing other than live game stuff. Sucks we open against the Chargers, but how long do you think it's really gonna take him to get acclimated in a scheme he already knows, players he's mainly already thrown to, and coaches he's already played for? I'm more concerned with Parris not getting the reps as a rookie WR. We needed that added element on offense, because the practice squad guys we were rolling out last year just wasn't acceptable. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the one good thing is we returned almost all the starters. 

 

With Parris being side lined he might not be as involved right away with the offense as he could of been. Rookies have it tough because they have no time off  after college. They have to prepare for the combine and then you have the draft then right into spring practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

 

Of course he is, I have no concerns at all about him or the team being ready for week 1. Did some even think that maybe he doesn't like training camp? A lot of players dislike training camp and even pre-season. Also a lot of the veteran QB's do not play in the pre-season much at all either. I have never been worried about Luck and still am not. I wasn't worried coming into last season and even posted Luck would come back healthy and have a monster season. I had us going 9-7 and making the 6th spot last season when many had us stinking up the joint lmao . We actually went 10-6.

 

I am not a doctor but Luck will start in week 1 and we will be fine IMO. All of this worrying is for nothing. I haven't watched football for 40 years for nothing to know what is going on.

 

Expectations remain the same for me with Luck playing all 16 games. As in, I expect 11-5 and an AFCCG appearance. I won't go as far as saying SB or bust yet because in reality we are still rebuilding. I had mentioned to many other posters that 2020 would be our year to win it all.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, stitches said:

I hate doing this but the Colts need to take a serious look into those soft tissue injuries and the recovery from them. Luck, Campbell, AC last year(I would bet there are a lot more that I just cannot remember right now). This continues happening. Players try to return after injury only to suffer setbacks and make things worse.

 

I heard some injury expert say we are bottom third in the league in injuries 10 years running. Every single year! This is coming to the point where it cannot be just dumb luck. Is it trainers/medical staff... is it the artificial turf at Lucas Oil Stadium? Is it the coaching? Is is the nutrition/food? Whatever it is, they need to figure it out. This can't keep happening again and again and again and again... I realize that this is contact sport and physical sport and some injuries are expected but the level and consistency of it happening to Colts players is very much out of the ordinary. 

I said a few years ago that it might be the turf. It looks good and allows a person to play faster but it doesn’t absorb falls very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If one lives their life using absolutes as a gauge to define one's own happiness, there is from a percentage point of likelihood..... a great deal of disappointment in one's future.

 

To clarify, when....

 

Luck doesn't appear in practice, it does not signify the offense will be out of rhythm.  

Luck does appear in practice, it does not signify the offense will be in rhythm. 

Nelson gets worked in practice against against Autry, it does not mean that he has regressed.

Nelson handles Autry, it does not mean that Autry will not be a feared man in the middle.

When our preseason schedule says "tough", that we are going to have a worse year.

When our preseason schedule says "easier", that we are going to have a better year.

 

There is so much, "This has happened or has not happened, therefore........" being posted. Absolutely none of it is true...yet. If we struggle offensively in the first part of the season, it could be for an entirely different reason than the absolute stated here, However, the I told you so will still be shared. 

 

Why does the preseason seem to get made into a supermarket tabloid cover? 

 

"Step right up....get your copy........Luck coins cagey calf....season in doubt!"  :thanks:

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ProblChld32 said:

Is this Walkers contract year? 

No. He has one more left. But they could extend him if they wanted to after the season since he will have his third year in.

Replacing walker would be a huge task for a rookie. He is the one who makes sure everyone is where they should be. Leonard says he is as good as he is because of Walker.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, aaron11 said:

im starting to think Brissett may be the problem with the offense.  he doesnt seem to read the field very well, never has tbh.  he doesnt move that well either 

Yah think???  I remember the posters were saying he was worth a second or even a 1st.  I would keep Kelly over him

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Yah think???  I remember the posters were saying he was worth a second or even a 1st.  I would keep Kelly over him

 

Kelly over Brissett after one preseason game against scrubs is just a touch premature.  

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, csmopar said:
 

 

 

Isn't he the highest paid slot corner already lol.... he better play like it.

 

13 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

 

 

May be nothing, but not a great sign for Pascal.

 

13 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

 

I really hope we see both Cain and Fountain on the field at the same time with Kelly this weekend.

 

13 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

The starting offense better get the * In gear,

 

 

So is Kelly taking second team snaps now vs Walker?

 

12 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

 

 

Rogers is looking more and more like a lock.... 

 

12 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

So Rock’s new name is Lock Ya Sin.

 

 

 

Rock the Lock

 

7 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

There is a difference in worrying and understanding there is defiantly a possibility this teams offense starts out bad. The ones saying it will be fine are  really not being honest either.  It really could go either way.

 

 

I wouldn't lose optimism just yet. I'm not going to get concerned until the week before our final preseason game. If Luck is back, two weeks will be plenty of time with the starters. He'll be just fine with Z, Slot, APB, and TE (TY, Ebron, Rogers, Doyle, Alie Cox, and Hines). Campbell has been out a bunch too, so not a lot of impact there. X will be in no worse shape than the musical chairs we experienced last year. One has to think it won't take too long to get up to speed with Funch and Cain., and Pascal should he still be here.

 

No impact to D. 

 

7 hours ago, CanuckColt said:

Just play Brissett for the 1st Qtr, Kelly for the 2nd and 3rd and Walker for the 4th. It's only preseason.

But it's true that Kelly can make things happen where Brissett can't.

 

100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CanuckColt said:

Just play Brissett for the 1st Qtr, Kelly for the 2nd and 3rd and Walker for the 4th. It's only preseason.

But it's true that Kelly can make things happen where Brissett can't.

 

 

I just love how you compare about a quarter and a half of the 1st pre-season game vs. 2nd and 3rd stringers for Kelly against Brissett who played almost the entire 17 season with a very poor team around him and played well by most all accounts.     He also played well in 4 games in the 16 regular season for New England in 4 games, where he won 3 of them.

 

But no worries....     your genius insights I'm sure are being noticed in the front office....   if for nothing else,  the pure comic relief....

 

Goodness gracious,  what nonsense....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BLAZEIN520 said:

NO Luck again. Give the ball to Brissett already. I'm still mad they let Peyton walk for this dude. Colts fan (with or with out Luck). Im bout ready to get rid of my Luck Jersey. 

Bye. Be careful when you step off the bandwagon, wouldn’t want you to hurt yourself

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, jskinnz said:

 

Kelly over Brissett after one preseason game against scrubs is just a touch premature.  

 

 

Brissett was terrible and he was with the 1's.... Kelly deserves a chance.  Brissett's effort is why no one offered the Colts anything major for him in a trade.  If he starts the season, Colts will not win with him against SD or any competent team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I just love how you compare about a quarter and a half of the 1st pre-season game vs. 2nd and 3rd stringers for Kelly against Brissett who played almost the entire 17 season with a very poor team around him and played well by most all accounts.     He also played well in 4 games in the 16 regular season for New England in 4 games, where he won 3 of them.

 

But no worries....     your genius insights I'm sure are being noticed in the front office....   if for nothing else,  the pure comic relief....

 

Goodness gracious,  what nonsense....

 

So, a big Brissett fan I guess... hope your genius insights are right..Maybe we should trade Luck;Brissett looked soooo good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Old Colt said:

Brissett was terrible and he was with the 1's.... Kelly deserves a chance.  Brissett's effort is why no one offered the Colts anything major for him in a trade.  If he starts the season, Colts will not win with him against SD or any competent team.

Brissett only had 4 starters playing offense in the Bills game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Old Colt said:

Brissett was terrible and he was with the 1's.... Kelly deserves a chance.  Brissett's effort is why no one offered the Colts anything major for him in a trade.  If he starts the season, Colts will not win with him against SD or any competent team.

 

I'll take things I have no clue about for $800 Alex.

 

Tell me how you know what the Colts were offered for Brissett?  Isn't it possible that they simply did not want to trade him regardless.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Old Colt said:

So, a big Brissett fan I guess... hope your genius insights are right..Maybe we should trade Luck;Brissett looked soooo good.

 

I like Jacoby....    but I'm here because of the OTHER quarterback....    you know,  #12.    Look at my avatar.

 

I'm more a fan of logic and common sense and facts.     You don't read too much into a brief appearnce of the 1st pre-season game.     You don't.    That's always been the way.    And then to compare it to the other guy who played in against the 2's and 3's....      silly.    Fan boy stuff.

 

The team has been raving about Jacoby since they acquired in in September of 17.   So, nearly two full years.     Things don't change after the first pre-season game.     They just don't.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I couldn't agree more with the bolded statement.  Once a player is on the team, the only thing his draft position does for him (aside from the money) is maybe give him a little more time to develop.  Mainly because teams are reluctant to admit that their research didn't pan out and they want to see their guy succeed.   As far as defense, I feel the number one responsibility of the GM and the coach is to help the franchise QB be the franchise QB, if you get what I mean.  And until that's proven, if it means sacrificing a need on defense in order to enhance the QB's arsenal, so be it.  But that's just me...    
    • Yeah I didn’t get the impression he felt a huge need to draft a CB.    He was asked about mentioning YAC guys and he said every team wants them. The Colts have had meetings with the two top YAC guys in the draft - Brock Bowers and Malachi Corley. I absolutely think we’re taking Bowers if he falls to us and I even think we may jump up a couple of picks to land him.    If Bowers gets taken ahead of us I feel pretty certain we’re trading back hoping to land another 3rd rounder.    I didn’t catch if they were talking about draft targets or players already on the roster when they talked about on dimensional guys? My initial thought was Pierce.    I think it’s a given we’re taking at least one Olineman this draft, but that’s not really anything new. 
    • My guesses based on this presser:   - Ballard will NOT draft a CB in the 1st... maybe at all? Everything he's saying seems to suggest he likes the group we have and he wants to see them play and have a chance to develop. I'm almost certain if Mitchell for example is there at 15... we pass on him... either for trade back or for an offensive weapon... or DE? - Ballard WILL trade back. If not in the 1st... then later in the draft... but most probably in the 1st. IMO he pretty much advertised to his potential customers by telling them how many 1st round grades he has. Teams 19-21 are welcome to call and will receive warm greetings from Ballard. Rams, Steelers, Dolphins?  - He seemed to be talking about a specific someone one dimensional offensive weapon when he was talking about them just having had a meeting about a certain player... about whether them and the coaching staff see the way he can be used the same way... and if they agree on this, IMO this is a potential target for the Colts. The names that come to mind - Brian Thomas Jr and Xavier Worthy... A lot of the other WRs are more well rounded...  - The Colts LOVE the OL class both at the top and in depth. I have seen some OL experts suggest there might be 10 starting centers in this draft... and the OTs class in the 1st is like nothing I've ever seen. Can we draft an OL in the 1st? Doubt it... but absolutely expect a few shots on day 2 and 3.   
    • We have TWO top 10 tackles in Raimann and Smith though? We need depth, sure, but I hope we’re not looking for depth in the 1st round…
    • True, but where they were drafted has no relevance to how they play now which is what would keep a team from drafting Bowers.    I’d like if we got another weapon for AR, but I feel we have a lot of needs - especially on defense. OL is probably the only choice I’d be really disappointed with. 
  • Members

    • Indeee

      Indeee 1,832

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Captain_Colts1317

      Captain_Colts1317 259

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jumpman

      Jumpman 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Boss7894

      Boss7894 177

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • T-Cubed

      T-Cubed 17

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 4,555

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,210

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,199

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsva

      coltsva 2,451

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,156

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...