Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Myles

1st preseason game. What do you want?

Recommended Posts

What do you want to see?

What do you expect to see?

 

I want to see what our RB's, behind Mack, will do.  Who's going to separate themselves from the rest.    

I want to see how the WR battle goes for that 4th and 5th (maybe 6th) WR spot.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see how our young pass rushers are progressing with Turay, Banogu, Lewis, and Mohammed. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the Colts to score more than 43 points over the course of the pre-season.

 

Weird NFL Stat IIRC: If your team fails to score at least 43 points during the pre-season since 1983, your season's success is capped at losing your first game in the playoffs.

  • Scoring 43 points does not mean a winning season or a lot of success
  • Scoring far less than 43 doesn't mean a losing season or not making the playoffs
     

Scoring 43 or fewer points ONLY means that your team will not win a game in the playoffs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see a complete unit play well individually. I don't expect them to put it all together, and that is OK to me, as long as they continue getting better as a team each week. I just want to see a healthy, competitive performance and be able to see the upside of a top 5 team like the power rankings suggest. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we should root for a loss.

Both 0-16 teams (Browns and Lions) had 4-0 preseason records.

 

2006 Champion Colts were 1-3 in preseason.

 

I think the takeaway should be to not concentrate on winning the games, concentrate on evaluating players and implementing the playbook.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see how Cain and fountain do. Also see Rock in a real game.

 

i doubt Campbell or Banogu will play because they have been out of practice with injuries for awhile.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WRs not named Hilton

RBs not named Mack

LBs not named Leonard

CB Ya Sin

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to get this spice girls song out of my headfriendship never ends GIF by Spice Girls

  • Haha 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see the "new speed" on defense. I remember last pre season seeing Leonard for the first time and saying "wow, that guy is everywhere." Hoping someone else jumps off the page tonight.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Myles said:

Maybe we should root for a loss.

Both 0-16 teams (Browns and Lions) had 4-0 preseason records.

 

2006 Champion Colts were 1-3 in preseason.

 

I think the takeaway should be to not concentrate on winning the games, concentrate on evaluating players and implementing the playbook.

That will probably mean we start 0-2 again. I'd like to win a few in the pre season even though it doesn't count. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Blueblood23 said:

That will probably mean we start 0-2 again. I'd like to win a few in the pre season even though it doesn't count. 

your point?  Patriots have started 0-2 several times, its been proven that Hoodie uses the first 2 games as extra games to thin his roster.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lets see how the rookies look in a game, ya sin has had a good camp maybe he can win a starting job sooner rather than later.  can rogers hold off the guys behind him or will pascal and fountain make that 5th spot a tough decision?

 

i would be conservative with mack in the preseason, but he should play some.  i wonder if Jacoby will have a big preseason and draw interest too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoosiers said:

I want to see Andrew Luck walking on the sideline with no visible pain or discomfort

I bet he didn’t make the trip. He probably stayed in Indy to work that calf.

 

No major injuries please tonight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, csmopar said:

your point?  Patriots have started 0-2 several times, its been proven that Hoodie uses the first 2 games as extra games to thin his roster.

Colts aren't the Patriots and Luck isn't Brady. Luck is a slow starter and he needs to play to be ready.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Myles said:

Maybe we should root for a loss.

Both 0-16 teams (Browns and Lions) had 4-0 preseason records.

 

2006 Champion Colts were 1-3 in preseason.

 

With the amount of variables factored into the postseason, this is meaningless. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just hoping  I can "see" it...but, I'm guessing I'll have to watch a replay on NFL Network

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheMarine said:

For the Colts to score more than 43 points over the course of the pre-season.

 

Weird NFL Stat IIRC: If your team fails to score at least 43 points during the pre-season since 1983, your season's success is capped at losing your first game in the playoffs.

  • Scoring 43 points does not mean a winning season or a lot of success
  • Scoring far less than 43 doesn't mean a losing season or not making the playoffs
     

Scoring 43 or fewer points ONLY means that your team will not win a game in the playoffs

I’m sure there’s some tiny correlation, but that’s about as trivial a preseason stat that I’ve ever seen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Barry Sears said:

I'm just hoping  I can "see" it...but, I'm guessing I'll have to watch a replay on NFL Network

Direct tv channel 212-1 at 7:00 or replay later on 212.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Blueblood23 said:

Colts aren't the Patriots and Luck isn't Brady. Luck is a slow starter and he needs to play to be ready.

I get that.  But the point I'm making is that 0-2 isn't a death sentence either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see our  TE's continue to create mismatches. This is a very key thing to this offense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to see some football. Year in year out I might do tiny bits of analyzing between now and say 2nd week of October. But it is around the 2nd week of October I get a pretty good idea of what type of season I will get out of this Colts team …….. GO COLTS !!!!!.....(And ANDREW get healthy ASAP !!!!!)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm ready to see who we got. I dont really care about wins/losses in preseason. Mostly excited to see how our rookies perform. 

 

And to see people on facebook lose their minds when we lose 2 or 3 preseason games.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

Meh...I don't care what happens as long as they win the game.

I'm quite the opposite.   I don't care if they win or lose as long as they use the practice time effectively.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ManningGM said:

With the amount of variables factored into the postseason, this is meaningless. 

Maybe, maybe not.   Using the preseason to evaluate play and players is more effective than concentrating on winning the games.   

 

To do this, we decided to compare the winning percentage of the pre-season of the team to the performance of that team in the regular season for every team over the last 10 season, which gave us a sample size of 320 team seasons. 

When comparing the records, we found that there was no correlation between the performance of the pre-season to the regular season. 

Statistically, the correlation between the winning percentage of a team in the pre-season and their winning percentage in the regular season is 0.0944 - values between -0.1 and +0.1 suggest no correlation between two variables.

There are a few issues with comparing the two records - mainly that the pre-season contains 4-5 games, which limits the number of possible winning percentages creating greater variability in the pre-season winning records. For example, one extra win in the pre-season means a lot more, from a percent standpoint, than in the regular season.

Taking this into consideration, we created buckets for winning percentages in the pre-season and calculated the average winning percentage for the regular season for that bucket.
 

Pre-season Record ofAverage Regular Season Record

1.0000 - .495

0.750-1.0000 - .508

0.5000 - .535

0.400-0.6250 - .533

0.2500 - .442

0.000-0.2500 - .450

0.0000 - .473

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No major injuries.

I wanna see the WRs in action and one or two of them step forward from the pack

I wanna see the 2nd stringers play well

I wanna see the rookies fly around to the ball

I wanna see Tell at CB and see how well that transition is coming

I wanna see two young guys make Milton obsolete as a gunner

I wanna see Foreman run roughshod over some Bills

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Zach Hicks Wilkins will be seeing a foot specialist today because his ankle has been bothering him. He hasn’t practiced the last couple of days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Blueblood23 said:

Colts aren't the Patriots and Luck isn't Brady. Luck is a slow starter and he needs to play to be ready.

There is no reason for Luck to start slow this year with the line and 

weapons on this team. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two things...

 

1) The rookies

2) Everyone get up after each play

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, dodsworth said:

There is no reason for Luck to start slow this year with the line and 

weapons on this team. 

I agree however, Luck is a slow starter in most games. That's just who he is. He has really been a slow starter coming out of pre season and it's possibly due to his limited action in those games. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Supe it's not an angle whatsoever, it's purely the truth.   I am, of course not talking about you, or what you do on this board in terms of evaluating players. I always enjoy hearing your take on players.   I am obviously talking about the people spewing bile on here after the loss to the Raiders, and every other loss for that matter. And a lot of that includes tripe about Jacoby Brissett that just goes way over the top.   We can disagree on Brissett, it's not really a big deal. And I apologize for quoting you in the other thread and giving you the impression I am including you in this. I'm really not. I quoted you because I would rather debate the topic with someone like yourself than get sucked into a flame war with some troll, which has happened to me a time or two. That's all. Me and you can have a somewhat interesting discussion. I always enjoy it.     
    • Nice thread...    There have been some arguments for a while now about the relative value of pass-coverage vs pass-rush. Teams offensively are turning to faster and faster game plans and this affects the pass-rush a ton. You can practically scheme the pass-rush away if you have good enough QB and receivers that get open quickly. The latest advanced analytics seem to favor positions like CB and WR value-wise over long-held champions like EDGE rushers or OTs. I will also take into account your characterization of the rest of the roster(average players as opposed to straight up trash). At some positions the improvement between pro-bowler and average/JAG is higher than at other positions. Those are just part of the considerations that will inform my choise here:   Offense:   1. QB: not controversial take here - most important position of all... he handles the ball and makes a decision that might affect the game pretty much 100% of the snaps. I want the best passer and decisionmaker to run my offense.    2. WR: yep, give me a beast of an X-receiver. Pass-catchers are incredibly important.   3. LT: Yeah, I know, this goes against some of the things I said above, but time and time again we see what a great LT does to an offensive line. Leremy Tunsil is not even that great and he almost single-handedly turned around the HOU OLine. Same with AC last year - we missed him mightily when he was injured to start the year and then turned the line into a great unit. And again - he's not even at the level we are talking here. He still has not had a pro-bowl or all-pro recognition(maybe he gets one this year, he deserves it). But yeah... give me Bakhtiari, give me Armstead, give me Tyron Smith level player... I think this raises the level of the whole O-Line, especially if it's filled with average players at the other positions(rather than horrible ones)   ------------------------------------ Those will be my selections offensively. I think a QB masks a lot of deficiencies and I think he elevates average players and squeezes everything out of most of them. Just look at what Luck used to do with players like Jack Doyle, Donte Moncrief, Eric Ebron, Inman, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen...    Defense:   4. CB: yep, I want a shut down corner. Like I said earlier, newest research shows pass-coverage and especially on the boundary is paramount. and it affects pass-rush more than pass-rush affects CB play.    5. CB: yep, give me one more... I'm shutting down both sides of the field and hoping this gives additional time to my pass-rush to get there. They will play on island and I will scheme out everything else(i.e. slot receivers and TEs)... if I have to I will double away from them.    6. WILL: I want a sideline to sideline monster to clean up the run game and take on crossing routes in the short-intermediate middle in coverage.     7. EDGE: I still want a player capable of beating his man one-on-one on the line and creating pressure/affecting the pass when my pro-bowl CBs lock down their match ups.    So what do you think? Does it make sense?     
    • 23: R1P23 DL JAVON KINLAW SOUTH CAROLINA   35: R2P3 QB JORDAN LOVE UTAH STATE   55: R2P23 OT CALVIN THROCKMORTON OREGON   87: R3P23 LB TROY DYE OREGON   129: R4P23 S J.R. REED GEORGIA   166: R5P22 G NICK HARRIS WASHINGTON   201: R6P23 CB ESSANG BASSEY WAKE FOREST   203: R6P25 WR MICHAEL PITTMAN JR. USC   236: R7P23 CB KINDLE VILDOR GEORGIA SOUTHERN
    • DE NT DT DE   LB   CB CB   Nobody is scoring on me. 
    • Don't be ridiculous   Darius Leonard was an All-Pro his rookie year. Okereke will have a hard time matching that.
  • Members

    • iLoveMyBoys

      iLoveMyBoys 40

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoatBeard

      GoatBeard 604

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 1,398

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colt18

      colt18 275

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...