Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
Myles

1st preseason game. What do you want?

Recommended Posts

What do you want to see?

What do you expect to see?

 

I want to see what our RB's, behind Mack, will do.  Who's going to separate themselves from the rest.    

I want to see how the WR battle goes for that 4th and 5th (maybe 6th) WR spot.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see how our young pass rushers are progressing with Turay, Banogu, Lewis, and Mohammed. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the Colts to score more than 43 points over the course of the pre-season.

 

Weird NFL Stat IIRC: If your team fails to score at least 43 points during the pre-season since 1983, your season's success is capped at losing your first game in the playoffs.

  • Scoring 43 points does not mean a winning season or a lot of success
  • Scoring far less than 43 doesn't mean a losing season or not making the playoffs
     

Scoring 43 or fewer points ONLY means that your team will not win a game in the playoffs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see a complete unit play well individually. I don't expect them to put it all together, and that is OK to me, as long as they continue getting better as a team each week. I just want to see a healthy, competitive performance and be able to see the upside of a top 5 team like the power rankings suggest. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we should root for a loss.

Both 0-16 teams (Browns and Lions) had 4-0 preseason records.

 

2006 Champion Colts were 1-3 in preseason.

 

I think the takeaway should be to not concentrate on winning the games, concentrate on evaluating players and implementing the playbook.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see how Cain and fountain do. Also see Rock in a real game.

 

i doubt Campbell or Banogu will play because they have been out of practice with injuries for awhile.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WRs not named Hilton

RBs not named Mack

LBs not named Leonard

CB Ya Sin

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to get this spice girls song out of my headfriendship never ends GIF by Spice Girls

  • Haha 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see the "new speed" on defense. I remember last pre season seeing Leonard for the first time and saying "wow, that guy is everywhere." Hoping someone else jumps off the page tonight.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Myles said:

Maybe we should root for a loss.

Both 0-16 teams (Browns and Lions) had 4-0 preseason records.

 

2006 Champion Colts were 1-3 in preseason.

 

I think the takeaway should be to not concentrate on winning the games, concentrate on evaluating players and implementing the playbook.

That will probably mean we start 0-2 again. I'd like to win a few in the pre season even though it doesn't count. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Blueblood23 said:

That will probably mean we start 0-2 again. I'd like to win a few in the pre season even though it doesn't count. 

your point?  Patriots have started 0-2 several times, its been proven that Hoodie uses the first 2 games as extra games to thin his roster.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lets see how the rookies look in a game, ya sin has had a good camp maybe he can win a starting job sooner rather than later.  can rogers hold off the guys behind him or will pascal and fountain make that 5th spot a tough decision?

 

i would be conservative with mack in the preseason, but he should play some.  i wonder if Jacoby will have a big preseason and draw interest too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoosiers said:

I want to see Andrew Luck walking on the sideline with no visible pain or discomfort

I bet he didn’t make the trip. He probably stayed in Indy to work that calf.

 

No major injuries please tonight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, csmopar said:

your point?  Patriots have started 0-2 several times, its been proven that Hoodie uses the first 2 games as extra games to thin his roster.

Colts aren't the Patriots and Luck isn't Brady. Luck is a slow starter and he needs to play to be ready.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Myles said:

Maybe we should root for a loss.

Both 0-16 teams (Browns and Lions) had 4-0 preseason records.

 

2006 Champion Colts were 1-3 in preseason.

 

With the amount of variables factored into the postseason, this is meaningless. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just hoping  I can "see" it...but, I'm guessing I'll have to watch a replay on NFL Network

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheMarine said:

For the Colts to score more than 43 points over the course of the pre-season.

 

Weird NFL Stat IIRC: If your team fails to score at least 43 points during the pre-season since 1983, your season's success is capped at losing your first game in the playoffs.

  • Scoring 43 points does not mean a winning season or a lot of success
  • Scoring far less than 43 doesn't mean a losing season or not making the playoffs
     

Scoring 43 or fewer points ONLY means that your team will not win a game in the playoffs

I’m sure there’s some tiny correlation, but that’s about as trivial a preseason stat that I’ve ever seen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Barry Sears said:

I'm just hoping  I can "see" it...but, I'm guessing I'll have to watch a replay on NFL Network

Direct tv channel 212-1 at 7:00 or replay later on 212.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Blueblood23 said:

Colts aren't the Patriots and Luck isn't Brady. Luck is a slow starter and he needs to play to be ready.

I get that.  But the point I'm making is that 0-2 isn't a death sentence either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see our  TE's continue to create mismatches. This is a very key thing to this offense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to see some football. Year in year out I might do tiny bits of analyzing between now and say 2nd week of October. But it is around the 2nd week of October I get a pretty good idea of what type of season I will get out of this Colts team …….. GO COLTS !!!!!.....(And ANDREW get healthy ASAP !!!!!)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm ready to see who we got. I dont really care about wins/losses in preseason. Mostly excited to see how our rookies perform. 

 

And to see people on facebook lose their minds when we lose 2 or 3 preseason games.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

Meh...I don't care what happens as long as they win the game.

I'm quite the opposite.   I don't care if they win or lose as long as they use the practice time effectively.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ManningGM said:

With the amount of variables factored into the postseason, this is meaningless. 

Maybe, maybe not.   Using the preseason to evaluate play and players is more effective than concentrating on winning the games.   

 

To do this, we decided to compare the winning percentage of the pre-season of the team to the performance of that team in the regular season for every team over the last 10 season, which gave us a sample size of 320 team seasons. 

When comparing the records, we found that there was no correlation between the performance of the pre-season to the regular season. 

Statistically, the correlation between the winning percentage of a team in the pre-season and their winning percentage in the regular season is 0.0944 - values between -0.1 and +0.1 suggest no correlation between two variables.

There are a few issues with comparing the two records - mainly that the pre-season contains 4-5 games, which limits the number of possible winning percentages creating greater variability in the pre-season winning records. For example, one extra win in the pre-season means a lot more, from a percent standpoint, than in the regular season.

Taking this into consideration, we created buckets for winning percentages in the pre-season and calculated the average winning percentage for the regular season for that bucket.
 

Pre-season Record ofAverage Regular Season Record

1.0000 - .495

0.750-1.0000 - .508

0.5000 - .535

0.400-0.6250 - .533

0.2500 - .442

0.000-0.2500 - .450

0.0000 - .473

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No major injuries.

I wanna see the WRs in action and one or two of them step forward from the pack

I wanna see the 2nd stringers play well

I wanna see the rookies fly around to the ball

I wanna see Tell at CB and see how well that transition is coming

I wanna see two young guys make Milton obsolete as a gunner

I wanna see Foreman run roughshod over some Bills

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Zach Hicks Wilkins will be seeing a foot specialist today because his ankle has been bothering him. He hasn’t practiced the last couple of days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Blueblood23 said:

Colts aren't the Patriots and Luck isn't Brady. Luck is a slow starter and he needs to play to be ready.

There is no reason for Luck to start slow this year with the line and 

weapons on this team. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two things...

 

1) The rookies

2) Everyone get up after each play

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, dodsworth said:

There is no reason for Luck to start slow this year with the line and 

weapons on this team. 

I agree however, Luck is a slow starter in most games. That's just who he is. He has really been a slow starter coming out of pre season and it's possibly due to his limited action in those games. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Making it work through athleticism is an incorrect statement and does a huge disservice to Smith.  Smith is making it work at tackle by working hard and becoming a tackle.  I'm not sure what makes a "true tackle" but to me a guy that plays tackle and plays it very well is as much of a true tackle as anyone else. As far as AC (or AT if you prefer  ) aging... yup, every player on the team is aging so that is not a shock.  But he is still just 30 and tackles often play into their mid to late 30s so that is not much of a concern.  Not to say they won't draft a tackle in the next couple of drafts, but I doubt they will try to find a starting tackle in the next couple of drafts.
    • I didn't watch him much in college, I typically watch Big 10 football but I have watched him closely in the NFL and if the "experts" think he would make a better guard then yes I disagree with them.  While he would be a good guard in a zone blocking scheme like the Colts use, his lack of lower body strength and quick hand punch off the snap would hamper him going against NFL DTs.  Additionally, Smith does better when he has a bit of space to work with before engaging and that would not happen often at RG. Again what "most" people on this board or in general think has no relevance on anything.  It's not unheard of for a tackle to move spots but it is uncommon, it's happening a bit more in the past few years as the skillsets for RT and LT are becoming closer because it's not just the LT that is dealing with the speed rushers, but it's still not preferred among oline coaches and teams.  that is why guys like Haeg are considered valuable assets to a team, he's not a great lineman but he is good and he can switch sides seamlessly and that is rare.
    • Or maybe it's because he didnt claim Brissett "panicked" or act like he knows how good his vision is, and he isnt commenting on his read progressions.....you know things he couldnt possibly know anything about and dont show up on the film anyways.    
    • That was my thoughts.  If he was looking to Pascal first (and I'm sure he was), they had high / low bracket coverage, with low guy moving to Pascal but ready to reverse and cover Mack in the flat if he checks down. Big Q has his guy locked up right in the throwing lane to T.Y. but in position to bat down a pass. JB7 pulls it back here. He looks right (that extra 1/2 second) and both receivers are locked up (and actually one falling down in the end zone).   https://imgur.com/AYob5ov   Then decides to escape.     I think he waited a 1/2 second too long to leave.  He would have caused major issues to the defender covering the under receiver had JB7 escaped first and looked at the his options down field second.  Ryan Kelly just couldn't keep Chris Jones engaged long enough and thus he was on JB7 quickly forcing the throwaway once JB7 escaped the tackle box.   https://imgur.com/eXTWsJG   Maybe Glow is also inhibiting JB7's escape route too.   https://imgur.com/5Zk7Ttw     That was my feeling. I'd rather try again on 3rd down, or end up with 3 points (the end result), rather than turn over the ball and momentum by forcing it to Pascal there and getting a pick.  I'm not debating other times or other items he has to improve (but I'd like to see them on video before I join the criticism), just saw this one differently is all.   I think Reich has to devise and disguise the plays downfield better. And the young WR guys have to learn the plays and improve running the route tree.
    • Draft   23: R1P23 DL JAVON KINLAW SOUTH CAROLINA   35: R2P3 QB JORDAN LOVE UTAH STATE   55: R2P23 OT CALVIN THROCKMORTON OREGON   87: R3P23 LB TROY DYE OREGON   129: R4P23 S J.R. REED GEORGIA   166: R5P22 G NICK HARRIS WASHINGTON   201: R6P23 CB ESSANG BASSEY WAKE FOREST   203: R6P25 WR MICHAEL PITTMAN JR. USC   236: R7P23 CB KINDLE VILDOR GEORGIA SOUTHERN   As far as FA is concerned with our own players -TE: I'm not signing both Ebron and Doyle to big contracts. I'd pick one. Even with Ebron's drops, he still has more yards and TDs with the same amount of targets as Doyle. I'd probably resign Ebron and MAC, and let Doyle go unless he's will to sign a very friendly contract.   -WR: We'll have a decision to make with Funch depending on how well he does when he comes back. Both Pascal and Rogers are FAs, and I'd definitely try to upgrade at least one. Position wise, I think Rogers is more flexible, so I'd likely keep him if any. Really hoping Fountain comes back strong. Love what we were seeing from him.   -DE: Sheard? I just don't know. We need an upgrade at DE. Stinks that Turay is losing time due to injury. Regardless, I think I'd resign Sheard if it's a team friendly deal.   
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...