Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

1st preseason game. What do you want?


Myles

Recommended Posts

What do you want to see?

What do you expect to see?

 

I want to see what our RB's, behind Mack, will do.  Who's going to separate themselves from the rest.    

I want to see how the WR battle goes for that 4th and 5th (maybe 6th) WR spot.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the Colts to score more than 43 points over the course of the pre-season.

 

Weird NFL Stat IIRC: If your team fails to score at least 43 points during the pre-season since 1983, your season's success is capped at losing your first game in the playoffs.

  • Scoring 43 points does not mean a winning season or a lot of success
  • Scoring far less than 43 doesn't mean a losing season or not making the playoffs
     

Scoring 43 or fewer points ONLY means that your team will not win a game in the playoffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see a complete unit play well individually. I don't expect them to put it all together, and that is OK to me, as long as they continue getting better as a team each week. I just want to see a healthy, competitive performance and be able to see the upside of a top 5 team like the power rankings suggest. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we should root for a loss.

Both 0-16 teams (Browns and Lions) had 4-0 preseason records.

 

2006 Champion Colts were 1-3 in preseason.

 

I think the takeaway should be to not concentrate on winning the games, concentrate on evaluating players and implementing the playbook.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Myles said:

Maybe we should root for a loss.

Both 0-16 teams (Browns and Lions) had 4-0 preseason records.

 

2006 Champion Colts were 1-3 in preseason.

 

I think the takeaway should be to not concentrate on winning the games, concentrate on evaluating players and implementing the playbook.

That will probably mean we start 0-2 again. I'd like to win a few in the pre season even though it doesn't count. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Blueblood23 said:

That will probably mean we start 0-2 again. I'd like to win a few in the pre season even though it doesn't count. 

your point?  Patriots have started 0-2 several times, its been proven that Hoodie uses the first 2 games as extra games to thin his roster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets see how the rookies look in a game, ya sin has had a good camp maybe he can win a starting job sooner rather than later.  can rogers hold off the guys behind him or will pascal and fountain make that 5th spot a tough decision?

 

i would be conservative with mack in the preseason, but he should play some.  i wonder if Jacoby will have a big preseason and draw interest too

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Hoo-Hoo-Hoo-Hoosiers said:

I want to see Andrew Luck walking on the sideline with no visible pain or discomfort

I bet he didn’t make the trip. He probably stayed in Indy to work that calf.

 

No major injuries please tonight.

Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, csmopar said:

your point?  Patriots have started 0-2 several times, its been proven that Hoodie uses the first 2 games as extra games to thin his roster.

Colts aren't the Patriots and Luck isn't Brady. Luck is a slow starter and he needs to play to be ready.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Myles said:

Maybe we should root for a loss.

Both 0-16 teams (Browns and Lions) had 4-0 preseason records.

 

2006 Champion Colts were 1-3 in preseason.

 

With the amount of variables factored into the postseason, this is meaningless. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheMarine said:

For the Colts to score more than 43 points over the course of the pre-season.

 

Weird NFL Stat IIRC: If your team fails to score at least 43 points during the pre-season since 1983, your season's success is capped at losing your first game in the playoffs.

  • Scoring 43 points does not mean a winning season or a lot of success
  • Scoring far less than 43 doesn't mean a losing season or not making the playoffs
     

Scoring 43 or fewer points ONLY means that your team will not win a game in the playoffs

I’m sure there’s some tiny correlation, but that’s about as trivial a preseason stat that I’ve ever seen.

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Blueblood23 said:

Colts aren't the Patriots and Luck isn't Brady. Luck is a slow starter and he needs to play to be ready.

I get that.  But the point I'm making is that 0-2 isn't a death sentence either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to see some football. Year in year out I might do tiny bits of analyzing between now and say 2nd week of October. But it is around the 2nd week of October I get a pretty good idea of what type of season I will get out of this Colts team …….. GO COLTS !!!!!.....(And ANDREW get healthy ASAP !!!!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

Meh...I don't care what happens as long as they win the game.

I'm quite the opposite.   I don't care if they win or lose as long as they use the practice time effectively.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ManningGM said:

With the amount of variables factored into the postseason, this is meaningless. 

Maybe, maybe not.   Using the preseason to evaluate play and players is more effective than concentrating on winning the games.   

 

To do this, we decided to compare the winning percentage of the pre-season of the team to the performance of that team in the regular season for every team over the last 10 season, which gave us a sample size of 320 team seasons. 

When comparing the records, we found that there was no correlation between the performance of the pre-season to the regular season. 

Statistically, the correlation between the winning percentage of a team in the pre-season and their winning percentage in the regular season is 0.0944 - values between -0.1 and +0.1 suggest no correlation between two variables.

There are a few issues with comparing the two records - mainly that the pre-season contains 4-5 games, which limits the number of possible winning percentages creating greater variability in the pre-season winning records. For example, one extra win in the pre-season means a lot more, from a percent standpoint, than in the regular season.

Taking this into consideration, we created buckets for winning percentages in the pre-season and calculated the average winning percentage for the regular season for that bucket.
 

Pre-season Record ofAverage Regular Season Record

1.0000 - .495

0.750-1.0000 - .508

0.5000 - .535

0.400-0.6250 - .533

0.2500 - .442

0.000-0.2500 - .450

0.0000 - .473

Link to post
Share on other sites

No major injuries.

I wanna see the WRs in action and one or two of them step forward from the pack

I wanna see the 2nd stringers play well

I wanna see the rookies fly around to the ball

I wanna see Tell at CB and see how well that transition is coming

I wanna see two young guys make Milton obsolete as a gunner

I wanna see Foreman run roughshod over some Bills

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Blueblood23 said:

Colts aren't the Patriots and Luck isn't Brady. Luck is a slow starter and he needs to play to be ready.

There is no reason for Luck to start slow this year with the line and 

weapons on this team. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, dodsworth said:

There is no reason for Luck to start slow this year with the line and 

weapons on this team. 

I agree however, Luck is a slow starter in most games. That's just who he is. He has really been a slow starter coming out of pre season and it's possibly due to his limited action in those games. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean boring coaches who don’t yell that much and don’t say much and say silly things like we are on to Cincinnati never win anything in this league... 
    • With how bad other parts of the game was, TY had a much better performance, 4 for 81 and a TD. Was targeted 5 times, I think the one was technically a drop, but that was on Rivers, TY had to slide and the ball was behind him too. The close to fumble, wasn't at all close, the refs you know, just were not good. On top of that, he still pulled the DEF towards him. With Houston next week, this could be a big breakout game for Hilton, and that would be real good timing
    • Why? We cut ties with a 1st Ballot HOFer to draft Luck. They have Cooper, Lamb and Gallup in place to catch the ball and Zeke to run it. You draft the young stud for 4-5 years on a rookie contract and let Dak walk.   Then you just freed up money for the defense....   They are surely thinking about both ramifications, but business should always take precedence over feelings...
    • Reich's been here a bit more than 2.5 seasons.  After a rough start in his first year, we were consistently winning with Luck.  Knowing we had major holes in a team that was being rebuilt, mind you.   I can't think of many coaches in the league, if any, who could go into a game vs. Derrick Henry without an all-pro DT (Buckner) and arguably the second best DL on the team (Autry) and contain him.  Plus missing a pro-bowl (arguably all-pro caliber) C (Kelly) and have a pro-bowl LT (Castonzo) go out early in the game without the top RB (JT) and have a stellar performance.  We were also missing Oke and had a banged up Q and Walker in the game.  It wasn't our best game, but still, if we can make our adjustments and get healthy, I don't think we'd be huge underdogs vs. TN if we have to play them in the playoffs (after all, we beat them by 17 just 2 weeks ago -- we lost by 19 today, take away the onside return and we'd only have lost by 12).     I'm not giving up on Reich at all.  And, if you can find me a coach in the league who doesn't have a 'silly slogan', please let me know.  Just about every coach in the league says 'it's a long season, we just have to take it 1 game at a time', or some sort of version of that.  Reich's 'silly slogans' like 'one game at a time', '1 and 0 every week', 'get 1 percent better every day' are not really silly, especially considering we have a very young team and several of the guys playing key roles today were thrown in there kind of last minute (Pinter's first time ever playing C).         Let's also not forget the Steelers have only played 3 teams with winning records this year.  They crushed CLE, but barely got by TN and BALT and haven't really had any other blowout performances aside from against the 1-10 Jags today and the 2 win Bengals last week after they knocked Burrows out of the game.  
    • Carrie is not the answer. Carrie is a good NB sub, or maybe even a NB starter, but he's not a CB1 or 2.   Rhodes was holding a ton all game. He just didn't called. The blatant hold they called didn't get accepted. A few plays later his obvious hook and hold was ignored. He had 2 or 3 other pretty obvious holds that were ignored. Not saying Rock doesn't need to quit being so grabby, just saying his rep is playing a part, and Rhodes is getting treated much better. Also, Blackmon wasn't very good today either. He got burnt bad once, and was out of position a few other times. Hard to see the Ss on a lot of plays with the camera coverage, but he didn't look good at all when you could see him.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...